Long-term follow-up of aneurysms treated electively with woven stent-assisted coiling

Effect of Stent Porosity, Platelet Function Test Usage, and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Stenting for Cerebral Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of stents with various porosities for treating cerebral aneurysms requires dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) without clear guidelines on the utility of platelet function tests (PFTs) and the duration of DAPT. We sought to determine the effects of stent porosity, PFT usage, and DAPT duration on the radiographic and clinical outcomes after stenting of cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

PubMed was searched on March 29, 2021 for studies of cerebral aneurysm stenting that had specified the stent type and DAPT duration. A random effects meta-analysis was used to measure the prevalence of nonprocedural thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, clinical outcomes, aneurysm occlusion, and in-stent stenosis stratified by stent porosity, PFT usage, and DAPT duration.

RESULTS

The review yielded 105 studies (89 retrospective and 16 prospective) with 117 stenting cohorts (50 high porosity, 17 intermediate porosity, and 50 low porosity). In the high-, intermediate-, and low-porosity stenting cohorts, PFT usage was 26.0%, 47.1%, and 62.0% and the mean DAPT duration was 3.51 ± 2.33, 3.97 ± 1.92, and 5.18 ± 2.27 months, respectively. The intermediate-porosity stents showed a reduced incidence of hemorrhagic events (π = 0.32%) compared with low-porosity stents (π = 1.36%; P = 0.01) and improved aneurysm occlusion (π = 6.18%) compared with high-porosity stents (π = 14.42%; P = 0.001) and low-porosity stents (π = 11.71%; P = 0.04). The prevalence of in-stent stenosis was lower for the intermediate-porosity (π = 0.57%) and high-porosity (π = 1.51%) stents than for the low-porosity stents (π = 3.30%; P < 0.05). PFT use had resulted in fewer poor clinical outcomes (π = 3.54%) compared with those without PFT use (π = 5.94%; P = 0.04). The DAPT duration had no effect on the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present meta-analysis, which had selected for studies of cerebral aneurysm stenting that had reported the DAPT duration, intermediate-porosity stents and PFT use had resulted significantly improved outcomes. No effect of DAPT duration could be detected.

Outcomes of Microsurgical Clipping of Recurrent Aneurysms After Endovascular Coiling

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of microsurgery of previously coiled aneurysms have been poorly described, and little is known about the factors predictive of poor outcome. Here we aimed to identify predictors of poor outcome following microsurgery for previously coiled recurrent aneurysms.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained vascular database, we reviewed presentations, recurrent aneurysm measurements, surgery, and outcomes of microsurgical clipping of recurrent previously coiled intracranial aneurysms.

RESULTS

Our series comprised 39 patients (mean age, 49 years; range, 22-70 years) who underwent microsurgical clipping of 40 previously coiled intracranial aneurysms. One patient suffered seizures, 1 patient experienced transient neurologic worsening, and 1 patient developed hyponatraemia, none of whom had long-term sequelae. Two patients sustained postoperative infarcts, for an overall incidence of permanent morbidity of 5.1%. There were no deaths or rebleeds on follow-up. In 3 patients, including the 2 patients with infarct and 1 patient with a transient deficit, an attempt was made to remove the coil ball. These patients had larger aneurysms (1106 mm³ vs. 135 mm³; P = 0.005), with larger coil balls (257 mm³ vs. 52 mm³; P = 0.01) and wider necks (7.09 mm vs. 2.69 mm; P = 0.02) but smaller remnant heights (1.59 mm vs. 1.99 mm; P = 0.04). They were also more likely to have prolapsing coil loops (3/3 vs. 3/27; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates good clinical outcomes from microsurgical clipping of recurrent aneurysms. In the vast majority of cases, clips can be applied primarily. Coil ball removal is associated with increased morbidity, and thus should be considered only as a second-line option, with the likely need identified before the initiation of surgery.