Endovascular thrombectomy beyond 12 hours of stroke onset: a stroke network’s experience of late intervention

Stroke imaging modality for endovascular therapy in the extended window: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the extended time window, the guidelines recommend advanced imaging (ADVI) to select patients for endovascular therapy (EVT). However, questions remain regarding its availability and applicability in the real world. It is unclear whether an approach to the extended window EVT that does not use ADVI would be equivalent.

METHODS

In April 2022, a literature search was performed to identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies describing 90-day outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of the proportion of aggregate using a random effect to estimate rates of functional independence, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2 at 90 days, mean mRS, mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) stratified by imaging modality.

RESULTS

Four RCTs and 28 observational studies were included. The pooled proportion of functional independence among patients selected by ADVI was 44% (95% CI 39% to 48%; I2=80%) and 48% (95% CI 41% to 55%; I2=75%) with non-contrast CT/CT angiography (NCCT/CTA) (p=0.36). Mean mRS with ADVI was 2.88 (95% CI 2.36 to 3.41; I2=0.0%) and 2.79 (95% CI 2.31 to 3.27; I2=0.0%) with NCCT (p=0.79). Mortality in patients selected by ADVI was 13% (95% CI 10% to 17%; I2=81%) and 16% (95% CI 12% to 22%; I2=69%) with NCCT (p=0.29). sICH with ADVI was 4% (95% CI 3% to 7%; I2=73%) and 6% with NCCT/CTA (95% CI 4% to 8%; I2=6%, p=0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that, in anterior circulation LVO, the rates of functional independence may be similar when patients are selected using ADVI or NCCT for EVT in the extended time window. A simplified triage protocol does not seem to increase mortality or sICH. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021236092).

Outcomes with Endovascular Treatment of Patients with M2 Segment MCA Occlusion in the Late Time Window

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Randomized trials in the late window have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy in large-vessel occlusions. Patients with M2-segment MCA occlusions were excluded from these trials. We compared outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2-versus-M1 occlusions presenting 6-24 hours after symptom onset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analyses were on pooled data from studies enrolling patients with stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy 6-24 hours after symptom onset. We compared 90-day functional independence (mRS ≤ 2), mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and successful reperfusion (expanded TICI = 2b-3) between patients with M2 and M1 occlusions. The benefit of successful reperfusion was then assessed among patients with M2 occlusion.

RESULTS

Of 461 patients, 367 (79.6%) had M1 occlusions and 94 (20.4%) had M2 occlusions. Patients with M2 occlusions were older and had lower median baseline NIHSS scores. Patients with M2 occlusion were more likely to achieve 90-day functional independence than those with M1 occlusion (adjusted OR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.25-3.65). There were no significant differences in the proportion of successful reperfusion (82.9% versus 81.1%) or mortality (11.2% versus 17.2%). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage risk was lower in patients with M2-versus-M1 occlusions (4.3% versus 12.2%, P = .03). Successful reperfusion was independently associated with functional independence among patients with M2 occlusions (adjusted OR = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.11-7.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In the late time window, patients with M2 occlusions treated with endovascular thrombectomy achieved better clinical outcomes, similar reperfusion, and lower symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates compared with patients with M1 occlusion. These results support the safety and benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2 occlusions in the late window.

Recommendations on the use of computed tomography in the stroke code: Consensus document SENR, SERAU, GEECV-SEN, SERAM

The Spanish Society of Emergency Radiology (SERAU), the Spanish Society of Neuroradiology (SENR), the Spanish Society of Neurology through its Cerebrovascular Diseases Study Group (GEECV-SEN) and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM) have met to draft this consensus document that will review the use of computed tomography in the stroke code patients, focusing on its indications, the technique for its correct acquisition and the possible interpretation mistakes.

Stroke imaging prior to thrombectomy in the late window: results from a pooled multicentre analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Collateral assessment using CT angiography is a promising modality for selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours). The outcome of these patients compared with those selected using perfusion imaging is not clear.

METHODS

We pooled data from seven trials and registries of EVT-treated patients in the late-time window. Patients were classified according to the baseline imaging into collateral imaging alone (collateral cohort) and perfusion plus collateral imaging (perfusion cohort). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving independent 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 'mRS' 0-2). We used the propensity score-weighting method to balance important predictors between the cohorts.

RESULTS

In 608 patients, the median onset/last-known-well to emergency arrival time was 8.8 hours and 53.2% had wake-up strokes. Both cohorts had collateral imaging and 379 (62.3%) had perfusion imaging. Independent functional outcome was achieved in 43.1% overall: 168/379 patients (45.5%) in the perfusion cohort versus 94/214 (43.9%) in the collateral cohort (p=0.71). A logistic regression model adjusting for inverse-probability-weighting showed no difference in 90-day mRS score of 0-2 among the perfusion versus collateral cohorts (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.59, p=0.83) or in a favourable shift in 90-day mRS (common adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.47, p=0.97).

CONCLUSION

This pooled analysis of late window EVT showed comparable functional outcomes in patients selected for EVT using collateral imaging alone compared with patients selected using perfusion and collateral imaging.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020222003.

Acute stroke imaging selection for mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window: is it time to go back to basics? A review of current evidence

Treatment with endovascular therapy in the extended time window for acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion involves stringent selection criteria based on the two landmark studies DAWN and DEFUSE3. Current protocols typically include the requirement of advanced perfusion imaging which may exclude a substantial proportion of patients from receiving a potentially effective therapy. Efforts to offer endovascular reperfusion therapies to all appropriate candidates may be facilitated by the use of simplified imaging selection paradigms with widely available basic imaging techniques, such as non-contrast CT and CT angiography. Currently available evidence from our literature review suggests that patients meeting simplified imaging selection criteria may benefit as much as those patients selected using advanced imaging techniques (CT perfusion or MRI) from endovascular therapy in the extended time window. A comprehensive understanding of the role of imaging in patient selection is critical to optimising access to endovascular therapy in the extended time window and improving outcomes in acute stroke. This article provides an overview on current developments and future directions in this emerging area.

Sex-Related Differences in Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Late-Window Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sex-related differences exist in many aspects of acute stroke and were mainly investigated in the early time window with conflicting results. However, data regarding sex disparities in late presenters are scarce. Therefore, we sought to investigate differences in outcomes between women and men treated with endovascular treatment in the late time window.

METHODS

Analyses were based on the SOLSTICE Consortium (Selection of Late-Window Stroke for Thrombectomy by Imaging Collateral Extent), which was an individual-patient level analysis of seven trials and registries. Baseline characteristics, 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were compared between women and men. Effect of sex on the association of age and successful reperfusion (final Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3) with outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, time from onset to puncture, occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and successful reperfusion, with interaction terms.

RESULTS

Among 608 patients treated with endovascular treatment, 50.5% were women. Women were older than men (median age of 72 versus 68 years, P=0.02) and had a lower prevalence of tandem occlusions (14.0% versus 22.9%, P=0.005). Workflow times were similar between sexes. Adjusted outcomes did not differ between women and men. Functional independence at 90 days was achieved by 127 out of 292 women (43.5%) and 135 out of 291 men (46.4%). Mortality at 90 days (54 [18.5%] versus 48 [16.5%]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (37 [13.3%] versus 33 [11.6%]) were similar between women and men. There was no sex-by-age interaction on functional outcomes. However, men had higher likelihood of mortality (P_interaction=0.003) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P_interaction=0.017) with advancing age. Sex did not influence the relation between successful reperfusion and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter analysis of late patients treated with endovascular treatment, sex was not associated with functional outcome. However, sex influenced the association between age and safety outcomes, with men experiencing worse outcomes with advancing age.

Novel selection paradigms for endovascular stroke treatment in the extended time window

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The optimal selection methodology for stroke thrombectomy beyond 6 hours remains to be established.

METHODS

Review of a prospectively collected database of thrombectomy patients with anterior circulation strokes, adequate CT perfusion (CTP) maps, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)≥10 and presenting beyond 6 hours from January 2014 to October 2018. Patients were categorised according to five selection paradigms: DAWN clinical-core mismatch (DAWN-CCM): between age-adjusted NIHSS and CTP core, DEFUSE 3 perfusion imaging mismatch (DEFUSE-3-PIM): between CTP-derived perfusion defect (Tmax >6 s lesion) and ischaemic core volumes and three non-contrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS)-based criteria: age-adjusted clinical-ASPECTS mismatch (aCAM): between age-adjusted NIHSS and ASPECTS, eloquence-adjusted clinical ASPECTS mismatch (eCAM): ASPECTS 6-10 and non-involvement of the right M6 and left M4 areas and standard clinical ASPECTS mismatch (sCAM): ASPECTS 6-10.

RESULTS

310 patients underwent analysis. DEFUSE-3-PIM had the highest proportion of qualifying patients followed by sCAM, eCAM, aCAM and DAWN-CCM (93.5%, 92.6%, 90.6%, 90% and 84.5%, respectively). Patients meeting aCAM, eCAM, sCAM and DAWN-CCM criteria had higher rates of 90-day good outcome compared with their non-qualifying counterparts(43.2% vs 12%,p=0.002; 42.4% vs 17.4%, p=0.02; 42.4% vs 11.2%, p=0.009; and 43.7% vs 20.5%, p=0.007, respectively). There was no difference between patients meeting DEFUSE-3-PIM criteria versus not(40.8% vs 31.3%,p=0.45). In multivariate analysis, all selection modalities except for DEFUSE-3-PIM were independently associated with 90-day good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

ASPECTS-based selection paradigms for late presenting and wake-up strokes ET have comparable proportions of qualifying patients and similar 90-day functional outcomes as DAWN-CCM and DEFUSE-3-PIM. They also might lead to better outcome discrimination. These could represent a potential alternative for centres where access to advanced imaging is limited.

Imaging Acute Stroke: From One-Size-Fit-All to Biomarkers

In acute stroke management, time window has been rigidly used as a guide for decades and the reperfusion treatment is only available in the first few limited hours. Recently, imaging-based selection of patients has successfully expanded the treatment window out to 16 and even 24 h in the DEFUSE 3 and DAWN trials, respectively. Recent guidelines recommend the use of imaging techniques to guide therapeutic decision-making and expanded eligibility in acute ischemic stroke. A tissue window is proposed to replace the time window and serve as the surrogate marker for potentially salvageable tissue. This article reviews the evolution of time window, addresses the advantage of a tissue window in precision medicine for ischemic stroke, and discusses both the established and emerging techniques of neuroimaging and their roles in defining a tissue window. We also emphasize the metabolic imaging and molecular imaging of brain pathophysiology, and highlight its potential in patient selection and treatment response prediction in ischemic stroke.

Acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset or in extended time windows: an individualized approach

Recent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have revolutionized acute ischemic stroke care by extending the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies in time windows that have been originally considered futile or even unsafe. Both systemic and endovascular reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve outcome in patients with wake-up strokes or symptom onset beyond 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis and beyond 6 h for endovascular treatment; however, they require advanced neuroimaging to select stroke patients safely. Experts have proposed simpler imaging algorithms but high-quality data on safety and efficacy are currently missing. RCTs used diverse imaging and clinical inclusion criteria for patient selection during the dawn of this novel stroke treatment paradigm. After taking into consideration the dismal prognosis of nonrecanalized ischemic stroke patients and the substantial clinical benefit of reperfusion therapies in selected late presenters, we propose rescue reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients not fulfilling all clinical and imaging inclusion criteria as an option in a subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological profiles suggesting low risk for complications, notably hemorrhagic transformation as well as local or remote parenchymal hemorrhage. Incorporating new data to treatment algorithms may seem perplexing to stroke physicians, since treatment and imaging capabilities of each stroke center may dictate diverse treatment pathways. This narrative review will summarize current data that will assist clinicians in the selection of those late presenters that will most likely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies. Different treatment algorithms are provided according to available neuroimaging and endovascular treatment capabilities.

ASPECTS-based selection for late endovascular treatment: a retrospective two-site cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The DAWN trial demonstrated the effectiveness of late endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients selected on the basis of a clinical-core mismatch. We explored in a real-world sample of endovascular treatment patients if a clinical-ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) mismatch was associated with an outcome benefit after late endovascular treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients admitted 6-24 h after last proof of good health in two stroke centers, with initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥10 and an internal carotid artery or M1 occlusion. We defined clinical-ASPECTS mismatch as NIHSS ≥ 10 and ASPECTS ≥ 7, or NIHSS ≥ 20 and ASPECTS ≥ 5. We assessed the interaction between the presence of the clinical-ASPECTS mismatch and late endovascular treatment using ordinal shift analysis of the three-month modified Rankin Scale and adjusting for multiple confounders.

RESULTS

The included 337 patients had a median age of 73 years (IQR = 61-82), admission NIHSS of 18 (15-22), and baseline ASPECTS of 7 (5-9). Out of 196 (58.2%) patients showing clinical-ASPECTS mismatch, 146 (74.5%) underwent late endovascular treatment. Among 141 (41.8%) mismatch negative patients, late endovascular treatment was performed in 72 (51.1%) patients. In the adjusted analysis, late endovascular treatment was significantly associated with a better outcome in the presence of clinical-ASPECTS mismatch (adjusted odd ratio, aOR = 2.83; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.48-5.58) but not in its absence (aOR = 1.32; 95%CI: 0.61-2.84). The p-value for the interaction term between clinical-ASPECTS mismatch and late endovascular treatment was 0.073.

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective two-site analysis, late endovascular treatment seemed effective in the presence of a clinical-ASPECTS mismatch, but not in its absence. If confirmed in randomized trials, this finding could support the use of an ASPECTS-based selection for late endovascular treatment decisions, obviating the need for advanced imaging.

Endovascular treatment in anterior circulation stroke beyond 6.5 hours after onset or time last seen well: results from the MR CLEAN Registry

Background

Randomised controlled trials with perfusion selection have shown benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischaemic stroke between 6 and 24 hours after symptom onset or time last seen well. However, outcomes after EVT in these late window patients without perfusion imaging are largely unknown. We assessed their characteristics and outcomes in routine clinical practice.

Methods

The Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands Registry, a prospective, multicentre study in the Netherlands, included patients with an anterior circulation occlusion who underwent EVT between 2014 and 2017. CT perfusion was no standard imaging modality. We used adjusted ordinal logistic regression analysis to compare patients treated within versus beyond 6.5 hours after propensity score matching on age, prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS), collateral status, location of occlusion and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Outcomes included 3-month mRS score, functional independence (defined as mRS 0–2), and death.

Results

Of 3264 patients who underwent EVT, 106 (3.2%) were treated beyond 6.5 hours (median 8.5, IQR 6.9–10.6), of whom 93 (87.7%) had unknown time of stroke onset. CT perfusion was not performed in 87/106 (80.2%) late window patients. Late window patients were younger (mean 67 vs 70 years, p<0.04) and had slightly lower ASPECTS (median 8 vs 9, p<0.01), but better collateral status (collateral score 2–3: 68.3% vs 57.7%, p=0.03). No differences were observed in proportions of functional independence (43.3% vs 40.5%, p=0.57) or death (24.0% vs 28.9%, p=0.28). After matching, outcomes remained similar (adjusted common OR for 1 point improvement in mRS 1.04, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.93).

Conclusions

Without the use of CT perfusion selection criteria, EVT in the 6.5–24-hour time window was not associated with poorer outcome in selected patients with favourable clinical and CT/CT angiography characteristics. randomised controlled trials with lenient inclusion criteria are needed to identify more patients who can benefit from EVT in the late window.

Endovascular stroke treatment after 6-24 hours only needs non-contrast CT

OBJECTIVES

Imaging selected patients with proximal anterior circulation stroke who demonstrate limited infarct may benefit from endovascular treatment beyond conventional time limits. Our aim was to evaluate the results of the EVT group series arriving between 6 and 24 hours from the onset of symptoms with (ASPECTS) ≥7 to our hospital (with 24/7 interventional neuroradiology) comparing them with those obtained in our prospectively registered series arriving between 0 and 6 hours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The inclusion criteria were ≥18 years, an interval between stroke and endovascular treatment of 6-24 hours, prestroke score mRS 0-2, no intracranial haemorrhage, (NIHSS) scale 8-22 and infarct evaluated by CT scan ≥7 in ASPECTS scale. Data, including patient demographics, neuroimaging findings, procedural details, recanalization rates and 90-day mRS, were collected.

RESULTS

Twelve of the 14 (85.71%) endovascular group patients who came to our centre between 6 and 24 hours had good outcomes at 90 days. To confirm our findings, we evaluated patients treated at our centre who met the selection criteria from January 2017 to September 2019. In this period, 382 patients with large vessel occlusion were treated endovascularly. 56 patients met all the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for our study. 31 of these 56 patients (56.36%) obtained a (mRS) scale ≤2 at three months. There was no significant difference (P = 0.063).

CONCLUSION

In circumstances of difficult access to MRI or CT perfusion, a computed tomography of ASPECTS ≥7 is sufficient to indicate endovascular treatment in a stroke of known onset between 6 and 24 hours.

Noncontrast Computed Tomography e-Stroke Infarct Volume Is Similar to RAPID Computed Tomography Perfusion in Estimating Postreperfusion Infarct Volumes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The e-Stroke Suite software (Brainomix, Oxford, United Kingdom) is a tool designed for the automated quantification of The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score and ischemic core volumes on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). We sought to compare the prediction of postreperfusion infarct volumes and the clinical outcomes across NCCT e-Stroke software versus RAPID (IschemaView, Menlo Park, CA) computed tomography perfusion measurements.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke presenting at a tertiary care center between September 2010 and November 2018 who had available baseline infarct volumes on both NCCT e-Stroke Suite software and RAPID CTP as well as final infarct volume (FIV) measurements and achieved complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale 2c-3) post-thrombectomy were included. The associations between estimated baseline ischemic core volumes and FIV as well as 90-day functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 years (55-75), median e-Stroke and computed tomography perfusion ischemic core volumes were 38.4 (21.8-58) and 5 (0-17.7) mL, respectively, whereas median FIV was 22.2 (9.1-56.2) mL. The correlation between e-Stroke and CTP ischemic core volumes was moderate (R=0.44; P<0.001). Similarly, moderate correlations were observed between e-Stroke software ischemic core and FIV (R=0.52; P<0.001) and CTP core and FIV (R=0.43; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that e-Stroke software and CTP performance was similar in the early and late (>6 hours) treatment windows. Multivariate analysis showed that both e-Stroke software NCCT baseline ischemic core volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]) and RAPID CTP ischemic core volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]) were independently and comparably associated with good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

NCCT e-Stroke Suite software performed similarly to RAPID CTP in assessing postreperfusion FIV and functional outcomes for both early- and late-presenting patients. NCCT e-Stroke volumes seems to represent a viable alternative in centers where access to advanced imaging is limited. Moreover, the future development of fusion maps of NCCT and CTP ischemic core estimates may improve upon the current performance of these tools as applied in isolation.

Oxygen metabolism MRI - A comparison with perfusion imaging in a rat model of MCA branch occlusion and reperfusion

The penumbra is sustained by an increased extraction of oxygen (OEF) from blood to brain tissue. Metabolic imaging may improve penumbra specificity when examining stroke patients with wake-up stroke and a long time between admission and symptom onset. We used MRI to examine OEF, and compared the volume of regions with elevated OEF to the volume of regions with perfusion deficit in a M2 occlusion model (M2CAO) with preserved collateral blood flow. OEF was calculated from BOLD MRI examining tissue R2', with ASL perfusion imaging employed to determine cerebral blood flows (CBF) and volumes. Diffusion imaging was used to identify the ischemic core (IC). Examinations were performed during and after transient M2CAO in rats. The IC-OEF mismatch was significantly smaller than the IC-CBF mismatch during M2CAO. The penumbra OEF was significantly increased during M2CAO, and decreased significantly after reperfusion. The IC-OEF mismatch may provide increased penumbra specificity compared to IC-CBF mismatch regimens. Results strongly indicate the potential of metabolic MRI for thrombectomy patient selection in cases with a long time from symptom onset to admission. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of reperfusion in alleviating metabolic disturbances in ischemic regions, emphasizing fast treatment to achieve significant neurological recovery in stroke patients.

May endovascular thrombectomy without CT perfusion improve clinical outcome?

BACKGROUND

DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials demonstrated the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy in late-presenting acute ischemic strokes due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. The aim of our study is to evaluate results of endovascular thrombectomy in large intracranial vessel occlusion without perfusion CT patient selection.

METHODS

we reviewed our prospectively collected endovascular databases for patients with an acute stroke from March 2016 to October 2018, treated after 6 h from stroke onset, without perfusion CT selection. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and outcomes were evaluated. A good outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. The association between clinical and procedural parameters and functional outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

out of 212 patients 55 were treated after 6 h from stroke onset, 49 of which for an anterior circulation occlusion. 18/49 were functional independent at 90 days (mRS 0-2), Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b to 3) was achieved in 38/49 patients (77 %). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a low baseline NIHSS was associated with favorable outcome (OR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.52-0.83, p-value 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

in our retrospective analysis, baseline NIHSS is the only parameter that can predict good outcome (90-days mRS 0-2). We confirm data from recent papers assessing that perfusion CT can provide a better patients' selection compared to mCTA for large vessels occlusion treated beyond six hours from symptom onset.

[Retrospective analysis of endovascular thrombectomy in anterior cerebral circulation out of 6-hours «therapeutic window» in regional vascular centers of Saint-Petersburg]

OBJECTIVE

Based on a retrospective analysis, to evaluate technical results and functional outcomes at discharge after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in anterior circulation out of 6-hours «therapeutic window» in patients with stroke.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective analysis of EVT in 594 acute stroke patients (303 male, 291 female, median age 69 years) with the anterior circulation large vessel occlusion was performed. EVT was carried out before 6 hrs in 550, later in 44 patients. Time to artery puncture was defined as a cut point. Patients were included in the study if they met the criterion for 0-6 hours «therapeutic window».

RESULTS

No significant differences in functional outcomes at discharge assessed with the Rankin scale (mRs 0-2 29.8% and 20.5% p<0.19; mRs 3-5 38.7% and 38.6% p<0.99; mRs 6 31.5% and 40.9% p<0.2) and the rates of intracranial haemorrhage, haemorrhagic transformation and symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation (4% and 0% p<0.17; 20.9% and 29.5% p<0.49; 10.1% and 11.4% p<0.78) were observed in patients exposed to EVT before 6 hrs and later.

CONCLUSION

EVT in anterior circulation stroke over 6 hrs «therapeutic window» based on the criterion for 0-6 hrs provides comparable functional outcomes at discharge without the increase in the frequency of intracranial haemorrhages, haemorrhagic and symptomatic haemorrhagic transformations.

Endovascular Treatment After Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion for Patients Presenting Very Late From Time Last Known Well

IMPORTANCE

Endovascular treatment (EVT) after ischemic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion is usually constrained by a specific window of less than 16 to 24 hours from the time the patient was last known well (LKW). Patients with slow progression and tenacious collateral circulation may persist beyond 16 hours.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of salvageable tissues 16 hours or more from LKW after ischemic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion and investigate the effectiveness of EVT in delayed large vessel occlusion.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In this case-control study, from a total of 8032 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack who were admitted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, to a single referral university hospital, 150 patients were retrospectively identified who had an acute ischemic stroke with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusion, had a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or more, and arrived 16 hours or more from time LKW. The decision for EVT was made by a treating physician according to the institutional protocol.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Baseline ischemic core, collateral circulation status, and computed tomographic or magnetic resonance perfusion parameters were retrospectively quantified. Follow-up images, evaluated a median of 93 hours (interquartile range, 66-120 hours) after arrival, were used to assess the final infarct and hemorrhagic transformation. The main outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days.

RESULTS

For 150 patients (81 men [54%]; mean [SD] age at onset, 70.1 [13.0] years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 [interquartile range, 8-18]), the median ischemic core volume was 11.5 mL (interquartile range, 0-39.1 mL), the median penumbra volume (>6 seconds) was 55.0 mL (interquartile range, 15-128 mL), and the median mismatch ratio was 4.0 (interquartile range, 0.9-18.3). By the imaging inclusion criteria for EVT trials, there were 50 DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo)-eligible patients (33%), 58 DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke)-eligible patients (39%), and 57 ESCAPE (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times)-eligible patients (38%). Endovascular treatment was performed for 24 patients (16%). In propensity score-matched analyses, EVT was associated with better odds of a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (adjusted odds ratio, 11.08 [95% CI, 1.88-108.60]) and a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score shift (common adjusted odds ratio, 5.17 [95% CI, 1.80-15.62]). Type 2 parenchymal hemorrhage was seen in 3 of 24 patients (13%) who received EVT and in 4 of 126 patients (3%) who received medical management (adjusted odds ratio, 4.06 [95% CI, 0.63-26.30]). In a subgroup of 109 patients who were 24 hours from time LKW, EVT was associated with a favorable mRS shift (common adjusted odds ratio, 10.54 [95% CI, 2.18-59.34]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting very late (>16 hours to 10 days) from the time they were LKW may benefit from EVT.

Non-Contrast CT and CT-Angiogram for Late Window Ischemic Stroke Treatment Selection

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of late window endovascular treatment (EVT) for anterior circulation ischemic stroke has been demonstrated using perfusion-based neuroimaging. We evaluated whether non-contrast CT (NCCT) and CT-angiogram (CTA) alone can select late-presenting patients for EVT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective comparison of all patients undergoing EVT at a single comprehensive stroke center from January 2016 to April 2017. Patients planned for EVT were divided into early (<6 hours from onset) and late (≥6 hours from onset or last time seen normal) window groups. Incidence of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformations (sHTs) at 24 hours and 3-month modified Rankin scores (mRSs) were compared.

RESULTS

During the study period, 204 (82%) patients underwent EVT in the early and 44 (18%) in the late window. Median (interquartile range) NIH Stroke Scale Score was similar between groups (early: 18 [15-23] vs. late: 17 [13-21]), as were median ASPECT scores (early: 9 [8-10] vs. late: 9 [7-9]). In the late window, 42 (95%) strokes were of unknown onset. Similar proportions of sHT occurred at 24 hours (early: 12 [6%] vs. late: 4 [9%], p = 0.43). At 3 months, the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (mRS 0-2) were comparable in the early (80/192 [42%]) and late (16/41 [39%]) windows (p = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

NCCT- and CTA-based patient selection led to similar functional independence outcomes and low proportions of sHT in the early and late windows. In centers without access to perfusion-based neuroimaging, this pragmatic approach could be safe, particularly for strokes of unknown onset.

Imaging Triage of Patients with Late-Window (6-24 Hours) Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Study Using Multiphase CT Angiography versus CT Perfusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of collateral imaging in selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy beyond 6 hours from onset has not been established. To assess the comparative utility of collateral imaging using multiphase CTA in selecting late window patients for EVT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used data from a prospective multicenter observational study in which all patients underwent imaging with multiphase CT angiography as well as CTP. Two blinded reviewers evaluated patients' eligibility for endovascular thrombectomy using published collateral imaging (multiphase CTA) criteria compared with CTP using the selection criteria of the Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention with Trevo (DAWN) and Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3 (DEFUSE-3) trials. CTP images were processed using automated commercial software. The outcomes of patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy according to multiphase CTA, DAWN, or DEFUSE-3 criteria were compared using multivariable logistic regression modeling. Model characteristics were compared using the C-statistic for the receiver operating characteristic curve, the Akaike information criterion, and the Bayesian information criterion.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients presented beyond 6 hours from onset/last known well (median, 9.6 hours; interquartile range, 4.1 hours). Thirty-five patients (40.7%) received endovascular thrombectomy, of whom good functional outcome (90-day mRS, 0-2) was achieved in 16/35 (47%). Collateral-based imaging paradigms significantly modified the treatment effect of endovascular thrombectomy on 90-day mRS 0-2 (P _interaction = .007). The multiphase CTA-based regression model best fit the data for the 90-day outcome (C-statistic, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94) and was associated with the least information loss (Akaike information criterion, 95.7; Bayesian information criterion, 114.9) compared with CTP-based models.

CONCLUSIONS

The collateral-based imaging paradigm using multiphase CTA compares well with CTP in selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy in the late time window.

Review of external referrals to a regional stroke centre: it is not just about thrombectomy

AIMS

To determine the experience of a regional stroke referral centre of external referrals for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with symptoms of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and large vessel occlusion (LVO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected prospectively over two 4-month periods (2017-2018) on consecutive external referrals for EVT. Baseline demographics, imaging findings, and key time parameters were recorded. Reasons for not transferring patients and for not performing EVT were recorded. Key time intervals were calculated and compared between the transferred and non-transferred group with and without intracranial occlusion and between the transferred patients who underwent thrombectomy and those who did not.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two patients were referred. Sixty-one percent (n=159) were accepted and transferred for treatment. Of those transferred, 86% (n=136) had EVT. Fourteen percent (n=23) were unsuitable for EVT on arrival due to no vessel occlusion (48% n=11), poor Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS)/established infarct (30%, n=7) haemorrhage (9%, n=2), and clinical recovery (13% n=3). One hundred and three patients (39%) were ineligible for EVT following phone discussion due to absence of intracranial occlusion (59%, n=61), low ASPECTS (22%, n=23), distal occlusion (4%, n=4), low/improving National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; 10.7%, n=11), and poor modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at baseline (3%, n=3). Patients with LVO but not transferred had longer onset to hospital arrival time compared with those transferred 151.5 versus 91 minutes (p<0.005), with a trend also toward a longer door to CT/CTA 40 minutes versus 30 minutes (p=0.142).

CONCLUSION

These data provide valuable insights into the service provision of a comprehensive stroke network. The present rates of EVT and futile transfers are modest compared to published data. Access to neuroradiology and specialised stroke assessment is crucial to optimise time to treatment.

Outcome, efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy in ischaemic stroke according to time to reperfusion: data from a multicentre registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) of the anterior circulation (AC) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT), data point to a decline of treatment effect with increasing time from symptom onset to treatment. However, the magnitude of the decline will depend on the clinical setting and imaging selection used. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the clinical effect of time to reperfusion (TTR); and (2) to assess the safety and technical efficacy of MT according to strata of TTR.

METHODS

Using the retrospective multicentre BEYOND-SWIFT registry data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03496064), we compared safety and efficacy of MT in 1461 patients between TTR strata of 0-180 min (n = 192), 180-360 min (n = 876) and >360 min (n = 393). Clinical effect of TTR was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for pre-specified confounders [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)]. Primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale: mRS 0-2) at day 90.

RESULTS

Every hour delay in TTR was a significant factor related to mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.933, 95% CI 0.887-0.981) with an estimated 1.5% decreased probability of good functional outcome per hour delay of reperfusion, and mRS 0-1 (aOR 0.929, 95% CI 0.877-0.985). Patients with late TTR had lower rates of successful and excellent reperfusion, higher complication rates and number of passes.

CONCLUSIONS

TTR is an independent factor related to long-term functional outcome. With increasing TTR, interventional procedures become technically less effective. Efforts should be made to shorten TTR through optimized prehospital and in-hospital pathways.

NCCT and CTA-based imaging protocol for endovascular treatment selection in late presenting or wake-up strokes

Introduction

Recently, the benefit of selecting patients for endovascular treatment (EVT) beyond the 6-hour time window using a tissue-based approach was demonstrated in two randomized trials. The optimal imaging protocol for selecting patients is under debate, and it is still unknown if a simpler and faster protocol may adequately select patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) and late-presenting stroke (LPS) for EVT.

Objective

To compare outcomes of patients submitted to EVT presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset or 6–24 hours after last seen well, selected using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA).

Methods

An observational study was performed, which included consecutive patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated with EVT. Patients presenting within 6 hours were treated if their NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was ≥6 and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) was ≥6, while patients presenting with WUS or 6–24 hours after last seen well (WUS/LPS) were treated if their NIHSSscore was ≥12 and ASPECTS was ≥7.

Results

249 patients were included, 63 of whom were in the WUS/LPS group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for longer symptom-recanalization time, lower admission NIHSS (16 vs 17, P=0.038), more frequent tandem occlusions (25.4% vs 11.8%, P=0.010), and large artery atherosclerosis etiology (22.2% vs 11.8%, P=0.043) in the WUS/LPS group. No differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, peri-procedural complications or mortality were found between groups. Three-month functional independence was similar in both groups (65.1% in WUS/LPS vs 57.0% in ≤6 hours, P=0.259) and no differences were found after adjustment for confounders.

Conclusions

This real-world observational study suggests that EVT may be safe and effective in patients with WUS and LPS selected using clinical-core mismatch (high NIHSS/high ASPECTS in NCCT).