Evaluation of the radiosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a retrospective single-center analysis of three decades

Natural history and clinical manifestation of Pediatric Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are aberrant arteriovenous shunts through a vascular nidus with no intervening capillary beds. They are one of the commonest causes of spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in children and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in cases of rupture. Treatment strategies include microsurgical resection, endovascular embolisation, stereotactic radiosurgery, multimodality treatment with a combination thereof, and particularly in high-grade bAVMs, conservative management. Clinicians involved in treating bAVMs need to have familiarity with the natural history pertaining to bAVMs in terms of risk of rupture, risk factors elevating rupture risk as well as understanding the clinical manifestations of bAVMs. This invited review serves to provide a synthesis on natural history and clinical presentation of bAVMs with particular focus in children to inform decision-making pertaining to management.

Radiosurgery With Prior Embolization Versus Radiosurgery Alone for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of adjuvant embolization to radiosurgery has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the relative efficacy and safety of radiosurgery with adjuvant embolization vs radiosurgery alone remain uncertain. Moreover, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have included a limited number of studies and did not consider the effects of baseline characteristics, including AVM volume, on the outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preradiosurgery embolization for intracranial AVMs with consideration to matching status between participants in each treatment group.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of preradiosurgery embolization were included.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies (9 matched and 71 unmatched) with a total of 12 088 patients were included. The mean age of the included patients was 32.41 years, and 48.91% of the patients were female. Preradiosurgery embolization was used for larger AVMs and patients with previous hemorrhage ( P < .01, P = .02, respectively). The obliteration rate for preradiosurgery embolization (49.44%) was lower compared with radiosurgery alone (61.42%, odds ratio = 0.56, P < .01), regardless of the matching status of the analyzed studies. Although prior embolization was associated higher rate of cyst formation ( P = .04), it lowered the odds of radiation-induced changes ( P = .04). The risks of minor and major neurological deficits, postradiosurgery hemorrhage, and mortality were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that although preradiosurgery embolization is a suitable option to reduce the AVM size for future radiosurgical interventions, it may not be useful for same-sized AVMs eligible for radiosurgery. Utilization of preradiosurgery embolization in suitable lesions for radiosurgery may result in the added cost and burden of an endovascular procedure.

CyberKnife based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as an upfront treatment for cerebral arteriovenous malformation

BACKGROUND

To explore the therapeutic outcomes of CyberKnife based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (CKFRT) for patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM).

METHODS

Between January 2008 and October 2020, 45 patients underwent CKFRT for cerebral AVMs as a first treatment. The delineation of AVM targets included AVM nidus. The mean target volume was 4.07 cm3, and 9 lesions (20%) were larger than 10.0 cm3. The mean marginal dose was 24 Gy (range, 20-35 Gy). CKFRT was delivered in median 3 fractions (range, 2 ∼ 5 fractions). AVM obliteration following CKFRT was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or angiography.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 47 (5-148) months, complete obliteration and partial obliteration of AVM after CKFRT were obtained in 23 (51%) and 13 (29%) patients, respectively. Median time to complete obliteration was 39 (15-63) months. The cumulative probability of complete obliteration rate at 3 years was 47%. Complete obliteration rate of AVM was associated with Radiosurgery-based AVM score, which was consisted of AVM volume, patients age, and AVM location. One (2%) patient had hemorrhage during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

CKFRT is an effective primary treatment for patients with cerebral AVMs with a low hemorrhage risk.

Analysis of potential time saving in brain arteriovenous malformation stereotactic radiosurgery planning using a new software platform

To evaluate the utility of integrating a 3D vessel tree co-registration software platform into the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) workflow and its time saving for brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) treatment in adults compared to the conventional stereotactic head frame workflow. Eight consecutive adult bAVM cases were selected and retrospectively reviewed. Total number of angiograms and SRS procedures were 8. The electronic medical records were analyzed by time stamps to determine the length of time for each component of the set-up, transport, and frame removal. Times were averaged and the start of sedation by anesthesia used as a surrogate for the start of the frame application process. Reductions in workflow times were then modeled assuming cerebral angiography as a separate procedure. There were 8 adult bAVM cases included. Six were female. All patients had a single treatment session. Average age was 51.5 years (Range: 36-71). All patients were treated under monitored anesthesia care. In 6 patients, the AVM was deeply located (basal ganglia, midbrain, brainstem); in 2 cases, the lesion was frontal. Spetzler-Martin grades were 4 (50%) Grade 2 and 4 (50%) Grade 3. The average prescription isodose volume (PIV) and 12 Gy volumes (V_12Gy) were 0.85 cc and 1.74 cc, respectively. The mean time from frame application to arrival in the angiography room was 111.5 minutes (range 40 to 171 min; median 107 min; SD 35.3 min); transport from angiography room to SRS was 47.5 minutes (range 15 to 107 min; median 36 min; SD 31.1 min), and frame removal after SRS was 20.5 minutes (range 10 to 47 min; median 16 min; SD 11.6 min). The average total additional time for the entire process of frame application, patient transportation, and frame removal was 132 minutes (range 87 to 181 min; median 127.5 min; SD 28.4 min). Therefore, assuming a non-frame based workflow and with angiography performed ahead of the actual radiosurgical treatment, the total time savings on the day of treatment was estimated at 132 minutes (range 87 to 181 min; median 127.5 min; SD 28.4 min). The ability to perform angiography, image fusion, and treatment planning for the actual day-of-delivery using 3-dimensional vessel tree co-registration could result in significant time savings over traditional workflow practices. Further experience with this system will evaluate its accuracy, reproducibility, and potential broader use in SRS workflow paradigms for the treatment of vascular pathologies. For bAVMs, the benefits of this time savings might allow for streamlined workflows on the day of SRS.

Chronic encapsulated expanding hematomas after stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare cerebral vascular lesions that are associated with high morbidity and mortality from hemorrhage; however, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-validated treatment modality. Few reports have delineated a subgroup of patients who develop delayed chronic encapsulated expanding hematomas (CEEHs) despite angiographic evidence of AVM obliteration following radiosurgery. In this report, the authors performed a retrospective review of more than 1000 radiosurgically treated intracranial AVM cases to delineate the incidence and management of this rare entity.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2019, 1010 patients with intracranial AVM underwent Gamma Knife SRS at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. In addition to a review of a prospective institutional database, the authors performed a retrospective chart review of the departmental AVM database to specifically identify patients with CEEH. Pertinent clinical and radiological characteristics as well as patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty patients with intracranial AVM (94%) had sufficient clinical follow-up for analysis. Of these, 6 patients with CEEH underwent delayed resection (incidence rate of 0.0045 event per person-year). These patients included 4 males and 2 females with a mean age of 45.3 ± 13.8 years at the time of initial SRS. Four patients had smaller AVM volumes (4.9-10 cm3), and 3 of them were treated with a single SRS procedure. Two patients had larger-volume AVMs (55 and 56 cm3), and both underwent multimodal management that included staged SRS and embolization. Time to initial recognition of the CEEH after initial SRS ranged between 66 and 243 months. The time between CEEH recognition and resection ranged from 2 to 9 months. Resection was required because of progressive neurological symptoms that correlated with imaging evidence of gradual hematoma expansion. All 6 patients had angiographically confirmed obliteration of their AVM. Pathology revealed a mixed chronicity hematoma with areas of fibrosed blood vessels and rare areas of neovascularization with immature blood vessels but no evidence of a persistent AVM. All 6 patients reported persistent clinical improvement after hematoma resection.

CONCLUSIONS

CEEH after SRS for AVM is a rare complication with an incidence rate of 0.0045 event per person-year over the authors' 30-year experience. When clinical symptoms progress and imaging reveals progressive enlargement over time, complete resection of a CEEH results in significant clinical recovery. Knowledge of this rare entity facilitates timely detection and eventual surgical intervention to achieve optimal outcomes.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Robotic Radiosurgery of Arteriovenous Malformations

Objective

CyberKnife offers CT- and MRI-based treatment planning without the need for stereotactically acquired DSA. The literature on CyberKnife treatment of cerebral AVMs is sparse. Here, a large series focusing on cerebral AVMs treated by the frameless CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system was analyzed.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with cerebral AVMs treated by CyberKnife SRS between 2005 and 2019 were included. Planning was MRI- and CT-based. Conventional DSA was not coregistered to the MRI and CT scans used for treatment planning and was only used as an adjunct. Obliteration dynamics and clinical outcome were analyzed.

Results

215 patients were included. 53.0% received SRS as first treatment; the rest underwent previous surgery, embolization, SRS, or a combination. Most AVMs were classified as Spetzler-Martin grade I to III (54.9%). Hemorrhage before treatment occurred in 46.0%. Patients suffered from headache (28.8%), and seizures (14.0%) in the majority of cases. The median SRS dose was 18 Gy and the median target volume was 2.4 cm³. New neurological deficits occurred in 5.1% after SRS, with all but one patient recovering. The yearly post-SRS hemorrhage incidence was 1.3%. In 152 patients who were followed-up for at least three years, 47.4% showed complete AVM obliteration within this period. Cox regression analysis revealed Spetzler-Martin grade (P = 0.006) to be the only independent predictor of complete obliteration.

Conclusions

Although data on radiotherapy of AVMs is available, this is one of the largest series, focusing exclusively on CyberKnife treatment. Safety and efficacy compared favorably to frame-based systems. Non-invasive treatment planning, with a frameless SRS robotic system might provide higher patient comfort, a less invasive treatment option, and lower radiation exposure.