Family presence during resuscitation: extending ethical norms from paediatrics to adults

The healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences with family presence during resuscitation: A qualitative evidence synthesis

INTRODUCTION

Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is a growing hospital praxis despite lack of high-quality evidence. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis review was to synthesize current evidence regarding healthcare professionals (HCP) perspectives on barriers and facilitating factors of FPDR and the potential impact of FPDR on HCP performance.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search May 17, 2023 including primary studies with qualitative study designs. We applied NVivo for data analysis. Data was coded with line-by-line coding and organized into themes and categories following the method for thematic synthesis described by Thomas and Harden to analyse data. The studies underwent quality appraisal by Critical Appraisal Skills Program. We used GRADE CERQual to assess the confidence in the evidence.

RESULTS

We identified 8241 articles suitable for screening, 141 articles were full text screened, and nine studies included from Australia, UK and USA. In total, 134 HCP participated, between 2005 and 2019. Most studies lacked sufficiently rigorous data analysis and findings were appraised to have moderate GRADE CERQual confidence. We identified three analytical themes ("Facilitating factors for FPDR", "Barriers for FPDR" and "How staff are affected by FPDR") with eight descriptive subthemes. One finding was of high GRADE CERQual confidence: a belief that FPDR is "the right thing to do" which was a "Facilitating factor of FPDR."

CONCLUSION

The evidence on HCP perspectives is of low to moderate confidence. The interviewed consent that FPDR is the "right thing to do", and an ethical principle of beneficence is dominant, especially regarding children.

Resuscitation Team Members' Perceptions of Supporting Parents During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Children: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Supporting parents is a crucial part of family-centered care in pediatric and neonate resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to appraise and synthesize studies conducted to determine resuscitation team members' perspectives of support for parents during pediatric and neonate resuscitation.

METHODS

The PRISMA model guided the systematic literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus for studies published until May 2022. The authors independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for eligibility. There was agreement about screened articles for inclusion. Full texts of all potentially relevant studies were evaluated for the rigor of the study design, sample, and analysis. This review included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. The quality of evidence across the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool as part of GRADE's (Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) certainty rating process.

RESULTS

There were 978 articles located. After reviewing for relevancy, 141 full-text articles were assessed, and 13 articles met criteria and were included in this review (4 quantitative, 7 qualitative, and 2 mixed-methods design). Five themes were revealed to summarize resuscitation team members' perspectives of parental support in pediatric resuscitation: providing information to parents, family facilitator, emotional support, presence of parents during resuscitation, and spiritual and religious support.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review can be used to improve support for parents by informing the education of resuscitation team members and clarifying policies and guidelines of resuscitation team roles to include support for parents.

Family presence during resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Patients and their relatives often expect to be actively involved in decisions of treatment. Even during resuscitation and acute medical care, patients may want to have their relatives nearby, and relatives may want to be present if offered the possibility. The principle of family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is a triangular relationship where the intervention of family presence affects the healthcare professionals, the relatives present, and the care of the patient involved. All needs and well-being must be balanced in the context of FPDR as the actions involving all three groups can impact the others.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this review was to investigate how offering relatives the option to be present during resuscitation of patients affects the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related symptoms in the relatives. The secondary aim was to investigate how offering relatives the option to be present during resuscitation of patients affects the occurrence of other psychological outcomes in the relatives and what effect family presence compared to no family presence during resuscitation of patients has on patient morbidity and mortality. We also wanted to investigate the effect of FPDR on medical treatment and care during resuscitation. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate and report the personal stress seen in healthcare professionals and if possible describe their attitudes toward the FPDR initiative.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to 22 March 2022 without any language limits. We also checked references and citations of eligible studies using Scopus, and searched for relevant systematic reviews using Epistomonikos. Furthermore, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and ISRCTN registry for ongoing trials; OpenGrey for grey literature; and Google Scholar for additional trials (all on 22 March 2022).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials of adults who have witnessed a resuscitation attempt of a patient (who was their relative) at the emergency department or in the pre-hospital emergency medical service.  The participants of this review included relatives, patients, and healthcare professionals during resuscitation.  We included relatives aged 18 years or older who have witnessed a resuscitation attempt of a patient (who is their relative) in the emergency department or pre-hospital. We defined relatives as siblings, parents, spouses, children, or close friends of the patient, or any other descriptions used by the study authors. There were no limitations on adult age or gender. We defined patient as a patient with cardiac arrest in need of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a patient with a critical medical or traumatic life-threatening condition, an unconscious patient, or a patient in any other way at risk of sudden death. We included all types of healthcare professionals as described in the included studies. There were no limitations on age or gender.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We checked titles and abstracts of studies identified by the search, and obtained the full reports of those studies deemed potentially relevant. Two review authors independently extracted data. As it was not possible to conduct meta-analyses, we synthesized data narratively.

MAIN RESULTS

The electronic searches yielded a total of 7292 records after deduplication. We included 2 trials (3 papers) involving a total of 595 participants: a cluster-randomized trial from 2013 involving pre-hospital emergency medical services units in France, comparing systematic offer for a relative to witness CPR with the traditional practice, and its 1-year assessment; and a small pilot study from 1998 of FPDR in an emergency department in the UK. Participants were 19 to 78 years old, and between 56% and 64% were women. PTSD was measured with the Impact of Event Scale, and the median score ranged from 0 to 21 (range 0 to 75; higher scores correspond to more severe disease). In the trial that accounted for most of the included participants (570/595), the frequency of PTSD-related symptoms was significantly higher in the control group after 3 and 12 months, and in the per-protocol analyses a significant statistical difference was found in favor of FPDR when looking at PTSD, anxiety and depression, and complicated grief after 1 year.  One of the included studies also measured duration of patient resuscitation and personal stress in healthcare professionals during FPDR and found no difference between groups. Both studies had high risk of bias, and the evidence for all outcomes except one was assessed as very low certainty.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was insufficient evidence to draw any firm conclusions on the effects of FPDR on relatives' psychological outcomes.   Sufficiently powered and well-designed randomized controlled trials may change the conclusions of the review in future.

Nurses' experiences of ethical and legal issues in post-resuscitation care: A qualitative content analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent care are subject to various ethical and legal issues. Few studies have addressed ethical and legal issues in post-resuscitation care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore nurses' experiences of ethical and legal issues in post-resuscitation care.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This qualitative study adopted an exploratory descriptive qualitative design using conventional content analysis.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in three educational hospital centers in northwestern Iran. Using purposive sampling, 17 nurses participated. Data were analyzed by conventional content analysis.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by Research Ethics Committees at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained. For each interview, the ethical principles including data confidentiality and social distance were respected.

FINDINGS

Five main categories emerged: Pressure to provide unprincipled care, unprofessional interactions, ignoring the patient, falsifying documents, and specific ethical challenges. Pressures in the post-resuscitation period can cause nurses to provide care that is not consistent with guidelines, and to avoid communicating with physicians, patients and their families. Patients can also be labeled negatively, with early judgments made about their condition. Medical records can be written in a way to indicate that all necessary care has been provided. Disclosure, withdrawing, and withholding of therapy were also specific important ethical challenges in the field of post-resuscitation care.

CONCLUSION

There are many ethical and legal issues in post-resuscitation care. Developing evidence-based guidelines and training staff to provide ethical care can help to reduce these challenges.

The experiences of parents witnessing their child's resuscitation in hospital

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this literature review is to explore parents' experiences of witnessing their child being resuscitated in hospital settings.

METHODS

An integrative literature review using the databases CINAHL, PubMed and PsycInfo to retrieve articles published between 2011 and 2021 on parent-witnessed resuscitation.

RESULTS

This review found strong evidence of the benefit of parents being present during their child's resuscitation, with three common themes emerging: need to be present, communication and seeing to believe. Parents and the healthcare team benefit from being present, and parents feel they have more positive experiences when they are allowed to choose their level of presence.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of parental witnessed resuscitation are shown throughout the review, however, this may not always be adopted in practice. Hospital policies or resuscitation training do not cover parent-witnessed resuscitation, therefore implementation of mandatory hospital policy regarding this issue should be introduced to practice to create continuity of high-quality care.

Humanization in oncology care: A necessary change

Developments in cancer care, automation of care, rationing of time and fragmentation of the work process for institutional imperatives can often lead to the dehumanization of care. Although, it is indisputable that these interventions have significantly improved outcomes in oncology, they may have caused the emotional needs of patients, families, and health professionals to be considered secondary concerns. Therefore, humanized care can help dispel the negative emotions associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment and may even contribute to improve patient outcomes. This empathetic and respectful approach to patients leads to increase patient expectations of recovery, accountability, control over their own health, satisfaction, safer care, patient happiness and healthcare professional resilience, resulting in time and cost savings. The humanization of care has emerged as a response to the needs and concerns of patients and their families that go beyond the biological.

Impact of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on team performance and perceived task load: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines recommend family presence to be offered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Data on the effects of family presence on the quality of CPR and rescuers' workload and stress levels are sparse and conflicting. This randomised trial investigated the effects of family presence on quality of CPR, and rescuers' perceived stress.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised single-blind trial.

SETTING

Voluntary workshops of educational courses.

PARTICIPANTS

1085 physicians (565 men) randomised to 325 teams entered the trial. 318 teams completed the trial without protocol violation.

INTERVENTIONS

Teams were randomised to a family presence group (n=160) or a control group (n=158) and to three versions of leadership: (a) designated at random, (b) designated by the team or (c) left open. Thereafter, teams were confronted with a simulated cardiac arrest which was video-recorded. Trained actors played a family member according a scripted role.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Secondary outcomes included interaction time, rescuers' perceived task load and adherence to CPR algorithms.

RESULTS

Teams interacted with the family member during 24 (17-36) % of the time spent for resuscitation. Family presence had no effect on hands-on time (88% (84%-91%) vs 89% (85%-91%); p=0.18). Family presence increased frustration (60 (30-75) vs 45 (30-70); p<0.001) and perceived temporal (75 (55-85) vs 70 (50-80); p=0.001) and mental demands (75 (60-85) vs 70 (55-80); p=0.009), but had no relevant effect on CPR performance markers. Leadership condition had no effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Interacting with a family member occupied about a quarter of the time spent for CPR. While this additional task was associated with an increase in frustration and perceived temporal and mental demands, family presence had no relevant negative effect on the quality of CPR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00024759.

Family involvement in the intensive care unit in four Nordic countries

BACKGROUND

Relevance to clinical practice The findings from the study highlighting family involvement, high-quality communication and flexible visiting policy as central aspects of family care may inspire clinicians to identify aspects of everyday family care in their ICUs calling for further improvement.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe family involvement, communication practices and visiting policies in adult ICUs.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

METHOD

A questionnaire consisting of 11 sections was developed, pilot tested and e-mailed to 196 ICUs. The participants were intensive care nurses in adult ICUs in four Nordic countries.

RESULTS

The survey was conducted in October to December 2019. The response rate was 81% (158/196) of the invited ICUs. Most of the units had fewer than 11 beds. Family participation in patient care, including involvement in ward rounds and presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, varied between the countries, whereas most families in all countries were involved in decision-making. Family conferences were generally initiated by staff or family members. Children under 18 did not always receive information directly from the staff, and parents were not advised about how to inform their children. Although most respondents described open visiting, restrictions were also mentioned in free-text comments.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of family care in ICUs in the four Nordic countries is generally based on nurses' discretion. Although most Nordic ICUs report having an open or flexible visiting policy, a wide range of potential restrictions still exists. Children and young relatives are not routinely followed up. Family members are included in communication and decision-making, whereas family involvement in daily care, ward rounds and family-witnessed resuscitation seem to be areas with a potential for improvement.

[Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions]

These European Resuscitation Council Ethics guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the ethical, routine practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care of adults and children. The guideline primarily focus on major ethical practice interventions (i.e. advance directives, advance care planning, and shared decision making), decision making regarding resuscitation, education, and research. These areas are tightly related to the application of the principles of bioethics in the practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions

These European Resuscitation Council Ethics guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the ethical, routine practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care of adults and children. The guideline primarily focus on major ethical practice interventions (i.e. advance directives, advance care planning, and shared decision making), decision making regarding resuscitation, education, and research. These areas are tightly related to the application of the principles of bioethics in the practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care.

Witnessed resuscitation: A concept analysis

BACKGROUND

The advance in the practice of resuscitation is globally recognised and fully sanctioned in scientific world. However, practicing family presence during resuscitation, also known as witnessed resuscitation, is yet to be endorsed by healthcare professionals. Many professional nursing and physician organisations have endorsed the practice of witnessed resuscitation by issuing guidelines. These organisations support family presence during resuscitation due to the research proving its benefit for patients and families.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the concept of witnessed resuscitation.

METHOD

A concept analysis was undertaken using Rodger's (2000) evolutionary method.

FINDINGS

The concept analysis suggests that witnessed resuscitation refers to the presence of a family member or relative during a resuscitation procedure, mostly in emergency and complex critical care areas. The defining attributes are family centred care approach, exercising patients and family rights and autonomy in end of life care decisions and involvement of family as active and passive observers during a resuscitation event.

CONCLUSION

Clarity surrounding witnessed resuscitation will guide the development of a conceptual framework, expand nursing knowledge and identify the research required to advance understanding of witnessed resuscitation in practice.

Family witnessed resuscitation and invasive procedures: Patient and family opinions

BACKGROUND

Family presence during invasive procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (FPDR) is a highly controversial issue, with divergence of opinion among health professionals, with clinical evidence in favor, and with barriers to its implementation in comprehensive patient care. Many international organizations support health policies for its implementation, but it is not a widespread practice. Little research has been conducted on this subject from the perspective of patients and families.

OBJECTIVE

To learn opinions, perceptions, and desires of family members and patients in terms of family presence during invasive procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

METHOD

Qualitative descriptive study, using semi-structured interviews with relatives and patients regarding their experiences and perceptions about FPDR (n = 18) from 8 October 2017 to 8 March 2018. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for later analysis using the method of content analysis.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

This study has the approval of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals and ethical considerations were carefully regarded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Three significant categories were identified: knowledge, respect for rights, and accompaniment of the patient, relating FPDR to courage, emotional support, and trust in professionals.

CONCLUSION

FPDR is an unusual practice; it is not offered to patients or their families, and it is not considered a patient's right, although most of the interviewees support it. The desire for accompaniment is conditioned by the courage and knowledge of the accompanying persons, as well as the degree of invasiveness of the procedures. The results of this study provide information for a change of vision in patient-centered care.

Family for Life and Death: Family Presence during Resuscitation

The dilemma of whether to allow relatives to see or even touch their loved one while she undergoes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been discussed for roughly four decades. However, Family Presence During Adult Resuscitation (FPDR) is still not widely implemented. In this paper, I espouse relational autonomy to make a case for a clinical approach of family-centered care and FPDR. In recent years, family-centered care (FCC) has gained increasing support. I argue that relational autonomy provides a conceptual framework for both FCC and FPDR. In turn, FCC provides a plausible clinical approach to justify FPDR, while the empirical evidence that supports FPDR provides a useful example to justify FCC.

Comparison the effect of trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department: A randomized controlled trial

Objective

The present study was aimed to compare the effect of the trained and untrained family presence on their anxiety during invasive procedures in an emergency department.

Methods

In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 90 patients who were candidates for receiving invasive nursing procedures were selected in an emergency department based on the inclusion criteria, and then were equally assigned into 3 groups by the random minimization method: A ("presence of the trained family member group "), B ("presence of the untrained family member group "), and C ("absence and untrained family member group"). The anxiety level was measured before and after implementation of the procedure using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The data were analyzed by SPSS software using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Chi-Square test, Kruskal Wallis Independent-Samples test, Paired Samples T-test, and ANOVA at the significance level of 0.05.

Results

The three groups were similar in terms of demographic variables. In all three groups, the SATI score significantly decreased after intervention phase (p = 0.001). The mean changes of the SATI score were not statistically different between the groups. However, The STAI score decreased significantly after intervention in the group B compared to the group A (p = 0.011) and C (p = 0.042). However, there was no significant difference between the SATI score in the group A and C (p = 0.867).

Conclusion

The results of the study revealed that, the “presence of the untrained" family members caused them to experience significantly less anxiety than the other two groups. However, changes in the anxiety score were not significant between the groups.

Factors Affecting Family Presence During Fracture Reduction in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Introduction

Asking family members to leave during invasive procedures has historically been common practice; however, evidence-based recommendations have altered the trend of family presence during pediatric procedures. The aim of this study was to determine factors related to family members’ choice to be present or absent during fracture reductions in a pediatric emergency department (ED), and their satisfaction with that choice.

Methods

We administered role-specific, anonymous surveys to a convenience sample of patients’ family members in the ED of a Level I pediatric trauma center. All family members were given a choice of where to be during the procedure.

Results

Twenty-five family members of 18 patients completed surveys. Seventeen family members chose to stay in the room. Family member satisfaction with their decision to be inside or outside the room during the procedure (median = very satisfied) was almost uniformly high and not associated with any of the following variables: previous presence during a medical procedure; provider-reported procedure difficulty, or anxiety levels. Family member perception of procedure success (median = extremely well) was also high and not associated with other variables. Location during the procedure was associated with a desire to be in the same location in the future (Fisher’s exact test, p=0.001). Common themes found among family members’ reasons for their location decisions and satisfaction levels were a desire to support the patient, high staff competence, and their right as parents to choose their location.

Conclusion

Family members self-select their location during their child’s fracture reduction to high levels of satisfaction, and they considered the ability to choose their location as important.

Narrative review of pediatric critical care humanization: Where we are?

The humanization of care emerges as a response to something that seems indisputable: the scientific and technological developments in Intensive Care Units. Such development has improved the care of the critically ill patient in quantitative terms, but has perhaps caused the emotional needs of patients, families and professionals to be regarded as secondary concerns. The humanization of healthcare should be discussed without confusing or discussing the humanity displayed by professionals. In this paper we review and describe the different strategic lines proposed in order to secure humanized care, and adopt a critical approach to their adaptation and current status in the field of pediatric critical care.

How do clinicians practise the principles of beneficence when deciding to allow or deny family presence during resuscitation?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To examine how clinicians practise the principles of beneficence when deciding to allow or deny family presence during resuscitation.

BACKGROUND

Family presence during resuscitation has important benefits for family and is supported by professional bodies and the public. Yet, many clinicians restrict family access to patients during resuscitation, and rationales for decision-making are unclear.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of an existing qualitative data set using deductive category application of content analysis.

METHODS

We analysed 20 interview transcripts from 15 registered nurses, two doctors and three paramedics who had experienced family presence during resuscitation in an Australian hospital. The transcripts were analysed for incidents of beneficent decision-making when allowing or denying family presence during resuscitation.

RESULTS

Decision-making around family presence during resuscitation occurred in time poor environments and in the absence of local institutional guidelines. Clinicians appeared to be motivated by doing "what's best" for patients and families when allowing or denying family presence during resuscitation. However, their individual interpretations of "what's best" was subjective and did not always coincide with family preferences or with current evidence that promotes family presence during resuscitation as beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to allow or deny family presence during resuscitation is complex, and often impacted by personal preferences and beliefs, setting norms and tensions between clinicians and consumers. As a result, many families are missing the chance to be with their loved ones at the end of life. The introduction of institutional guidelines and policies would help to establish what safe and effective practice consists of, reduce value-laden decision-making and guide beneficent decision-making.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

These findings highlight current deficits in decision-making around FPDR and could prompt the introduction of clinical guidelines and policies and in turn promote the equitable provision of safe, effective family-centred care during resuscitation events.