Long term follow up of multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block under treatment

[A borderline case between multifocal motor neuropathy and motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy revealed by the magnetic fatigue test]

A 26-year-old woman presented with a seven-month history of weakness in her left upper limb, progressing to difficulty lifting her arms within a few weeks. Her symptoms progressed with fluctuations. For the past three months, she has been unable to stand due to weakness in her proximal lower limbs. Nerve conduction studies did not show any definite conduction block or abnormal sensory conduction, but motor conduction studies showed a slight prolongation of the terminal latency and a decrease in the frequency of the F-wave. A magnetic fatigue test indicated a proximal conduction block. Her symptoms were rapidly resolved with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, leading to a diagnosis of chronic immune-mediated neuropathy, met both criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Our case highlights the utility of the magnetic fatigue test in detecting conduction blocks and its role in differentiating between MMN and motor CIDP.

Deterioration in multifocal motor neuropathy upon treatment of immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibition

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the clinical outcome in multiple types of advanced or metastatic malignancies and are prescribed increasingly. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur frequently. Here, we present a patient with multifocal motor neuropathy and melanoma, with worsening of muscle weakness upon ICI therapy and concomitant use of steroids for the treatment of hepatitis, which was considered an irAE. Upon treatment with highly dosed immunoglobulins and steroid tapering, the patients' muscular symptoms improved while hepatitis resolved. This case highlights the importance of careful evaluation of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy treated with ICIs, highlights the risks of treatment with steroids in multifocal motor neuropathy patients and suggests an alternative treatment of irAEs with intravenous immunoglobulins.

Immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, probably immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. Treatment options for MMN are few. People with MMN do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange. Uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005, with an amendment in 2007. We updated the review to incorporate new evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin in people with MMN.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 20 April 2021: the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, and checked the reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered RCTs and quasi-RCTs examining the effects of any dose of IVIg and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in people with definite or probable MMN for inclusion in the review. Eligible studies had to have measured at least one of the following outcomes: disability, muscle strength, or electrophysiological conduction block. We used studies that reported the frequency of adverse effects to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed the literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We followed standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

Six cross-over RCTs including a total of 90 participants were suitable for inclusion in the review. Five RCTs compared IVIg to placebo, and one compared IVIg to SCIg. Four of the trials comparing IVIg versus placebo involved IVIg-naive participants (induction treatment). In the other two trials, participants were known IVIg responders receiving maintencance IVIg at baseline and were then randomised to maintenance treatment with IVIg or placebo in one trial, and IVIg or SCIg in the other. Risk of bias was variable in the included studies, with three studies at high risk of bias in at least one risk of bias domain. IVIg versus placebo (induction treatment): three RCTs including IVIg-naive participants reported a disability measure. Disability improved in seven out of 18 (39%) participants after IVIg treatment and in two out of 18 (11%) participants after placebo (risk ratio (RR) 3.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 10.12; 3 RCTs, 18 participants; low-certainty evidence). The proportion of participants with an improvement in disability at 12 months was not reported. Strength improved in 21 out of 27 (78%) IVIg-naive participants treated with IVIg and one out of 27 (4%) participants who received placebo (RR 11.00, 95% CI 2.86 to 42.25; 3 RCTs, 27 participants; low-certainty evidence). IVIg treatment may increase the proportion of people with resolution of at least one conduction block; however, the results were also consistent with no effect (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 51.70; 4 RCTs, 28 participants; low-certainty evidence). IVIg versus placebo (maintenance treatment): a trial that included participants on maintenance IVIg treatment reported an increase in disability in 17 out of 42 (40%) people switching to placebo and seven out of 42 (17%) remaining on IVIg (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.24; 1 RCT, 42 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and a decrease in grip strength in 20 out of 42 (48%) participants after a switch to placebo treatment compared to four out of 42 (10%) remaining on IVIg (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.54; 1 RCT, 42 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, IVIg versus placebo (induction or maintenance): four trials comparing IVIg and placebo reported adverse events, of which data from two studies could be meta-analysed. Transient side effects were reported in 71% of IVIg-treated participants versus 4.8% of placebo-treated participants in these studies. The pooled RR for the development of side effects was 10.33 (95% CI 2.15 to 49.77; 2 RCTs, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was only one serious side effect (pulmonary embolism) during IVIg treatment. IVIg versus SCIg (maintenance treatment): the trial that compared continuation of IVIg maintenance versus SCIg maintenance did not measure disability. The evidence was very uncertain for muscle strength (standardised mean difference 0.08, 95% CI -0.84 to 1.00; 1 RCT, 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence was very uncertain for the number of people with side effects attributable to treatment (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.40; 1 RCT, 9 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low-certainty evidence from three small RCTs shows that IVIg may improve muscle strength in people with MMN, and low-certainty evidence indicates that it may improve disability; the estimate of the magnitude of improvement of disability has wide CIs and needs further studies to secure its significance. Based on moderate-certainty evidence, it is probable that most IVIg responders deteriorate in disability and muscle strength after IVIg withdrawal. SCIg might be an alternative treatment to IVIg, but the evidence is very uncertain. More research is needed to identify people in whom IVIg withdrawal is possible and to confirm efficacy of SCIg as an alternative maintenance treatment.

Nerve Pathology Distinguishes Focal Motor Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy From Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to distinguish the mechanisms of disease for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), which we believe to be fundamentally different. However, distinguishing the mechanisms is more difficult when the presentation of CIDP is motor-predominant, focal, or asymmetric.

METHODS

We describe 3 focal, motor-predominant, representative cases that could be interpreted on clinical and/or electrophysiological grounds as either MMN or focal CIDP, and present pathological findings.

RESULTS

We highlight pathological differences in these cases, and provide an argument that CIDP and MMN are distinct entities with different pathophysiological mechanisms-chronic demyelination for CIDP, and an immune-mediated attack on paranodal motor axons for MMN.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on clinical evaluation, electrophysiology, and nerve biopsy pathology, we can divide the conditions into inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (focal CIDP) versus chronic axonal neuropathy (MMN). The divergent pathological findings provide further evidence that CIDP and MMN are fundamentally different disorders.

Estimation of the latent therapeutic demand for immunoglobulin therapies in autoimmune neuropathies in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of immunoglobulin (IG) solutions as an immunomodulatory therapy in certain neurological conditions has become an established modality and represents a significant proportion of total IG use. The estimation of the evidence-based potential demand designated as the latent therapeutic demand (LTD) for IG in these diseases is required for adequate planning of the plasma supply required to manufacture the product.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The diseases studied included chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The LTD for IG was assessed using a decision analysis model, using Microsoft Excel. The model analysed the epidemiological and clinical factors contributing to IG usage. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis derived the LTD in grams per 1000 inhabitants. The key variables included the treatment schedule and the prevalence of the disease.

RESULTS

The model estimates that an average annual IG demand and standard deviation for CIDP, GBS and MMN in the United States is 83.05 ± 24.5, 6.1 ± 3.2 and 36.1 ± 25.5 g/1000 inhabitants, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Together with previous work on the LTD for IG in immunodeficiencies, these results indicate that current IG usage reflects the estimated LTD for the main indications for IG in the United States The wide range of LTD found in all these studies emphasizes the need for more precise assessment of the underlying variables, particularly disease prevalence and dosage. Further studies on other indications such as secondary immunodeficiencies will augment these results and will assist in guiding demand planning for IG use and plasma collection in the United States and inform blood policy in other countries.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: controversies and priorities

Despite 30 years of research there are still significant unknowns and controversies associated with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) including disease pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria and treatment. Foremost relates to the underlying pathophysiology, specifically whether MMN represents an axonal or demyelinating neuropathy and whether the underlying pathophysiology is focused at the node of Ranvier. In turn, this discussion promotes consideration of therapeutic approaches, an issue that becomes more directed in this evolving era of precision medicine. It is generally accepted that MMN represents a chronic progressive immune-mediated motor neuropathy clinically characterised by progressive asymmetric weakness and electrophysiologically by partial motor conduction block. Anti-GM1 IgM antibodies are identified in at least 40% of patients. There have been recent developments in the use of neuromuscular ultrasound and MRI to aid in diagnosing MMN and in further elucidation of its pathophysiological mechanisms. The present Review will critically analyse the knowledge accumulated about MMN over the past 30 years, culminating in a state-of-the-art approach to therapy.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 22 September 2014 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for trials of MMN. We also searched two trials registers for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one RCT of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in MMN. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with IVIg, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for IVIg. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for IVIg or improving muscle strength in MMN. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Predicting treatment response in chronic, acquired demyelinating neuropathies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy is an immune-mediated neuropathy that was first described approximately 30 years ago. Since that time an increasingly wide spectrum of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies exhibiting different phenotypes, clinical course and treatment responses to immunomodulatory treatment have been described. Several new therapeutic agents have been prescribed for such conditions, some with promising results. This review summarizes what is presently known about the clinical courses, treatment responses and predictors of response of the chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy subgroups.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: a review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an uncommon, purely motor neuropathy associated with asymmetric deficits with predilection for upper limb involvement. Even in the early descriptions of MMN, the associations of anti-GM1 antibodies and robust response to immunomodulatory treatment were recognized. These features highlight the likelihood of an underlying autoimmune etiology of MMN. The clinical presentation of MMN can closely mimic several neurological conditions including those with more malignant prognoses such as motor neuron disease. Therefore early and rapid recognition of MMN is critical. Serological evidence of anti GM-1 antibodies and electrodiagnostic findings of conduction block are helpful diagnostic clues for MMN. Importantly, these diagnostic features are not universally present, and patients lacking these characteristic findings can demonstrate similar robust response to immunodulatory treatment. In the current review, recent research in the areas of diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of MMN and needs for the future are discussed. The characteristic findings of MMN and treatment implications are reviewed and contrasted with other mimicking disorders.

Multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, and other chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy variants

Chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathies (CADP) constitute an important group of immune neuromuscular disorders affecting myelin. This article discusses CADP with emphasis on multifocal motor neuropathy, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy, and less common variants. Although each of these entities has distinctive laboratory and electrodiagnostic features that aid in their diagnosis, clinical characteristics are of paramount importance in diagnosing specific conditions and determining the most appropriate therapies. Knowledge regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of these disorders continues to expand, resulting in improved opportunities for identification and treatment.

Neurophysiological approach to disorders of peripheral nerve

Disorders of the peripheral nerve system (PNS) are heterogeneous and may involve motor fibers, sensory fibers, small myelinated and unmyelinated fibers and autonomic nerve fibers, with variable anatomical distribution (single nerves, several different nerves, symmetrical affection of all nerves, plexus, or root lesions). Furthermore pathological processes may result in either demyelination, axonal degeneration or both. In order to reach an exact diagnosis of any neuropathy electrophysiological studies are crucial to obtain information about these variables. Conventional electrophysiological methods including nerve conduction studies and electromyography used in the study of patients suspected of having a neuropathy and the significance of the findings are discussed in detail and more novel and experimental methods are mentioned. Diagnostic considerations are based on a flow chart classifying neuropathies into eight categories based on mode of onset, distribution, and electrophysiological findings, and the electrophysiological characteristics in each type of neuropathy are discussed.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 3 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011), and LILACS (January 1982 to September 2011) for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one randomised controlled trial of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in multifocal motor neuropathy. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with intravenous immunoglobulin, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for intravenous immunoglobulin or improving muscle strength. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Treatment in inflammatory neuropathies

This review focuses on recent developments in the treatment of inflammatory neuropathies arising from immune dysregulation, rather than from infectious causes. The dysimmune inflammatory neuropathies are diseases of the peripheral nerves that have varying etiologies and may respond to immunomodulatory therapies. They are characterized by inflammatory changes in the nerve with associated destruction of myelin and axons. The underlying immune mechanisms are better understood in some of these conditions than others. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to prevent clinical progression. Randomized controlled trials of some treatments in the more common inflammatory neuropathies have clarified their effectiveness; however, there are still groups of patients who are resistant to currently available treatments and for whom little effective treatment is available. Newer, targeted biologics and larger controlled trials of existing and novel therapies in these conditions offer promise of improved morbidity and mortality in this group of diseases.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (October 8 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to October 8 2008), and EMBASE (from January 1980 to October 8 2008), for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were to be included and one was found. Prospective and retrospective case series and case reports were considered in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found the first randomised controlled trial of multifocal motor neuropathy. This study, which randomised 28 patients, showed that mycophenolate mofetil did not significantly improve strength or function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the only randomised placebo-controlled trial of any immunosuppressive agent, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies: treatment update

This review focuses on recent data regarding inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies. We describe both acute and chronic inflammatory neuropathies, and we discuss conditions ranging from mostly cell-mediated to antibody-mediated disorders. These diseases are characterized by proximal and distal sensory motor involvement. Treatments are based on immune-modulation and/or immune-suppression. Work-up sequence and therapeutical modes are discussed in the light of recently published data, with a special interest on new treatment modalities.

Anti-GM1 antibodies as a model of the immune response to self-glycans

Glycans are a class of molecules with high structural variability, frequently found in the plasma membrane facing the extracellular space. Because of these characteristics, glycans are often considered as recognition molecules involved in cell social functions, and as targets of pathogenic factors. Induction of anti-glycan antibodies is one of the early events in immunological defense against bacteria that colonize the body. Because of this natural infection, antibodies recognizing a variety of bacterial glycans are found in sera of adult humans and animals. The immune response to glycans is restricted by self-tolerance, and no antibodies to self-glycans should exist in normal subjects. However, antibodies recognizing structures closely related to self-glycans do exist, and can lead to production of harmful anti-self antibodies. Normal human sera contain low-affinity anti-GM1 IgM-antibodies. Similar antibodies with higher affinity or different isotype are found in some neuropathy patients. Two hypotheses have been developed to explain the origin of disease-associated anti-GM1 antibodies. According to the "molecular mimicry" hypothesis, similarity between GM1 and Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharide carrying a GM1-like glycan is the cause of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with anti-GM1 IgG-antibodies. According to the "binding site drift" hypothesis, IgM-antibodies associated with disease originate through changes in the binding site of normally occurring anti-GM1 antibodies. We now present an "integrated" hypothesis, combining the "mimicry" and "drift" concepts, which satisfactorily explains most of the published data on anti-GM1 antibodies.

[Long-term follow-up of multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block under intravenous immunoglobulin]

INTRODUCTION

Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block is an immune-mediated motor neuropathy, which usually responds to intravenous immunoglobulin. However, efficacy of long-term intravenous immunoglobulin is controversial. Our aim was to establish the long-term effects of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy on clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures and to determine the criteria predicting a good response to long-term intravenous immunoglobulin treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction blocks patients followed for at least 4 years who received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. We compared clinical data, MRC sumscores and electrophysiological data between the first and the last examination in the department.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were followed for an average of 8 years (range 4 to 18 years). At last examination, weakness remained asymmetric, predominant in the upper limbs, with a peripheral nerve distribution. At last examination, 3 patterns of evolution was seen: 6/17 patients had muscle strength improvement and need no more intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, 6/17 had initial improvement but became intravenous immunoglobulin dependent and 5/17 did not respond to intravenous immunoglobulin. MRC sumscores, number of conduction blocks and distal compound muscle action potential amplitudes were comparable between the first and the last examination (p>0.05). Improvement of MRC sumscores was not correlated with the clinical, biological and electrophysiological data that we analysed: age, gender, duration of disease, time from onset to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, number of involved nerves, number of affected limbs, presence of muscle atrophy, MRC sumscores at diagnosis, number of conduction blocks, mean amplitude of the motor evoked potentials, presence of anti-GM1 antibodies, titers and IgM or IgG type of anti-GM1 antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, one third of multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction blocks patients have clinical improvement at last examination and need no more treatment, one third are intravenous immunoglobulin dependent and one third have never responded to intravenous immunoglobulin. Electrophysiological data are comparable between the first and the last examination. No predictive factor has been disclosed for long-term response to intravenous immunoglobulin.

Long-term evolution of anti-ganglioside antibody levels in patient with chronic dysimmune neuropathy under IVIg therapy

The authors retrospectively examined the anti-ganglioside antibody (AGA) IgM level changes from 14 patients with chronic dysimmune neuropathy (5 with multifocal motor neuropathy and 9 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy) treated with maintenance doses of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The median follow-up was 5 years. At last follow-up, 93% of the patients had an increment of AGA levels, and five patients with initial AGA values within normal range became positive during follow-up. Overall, median AGA titers significantly increased from the first to the last samples, despite a substantial clinical stability after the initial improvement with IVIg. The AGA increment rate was inversely correlated with IVIg infusions interval necessary to maintain therapeutic efficacy. Thus, antibody testing in the follow-up of patients with dysimmune neuropathies may be helpful to predict the decline of IVIg efficacy and to identify those patients who eventually take advantage from an increase in infusion frequency.

Axon loss is an important determinant of weakness in multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by asymmetrical weakness and muscle atrophy, in the arms more than the legs, without sensory loss. Despite a beneficial response to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), weakness is slowly progressive. Histopathological studies in MMN revealed features of demyelination and axon loss. It is unknown to what extent demyelination and axon loss contribute to weakness. Unlike demyelination, axon loss has not been studied systematically in MMN. Aims/

METHODS

To assess the independent determinants of weakness in MMN, 20 patients with MMN on IVIg treatment were investigated. Using a standardised examination in each patient, muscle strength was determined in 10 muscles. In the innervating nerve of each muscle, axon loss was assessed by concentric needle electromyography, and conduction block or demyelinative slowing by motor nerve conduction studies. Multivariate analysis was used to assess independent determinants of weakness.

RESULTS

Needle electromyography abnormalities compatible with axon loss were found in 61% of all muscles. Axon loss, and not conduction block or demyelinative slowing, was the most significant independent determinant of weakness in corresponding muscles. Furthermore, axon loss and conduction block were independently associated with each other.

CONCLUSION

Axon loss occurs frequently in MMN and pathogenic mechanisms leading to axonal degeneration may play an important role in the outcome of the neurological deficit in patients with MMN. Therapeutic strategies aimed at prevention and reduction of axon loss, such as early initiation of treatment or additional (neuroprotective) agents, should be considered in the treatment of patients with MMN.

Initial and long-term management of autoimmune neuropathies

The inflammatory neuropathies (chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy [CIDP], Guillain-Barré syndrome [GBS] and multifocal motor neuropathy [MMN]) affect only one to two individuals per 100 000 of the population, but result in major disability and impairment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can be used as an initial treatment for CIDP, GBS and MMN. While plasma exchange and corticosteroids can also be used initially, they are not as uniformly effective for each of these disorders as IVIg. Substituting corticosteroids, plasma exchange or immunosuppressants may be appropriate for patients not responding to initial IVIg therapy, and combination therapy may be needed in some patients. There are no data from controlled clinical trials of long-term management strategies for CIDP and MMN; however, empirical evidence suggests that a positive long-term response to IVIg can be achieved by increasing the initial dose or its frequency of administration. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants may be appropriate in some patients with CIDP. Adverse events with IVIg are usually mild and not treatment limiting; however, patients do need to be monitored for uncommon, but serious, adverse events such as renal insufficiency, stroke and thromboembolic events. Nevertheless, the safety profile of IVIg is exceptional relative to the potential complications of other long-term treatments for CIDP and MMN, especially corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Predictors of response have been reported for each of the neuropathies, and until controlled clinical trials provide evidence on which to base treatment strategies, effective management will require individualising therapy according to patient response.

[The use of intravenous immunoglobulins in neurology]

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been widely used and their administration has grown throughout the world. The current indications of IVIG in neurological diseases are discussed on the basis of the passed and current trials. Unlike other immuomodulatory agents, IVIG are well tolerated and have very few side effects and a good viral safety.

STATE OF ART

There is clinical evidence, based on controlled trials, for the effectiveness of IVIG in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal neuropathy with conduction blocks. In myasthenia gravis, the IVIG are effective especially in myasthenic crisis, but their synergistic effect with other treatments, the steroid sparing effect, and their long-term effect are unknown. These issues need to be addressed in further controlled clinical trials. In dermatoploymyositis, IVIG are reserved for steroid resistant patients. There is actually no support or no significant clinical benefit for the routine use of IVIG in other neurological diseases.

PERSPECTIVES

Further controlled trials are warranted to assess the quality of life, the dose-finding effect and their long-term efficacy in order to improve clinical practices.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of IVIG should be reserved for diseases in which positive controlled trials are available. For the remaining dysimmune diseases, IVIG should be assess in comparison with the other available therapies, taking into consideration the age of the patients, the safety of the IVIG and, in our country, the economic aspect.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and minimal sensory abnormality. The diagnostic feature of this condition is the presence of multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Immunosuppressive agents have been used as primary, second-line or adjunctive agents for its treatment. This review was undertaken to identify and review systematically randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive agents. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin will be the subject of a separate review.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register for all trials of multifocal motor neuropathy published, using 'multifocal motor neuropathy' OR 'chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy' OR ' conduction block' OR ' motor neuropathy' AND 'immunosuppressive agents', 'immunosuppressants', 'corticosteroids', 'plasma exchange', 'azathioprine', 'cyclophosphamide', 'cyclosporin', 'ciclosporin', 'methotrexate', and 'mycophenolate', 'immunomodulatory agents', 'interferon', 'total lymphoid irradiation' or 'bone marrow transplantation' as search terms. In addition we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE for 2000 and 2001 and CINAHL, LILACS for all years. We updated the register search in February 2004 and searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to end May 2004) and EMBASE (January 1980 to end May 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised clinical trials in which allocation was not random but was intended to be unbiased (e.g. alternate allocation) were to have been selected. Since no such trials were discovered, all prospective and retrospective case series were included in the 'background' or 'discussion' sections of the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All studies on multifocal motor neuropathy or lower motor neuron weakness with conduction block and no sensory abnormality were scrutinised for data on patients treated with any form of immunosuppressive agents besides intravenous immunoglobulin. The information on the outcome of treatment was then collated and summarised.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised controlled trials of any immunosuppressive agents for multifocal motor neuropathy. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised controlled trials to indicate whether immunosuppressive agents are beneficial in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current concepts and controversies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now a well-defined purely motor multineuropathy characterized by the presence of multifocal partial motor conduction blocks (CB), frequent association with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies, and usually a good response to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. However, several issues remain to be clarified in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of this condition including its nosological position and its relation to other chronic dysimmune neuropathies; the degree of CB necessary for the diagnosis of MMN; the existence of an axonal form of MMN; the pathophysiological basis of CB; the pathogenetic role of antiganglioside antibodies; the mechanism of action of IVIg treatments in MMN and the most effective regimen; and the treatment to be used in unresponsive patients. These issues are addressed in this review of the main clinical, electrophysiological, immunological, and therapeutic features of this neuropathy.

Immunomodulatory Effects of Intravenous Immunoglobulins as a Treatment for Autoimmune Diseases, Cancer, and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a safe preparation, made of human plasma of thousands of healthy donors. The fascinating history of gamma globulin therapy begins in 1930 when Finland treated pneumococcal pneumonia patients with equine serum, which prolonged their survival from pneumonia. Since then, significant breakthroughs were achieved by Cohn, Bruton, Imbach, and others, whose clinical contribution to the world of medicine was of great importance. Originally IVIG was used to treat immunodeficiencies. Later on the use of IVIG extended to autoimmune diseases as well. The efficacy of IVIG has been established only in several autoimmune diseases; clinical reports of trials, series, and case reports indicate significant improvement in many more autoimmune diseases. IVIG have also showed antimetastatic effects in a variety of cancer cell lines, as well as in a few case reports. The efficiency of IVIG has also been observed in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), either as a result of an autoimmune disease or spontaneous. Several attempts were made to discover the immunomodulatory effects of IVIG, but it is still not fully understood. Clearly IVIG has multiple mechanisms of actions, which are thought to cooperate synergistically. One of the main mechanisms of actions of IVIG is its ability to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies via anti-idiotypic antibodies within IVIG preparation. The ability of IVIG to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies is of great importance in many autoimmune diseases, as well as in RPL. In cancer cell lines, IVIG modulates the immune system in a few ways, including the induction of IL-12 secretion, which consequently activates natural killer cells, and the induction of expression of proapoptotic genes only in cancer cells. Side effects from IVIG are rare and mostly mild and transient. More importantly adverse effects can be minimized by administration to a selective patient population in a proper way: slow infusion rate of 0.4 g/Kg body weight IVIG for 5 consecutive days, given in monthly cycles. The only downside of IVIG therapy is its high price. Therefore, clinicians should balance efficiency versus cost in deciding whether or not to treat certain conditions with IVIG.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetrical weakness of limbs without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN mimics that of lower-motor-neuron disease, but in nerve-conduction studies of patients with MMN motor-conduction block has been found. By contrast with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, treatment with prednisolone and plasma exchange is generally ineffective in MMN and even associated with clinical worsening in some patients. Of the immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide has been reported as effective but only anecdotally. Various open trials and four placebo-controlled trials have shown that treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to improvement of muscle strength in patients with MMN. Although clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological studies have improved our understanding of MMN over the past 15 years, further research is needed to elucidate pathogenetic disease mechanisms in the disorder.

IVIg in idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies: analysis in the light of the latest results

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is effective in the treatment of idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), representing a useful option or, as in MMN, the gold standard for their treatment. In GBS, two randomised, controlled trials (RCT) showed that IVIg is at least as effective as plasma exchange (PE). IVIg may however be preferred due to its low number of contraindications and complications and the fact that it can be administered at any time, in any department, including patients with contraindications to PE, or in intensive care units. In CIDP, at least four RCTs have demonstrated the efficacy of IVIg in over 60% of CIDP patients, while two additional RCTs have shown a comparable effect to steroids and PE as initial treatment. As with PE, the effects of IVIg usually last a few weeks meaning that the majority of patients require periodic maintenance infusions. The lower cost and easier administration of oral steroids compared to IVIg may be partly compensated by the safer long-term profile of IVIg over steroids. In MMN, almost 80% of patients improve with IVIg, the efficacy of which has been confirmed by four RCTs, making of IVIg the first-choice therapy in MMN, for which steroids and PE are ineffective or even detrimental. Also in these patients, IVIg induces a rapid improvement that usually lasts only a few weeks and has to be maintained with periodic IVIg infusions for long periods of time, if not indefinitely.

A review of the medical management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare condition, but merits consideration due to its disabling consequences for patients and the growing existence of efficacious therapies during the last few decades. The first step is to characterise this neuropathy among the chronic dysimmune polyneuropathies, according to clinical, electrophysiologicalal and sometimes pathologicalal and immunochemical criteria. Typical CIDP is currently defined by criteria which have progressively improved since the first attempt made by an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology in 1991. However, CIDP may be associated with several concurrent diseases, and other chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies may be considered as either subtypes of CIDP, such as sensory CIDP and multifocal acquired sensory and motor neuropathy, or frontiers of CIDP, such as multi-focal motor neuropathy and polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy. These considerations are helpful in the choice of treatments, as the response to immunomodulatory agents is different according to the type of the dysimmune neuropathy. CIDP is considered to be an immune-mediated disorder and may respond dramatically to numerous short-term therapies, such as corticosteroids, plasma exchanges, or intravenous immunoglobulin. The aim of this review is both to summarise the main results of the published open and randomised controlled trials for CIDP, and to provide some information about randomised controlled trials currently in progress. The objectives of the current and future trials are firstly, to choose the best regimen for short-term treatments, and secondly, to test new immunosuppressants in long-term therapy, if the neurological condition requires it.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare, probably immune mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. The treatment options for multifocal motor neuropathy are sparse. Patients with multifocal motor neuropathy do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, and may even worsen with these treatments. Many uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Review Group to search the Disease Group register (searched September 2003), MEDLINE (January 1990 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003) and ISI (January 1990 to September 2003) databases for randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies examining the effects of any dose of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo in patients with definite or probable multifocal motor neuropathy. Outcome measures had to include one of the following: disability, strength, or conduction block. Studies which reported the frequency of adverse effects were used to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, scored their quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated relative risks, and for continuous data, effect sizes and weighted pooled effect sizes. Statistical uncertainty was expressed with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials including a total of 34 patients were suitable for this systematic review. Strength improved in 78% of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and only 4% of placebo-treated patients. Disability improved in 39% of patients after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and in 11% after placebo (statistically not significantly different). Mild, transient side effects were reported in 71% of intravenous immunoglobulin treated patients. Serious side effects were not encountered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that intravenous immunoglobulin has a beneficial effect on strength. There was a non-significant trend towards improvement in disability. More research is needed to discover whether intravenous immunoglobulin improves disability and is cost-effective.

Treatment of dysimmune neuropathies

Several therapies are currently used in dys-immune neuropathies including steroids,plasma exchange (PE), high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins(IVIg), and immuno-suppressive agents (IS). Even if there is substantial evidence that these treatments may improve the course of the neuropathy, their effectiveness is far from being complete and is sometime hampered by the occurrence of associated side effects. In Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS),IVIg and PE are similarly effective in accelerating the recovery but there is still little evidence that they can reduce mortality or long-term disability. Recent reports on the association of intravenous methylprednisolone or interferon-beta (IFN-beta) to IVIg did not result in significant further improvement. In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy(CIDP) steroids, PE, and IVIG are initially similarly effective. The short-term effect of PE and IVIgand the side effects associated with the long-term use of steroids have prompted the use of several IS, interferon and,more recently, the anti-CD20 monoclonal-antibody Rituximab, but their efficacy has still to be proved in controlled studies. The recent identification of multifocal motor neuropathy(MMN) was shortly followed by the finding of an effective therapy. Almost 80% of patients respond toIVIg whose effect needs to be maintained with periodic infusions for long periods of time, and tends to decrease after several years. Also in this condition a number of immune modulating agents have been used to reduce the frequency or improve the effectiveness of IVIg,but their efficacy has not been sofar confirmed in randomized trials. Similar conclusions can be drawn for neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies where only PE and IVIg have proved to be effective in controlled studies,while the promising initial results obtained with Rituximab in neuropathy associated IgM monoclonal gammopathy awaits confirmation from controlled trials.

Neuropathies motrices multifocales avec blocs de conduction persistants : 18 ans après

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was firstly reported in 1986 and outlined from the group of purely motor diseases of the peripheral nervous system. The main criterion is the presence of conduction blocks located only on the motor nerves; additionally 30 percent of patients have IgM subclass serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. The clinical picture is a multifocal, asymmetrical, neuropathy, starting and predominant in the upper limbs, occurring in males aged 50 years and more, and having a progressive course. There is no biological sign besides elevated anti-GM1 antibodies. CSF analysis discloses mild increased protein count. The course is unpredictable, the neuropathy may be strictly limited to one or two motor nerves, or spread to other motor nerves in the four limbs. There is no involvement of the sensory and the cranial nerves, no involvement of the autonomic and the central nervous system. The pathophysiology is unknown, animal models do not allow to confirm the role of humoral immunity, and the role of anti-GM1 antibodies is controversial. Randomized controlled trials have assessed the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins which dramatically improve strength in 70-80 percent of patients in the short term, but remain unable to prevent motor deterioration in most patients, together with the occurrence of new conduction blocks. Corticosteroids and plasma exchanges do not improve the patients and may be followed by transient worsening. Long-term efficacy of immunosuppressive agents is not known.

Pure motor mononeuropathy with distal conduction block: an unusual presentation of multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction blocks

OBJECTIVE

To report an hitherto undescribed presentation of Motor Neuropathy with Multifocal Conduction Block (MMNCB).

METHODS

Description of two patients presenting with complete paralysis of the 3 heads of the trapezius muscle (case one) and progressive weakness of finger extension (case 2).

RESULTS

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) established that the corresponding nerves were distally inexcitable. In the affected muscles, no voluntary activity was elicited in both patients with spontaneous activity noted in patient 2. Systematic NCSs documented an asymptomatic, partial conduction block (CB) in a median nerve forearm segment in both patients. Neurophysiological follow-up after a dramatic response to intravenous immunoglobulins demonstrated recovery of the initially unobtainable motor responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This indicates that a complete, distal CB of the motor fibers destined to the trapezius muscle in patient 1, and to the extensor indicis proprius in patient 2, had caused the heralding deficits.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings underscore the possibility of distal CB in this disorder and the need for extensive NCSs, including asymptomatic nerves, for an accurate diagnosis.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: pathologic alterations at the site of conduction block

The pathologic changes of nerves in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), a rare neuropathy with selective focal conduction block of motor fibers in mixed nerves, remain essentially unstudied. Fascicular nerve biopsy of 8 forearm or arm nerves in 7 patients with typical MMN was undertaken for diagnostic reasons at the site of the conduction block. Abnormalities were seen in 7 of 8 nerves, including a varying degree of multifocal fiber degeneration and loss, an altered fiber size distribution with fewer large fibers, an increased frequency of remyelinated fiber profiles, and frequent and prominent regenerating fiber clusters. Small epineurial perivascular inflammatory infiltrates were observed in 2 nerves. We did not observe overt segmental demyelination or onion bulb formation. We hypothesize that an antibody-mediated attack directed against components of axolemma at nodes of Ranvier could cause conduction block, transitory paranodal demyelination and remyelination, and axonal degeneration and regeneration. Alternatively, the antibody attack could be directed at components of paranodal myelin. We favor the first hypothesis because in nerves studied by us, axonal pathological alteration predominated over myelin pathology. Irrespective of which mechanism is involved, we conclude that the unequivocal multifocal fiber degeneration and loss and regenerative clusters at sites of conduction block explains the observed clinical muscle weakness and atrophy and alterations of motor unit potentials. The occurrence of conduction block and multifocal fiber degeneration and regeneration at the same sites suggests that the processes of conduction block and fiber degeneration and regeneration are linked. Finding discrete multifocal fiber degeneration may also provide an explanation for why the functional abnormalities remain unchanged over long periods of time at discrete proximal to distal levels of nerve and may emphasize a need for early intervention (assuming that efficacious treatment is available).

Immunotherapy of idiopathic inflammatory neuropathies

Evaluation of peripheral neuropathy is a common reason for referral to a neurologist. Recent advances in immunology have identified an inflammatory component in many neuropathies and have led to treatment trials using agents that attenuate this response. This article reviews the clinical presentation and treatment of the most common subacute inflammatory neuropathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Fisher syndrome, and describes the lack of response to corticosteroids and the efficacy of treatment with plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, although sharing some clinical, electrodiagnostic, and pathologic similarities to GBS, improves after treatment with plasma exchange and IVIG and numerous immunomodulatory agents. Controlled trials in multifocal motor neuropathy have shown benefit after treatment with IVIG and cyclophosphamide. Also discussed is the treatment of less common inflammatory neuropathies whose pathophysiology involves monoclonal proteins or antibodies directed against myelin-associated glycoprotein or sulfatide. Little treatment data exist to direct the clinician to proper management of rare inflammatory neuropathies resulting from osteosclerotic myeloma; POEMS syndrome; vasculitis; Sjögren's syndrome; and neoplasia (paraneoplastic neuropathy).

Demyelination and axonal loss in multifocal motor neuropathy: distribution and relation to weakness

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterized by a slowly progressive, asymmetric weakness of the limbs without sensory loss. The arms are usually affected to a greater extent than the legs, and distal muscles more than proximal muscles. The distribution of electrophysiological abnormalities and its correlation with weak muscle groups in MMN have not been investigated systematically. The aim of the present study was to assess whether electrophysiological abnormalities have a preferential or random distribution, whether electrophysiological abnormalities in a nerve correlate with weakness in the innervated muscles, and whether these results are relevant for the development of optimal electrodiagnostic protocols. We compared the pattern of weakness and electrophysiological abnormalities in 39 patients with a lower motoneuron syndrome and a positive response to intravenous immunoglobulins. All patients underwent an extensive standardized electrophysiological examination. Electrophysiological evidence of demyelination was found more often in the nerves of the arms and was distributed randomly over lower arm, upper arm and shoulder segments. Electrophysiological evidence of axonal loss presented more frequently in longer nerves, occurring most often in the leg nerves. For the arm nerves, it is possible that the length dependence of axonal loss is due to the random distribution of demyelinating lesions that lead to axonal degeneration. Weakness was associated with features of demyelination and axonal loss in the nerves of the arm, and with features of axonal loss in leg nerves. However, a substantial number (approximately one-third) of electrophysiological abnormalities were found in nerves innervating non-weakened muscles. These results imply that in MMN, conduction block is most likely to be found in long arm nerves innervating weakened muscles, but if conduction block cannot be detected in these nerves, the electrophysiological examination should be extended to other arm nerves including those innervating non-weakened muscles.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: long-term clinical and electrophysiological assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment

We performed a long-term follow-up study of 11 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) who received maintenance treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). Patients were treated initially with one full course of IVIg (0.4 g/kg for 5 days) followed by one IVIg infusion (0.4 g/kg) every week. During follow-up, the frequency and dosage of IVIg infusions were determined for each patient and ranged from one infusion every 1 to 7 weeks and an average dose of 7 to 48 g per week. During the 4- to 8-year follow-up period, muscle strength was assessed by measuring the MRC (Medical Research Council) sumscore of 20 muscle groups and by performing hand-held dynamometry on a selection of weak muscle groups. Systematic electrophysiological studies were performed before treatment and each year during IVIg maintenance treatment. Disability was assessed with the upper limb and lower limb subscales of the Guy's Neurological Disability Scale before treatment, after the first full course of IVIg and at the last follow-up examination. Muscle strength improved significantly within 3 weeks of the start of IVIg treatment and was still significantly better at the last follow-up examination than before treatment, even though it decreased slightly and significantly during the follow-up period. Upper limb disability was significantly better after the first full course of IVIg than before treatment. Conduction block disappeared in six nerve segments but new conduction block appeared in eight nerve segments during the follow-up period. Changes consistent with improvement (remyelination or reinnervation) occurred in 13 nerves during follow-up and changes consistent with worsening (demyelination or axon loss) occurred in 14 nerves. Electrophysiological changes consistent with improvement were significantly associated with the presence of conduction block before IVIg treatment. In conclusion, IVIg maintenance treatment has a beneficial long-term effect on muscle strength and upper limb disability but may not prevent a slight decrease in muscle strength. The electrophysiological findings imply that IVIg treatment favourably influences the mechanisms of remyelination or reinnervation but that axon loss cannot be prevented.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurological disease: a specialist review

Treatment of neurological disorders with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an increasing feature of our practice for an expanding range of indications. For some there is evidence of benefit from randomised controlled trials, whereas for others evidence is anecdotal. The relative rarity of some of the disorders means that good randomised control trials will be difficult to deliver. Meanwhile, the treatment is costly and pressure to "do something" in often distressing disorders considerable. This review follows a 1 day meeting of the authors in November 2000 and examines current evidence for the use of IVIg in neurological conditions and comments on mechanisms of action, delivery, safety and tolerability, and health economic issues. Evidence of efficacy has been classified into levels for healthcare interventions (tables 1 and 2).

Diagnosis of motor neuropathy

Motor neuropathy is a clinical entity which leads to consideration of a wide spectrum of peripheral nerve disorders. Firstly, it may be distinguished from other causes of peripheral motor involvement such as muscle diseases and disorders of the neuromuscular junction. Secondly, it may be discussed in two different forms: acute and chronic. Acute chronic neuropathies are mainly observed in Guillain-Barré syndrome, in which electrophysiological studies allow us to recognize the classical demyelinating form and the axonal form. The other causes of acute motor neuropathy are mainly poliomyelitis and porphyrias. Chronic motor neuropathies are mainly observed in motor neuron diseases, mainly amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, but also Kennedy's disease and other lower motor neuron diseases which may be inherited or acquired. The other causes are multifocal motor neuropathy and the predominantly motor forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The characterization of these different types of chronic neuropathy is of major importance because of the therapeutic consequences which may lead to the proposal of specific treatments.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a recently identified peripheral nerve disorder characterized by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetric limb weakness mostly affecting upper limbs, minimal or no sensory impairment, and by the presence on nerve conduction studies of multifocal persistent partial conduction blocks on motor but not sensory nerves. The etiopathogenesis of MMN is not known, but there is some evidence, based mostly on the clinical improvement after immunological therapies, that the disease has an immunological basis. Antibodies, mostly IgM, to the gangliosides GM1, and though less frequently, GM2 and GD1a, are frequently detected in patients' sera, helping in the diagnosis of this disease. Even if there is some experimental evidence that these antibodies may be pathogenic in vitro, their role in the neuropathy remains to be established. Patients with MMN do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, which may occasionally worsen the symptoms, while the efficacy of cyclophosphamide is limited by its relevant side effects. More than 80% of MMN patients rapidly improve with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg). The effect of this therapy is, however, transient and improvement has to be maintained with periodic infusions. A positive response to interferon-beta has been recently reported in a minority of patients, some of whom were resistant to IVIg. Even if many progresses have been made on the diagnosis and therapy of MMN, there are still several issues on the nosological position, etiopathogenesis and long-term treatment of this neuropathy that need to be clarified.