Source of pain and primitive dysfunction in migraine: an identical site?

The headache and aura-inducing effects of sildenafil in patients with migraine with aura

INTRODUCTION

It has not been established if migraine headache and migraine aura share common pathophysiological mechanisms. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, causes cGMP accumulation and provokes migraine-like headache in patients with migraine without aura. We investigated if sildenafil induced aura and migraine-like headache in patients with migraine with aura.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study, 16 patients with migraine with aura (of whom 11 patients exclusively had attacks of migraine with aura) received 100 mg sildenafil or placebo on two separate days. The development, duration, and characteristics of aura and headache were recorded using a questionnaire. The primary outcome was the incidence of migraine aura.

RESULTS

Aura symptoms were induced in three patients (19%) after sildenafil and none after placebo (P < 0.001). After administration of sildenafil, 12 patients (75%) developed headache compared with two patients (12.5%) after placebo (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). The headache in nine patients (56%) after sildenafil and one patient (6%) after placebo fulfilled the criteria for migraine-like attacks (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.002). All patients, who fulfilled the criteria for migraine-like attacks, reported that the attack mimicked the headache phase during their usual migraine attacks.

DISCUSSION

Sildenafil have a moderate migraine headache-inducing and a modest aura-inducing effect in patients with migraine with aura, even in those who exclusively experienced attacks of migraine with aura in their spontaneous attacks. These findings suggest that accumulation of cGMP by PDE5-inhibition do not play any significant role in the initiation of migraine aura and refute the hypothesis of sildenafil being a tool for pharmacological provocation of this phenomenon. These findings further support dissociation between the aura and the headache phase.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT02795351.

Intravenous Endothelin-1 Infusion Does Not Induce Aura or Headache in Migraine Patients With Aura

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether intravenously infused provokes migraine aura and migraine headache in migraine patients with aura.

BACKGROUND

Migraine with aura has been associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased stroke risk. The initiating mechanism of migraine aura symptoms is not known. Experimental provocation of migraine headache using vasoactive peptides has provided tremendous advances in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology but substances that can induce migraine aura have not been identified. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), an endogenous, potent vasoconstrictor peptide released from the vascular endothelium, has been proposed to trigger migraine aura. This hypothesis is based on reports of increased plasma ET-1 levels early during the migraine attacks and the observation that ET-1 applied to the cortical surface potently induces the cortical spreading depolarization, the underlying electrophysiological phenomenon of migraine aura, in animals. Further, endothelial damage due to, for example, carotid puncture and vascular pathology is known to trigger aura episodes.

METHODS

We investigated whether intravascular ET-1 would provoke migraine aura in patients. Using a two-way crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design, we infused high-dose (8 ng/kg/minutes for 20 minutes) intravenous ET-1 in patients with migraine with typical aura. The primary end-point was the difference in incidence of migraine aura between ET-1 and placebo. Experiments were carried out at a public tertiary headache center (Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients received intravenous ET-1. No patients reported migraine aura symptoms or migraine headache during or up to 24 hours following the ET-1 infusion. Four patients reported mild to moderate headache only on the ET-1 day, 3 patients reported moderate headache on the placebo day, and 1 patient reported mild headache on both days. No serious adverse events occurred during or after infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Provocation of migraine aura by procedures or conditions involving vascular irritation is unlikely to be mediated by ET-1.

Can migraine aura be provoked experimentally? A systematic review of potential methods for the provocation of migraine aura

Background

The nature of the migraine aura and its role in migraine pathophysiology is incompletely understood. In particular, the mechanisms underlying aura initiation and the causal relation between aura and headache are unknown. The scientific investigation of aura in patients is only possible if aura can be triggered. This paper reviews potential methods for the experimental provocation of migraine aura.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed for studies of experimental migraine provocation, including case reports of patients with aura and reports of the occurrence of aura following exposure to any kind of suspected trigger.

Results

We identified 21 provocation studies, using 13 different prospective provocation methods, and 34 case reports. In the prospective studies, aura were reported following the administration of intravenous and sublingual glyceryl trinitrate, visual stimulation, physical activity, calcitonin gene-related peptide infusion, chocolate ingestion, and the intravenous injection of insulin. In addition, carotid artery puncture has consistently been reported as a trigger of aura.

Conclusions

No safe and efficient method for aura provocation exists at present, but several approaches could prove useful for this purpose.

Migrainous scintillating scotoma and headache is ocular in origin: A new hypothesis

Brain neuronal dysfunction has been implicated in pathogenesis of migraine but direct evidence is lacking. Scintillating scotoma of migraine is generally believed to originate at the visual cortex. While cortical spreading depression is a relatively late physiological alteration in migraine, its protective role in neuronal ischaemia is increasingly being recognized. Atenolol, nadolol, or verapamil prevent migraine but do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier or critically influence any brain or peripheral neuronal function. Typical migraine headache, aura, or scintillating scotoma has not been reported following enucleation or evisceration of the eye. In humans, pain and temperature fibres from only the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve reach the upper cervical spinal segments. Pain in migraine attacks including occipital and nuchal discomfort reflects selective involvement of the ophthalmic nerve. Photophobia is largely a retinal reflex involving the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve. Key clinical features of the migrainous scintillating scotoma are consistent with retinal origin. Spreading depression in the retina is well-established. A subtle regional ocular sympathetic deficit prevails in migraine patients and possibly impairs regulation of intraocular choroidal blood volume and intraocular pressure. Several first-line migraine prophylactic agents lower the intraocular pressure. The neuro-ophthalmological basis for a monocular origin of migrainous scintillating scotomata due to mechanical deformation of the posterior segment of the corneo-scleral envelope consequent to choroidal venous congestion and rise in intraocular pressure is presented. Study of distribution and displaceability of the migrainous scintillating scotoma can settle its site of origin. Headache of migraine possibly arises from a similar mechanical deformation of the anterior eye segment followed by antidromic discharge in the trigeminovascular system. Lateralizing negative deficits such as homonymous hemianopia probably reflect vasospastic complications of migraine. A rational explanation for the most characteristic clinical features of migraine and a new template to elucidate the pharmacological basis of anti-migraine drugs is offered.

Investigations into the role of nitric oxide and the large intracranial arteries in migraine headache

Previous studies suggest that nitric oxide (NO) is involved in headaches induced by i.v. infusion of the vasodilator and NO donor glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in healthy subjects. Extending these studies to sufferers of migraine without aura, it was found that migraineurs experienced a stronger headache than non-migraineurs. In addition, most migraineurs experienced a delayed migraine attack at variable times (mean 5.5 h) after GTN provocation. This biphasic headache response in migraineurs may be linked to hypersensitivity in the NO-cGMP pathway. Thus, compared to controls, migraineurs were found to be more sensitive to GTN-induced intracranial arterial dilatation, which is known to be mediated via liberation of NO and subsequent synthesis of cGMP Furthermore, histamine infusions in migraineurs induced headache responses and intracranial arterial responses resembling those induced by GTN in migraineurs. Histamine is known to liberate NO from the endothelium via stimulation of the H1 receptor, which is present in the large intracranial arteries in man. Because both immediate histamine-induced headache and intracranial arterial dilatation and delayed histamine-induced migraine are blocked by H1-receptor blockade, a likely common pathway for GTN and histamine-induced headaches/migraines and intracranial arterial responses may be via activation of the NO-cGMP pathway. The delay in the development of these experimental migraines may reflect activation of multiple physiological processes. The intracranial arteries of migraineurs were found supersensitive to the vasodilating effect of GTN (exogenous NO). This relates to clinical findings suggesting dilatation of the large intracranial arteries on the headache side during spontaneous migraine attacks. The function of arterial regulatory mechanisms involving NO in migraine was therefore studied. In peripheral arteries, no endothelial dysfunction of NO was found and cardiovascular and intracranial arterial sympathetic function was normal. A mild parasympathetic dysfunction may be involved and may, via denervation supersensitivity, be responsible for the observed supersensitivity to NO. Another possibility is that NO initiates a perivascular neurogenic inflammation with liberation of vasoactive peptides. NO also mediates a variety of other physiological phenomena. One of these, the pain-modulating effect observed in animals, was evaluated in a human study using GTN infusion and measurements of pain thresholds. No definite effects of GTN were demonstrated. The precise mechanisms involved in NO-triggered migraines and which part of the NO-activated cascade that is involved remain to be determined. The possibilities for pharmacological stimulation and/or inhibition of several steps of the NO-activated cascade increase rapidly and soon may be available for human studies.

Sweating and vascular responses in the face: normal regulation and dysfunction in migraine, cluster headache and harlequin syndrome

At least four neural mechanisms influence facial blood flow. Firstly, sympathetic vasoconstrictor fibres exert a tonic constrictor influence on the vasculature of the ears, lips and nose, and sparsely supply other parts of the face. Secondly, the sympathetic nervous system actively dilates the cutaneous vasculature of the face during heat stress and emotion. Thirdly, parasympathetic vasodilator reflexes in the facial and glossopharyngeal nerves increase blood flow to the exocrine glands and tissues of the eyes, nose and mouth when these tissues are irritated. Fourthly, axon reflexes release vasoactive peptides from sensory fibres, which participate in local inflammatory responses. The sympathetic nervous system normally controls facial sweating. However, after injury to postganglionic sympathetic fibres, parasympathetic fibres sometimes make functional connections with sweat glands, so that parasympathetic reflexes provoke pathological sweating. In this review, new information about the neural pathways and stimuli which influence facial sweating and blood flow is summarized, and this is followed by a discussion of the pathophysiology of extracranial vascular disturbances and facial sweating in migraine, cluster headache and harlequin syndrome.