Balloon-mounted stenting for ICAS in a multicenter registry study in China: a comparison with the WEAVE/WOVEN trial

Risk factors of restenosis after paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment has shown promise for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). However, studies on restenosis and its associated factors after PCB use are lacking. This study aimed to elucidate risk factors of restenosis after PCB treatment for ICAD. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients who had been successfully treated with PCBs for symptomatic ICAD between January 2016 and December 2022. Eligible patients were classified into "no-restenosis" and "restenosis" groups by follow-up DSA. Demographic, clinical, laboratory test, and angiographic data were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors of restenosis after PCB treatment. A total of 261 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. There was no death and there were 6.51% (17/261) patients had ipsilateral stroke within 30 days. During 6 months clinical follow up, there was no death and there were 3.07% (8/261) patients had ipsilateral stroke after 30 days, and 13.41% (35/261) patients were identified with restenosis. The restenosis group had significantly higher follow-up hs-CRP (P = 0.040), higher stenosis degree (P = 0.011), higher total occlusion rate (P = 0.009), longer lesion length (P < 0.001), higher residual stenosis after intervention (P < 0.001) and lower stenting rate (P = 0.017).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline neutrophil count (OR 1.356, 95% CI 1.015-1.812; P = 0.039), lesion length (OR 1.113, 95% CI 1.032-1.199; P = 0.005) and residual stenosis after intervention (OR 1.066, 95% CI 1.036-1.097; P < 0.001) were risk factors of restenosis.

Feasibility of emergent single-step intracranial self-expanding stent deployment using over-the-wire coronary balloons in intracranial atherosclerosis-related large vessel occlusion thrombectomy

BACKGROUND

The currently US Food and Drug Administration approved intracranial stent delivery system involves a multistep deployment process that requires the use of an exchange length microwire (ELW). In this study, we describe a single-step approach to deploy the Neuroform Atlas stent without the need for ELW or lesion re-access, using the MINI TREK II over-the-wire (OTW) semi-compliant coronary balloon.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively maintained mechanical thrombectomy databases from two comprehensive stroke centers. The study included consecutive large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients who underwent single-step angioplasty with the MINI TREK II OTW balloon followed by deployment of the Neuroform Atlas intracranial stent, without the use of an ELW.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, the median age was 67 years (IQR: 58-73) and 50% were female. Most patients had middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusion (75%). One-third of the patients received intravenous thrombolysis. All patients achieved successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b/3) with a median of two passes. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score decreased from 14 (IQR: 10-19) at baseline to 4 (IQR: 1-9) at discharge, and the median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 1 (IQR: 1-4) at discharge and 3 (IQR: 2-4) at 90 days. None of the patients in this series experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, though two patients (16.7%) were dead at 90 days but there was no procedural-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience demonstrates the technical feasibility and success of single-step deployment of the Neuroform Atlas stent following angioplasty with the MINI TREK II OTW balloon, without the need for an ELW or lesion re-access. Larger prospective studies with extended clinical follow-up are needed to validate these findings.

Drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic artery stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke globally and is associated with poor recanalization rates, high recurrence, and adverse functional outcomes. The use of stents has been explored as a treatment option to improve outcomes, despite concerns over procedure-related complications and in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) in treating patients with symptomatic ICAS (sICAS).

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, with a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to March 1, 2024. Studies that reported outcomes such as technical and clinical success rates, periprocedural complications, ISR, and stroke rates were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata v.17.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies involving 13,658 patients were included. DES demonstrated lower pooled rates of major stroke (3% [95% CI 2-4%]) and ISR (8% [95% CI 3-12%]) compared to BMS (5% [95% CI 3-6%] for major stroke and 19% [95% CI 14-24%] for ISR), though the difference in major stroke rate was not statistically significant. The clinical success rate was similar between DES (89% [95% CI 78-99%]) and BMS (86% [95% CI 76-97%]). Technical success rates were high and comparable for both stent types. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression identified significant factors influencing heterogeneity, including stent or wire length and diameter.

CONCLUSION

DES showed a significant advantage over BMS in reducing ISR and major stroke rates while maintaining comparable safety and technical success. These findings support the preferential use of DES in clinical practice for managing sICAS, emphasizing their role in enhancing patient outcomes through reduced restenosis and recurrent ischemic events.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon with bare-metal stent in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: the AcoArt sICAS randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Restenosis after stenting with a standard bare-metal stent (BMS) is the main cause of stroke recurrence for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS). Whether a drug-coated balloon (DCB) could reduce the risk of restenosis for such patients is unknown. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DCB in reducing 6 month restenosis in patients with sICAS.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial was conducted at 13 stroke centers across China. Eligible patients aged 18-80 years with sICAS defined as a recent transient ischemic attack (<180 days) or ischemic stroke (14-180 days) before enrollment attributed to a 70-99% atherosclerotic stenosis of a major intracranial artery were recruited between June 4, 2021 and September 15, 2022 (final follow-up: April 13, 2023). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a DCB (n=90) or BMS at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the post-procedure incidence of restenosis in the target lesion at 6 months (165-225 days). The safety outcome was post-procedure target vessel-related stroke (hemorrhage or ischemia) or death at 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 201 randomized patients, 180 were confirmed eligible (mean age 58 years) and completed the trial. Compared with BMS, DCB was associated with a lower rate of post-procedure incidence of restenosis in the target lesion at 6 months (6.9% vs 32.9%, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.42, P=0.0003). Regarding the safety outcome, post-procedure target vessel-related stroke (hemorrhage or ischemia) or death at 30 days did not differ between the two groups (4.4% vs 5.6%, OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.21 to 3.05, P=0.73).

CONCLUSION

DCB was superior to BMS in reducing the incidence of restenosis without increasing the risk of target vessel-related stroke or death within 6 months. Further trials comparing the outcomes of DCB with medical management for sICAS are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04631055.

Balloon-mounted versus self-expandable stent in failed neurothrombectomy: a post hoc analysis of the SAINT study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that when thrombectomy has failed, rescue intracranial stenting is associated with better clinical outcomes compared with failed reperfusion. However, comparative data regarding stent type are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of balloon-mounted stents (BMS) with those of self-expandable stents (SES).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from the Stenting and Angioplasty in NeuroThrombectomy (SAINT) consortium. Patients were included if thrombectomy had failed and they then underwent rescue emergency stenting. Patients treated with SES or BMS were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was the final reperfusion as measured by the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) Scale. Safety measures included rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, procedural complications, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients were included. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were well balanced among both groups. The BMS group (n=127) had higher rates of successful reperfusion (94.5% vs 86.6%, aOR=4.23, 95% CI 1.57 to 11.37, P=0.004) and increased likelihood of higher degree of final reperfusion on the mTICI Scale (acOR=2.06, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.57, P=0.01) than the SES group (n=201). No difference in modified Rankin Scale shift (acOR=0.98, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.79, P=0.95), rates of mRS0-2 (26% vs 36%, aOR=0.93, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.88, P=0.83) and mRS0-3 (43% vs 50%, aOR=0.92, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.66, P=0.77) at 90 days were noted. Safety measures were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates higher reperfusion rates with BMS than with SES in failed thrombectomy procedures that involved rescue stenting. No differences in hemorrhagic complications or clinical outcomes were noted. Further larger controlled studies are warranted.

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the primary cause of stroke recurrence after intracranial stenting. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have recently shown great potential for reducing restenosis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DES compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS).

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase (Ovid) and Web of Science databases for studies published from inception through 10 October 2023, comparing DES with BMS for the treatment of symptomatic severe ICAS. We included randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that compared DES and BMS in adult patients with ICAS. The primary outcomes were stroke or death within 30 days and ISR within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related adverse events, technical success, functional evaluation findings, restenosis degree and other safety endpoints within 1 year. Subgroup analyses were conducted across different study types.

RESULTS

A total of 510 participants fulfilling all eligibility criteria were enrolled in four studies. DES had a similar rate of any stroke or death within 1 month (3 studies, 476 participants: risk ratio (RR): 1.00; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.11; p=1.00; I2=31%) to that of the BMS group and had a significantly lower rate of ISR within 1 year (4 studies, 429 participants: RR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.41; p<0.001; I2=0%). Moreover, a lower rate of stroke recurrence within 1 year was reported (3 studies, 436 participants: RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.88; p=0.02; I2=52%) in the DES group.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates that the application of DES for intracranial stenting is safe and can significantly reduce the rates of ISR and recurrent ischaemic events. Further research is required to validate these results.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022338178.

Use of a large-bore 088 intracranial access support catheter for delivery of large intracranial devices: case series with the TracStar LDP in 125 cases

BACKGROUND

The delivery of neuroendovascular devices requires a robust proximal access platform. This demand has previously been met with a 6Fr long sheath (8Fr guide) that is placed in the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery segments. We share our experience with the first 0.088 inch 8Fr guide catheter designed for direct intracranial access.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB-approved institutional database of the senior authors to identify all cases where the TracStar Large Distal Platform (LDP) was positioned within the intracranial vasculature, defined as within or distal to the petrous ICA, vertebral artery (V3) segments, or transverse sinus. Technical success was defined as safe placement of the TracStar LDP within or distal to the described distal vessel segments with subsequent complication-free device implantation.

RESULTS

Over the 41-month study period from January 2020 to June 2023, 125 consecutive cases were identified in whom the TracStar LDP was navigated into the intracranial vasculature for triaxial delivery of large devices, 0.027 inch microcatheter and greater, for aneurysm treatment (n=108, 86%), intracranial angioplasty/stenting (n=15, 12%), and venous sinus stenting (n=2, 1.6%). All cases used a direct select catheter technique for initial guide placement (no exchange). Posterior circulation treatments occurred in 14.4% (n=18) of cases. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. No vessel dissections occurred in any cases.

CONCLUSION

The TracStar LDP is an 0.088 inch 8Fr guide catheter that can establish direct intracranial access with an acceptable safety profile. This can be achieved in a wide range of neurointerventional cases with a high rate of technical success.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in symptomatic intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis: a meta-analysis

Objectives

This study aims to present the first comprehensive meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in treating intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis.

Methods

A comprehensive examination was undertaken to compare the effectiveness and safety of DES and BMS in individuals experiencing symptomatic stenosis in the intracranial and vertebral arteries through an in-depth analysis of clinical research. We conducted an extensive search across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2024. The emphasis of our investigation was on various outcomes including rates of in-stent restenosis, symptomatic occurrences of in-stent restenosis, incidence of stroke, procedural success, mortality rates, complications associated with the procedure, and any adverse events.

Results

Our analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1,243 patients (562 in the DES group and 681 in the BMS group). The findings demonstrated a significantly lower rate of in-stent restenosis in the DES group for both intracranial [odds ratio (OR): 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13 to 0.41; p < 0.00001] and vertebral artery stenosis (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.72; p = 0.003) compared to the BMS group. Additionally, the DES group showed a significantly reduced rate of postoperative strokes in vertebral artery stenosis cases (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.90; p = 0.03), with no significant differences noted in the intracranial artery stenosis comparison (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.95; p = 0.42). The study also revealed no significant disparities in symptomatic in-stent restenosis, procedural success, mortality, adverse effects, and perioperative complications between the two groups across the conditions studied.

Conclusion

The comparison indicates that DES significantly reduces the risk of in-stent restenosis and postoperative strokes in patients with vertebral artery stenosis, compared to BMS. For both intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis, DES and BMS exhibit comparable safety profiles.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=439967.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of Neuroform Atlas stent deployed via Gateway balloon catheter and microcatheter for the treatment of intracranial stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Atlas stent released by the Gateway catheter and microcatheter in the treatment of intracranial stenosis (IS).

METHODS

The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate and post-procedural stroke or death within one month.

RESULTS

Atlas stents were deployed using the Gateway catheter and microcatheter in 19 (57.6 %) and 14 (42.4 %) procedures, respectively. Follow-up imaging data were available for 26 patients; the incidence of ISR was 15.4 %, and the ISR rate was higher, though not significantly, in the microcatheter group than in the Gateway group (30.0% vs. 6.25 %, P = .39). Clinical follow-up data were available for 30 patients; the post-procedural stroke rate was 3.3 % within one month and 13.3 % from one month to one year. The post-procedural stroke rate within one month was higher, though not significantly, in the microcatheter group than in the Gateway group (7.7% vs. 0 %, P = .43). The Gateway group had a significantly lower rate of post-procedural stroke in the same territory than that of the microcatheter group (0% vs. 30.8 %, P = .026). A higher incidence of residual stenosis <30 % was found in the non-ISR group than in the ISR group (72.2% vs. 0 %, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence that the Atlas stent is safe and effective for IS treatment. The use of the Gateway catheter to deliver the Atlas stent appears to be safer than using microcatheter. The incidence of ISR may be related to the degree of the residual stenosis.

Self-expanding versus balloon expandable stent for intracranial arterial stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are limited data regarding the comparison of balloon expandable stents (BES) and self-expanding stents (SES) for the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that compared SES and BES in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Data were extracted from relevant studies found through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until from January 1, 2010 to September 28, 2023. Statistical pooling with random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the rates/severity of postprocedure stenosis, technical success, 30-day stroke and/or death, cumulative clinical endpoints, and restenosis rates.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) for postprocedure stenosis (%) was significantly lower (SMD: -0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.79 to -0.24, p < .001, 10 studies involving 1515 patients) with BES. The odds for 30-day stroke and/or death were significantly lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94, p = .019, 15 studies involving 2431 patients), and cumulative clinical endpoints on follow-up were nonsignificantly lower (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.37, p = .250, 10 studies involving 947 patients) with BES. The odds for restenosis during follow-up were significantly lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, p = .004, 13 studies involving 1115 patients) with BES.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SES, BES were associated with lower rates of postprocedure 30-day stroke and/or death with lower rates of restenosis during follow up and the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion due to Intracranial Stenosis: Identification, Management, Challenges, and Future Directions

This comprehensive literature review focuses on acute stroke related to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), with an emphasis on ICAS-large vessel occlusion. ICAS is the leading cause of stroke globally, with high recurrence risk, especially in Asian, Black, and Hispanic populations. Various risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and advanced age lead to ICAS, which in turn results in stroke through different mechanisms. Recurrent stroke risk in patients with ICAS with hemodynamic failure is particularly high, even with aggressive medical management. Developments in advanced imaging have improved our understanding of ICAS and ability to identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intervention. Herein, we focus on current management strategies for ICAS-large vessel occlusion discussed, including the use of perfusion imaging, endovascular therapy, and stenting. In addition, we focus on strategies that aim at identifying subjects at higher risk for early recurrent risk who could benefit from early endovascular intervention The review underscores the need for further research to optimize ICAS-large vessel occlusion treatment strategies, a traditionally understudied topic.

Comparison of drug-coated balloon with conventional balloon for angioplasty in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been studied for reducing the occurrence of restenosis after treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), but no comparison has been published of the use of drug-coated and non-coated balloons in angioplasty for ICAS. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of DCB angioplasty with conventional balloon (CB) angioplasty for the treatment of symptomatic ICAS.

METHODS

One hundred cases with symptomatic ICAS treated with DCB (n=49) and CB (n=51) angioplasty were retrospectively analyzed. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was completed to eliminate bias in the patients selected for further analysis. The periprocedural events and follow-up outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were 32 cases in each group after PSM. Technical success (<50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 30 cases (93.8%) in the DCB group and in 28 cases (87.5%) in the CB group. The rates of stroke or mortality within 30 days were 3.1% in the DCB group and 6.3% in the CB group (p=1). The incidence of restenosis in the DCB group (6.3%) was significantly lower than that in the CB group (31.3%) (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CB angioplasty, DCB angioplasty can effectively reduce the incidence of restenosis. Further studies are needed to validate the role of DCB angioplasty in the management of symptomatic ICAS.

Resolute onyx stent more effective than wingspan stent at preventing procedural complications and long-term restenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Angioplasty and stenting is a treatment option for patients with medically refractory symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD). Currently the Wingspan Stent System (WSS) is the only FDA approved device for this indication. We find the Resolute (R) Onyx Stent, a drug-eluting balloon mounted stent (DES), a better alternative to the WSS for treatment of sICAD. Herein, we present our findings comparing the two stents based on our single center experience.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained neuro-endovascular databased was queried for patients between January 2013 to June 2021. Inclusion criteria for patients included sICAD with failed medical management, and intracranial stenting with either R-Onyx DES or WSS, including patients treated within 7 days of their last stroke. Primary outcomes were assessed via the occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or death within 72 h of the procedure. Secondary outcomes consisted of recurrent stroke or significant in-stent restenosis evaluated by a clinical or angiographic follow-up at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients, average age 61.26 (SD = 12.53) (44% women), were eligible for analysis with 58 having R-onyx DES and 126 having WSS. Within 72 h, the primary outcome was observed in 1.7% (n = 1) of patients in the R-onyx DES group and 6.3% (n = 8) of patients in the WSS group (p = 0.089). Among 41 angiographic and clinical follow-ups in the R-onyx DES group, none had a recurrent stroke, while among 101 patients who had follow-up in the WSS group, 8.9% (n = 9) had a stroke (p = 0.024). At a 6-month angiographic follow-up, there was a significantly lower rate of symptomatic in-stent restenosis among the R-onyx DES group with 1.7% (n = 1) compared with 21.4% (n = 27) in the WSS group (p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

R-onyx DES is more effective than WSS in treating sICAD with low rates of periprocedural complications and long-term strokes and symptomatic in-stent restenosis. Future prospective randomized multicenter trials are needed.

Safety and efficacy of enterprise stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic severe posterior circulation stenosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of Enterprise stent angioplasty and risk factors for the prognoses in treating symptomatic severe posterior circulation atherosclerotic stenosis (SSPCAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with SSPCAS who were treated with the Enterprise stent angioplasty were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data, peri-procedural complications, postoperative residual stenosis, in-stent restenosis and recurrent stroke at follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

262 patients with 275 stenotic lesions treated with the Enterprise stent angioplasty were enrolled. The stenosis degree was reduced from 86.3 ± 6.2% before to 19.3 ± 5.4% after stenting. Complications occurred in 14 (5.3%) patients. Clinical follow-up was performed in 245 (93.51%) patients for 16.5 ± 7.3 months. During 1 year follow-up, 7 patients (2.9%) had recurrent symptoms, including 4 patients with stenting in the intracranial vertebral artery and 3 in the basilar artery. Imaging follow-up was conducted in 223 (85.11%) patients. In-stent restenosis was present in 35 patients (15.7%), with the restenosis rate of 26.4% (n = 23) in the intracranial vertebral artery, which was significantly (P < 0.001) greater than in the basilar artery (8.8%). Six patients (17.1%) with in-stent restenosis were symptomatic. The stenotic length was the only significant (P = 0.026 and 0.024, respectively) independent risk factor for 1 year stroke or death events and in-stent restenosis.

CONCLUSION

The Enterprise stent can be safely and efficaciously applied in the treatment of symptomatic severe posterior circulation atherosclerotic stenosis, with a relatively low rate of in-stent restenosis and recurrent stroke within 1 year. The stenotic length was the only significant independent risk factor for 1 year stroke or death events and in-stent restenosis.

Cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis measured by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: association with CT perfusion

OBJECTIVES

Cerebral hemodynamics is important for the management of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). This study aimed to determine the utility of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to reflect cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation ICAS by evaluating its association with CT perfusion (CTP).

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with unilateral symptomatic stenosis in the intracranial internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery who received percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or PTA with stenting were included. Murray law-based QFR (μQFR) was computed from a single angiographic view. CTP parameters including cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, mean transit time (MTT), and time to peak (TTP) were calculated, and relative values were obtained as the ratio between symptomatic and contralateral hemispheres. Relationships between μQFR and perfusion parameters, and between μQFR and perfusion response after intervention, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients had improved perfusion after treatment. μQFR was significantly correlated with relative values of TTP and MTT, with correlation coefficients of  -0.45 and  -0.26, respectively, on a per-patient basis, and  -0.72 and  -0.43, respectively, on a per-vessel basis (all p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for μQFR to diagnose hypoperfusion at a cut-off value of 0.82 were 94.1% and 92.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that μQFRpost (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.48; p = 0.002), collateral score (adjusted OR, 6.97; p = 0.01), and current smoking status (adjusted OR, 0.03; p = 0.01) were independently associated with perfusion improvement after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

μQFR was associated with CTP in patients with symptomatic anterior circulation ICAS and may be a potential marker for real-time hemodynamic evaluation during interventional procedures.

KEY POINTS

• Murray law-based QFR (μQFR) is associated with CT perfusion parameters in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and can differentiate hypoperfusion from normal perfusion. • Post-intervention μQFR, collateral score, and current smoking status are independent factors associated with improved perfusion after treatment.

Association of occlusion time with successful endovascular recanalization in patients with symptomatic chronic intracranial total occlusion

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular treatment is one of the choices for symptomatic chronic intracranial total occlusion (CITO); however, its safety and efficacy remain unclear. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and long-term outcome of endovascular treatment for CITO at a high-volume stroke center.

METHODS

Data about patients with symptomatic CITO who received endovascular treatment were retrospectively collected. Technique success was regarded as ≤ 30% residual stenosis. Periprocedural complications within 30 days were used to evaluate safety. Baseline characteristics and lesion features were compared between patients with successful recanalization and those with recanalization failure. Stroke recurrence and in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the culprit arteries during follow-up were used to evaluate long-term efficacy.

RESULTS

From June 2012 to September 2019, 117 patients (mean ± SD age 55.8 ± 9.6 years) were included. The successful recanalization rate was 82.9% (97/117 patients). The combined rate of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, and death was 8.5% (10/117). Compared with patients with successful recanalization, patients with recanalization failure had longer occlusion time and longer lesion length (27.0 mm vs 15.4 mm, p = 0.001). In the median 23.0-month clinical follow-up period, recurrent stroke occurred in 12.6% (11/87) of patients with successful recanalization. In the median 5-month imaging follow-up period, ISR was detected in 26.6% (21/79) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment was relatively safe for patients with symptomatic CITO. Shorter occlusion time and shorter lesion length may be associated with higher recanalization rate. The rates of stroke recurrence and symptomatic ISR were acceptable but need to be confirmed in future studies.

Non-invasive Detection of Diffuse Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate diffuse intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis by ultrasonic examination with digital subtraction angiography as the reference. Five hundred forty-one vertebrobasilar arteries with a normal lumen or intracranial stenosis were enrolled. Peak systolic velocity, mean flow velocity and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) at the intracranial vertebrobasilar arteries and extracranial vertebral arteries (VAs) were measured. The resistance index (RI) at extracranial VAs and the difference between the RI of extracranial VAs and the RI of the extracranial internal carotid artery (RI_ica) were calculated. Compared with normal arteries, all stenotic arteries were divided into the high-velocity group (focal stenosis, multiple-segment stenosis and multiple-artery stenosis) and low-velocity group (critical stenosis and long stenosis). The consistency between ultrasonic examination and digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of vertebrobasilar arteries with multiple-segment stenosis and multiple-artery stenosis was not favorable when applying the widely used Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis criteria (κ = 0.442 and 0.438, respectively). The optimal low-velocity criteria for identifying intracranial vertebrobasilar arteries with critical stenosis and long stenosis were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and were as follows: EDV ≤15 cm/s and RI ≥0.68 at the extracranial VA and RIica ≥0.10.

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent With Bare-Metal Stent in Patients With Symptomatic High-grade Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the primary reason for stroke recurrence after intracranial stenting in patients who were treated with a standard bare-metal stent (BMS). Whether a drug-eluting stent (DES) could reduce the risk of ISR in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) remains unclear.

Objective

To investigate whether a DES can reduce the risk of ISR and stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS.

Design, Settings, and Participants

A prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment was conducted from April 27, 2015, to November 16, 2018, at 16 medical centers in China with a high volume of intracranial stenting. Patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS were enrolled, randomized, and followed up for 1 year. Intention-to-treat data analysis was performed from April 1 to May 22, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to receive DES (NOVA intracranial sirolimus-eluting stent system) or BMS (Apollo intracranial stent system) treatment in a 1:1 ratio.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point was ISR within 1 year after the procedure, which was defined as stenosis that was greater than 50% of the luminal diameter within or immediately adjacent to (within 5 mm) the implanted stent. The primary safety end point was any stroke or death within 30 days after the procedure.

Results

A total of 263 participants (194 men [73.8%]; median [IQR] age, 58 [52-65] years) were included in the analysis, with 132 participants randomly assigned to the DES group and 131 to the BMS group. The 1-year ISR rate was lower in the DES group than in the BMS group (10 [9.5%] vs 32 [30.2%]; odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11-0.52; P < .001). The DES group also had a significantly lower ischemic stroke recurrence rate from day 31 to 1 year (1 [0.8%] vs 9 [6.9%]; hazard ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.80; P = .03). No significant difference in the rate of any stroke or death within 30 days was observed between the DES and BMS groups (10 [7.6%] vs 7 [5.3%]; odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.54-3.94; P = .46).

Conclusions and Relevance

This trial found that, compared with BMSs, DESs reduced the risks of ISR and ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with symptomatic high-grade ICAS. Further investigation into the safety and efficacy of DESs is warranted.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02578069.

Effect of Ginkgolide in Ischemic Stroke patients with large Artery Atherosclerosis: Results from a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy is considered beneficial in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS), with more bleeding events. Ginkgolide is shown to reduce platelet activation after infarction, which might be of benefit in AIS. We aimed to explore the effect of Ginkgolide in AIS patients with ICAS.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 61 centers in China. Within 72 h after onset, consecutive patients diagnosed as AIS with ICAS were randomized to either Ginkgolide or placebo treatment. The primary outcome was the composite of mortality and recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) during first 4 weeks in an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary functional outcome was assessed by modified Rankin Scale and improvement of stroke severity was assessed by National Institution of Health Stroke Scale at day 28. Safety outcome was measured by the rate of severe adverse event (SAE).

RESULTS

There were 936 patients randomized to either Ginkgolide or placebo treatment. Their average age was 64.2 ± 10.4 years old and 36.0% of the patients were female. The composite index event occurred in six patients in placebo group, and none occurred in Ginkgolide group (risk ratio 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.02). There were more patients who achieved favorable outcome in Ginkgolide group, compared with that of the placebo group (OR 2.16, 95%CI 1.37-3.41). SAE occurred in five (1.1%) patients in the Ginkgolide group and three (0.6%) in the placebo group (OR0.60, 95CI% 0.14-2.53). Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1/473 (0.2%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ginkgolide, working as PAF antagonist, may reduce recurrent stroke in AIS with ICAS patients within 72 hours after onset. It might be an optional treatment in moderate-to-severe AIS patients with ICAS. (http://www.chictr.org.cn Number as ChiCTR-IPR-17012310).

Safety and efficacy of balloon-mounted stent in the treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have failed to prove that the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is better than that of medical management. A recent study using a self-expandable stent showed acceptable lower rates of periprocedural complications.

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and efficacy of a balloon-mounted stent (BMS) in the treatment of symptomatic ICAD.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained databases from 15 neuroendovascular centers between 2010 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis in the target artery, medical management had failed, and they underwent intracranial stenting with BMS after 24 hours of the qualifying event. The primary outcome was the occurrence of stroke and mortality within 72 hours after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and mortality on long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients were eligible for the analysis (mean age 62.8 years, 34.1% female). The intracranial stenotic lesions were located in the anterior circulation in 135 (58.2%) cases. Recurrent stroke was the qualifying event in 165 (71.1%) while recurrent TIA was identified in 67 (28.9%) cases. The median (IQR) time from the qualifying event to stenting was 5 (2-20.75) days. Strokes were reported in 13 (5.6%) patients within 72 hours of the procedure; 9 (3.9%) ischemic and 4 (1.7%) hemorrhagic, and mortality in 2 (0.9%) cases. Among 189 patients with median follow-up time 6 (3-14.5) months, 12 (6.3%) had TIA and 7 (3.7%) had strokes. Three patients (1.6%) died from causes not related to stroke.

CONCLUSION

Our study has shown that BMS may be a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory symptomatic ICAD. Additional prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Long-Term Outcome of Enterprise Stenting for Symptomatic ICAS in a High-Volume Stroke Center

Background and Purpose: The Enterprise stent has been used for treating intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), but its long-term outcome remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the Enterprise stent used for patients with symptomatic ICAS due to hypoperfusion.

Method: Patients with symptomatic ICAS due to hypoperfusion treated with the Enterprise stents from a high-volume stroke center were evaluated. The successful recanalization was defined as the Modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥ 2b. The stroke and neurological death that occurred within 72 h after the procedure as well as long-term clinical and imaging outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Overall, 130 patients with 130 ICAS treated with the Enterprise stent were included in our study. The successful recanalization rate was 100%. The mean pre- and postprocedural stenosis was 82.9 ± 8.9% vs. 15.1 ± 8.4%. Periprocedural complications occurred in 5 (3.8%) patients within 72 h after the procedure. Clinical follow-up data were available in 125 (96.2%) patients (median, 24 months) and any stroke or neurological death was encountered in 6 (4.8%) patients. Angiographic follow-up data was obtained from 118 (90.8%) patients (median, 13.5 months). In addition, 1-year in-stent restenosis (>70%) was found in 17 (14.4%) patients, and among them, 4 (23.5%) patients were symptomatic.

Conclusion: Deployment of Enterprise stent is safe for ICAS. The short-term and long-term outcomes were acceptable, but the efficacy of the Enterprise stent needs to be further evaluated in future studies.

Intracranial Angioplasty with Enterprise Stent for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience and a Systematic Review

Background

The high rate of periprocedural complications for the endovascular stent procedure in the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Management Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial resulted in it being less recommended than medical therapy to treat intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). Because Enterprise stent use might reduce the incidence of complications in ICAS treatment compared to other frequently used stents, this paper evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Enterprise stent for the treatment of ICAS.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search for reports on intracranial angioplasty using the Enterprise stent for ICAS treatment from the earliest date available from each database to May 2020 for PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Clinical Trials databases. We also reviewed the single-center experience of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. We extracted information regarding periprocedural complications, procedure-related morbidity, mortality, immediate angiographic outcome, and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes, among others. Event rates were pooled across studies using random-effects or fixed-effects models depending on the heterogeneity.

Results

Five hundred fifty-seven patients with 588 lesions from seven studies, including the institutional series, were included in the analysis. The incidence of stroke or death within 30 days was 7.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5%-10.1%). The incidence of ischemic stroke or TIA in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days and during follow-up was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-9.5%). The incidence of in-stent restenosis was 10.1% (95% CI, 4.6%-22.2%), and the incidence of symptomatic restenosis was 4.1% (95% CI, 1.7%-9.9%).

Conclusions

Intracranial angioplasty utilizing the Enterprise stent for ICAS treatment was relatively safe and effective but required further verification using additional sources for evidence.