Endovascular parent artery occlusion of proximal posterior cerebral artery aneurysms: a report of two cases

Clinical and Anatomical Characteristics of Perforator Aneurysms of the Posterior Cerebral Artery: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms represent up to 1% of all cerebral aneurysms. P1-P2 perforator aneurysms are thought to be even less prevalent and often require complex treatment strategies due to their anatomical and morphological characteristics, with risk of a perforator infarct. We studied the treatment of P1-P2 perforator aneurysms in a single-center cohort from a high-volume tertiary center, reporting clinical and anatomical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of adult patients with a P1-P2 perforator aneurysm who presented at our institution between January 2000 and January 2023 was performed. The patients were analyzed for demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, treatment techniques, outcomes, and complications. Subgroup analyses between ruptured versus non-ruptured cases were included.

RESULTS

Out of 2733 patients with a cerebral aneurysm, 14 patients (0.5%) presented with a P1-P2 perforator aneurysm. All six patients with a ruptured aneurysm were treated by endovascular coiling, of whom one patient (16.7%) required surgical clipping of a recurrence. One out of eight (12.5%) patients with unruptured aneurysms was treated by surgical clipping. P1-P2 perforator aneurysms predominantly affected middle-aged individuals (median 59.5 years), with 10/14 (71.4%) being female. Endovascular coiling was the primary treatment modality overall, yielding favorable technical outcomes, however, it was complicated by a perforator infarct in two patients (33.3%) without new permanent morbidity or mortality secondary to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

P1-P2 perforator aneurysms are a rare subtype of intracranial aneurysm. Endovascular coiling could present an effective treatment modality; however, care should be taken for ischemic complications in the dependent perforator territory. Larger studies are required to provide more insights.

Endovascular Treatment in Precommunicating Segment Aneurysms of Posterior Cerebral Artery

BACKGROUND

Precommunicating (P1) segment aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery are rare, with few studies reported to date. Herein, we address the clinical and radiologic outcomes of their endovascular treatment.

METHODS

For this study, we retrieved prospectively collected data on 35 consecutive patients with 37 P1 aneurysms, analyzing the clinical ramifications and morphologic outcomes of treatment. All subjects received endovascular interventions between January 2001 and October 2021.

RESULTS

There were 16 aneurysms (43.2%) of P1 segment sidewalls and 21 (56.8%) at P1/posterior communicating artery junctions. Five (13.5%) were fusiform, and 14 (37.8%) were ruptured. In 14 patients (40%), 16 aneurysms (43%) were associated with intracranial arterial occlusive disease of the anterior circulation. Selective coiling was undertaken in 34 aneurysms (91.9%), using single (n = 24) or double (n = 4) microcatheters, microcatheter protection (n = 2), or stents (n = 4); and trapping was done in 3 (8.1%). No procedure-related morbidity or mortality resulted. Excluding the trapped lesions, angiographic follow-up of 29 aneurysms obtained >6 months after embolization (mean, 12.4 month) revealed stable occlusion in 21 (72.4%), with some recanalization in the other 8 (minor: 3/29, 10.4%; major: 5/29, 17.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysms of P1 segment (vs. other locations) are strongly associated with intracranial arterial occlusive disease of the anterior circulation and thus are likely flow related. Endovascular treatment of such lesions seems safe and efficacious, despite the array of technical strategies that their distinctive anatomic configurations impose.

A Recurrent Large Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Successfully Treated with Parent Artery Occlusion Using Somatosensory-Evoked Potential: A Case Report

Objective

Treatment of large posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysm involving the P1-P2 segment is difficult by both neurosurgery and endovascular treatment. Balloon occlusion test (BOT) to identify precise peripheral collateral flow is difficult prior to parent artery occlusion (PAO). Besides, PAO at the aneurysm at this location can cause peripheral cortical infarction of the occipital and temporal lobes and/or perforator infarction involving the midbrain and thalamus perfused by the perforating artery arising from the P1-P2 segment. However, detection of the perforator during PAO is difficult.

Case Presentation

The patient was a 49-year-old woman. At the age of 43 years, a right large PCA aneurysm was discovered in the right P1-P2 segment. A simple technique coiling was performed. As recurrence was identified 1 year later, embolization was performed using a same procedure. Since further recurrences were later found, a third round of treatment was planned. Somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) was recorded as intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring. Tortuosity of the right PCA was observed at the aneurysm neck and the distal right PCA could not be secured. We could neither perform stent-assisted coil embolization nor BOT in the right PCA. Hence, we inflated the balloon in the basilar artery and checked the collateral circulation routes retrograde into the right PCA from the right middle cerebral artery via a leptomeningeal anastomosis. PAO was performed on the right P1-P2 segment at the aneurysm neck. The signal of the SEP was not decreased, and the aneurysm was not visualized. Another coil was added to strengthen the PAO to the right P1 segment, which decreased the SEP amplitude in the extremities by 3 minutes after. As the last coil was thought to be occluding the perforator branching from the right P1 segment, it was removed without detaching. The SEP amplitude began to improve and recovered by 9 minutes after. There was no postoperative deficit. No recurrence of aneurysm was observed on MRA 9 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

During PAO at the P1 segment of large PCA aneurysm involving the P1-P2 segment, SEP may be helpful to prevent perforator infarction, even if perforating artery originating from the proximal portion of the aneurysm was not detected by angiography.

Endovascular Treatment of Posterior Cerebral Artery Trunk Aneurysm: The Status Quo and Dilemma

The posterior cerebral artery (PCA) is an important artery that can be divided into four segments (P1-4): segments P1-2 are proximal segments, and segments P3-4 are distal segments. Various aneurysms can occur along the PCA trunk. True saccular aneurysms are rare, and most PCA trunk aneurysms are dissecting. Sometimes, the PCA trunk can give rise to flow-related aneurysms in association with high-flow arteriovenous shunt diseases or moyamoya disease and internal carotid artery occlusion. Some PCA trunk aneurysms require treatment, especially ruptured or large/giant aneurysms. Recently, endovascular treatment (EVT) has become the mainstream treatment for PCA trunk aneurysms, and it mainly involves reconstructive or deconstructive techniques. Traditional EVT includes selective coiling with/without stent or balloon assistance and parent artery occlusion (PAO). For proximal aneurysms, the PCA should be preserved. For distal aneurysms, PAO can be performed. However, during EVT, preservation of the PCA must naturally be the prime objective. Recently, flow-diverting stents have been used and are a revolutionary treatment for unruptured dissecting aneurysms of the PCA trunk. Despite the associated complications, EVT remains an effective method for treating PCA trunk aneurysms and can result in a good prognosis.