1
|
Bayesian Statistics for Medical Devices: Progress Since 2010. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2023; 57:453-463. [PMID: 36869194 PMCID: PMC9984131 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-022-00495-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
The use of Bayesian statistics to support regulatory evaluation of medical devices began in the late 1990s. We review the literature, focusing on recent developments of Bayesian methods, including hierarchical modeling of studies and subgroups, borrowing strength from prior data, effective sample size, Bayesian adaptive designs, pediatric extrapolation, benefit-risk decision analysis, use of real-world evidence, and diagnostic device evaluation. We illustrate how these developments were utilized in recent medical device evaluations. In Supplementary Material, we provide a list of medical devices for which Bayesian statistics were used to support approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), including those since 2010, the year the FDA published their guidance on Bayesian statistics for medical devices. We conclude with a discussion of current and future challenges and opportunities for Bayesian statistics, including artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) Bayesian modeling, uncertainty quantification, Bayesian approaches using propensity scores, and computational challenges for high dimensional data and models.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lauzier DC, Huguenard AL, Srienc AI, Cler SJ, Osbun JW, Chatterjee AR, Vellimana AK, Kansagra AP, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Moran CJ. A review of technological innovations leading to modern endovascular brain aneurysm treatment. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1156887. [PMID: 37114225 PMCID: PMC10126349 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1156887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Tools and techniques utilized in endovascular brain aneurysm treatment have undergone rapid evolution in recent decades. These technique and device-level innovations have allowed for treatment of highly complex intracranial aneurysms and improved patient outcomes. We review the major innovations within neurointervention that have led to the current state of brain aneurysm treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Lauzier
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- *Correspondence: David C. Lauzier ;
| | - Anna L. Huguenard
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Anja I. Srienc
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Samuel J. Cler
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Joshua W. Osbun
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Arindam R. Chatterjee
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ananth K. Vellimana
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Akash P. Kansagra
- Department of Neurointerventional Surgery, California Center of Neurointerventional Surgery, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Colin P. Derdeyn
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa School of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Dewitte T. Cross
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Christopher J. Moran
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wu H, Wei L, Zhou G, Zhang Y, Deng L, Cheng Y, Li M, Santos HA, Cui W. Endovascular Metal Devices for the Treatment of Cerebrovascular Diseases. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2019; 31:e1805452. [PMID: 30589125 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201805452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Cerebrovascular disease involves various medical disorders that obstruct brain blood vessels or deteriorate cerebral circulation, resulting in ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Nowadays, platinum coils with or without biological modification have become routine embolization devices to reduce the risk of cerebral aneurysm bleeding. Additionally, many intracranial stents, flow diverters, and stent retrievers have been invented with uniquely designed structures. To accelerate the translation of these devices into clinical usage, an in-depth understanding of the mechanical and material performance of these metal-based devices is critical. However, considering the more distal location and tortuous anatomic characteristics of cerebral arteries, present devices still risk failing to arrive at target lesions. Consequently, more flexible endovascular devices and novel designs are under urgent demand to overcome the deficiencies of existing devices. Herein, the pros and cons of the current structural designs are discussed when these devices are applied to the treatment of diseases ranging broadly from hemorrhages to ischemic strokes, in order to encourage further development of such kind of devices and investigation of their use in the clinic. Moreover, novel biodegradable materials and drug elution techniques, and the design, safety, and efficacy of personalized devices for further clinical applications in cerebral vasculature are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yueqi Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China
| | - Hongbo Zhang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, FI-20520, Finland
- Turku Center for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, FI-20520, Finland
| | - Yiran Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China
| | - Huayin Wu
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Liming Wei
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China
| | - Gen Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China
| | - Yuezhou Zhang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, FI-20520, Finland
- Turku Center for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, FI-20520, Finland
| | - Lianfu Deng
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China
| | - Yingsheng Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China
| | - Minghua Li
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China
| | - Hélder A Santos
- Drug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Wenguo Cui
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sylvester PT, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Dacey RG, Zipfel GJ, Kim AH, Uppaluri R, Haughey BH, Tempelhoff R, Rich KM, Schneider J, Chole RA, Chicoine MR. Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2016; 125:1256-1276. [PMID: 26771847 DOI: 10.3171/2015.6.jns142483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Internal carotid artery (ICA) injury is a rare but severe complication of endonasal surgery. The authors describe their endovascular experience managing ICA injuries after transsphenoidal surgery; they review and summarize the current literature regarding endovascular techniques; and they propose a treatment algorithm based on the available evidence. METHODS A retrospective review of 576 transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resections was performed. Cases of ICA injury occurring at our institution and transfers from other hospitals were evaluated. Endovascular treatments for ICA injury reported in the literature were also reviewed and summarized. RESULTS Seven cases were identified from the institutional cohort (mean age 46.3 years, mean follow-up 43.4 months [1-107 months]) that received endovascular treatment for ICA injury. Five injuries occurred at our institution (5 [0.9%] of 576), and 2 injuries occurred at outside hospitals. Three patients underwent ICA sacrifice by coil placement, 2 underwent lesion embolization (coil or stent-assisted coil placement), and 2 underwent endoluminal reconstruction (both with flow diversion devices). Review of the literature identified 98 cases of ICA injury treated with endovascular methods. Of the 105 total cases, 46 patients underwent ICA sacrifice, 28 underwent lesion embolization, and 31 underwent endoluminal reconstruction. Sacrifice of the ICA proved a durable solution in all cases; however, the rate of persistent neurological complications was relatively high (10 [21.7%] of 46). Lesion embolization was primarily performed by coil embolization without stenting (16 cases) and stent-assisted coiling (9 cases). Both techniques had a relatively high rate of at least some technical complication (6 [37.5%] of 16 and 5 [55.6%] of 9, respectively) and major technical complications (i.e., injury, new neurological deficit, or ICA sacrifice) (5 [31.3%] of 16 and 2 [22.2%] of 9, respectively). Endoluminal reconstruction was performed by covered stent (24 cases) and flow diverter (5 cases) placement. Covered stents showed a reasonably high rate of technical complications (10 [41.7%] of 24); however, 8 of these problems were resolved, leaving a small percentage with major technical complications (2 [8.3%] of 24). Flow diverter placement was also well tolerated, with only 1 minor technical complication. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular treatments including vessel sacrifice, coil embolization (with or without stent assistance), and endoluminal reconstruction offer a tailored approach to ICA injury management after endonasal surgery. Vessel sacrifice remains the definitive treatment for acute, uncontrolled bleeding; however, vessel preservation techniques should be considered carefully in select patients. Multiple factors including vascular anatomy, injury characteristics, and risk of dual antiplatelet therapy should guide best treatment, but more study is needed (particularly with flow diverters) to refine this decision-making process. Ideally, all endovascular treatment options should be available at institutions performing endonasal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher J Moran
- Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Colin P Derdeyn
- Departments of 1 Neurosurgery.,Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - DeWitte T Cross
- Division of Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durst C, Khan P, Gaughen J, Patrie J, Starke R, Conant P, Liu K, Jensen M, Evans A. Direct comparison of Neuroform and Enterprise stents in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Clin Radiol 2014; 69:e471-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Revised: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
6
|
Durst CR, Starke RM, Gaughen JR, Geraghty S, Kreitel KD, Medel R, Demartini N, Liu KC, Jensen ME, Evans AJ. Single-center experience with a dual microcatheter technique for the endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2014; 121:1093-101. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.jns132237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Object
The endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms can be technically challenging due to distal coil migration or impingement of the parent vessel. In this paper, the authors illustrate an alternative method for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using a dual microcatheter technique.
Methods
The authors' first 100 consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization of a wide-necked aneurysm using a dual microcatheter technique are reported. With this technique, 2 microcatheters are used to introduce coils into the aneurysm. The coils are deployed either sequentially or concurrently to form a stable construct and prevent coil herniation or migration. Angiographic and clinical outcomes are reported.
Results
The technical success rate of the dual microcatheter technique is 91% with a morbidity and mortality of 1% and 2%, respectively. Clinical outcomes are excellent with 93% of patients demonstrating a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 at long-term follow-up regardless of their score at presentation. Retreatment rates are 18%.
Conclusions
The dual microcatheter technique may be a safe and efficacious first line of treatment for widenecked aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert M. Starke
- 2Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | | | | | - Ricky Medel
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana; and
| | | | - Kenneth C. Liu
- 1Departments of Radiology and Medical Imaging and
- 2Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Mary E. Jensen
- 1Departments of Radiology and Medical Imaging and
- 2Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Avery J. Evans
- 1Departments of Radiology and Medical Imaging and
- 2Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim LJ, Tariq F, Levitt M, Barber J, Ghodke B, Hallam DK, Sekhar LN. Multimodality treatment of complex unruptured cavernous and paraclinoid aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2014; 74:51-61; discussion 61; quiz 61. [PMID: 24089048 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unruptured aneurysms of the cavernous and paraclinoid internal carotid artery can be approached via microsurgical and endovascular approaches. Trends in treatment reflect a steady shift toward endovascular techniques. OBJECTIVE To analyze our results with multimodal treatment. METHODS We reviewed patients with unruptured cavernous and paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms proximal to the posterior communicating artery treated at a single center from 2007 to 2012. Treatment included 4 groups: (1) stent-assisted coiling, (2) pipeline endovascular device (PED) flow diverter, (3) clipping, and (4) trapping/bypass. Follow-up was 2 to 60 months. RESULTS The 109 aneurysms in 102 patients were studied with the following treatment groupings: 41 were done with stent-assisted coiling, 24 with Pipeline endovascular device, 24 by microsurgical clipping, and 20 by trap/bypass. Group: (1) two percent had delayed significant intraparenchymal hemorrhage; (2) thirteen percent had central nerve palsies, 8% had small asymptomatic infarcts, and 4% had small, asymptomatic remote-site hemorrhages; (3) twenty-nine percent of patients suffered from transient central nerve palsies, 4% experienced major stroke, and 8% had small intracerebral hemorrhages; (4) thirty-five percent had transient central nerve palsies, 10% had strokes, and 10% had intracerebral hemorrhages. In terms of follow-up obliteration, 83% had complete/nearly complete obliteration at last follow-up, 17% had residual aneurysms, and 10% required retreatment. Ninety-six percent of group 1 (35/38), 100% of group 2 (23/23), 100% of group 3 (21/21), and 95% of group 4 had modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 1. CONCLUSION Treatment of these aneurysms can be carried out with acceptable rates of morbidity. Careful patient selection is crucial for optimal outcome. Endovascular treatment volumes likely will continue to predominate over microsurgical techniques as changing skill sets evolve in neurosurgery, but individualized application of all available treatment options will continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis J Kim
- *Department of Neurological Surgery; and ‡Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zuckerman SL, Eli IM, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Mocco J. Novel technologies in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurol Res 2014; 36:368-82. [DOI: 10.1179/1743132814y.0000000318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
9
|
BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL META-ANALYSIS MODEL FOR MEDICAL DEVICE EVALUATION: APPLICATION TO INTRACRANIAL STENTS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29:123-30. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462313000093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to propose a statistical model that takes into account clinical data on earlier versions when evaluating the latest version of an implantable medical device (IMD).Methods: We compared the performances of a Bayesian three-level hierarchical meta-analysis model with those of a Bayesian random-effects model through a simulation study. Posterior mean estimates of the success rate for each IMD version were computed as well as the probability that the latest version improved in effectiveness. Models were compared using the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC), the estimated bias and the standard deviation of the mean success rates. Sensitivity analyses to the choice of the priors were performed. These methods were applied to the evaluation of an intracranial stent used to treat wide-necked aneurysms.Results: When IMD versions did not differ in effectiveness, the best-fitting model was the random-effects model. By contrast, when there was a version effect, the hierarchical model was selected in more than 95 percent of the cases. It provided precise estimations of success rates of each IMD version and allowed detecting an improvement in effectiveness of the latest version, with a low influence of the choice of the priors. No evidence of benefit from the latest version of the intracranial stent was found.Conclusions: In the setting of IMD assessment, comparison of DIC between the two proposed models appeared useful for detecting version effects. In that case, Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis model may help the decision maker by providing useful information on the latest version of IMD compared with the previous versions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Comparison of Enterprise With Neuroform Stent-Assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200:872-8. [PMID: 23521463 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.12.8954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
11
|
Jahshan S, Abla AA, Natarajan SK, Drummond PS, Kan P, Karmon Y, Snyder KV, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI. Results of Stent-Assisted vs Non-Stent-Assisted Endovascular Therapies in 489 Cerebral Aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2012; 72:232-9. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e31827b93ea] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Whether the addition of stenting to intracranial aneurysm coil embolization results in benefit in terms of occlusion rates or additional risk in terms of periprocedural adverse events is not clear.
OBJECTIVE:
To report retrospectively analyzed results of endovascular aneurysm treatment comparing stent-assisted coiling with coiling without stents at our hospital from 2005 to 2009.
METHODS:
In this retrospectively reviewed case series, aneurysms were grouped as intent-to-treat or initially treated with stent-assisted coiling (A) vs coiling alone (B) or as-treated—those that ultimately received a stent (C) or not (D). Complication and occlusion rates were compared between groups. Some patients crossed from group B to C after receiving stent placement at a later treatment following the initial therapeutic modality (without a stent).
RESULTS:
In 459 patients, 489 aneurysms were treated by group as follows: A = 181, B = 308, C = 225, and D = 264. In stent groups (A and C), there were significantly lower frequencies of ruptured aneurysms (A vs B = 11% vs 62%, P < .001; C vs D = 20.4% vs 62.5%, P < .001) and more giant aneurysms (A vs B = 7.3% vs 1.0%, P = .001; C vs D = 5.9% vs 1.1%, P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in permanent event-related morbidity (A vs B = 4.4% vs 4.2%, P = 1.0; C vs D = 4.4% vs 4.2%, P = 1.0). Average angiographic follow-up after last treatment was 18.2 ± 15 months (median = 14). Higher rates of complete occlusion at last angiographic follow-up were observed in stented aneurysms (A vs B = 64.6% vs 49.7%, P = .001; C vs D = 62.7% vs 48.9%, P = .003).
CONCLUSION:
Stent-assisted aneurysm treatment resulted in higher total occlusion rates than non-stent-assisted treatment, with acceptable, comparable periprocedural event rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shady Jahshan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Adib A. Abla
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sabareesh K. Natarajan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Patrick S. Drummond
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
| | - Peter Kan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Yuval Karmon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Kenneth V. Snyder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Toshiba Stroke Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
| | - L. Nelson Hopkins
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Toshiba Stroke Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Adnan H. Siddiqui
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Toshiba Stroke Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
| | - Elad I. Levy
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Radiology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
- Toshiba Stroke Research Center, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|