Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of basilar tip aneurysms

Risk factors for recanalization of basilar tip aneurysm after endovascular treatment: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular treatment (EVT) of basilar tip aneurysms (BTAs) is arduous because of the lesions' angioarchitecture and the relatively high recanalization rate after EVT. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical characteristics of BTAs and evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for recanalization.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five patients with BTAs (11 ruptured, 114 unruptured) treated with EVT between 2009 and 2019 at one institution were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 113 patients were included in statistical analyses. The anatomical parameters of the aneurysms and clinical data were analyzed. Univariate (chi-square test and t-test) and multivariate (multiple logistic regression) analyses were performed to identify risk factors for recanalization.

RESULTS

        Recanalization of the BTA occurred in 15 patients (13.3%). One patient (0.9%) was retreated endovascularly. The mean follow-up duration was 49.8 months. Neck size, posterior cerebral artery (PCA) angle, maximum diameter, and the rupture rate differed significantly between the recanalization and non-recanalization groups (P=.007, P<.001, P=.006, and P=.048, respectively). The maximum diameter (odds ratio, 1.483 per mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.145-1.919; P=.003) and PCA angle (odds ratio, 1.020 per degree; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.039; P=.036) were independently associated with recanalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all investigated BTAs, 96.8% were wide-neck aneurysms. The recanalization rate of BTAs after EVT was 13.3%. The PCA angle and maximal aneurysmal diameter were independently associated with recanalization; no associations were observed regarding vertebral artery dominance or modality of treatment. As such, BTA patients with wide PCA angles should be carefully monitored over time.

The Lateral Supraorbital Craniotomy Approach for Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Modern Surgical Case Series in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND

The lateral supraorbital (LSO) approach is a minimally invasive modification of the standard pterional approach to anterior circulation aneurysms. This study aimed to describe a dual-trained cerebrovascular neurosurgeon's first 18-month experience with the LSO approach, including decision-making criteria and lessons learned.

METHODS

This retrospective case series analyzed 50 consecutive patients treated with LSO craniotomy for aneurysm clipping by a single surgeon. Aneurysms were separated into 3 categories by location: internal carotid artery, anterior communicating artery, and middle cerebral artery. Surgical characteristics were evaluated for differences by location and rupture status.

RESULTS

Aneurysm clipping via LSO was performed on 57 aneurysms in 50 patients. Fixed retraction was employed less often in patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms than in patients with anterior communicating artery, middle cerebral artery, or multiple aneurysms (10% vs. 68.2%, 45.5%, and 42.9, P = 0.02). Of patients, 26 (52%) presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage; the majority of patients (92.3%) had Hunt and Hess grade I-III. No differences were noted in intraoperative rupture rates, fixed retractor use, operative duration, or estimated blood loss by rupture status. Adverse events included permanent frontalis nerve palsy in 1 patient (2%), temporalis atrophy in 1 patient, and transient aphasia in 1 patient. No postoperative hematomas or strokes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The LSO approach can safely and effectively treat anterior circulation aneurysms and should be considered a viable minimally invasive option for aneurysm clipping. Further studies comparing the LSO approach with other cranial approaches are needed.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Thailand

BACKGROUND

For patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand covers the full costs of surgical and endovascular procedures except for those of embolization coils and assisting devices. Costs and effectiveness were compared between endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping to inform reimbursement policy decisions.

METHODS

Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared between coiling and clipping using the decision tree and Markov models. Mortality and functional outcomes of clipping were derived from national and hospital databases, and relative efficacies of coiling were obtained from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Risks of rebleeding were abstracted from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. Costs of the primary treatments, retreatments and follow-up care as well as utilities were obtained from hospital-based data. Non-health and indirect costs were abstracted from standard cost lists.

RESULTS

Coiling and clipping contributed 10.59 and 9.28 QALYs to patients aged in their 50s. Under the societal and healthcare perspectives, the incremental costs incurred by coiling compared with clipping were US$1923 and $4343, respectively, which were equal to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$1470 and $3321 per QALY gained, respectively. Coiling became a cost-saving option when the costs of coil devices were reduced by 65.7%. At the country's cost-effectiveness threshold of US$5156, the probability of coiling being cost-effective was 71.3% and 65.6%, under the societal and healthcare perspectives, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment for aSAH is cost-effective and this evidence supports coverage by national insurance.

Surgical Versus Endovascular Management of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Emergent Issues and Future Directions

Ideal management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) and ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) is a controversial issue. Over the last few decades, a significant paradigm shift has occurred away from open microsurgical clipping toward endovascular coil embolization. Multiple studies have been performed with mixed results. Some studies suggest that endovascular treatment produces better clinical and functional outcomes, but is associated with increased need for retreatment. Other studies report increased durability in aneurysms treated with microsurgical clipping, but that clipping may be associated with worse functional outcomes in some cases. Further complicating the dialogue are variable costs associated with different treatment modalities, including country-dependent cost differences. Here we provide a review of some of the major studies comparing open surgery versus endovascular treatment for both RIAs and UIAs to distill their key findings and corresponding implications for clinical practice. We relate these research results to our institution's experience with RIAs and UIAs and describe our approach to treatment of these conditions. Finally, we discuss implications of the paradigm shift for both open and endovascular surgery, including educational initiatives directed toward preserving important microsurgical tenets in the setting of diminishing surgical volume.