Mortality after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device

Endovascular Management of Basilar Artery Aneurysms: A Consecutive Series of 124 Patients

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no established criterion for determining when interventional treatment is necessary or which strategy is appropriate for basilar artery (BA) aneurysms. Through this study, we aimed to propose an algorithm that can effectively determine the optimal endovascular treatment (EVT) option for BA aneurysms.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with BA aneurysms from June 2016 to December 2022 and performed procedures based on the algorithm. The analysis included demographic, clinical, and aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details, complications, angiographic outcomes, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 124 patients (mean age 55.0 years) with a BA aneurysm who underwent EVT. Of these, 21 aneurysms were treated in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage. The majority of the aneurysms were located at the basilar apex (74), followed by the basilar trunk (30) and vertebrobasilar junction (20). Coiling was used in 18.5% of the cases, while stent-assisted coiling embolization was chosen for 58.9%. Overlapping stents were used in 12.9%, flow diverter implantation in 3.2%, Y/T stent techniques in 4.8%, and stent adjunctive coiling with unilateral vertebral artery occlusion in only 1.6%. Procedure-related complications occurred in 15 patients (12.1%). The patients had a modified Rankin Scale score of 0.74 ± 1.62; 98 (86.7%) had a good prognosis with modified Rankin Scale scores ranging from 0 to 2 at the last follow-up. Digital subtraction angiography was performed on 105 (84.7%) patients, revealing that 101 (81.5%) achieved complete or near-complete occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria for EVT of BA aneurysms based on multi-characteristics were safe and effective. However, further evidence from large cohort studies is needed.

Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A retrospective long-term single center analysis

PURPOSE

The introduction of flow diverters (FDs) in 2007 greatly enhanced the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Here, we present our long-term clinical experience in treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms with FDs.

METHODS

107 patients with unruptured aneurysms and treated with an FD between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Aneurysm occlusion, procedural complications, and clinical outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Angiographic follow-up was available for 93 patients with a mean long-term follow-up time of 28.4 ± 21.6 months. Additional coiling was performed in 15.1% of patients (n = 14). Adequate aneurysm occlusion (Kamran grades 3 and 4) at long-term follow-up was achieved in 94.6% of patients (n = 88). 3.2% (n = 3) required endovascular retreatment since the last follow-up showed a lack of aneurysm occlusion (Kamran grade 0) due to a foreshortening of the FD. Incomplete opening of the FD and parent vessel occlusion was seen in 1.1% (n = 1) and 3.2% (n = 3) of patients, respectively. In-stent stenosis was observed in 57% (n = 53) of cases at short-term follow-up and 22.6% (n = 21) at long-term, which were moderate and asymptomatic overall. In-stent stenosis decreased significantly between short- and long-term follow-ups (31.4 ± 17.0% vs 9.7 ± 13.6%, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events occurred in 7.5% (n = 7) and 1.1% (n = 1) of patients, respectively. Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale: 0-2) was obtained in 97.8% (n = 91) leading to an overall treatment-related morbidity of 2.2% (n = 2). There was no procedural mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that FD treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is effective and safe with high occlusion rates and low rates of permanent morbidity at long-term follow-up.

Flow diversion effect of the leo braided stent for aneurysms in the posterior and distal anterior circulations: A multicenter cohort study

Background and purpose

The treatment of aneurysms located in the posterior and distal anterior circulations remains a challenge. Leo stents with a flow diversion (FD) effect may be a potential option, which needs to be clearly studied.

Methods

From January 2016 to October 2021, 133 patients with 145 aneurysms in the posterior and distal anterior circulations, treated with Leo stents, were retrospectively analyzed in three neurosurgical centers. Data on demographic information, aneurysm characteristics, procedural outcomes, postoperative course, and aneurysm occlusion were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

After immediate surgery, 90 aneurysms (60.1%) were in complete occlusion [Raymond-Ray Occlusion Class (RROC) 1 and O'Kelly Marotta (OKM) grade D], 29 aneurysms (20%) in good occlusion (RROC 2 and OKM grade C), 17.9% in incomplete occlusion (RROC 3a or OKM grade B), and no aneurysms in invalid occlusion (RROC 3b and OKM grade A). A total of 112 patients with 117 aneurysms received angiographic follow-up (mean 11.4 months), and the degree of occlusion showed a significant improvement (Z = 3.900, p < 0.001). The complete occlusion rate increased to 84.6% (99/117), while good and incomplete occlusion decreased to 6.8% (8/117) and 8.6% (10/117), respectively. A total of 14 cases (10.5%) presented narrowing of the parent artery, and nine cases (6.8%) had injured side branches. Cerebral hemorrhage occurred in four patients (3.0%), and symptomatic ischemic infarction occurred in six patients (4.5%). The final permanent morbidity (mCS ≥3) and mortality were 2.8% (3/133) and 0.8% (1/133), respectively. For 82 aneurysms treated by stent-assisted with coiling (SAC), large-sized, ruptured aneurysms (χ² = 7.767, p = 0.005) occurred. For 63 aneurysms treated by LEO stent monotherapy (LSM), multiple aneurysms, fusiform aneurysms (χ² = 18.958, p < 0.01), and/or small-sized aneurysms (Z = −2.692, p = 0.007) occurred.

Conclusions

Leo stents are safe and effective for aneurysms located in the posterior and distal anterior circulations. The overall degree of occlusion improved during a follow-up because of the FD effect of Leo stents. Aneurysms in these areas should be treated with personalized measures.