The end for the ‘Roman Sandal’: an observational study of methods of securing chest drains in a deployed military setting

Intercostal chest drain fixation strength: comparison of techniques and sutures

OBJECTIVE

The accidental removal of an intercostal chest drain (ICD) is common and may result in serious complications. A number of fixation techniques and suture material are in use, and the selection is often based on personal preferences and equipment availability. This study is designed to determine which of the common techniques provides the strongest ICD fixation.

METHODS

This study compared the mechanical strength of eight different ICD fixation techniques (purse string, 'Roman sandal', 'Jo'burg' (JO) technique, a suture through the tube, one and two passes through a locking plastic tie, tape fixation and a commercial disposable drainage tube holder) and two silk suture sizes using porcine cadavers and a digital push-pull dynamometer to simulate accidental removal of an ICD. A total of 14 different experimental set-ups produced 280 measurements.

RESULTS

Significant differences in ICD fixation strength were observed. A modified JO technique using a size 1 silk suture was nearly three times stronger than a purse-string fixation using a size 0 silk and 10 times stronger from a commercial, adhesive-based device (180, 70 and 22, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In situations where the mechanical strength of ICD fixation is important, using a size 1 silk and a modified JO technique may provide the strongest fixation.

A new adaptation for a secure surgical drain placement and a comparison with four common drain fixation methods

INTRODUCTION

The importance of postoperative drain fixation cannot be overemphasised. There are numerous described techniques for drain fixation. However, to our knowledge, there is no evidence-based comparison between the various techniques of drain fixation used in postoperative management. We describe a new method and compare its reliability with four other commonly used methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five methods were chosen for testing based on current trends in clinical practice: centurion sandal with plastic locking ties, centurion sandal or lattice method, centurion sandal with half-inch Steristrips®, double and multiple looped methods. We used an Instron 8872® tensiometer to apply a measured force to a secured drain. Each fixation method was tested ten times and all fixation methods were performed by the same experienced surgeon. We measured the average number of cycles before failure, the average displacement of the tube at failure and the time needed to apply each fixation method.

RESULTS

The number of cycles completed before failure showed that the centurion sandal method, the centurion sandal with plastic ties and the centurion sandal method with Steristrips had the lowest failure rate. The amount of displacement was the least in the centurion sandal with plastic ties followed by the double-loop method and centurion sandal with Steristrips. There was little difference in the time taken to complete the fixation methods (range 21-33 seconds).

DISCUSSION

We recommend the use of the centurion sandal with plastic locking ties, centurion sandal with Steristrips followed by the centurion sandal method alone as fixation techniques that are quick to perform, secure and reliable.

The modified 'Jo'burg' technique for securing intercostal chest drains

Insertion of an intercostal chest drain (ICD) is a common intervention in the management of either blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma. It is frequently performed by junior medical personnel as an emergency procedure during the initial resuscitation period and often within a stressful environment. Approximately one-fifth of all ICD insertions are associated with complications. In a retrospective review of over 1000 ICD insertions, 7% of the complications observed were due to inadequate fixation, resulting in dislodgement. The risk of dislodgement is greatest during transit or transfer of a casualty. In a military setting, this may involve movement of a casualty in a non-permissive environment and includes transfer on and off rotary wing, fixed wing, road vehicle and maritime transport platforms as well as between stretchers and hospital beds. While ICD insertion follows a standard technique in accordance with the Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines, the method of securing ICDs has not been standardised across the Defence Medical Services (DMS). The aim of this paper is to first propose a modified version of a tried and tested technique of securing ICDs with alternative steps described for medical staff unfamiliar with surgical knot tying by hand. Second, we present the results from a pilot validation study of this technique when introduced to candidates on a trauma surgical skills course. We describe and demonstrate a robust, easily teachable and reproducible technique for securing ICDs. We would advocate the use of this technique among both surgically and non-surgically trained medical personnel and suggest that this should become the standardised technique for securing ICDs across the DMS. This could be easily implemented by introducing this technique into the various military trauma courses, for example the Military Operational Surgical Training, Medical Emergency Response Team and Critical Care Air Support Team courses.

Thoracic Trauma: Which Chest Tube When and Where?

Clinical suspicion of hemo/pneumothorax: when in doubt, drain the chest. Stable chest trauma with hemo/pneumothorax: drain and wait. Unstable patient with dislocated trachea must be approached with drain in hand and scalpel ready. Massive hemo/pneumothorax may be controlled by drainage alone. The surgeon should not hesitate to open the chest if too much blood drains over a short period. The chest drainage procedure does not end with the last stitch; the second half of the match is still ahead. The drained patient is in need of physiotherapy and proper pain relief with an extended pleural space: control the suction system.