Clinical outcomes of rescue stenting for failed endovascular thrombectomy: a multicenter prospective registry

Determinants of day-1 stent patency following rescue intracranial stenting in failed intracranial thrombectomy

IntroductionThis study aimed to identify factors affecting stent patency in patients treated with rescue intracranial stenting (RIS) for a refractory intracranial occlusion following mechanical thrombectomy (MT), focusing on antithrombotic regimens, and types of devices used.Material and methodsData from 14 university hospitals spanning from 2015 to 2021 were utilized, concentrating on patients who underwent MT in the anterior circulation. The primary outcome was stent patency on follow-up imaging at day 1.ResultsThroughout the study period, a total of 101 patients received RIS at 14 centers for refractory anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO). Amongst the 101 implanted stents, 18 were coronary and 83 were neuro-stents. Seventy-six patients were given a double antiplatelet (AP) regimen following stent implantation. After adjustment on LVO level (M1 vs. carotid), sex, susceptibility vessel sign, number of stent passes, follow-up AP, and coronary versus neuro-stent usage, the presence of follow-up dual antiplatelet regimen was independently linked to stent patency on follow-up imaging (p = .0016). The type of stent and other factors were not.ConclusionOur study shows that in patients treated with RIS in the context of failed MT, starting dual antiplatelet therapy is independently associated with stent patency on follow-up imaging at day 1. In this large series, we have not found evidence supporting the superiority of a specific class of antiplatelet drugs or a stent category, especially coronary versus neuro-stents. These results may inform the design of future clinical trials.

Cangrelor versus GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in endovascular treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) failures and early reocclusions in stroke often result from arterial wall disease, incomplete thrombus withdrawal, or acute endothelial injury. Intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis, in particular, poses a risk of reocclusion, sometimes requiring tailored interventions (eg, angioplasty, stenting). While glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been widely studied in ischemic stroke, cangrelor remains less explored.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cangrelor compared with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry included patients from 34 French centers who received cangrelor or GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors during EVT between July 2018 and September 2023. Eligible cases had refractory occlusions or arterial disease at risk of reocclusion. The primary outcome was a 90-day favorable outcome. Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome, early neurological improvement, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), procedural complications, and day 1 arterial patency. Propensity score overlap weighting was used for comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 559 patients, 160 received GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and 399 received cangrelor. Favorable outcomes were comparable (41.7% vs 43.7%; OR=1.1; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.93), as were rates of excellent functional outcome and early neurological improvement. Angiographic efficacy was similar, with modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b rates of 89.5% for GPIIb/IIIa and 90.1% for cangrelor. No significant differences were observed in day 1 patency, 90-day mortality, or symptomatic ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

Cangrelor showed comparable safety and efficacy to GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. These results, along with the specific pharmacodynamics, make this drug a promising agent in the acute management of complex intracranial and extracranial LVOS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03776877.

Long-Term Outcome of Rescue Stenting for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Rescue stent (RS) is an accepted rescue option after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the long-term outcomes (≥12 months) of RS have not yet been elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 154 patients with RS for ICAS-related LVO, which were identified from a prospectively maintained multicenter database of RS after MT failure, to assess good outcome (mRS 0-2), mortality, stroke recurrence, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and stent patency.

RESULTS

Among 154 patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 132 (85.7%) after RS. Clinical follow-up was available in 148 patients at 3 months, of whom 126 were followed longer than 12 months. Good outcome was observed in 53.4% (79/148) at 3 months and 53.2% (67/126) at the final assessment among survivors (median, 33; interquartile range [IQR], 13-91 months). The overall incidence of mortality was 16.2% (24/148). Mortality occurred in 8.8% (13/148) of patients at 3 months and 8.7% (11/126) thereafter, respectively. Stroke recurrence was 0.7% (1/148) within 3 months and 3.2% (4/126) thereafter. The overall incidence of SICH was 9.5% (14/148). SICH occurred in 8.8% (13/148) within the first 3 months and in 0.8% (1/126) thereafter. The stented vessel was patent in 81.1% (99/122) at the first follow-up (median, 3; IQR, 1-125 months) and 96.7% (89/92) at the final follow-up (median, 18; IQR, 13-68 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RS for ICAS-LVO showed a low stroke recurrence rate in the long-term. The long-term patency of RS appears to remain durable, particularly when it remained patent during the initial follow-up.

A New Fibrin-Heparine Coated Self-Expanding Stent for the Rescue Treatment of Intracranial Stenosis-a Multicentric Study

INTRODUCTION

Rescue intracranial stenting is necessary to provide sufficient recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute large vessel occlusions (LVO) due to an underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). The CREDO heal is a novel stent that provides a potentially lower thrombogenicity due to surface modification. We present the first multicentric experience with the CREDO heal for acute rescue stenting.

METHODS

Data of 81 patients who underwent rescue stenting after MT at 12 centers in Germany and Spain were prospectively collected and retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Final mTICI 2b‑3 was reached in 95.1% after median two MT maneuvers and stenting. Four periprocedural complications resulted in clinical deterioration (4.9%). Intraparenchymal hemorrhage occurred in one patient (1.2%) and functional independence at FU was reached by 42% of the patients. Most interventions were performed under Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

CREDO heal was effective and safe in our case series. However, more data is needed to define the optimal antithrombotic regime. The use under single antiplatelet medication is not supported by our study.

Comparison of early versus late rescue stenting after failed thrombectomy for intracranial atherosclerosis-related large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing for rescue stenting (RS) following failed thrombectomy in patients with underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unknown. We aimed to determine this by comparing the angiographic and clinical outcomes of early and late RS.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent stent-retriever thrombectomy for ICAS-related LVO. Per-pass analysis was performed to assess recanalization rates after each retrieval in all patients. Patients were classified into early and late groups based on the number of stent retrievals before RS (early: 1 or 2 attempts; late: ≥ 3 attempts). Angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

Among 126 patients with ICAS-related LVO, 257 retrievals were evaluated. Successful and complete recanalization rates were highest on the first attempt and significantly decreased between the second and third passes. Overall, 56 patients underwent RS, of which 27 and 29 were classified into the early and late RS groups, respectively. The early RS group had shorter procedure times (45 min vs. 70 min, p < 0.001) and higher rates of favorable outcomes (85.2% vs. 55.2%, p = 0.014) than the late RS group. Intact stent patency rates were also higher in the early RS group than in the late RS group (88.0% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.059). Multivariate analysis identified early RS (OR, 7.187; 95% CI, 1.385-37.306; p = 0.019) and stent patency (OR, 7.291; 95% CI, 1.288-41.277; p = 0.025) as significant factors influencing favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

RS should be performed at an early stage after failed thrombectomy for ICAS-related LVO.

Rescue Stenting for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions: Analysis of the PC-SEARCH Registry

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate whether rescue stenting (RS) following failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute basilar artery occlusion results in superior functional outcomes and enhanced safety compared with the natural history of failed MT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Evaluation: Analyzing Radiographic and Intra-Procedural Predictors for Mechanical Thrombectomy registry, encompassing 8 high-volume centers in the United States and covering the period from 2015 to 2021. Patients with basilar artery occlusion who experienced failed MT (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a after at least 1 attempt of clot retrieval) were categorized based on whether they received additional intervention with RS. The primary outcome was a shift analysis of the 90-day modified Rankin Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess both efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Of a total of 444 patients, 119 presented failed MT and were included in the analysis. The RS group comprised 65 (14.6%) patients, while the control group consisted of 54 (12.2%) patients. After adjusting, the RS group showed a favorable shift in the overall 90-day modified Rankin Scale distribution (adjusted common odds ratio, 4.56 [95% CI, 1.67-12.45]; P=0.003) and higher rates of 90-day 0 to 3 modified Rankin Scale score (RS: 44.6% versus control: 18.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 7.57 [95% CI, 1.91-30.12]; P=0.004) compared with the control group. RS also showed lower rates of 90-day mortality (RS: 43.1% versus control: 64.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.09-0.80]; P=0.018) and comparable rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RS: 3.1% versus control: 13%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.05-1.95]; P=0.214).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that RS is associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality in basilar artery occlusion patients presenting MT failure. Further randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting after mechanical thrombectomy: who can benefit?

BACKGROUND

Angioplasty and/or stenting is a rescue therapy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute intracranial large vessel occlusion. This study was undertaken to determine whether rescue angioplasty and/or stenting improves the outcome after MT and to investigate whether outcomes differ by subgroup of rescue indication.

METHODS

We performed propensity score matching (PSM) with data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment. Patients were divided into the MT alone group and the MT with rescue therapy group. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. PSM was also performed in the failed MT (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 0-2a) and the residual severe stenosis (mTICI 2b-3) subgroups, respectively.

RESULTS

326 patients of mean±SD age 62.7±12.0 years (90 women, 27.6%) were matched from 1274 patients. In the matched cohort, functional independence at 90 days was higher in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (44.2% vs 29.5%; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06, P=0.008). In the failed MT subgroup with 66 matched pairs, more patients had functional independence in the rescue therapy group than in the MT alone group (39.0% vs 17.0%; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.29 to 7.59, P=0.01). In the residual stenosis subgroup with 63 matched pairs, functional independence rates were similar in the rescue therapy and the MT alone groups (51.6% vs 55.7%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72, P=0.65).

CONCLUSION

Rescue angioplasty and/or stenting could improve the clinical outcome in patients with acute large vessel occlusion with failed MT, while no benefit was seen in those with residual severe stenosis but substantial reperfusion.

Single-Center Experience With Endovascular Therapy in Acute Occlusion of ICAS: Preferred Stent Thrombectomy Versus Preferred Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

The preferred endovascular therapy (EVT) for large-vessel occlusion in intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is unknown. We compared the efficacy of preferred stent thrombectomy and preferred angioplasty in patients with acute large-vessel occlusion in ICAS.

METHODS

Data from consecutive EVT patients (May 2020 to September 2023) with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in ICAS were retrospectively analyzed. Preferred angioplasty was performed if there was a preoperative "microcatheter first-pass effect;" otherwise, preferred stent thrombectomy was performed. Analyses were grouped according to the two EVT treatments. Clinical data of all patients, including the time from puncture to recanalization, rate of successful reperfusion, early neurological improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Six-two patients were enrolled in this study (mean age was 60.66±13.21 y, 22.6% female). The preferred angioplasty group had a higher first-pass recanalization rate than the preferred stent thrombectomy group (61.3% vs. 21.9%, P <0.001) and a higher proportion of patients who were functionally independent (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3) at 90 days [odds ratio,3.681; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.009 to 13.428; P =0.048]. There was no significant difference between the groups in the time from puncture to recanalization, the frequency of successful reperfusion, and early neurological improvement, or intracranial hemorrhage ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in ICAS, preferred angioplasty may be a safe and effective procedure.

Use of Onyx Frontier™ for intracranial stenting in stroke patients: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) carries a high risk of recurrence despite aggressive medical management. The aim of our study is to present our initial experience with the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) for AIS due to ICAD.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study describing the technical feasibility, safety, and performance of using the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent in patients with acute intracranial vessel occlusion due to ICAD across three comprehensive stroke centers in the United States.

RESULTS

We included 23 patients in our study (mean age 67.3 [10.7]; females: n = 13/23, 56.5%). Most patients were Black (n = 14/23, 60.9%). The most common site of vessel occlusion was the M1 branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) (n = 14/23, 60.9%), followed by the vertebrobasilar system (n = 5/23, 21.7%), and the internal carotid artery (n = 3/23, 13.0%). Treatment with the Onyx Frontier™ stent was associated with a final mTICI score ≥2b for 100% of patients, with no vessel perforations or distal embolization. None of the patients had any restenosis or re-treatment over a median follow-up of 3.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 7.8). All cases required a single stent except for one, where two were deployed. Transfemoral access was used in most cases (n = 18/23, 78.3%), with one in-hospital death due to access site complication (n = 1/23, 4.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest multicenter cohort study demonstrating the feasibility and safety of using the Onyx Frontier™ balloon-mounted zotarolimus-eluting stent to treat symptomatic AIS due to ICAD.

Rescue Therapy for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the association between rescue therapy (RT) and functional outcomes compared to medical management (MM) in patients presenting after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized prospectively collected and maintained data from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry, spanning from 2011 to 2021. The cohort comprised patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) with failed MT. The primary outcome was the shift in the degree of disability, as gauged by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Additional outcomes included functional independence (90-day mRS score of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of a total of 7,018 patients, 958 presented failed MT and were included in the analysis. The RT group comprised 407 (42.4%) patients, and the MM group consisted of 551 (57.5%) patients. After adjusting for confounders, the RT group showed a favorable shift in the overall 90-day mRS distribution (adjusted common odds ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-2.45, p < 0.001) and higher rates of functional independence (RT: 28.8% vs MM: 15.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.21-3.07, p = 0.005) compared to the MM group. RT also showed lower rates of sICH (RT: 3.8% vs MM: 9.1%, aOR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.28-0.97, p = 0.039) and 90-day mortality (RT: 33.4% vs MM: 45.5%, aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.89, p = 0.009).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings advocate for the utilization of RT as a potential treatment strategy for cases of LVO resistant to first-line MT techniques. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these observations and optimize the endovascular approach for failed MT patients. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:343-355.

Single-center outcomes of Onyx Frontier™ and Resolute Onyx™ drug-eluting balloon-mounted stents for rescue stenting for acute large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

In cases where mechanical thrombectomy (MT) fails, rescue stenting may be necessary to achieve reperfusion; however, the lack of standardized techniques or devices poses a challenge. This series aims to present our early experience with the Onyx Frontier™ and Resolute Onyx™ balloon-mounted drug-eluting stents for rescue stenting.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent rescue stenting, in the setting of failed MT, using Onyx Frontier™ or Resolute Onyx™ stents at a single institution. Technical details, procedural complications, and patient outcomes were recorded for each case.

RESULTS

Twenty-two Onyx Frontier™ and Resolute Onyx™ stents were deployed in 18 patients undergoing rescue stenting. Stent locations included the middle cerebral artery (36.4%), internal carotid artery (18.2%), vertebral artery (22.7%), and basilar artery (22.7%). The average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score before MT was 13.8 (range 0-31). The median initial modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was zero, while the median mRS score at follow-up was three. Successful reperfusion, as assessed by TICI scores, was achieved in 43.8% of patients for TICI 3, 43.8% for TICI 2C, and 12.5% for TICI 2B. Post-revascularization, 16.7% of patients experienced hemorrhage, of which one patient (5.6%) had symptomatic hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Onyx Frontier™ and Resolute Onyx™ stents are well suited for rescue stenting in cases of failed MT. These balloon-mounted drug-eluting stents exhibit excellent navigability, rendering them appropriate for rescue revascularization procedures. Our findings demonstrate that these stents confer a high degree of technical success.

Rescue intracranial permanent stenting for refractory occlusion following thrombectomy: a propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Rescue intracranial stenting (RIS) can be used in refractory large vessel occlusion (LVO) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RIS versus a propensity matched sample of patients with persistent LVO.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a multicenter retrospective pooled cohort of patients with anterior LVO (2015-2021) treated with MT, and identified patients with at least three passes and a modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of 0 to 2a. Propensity score matching was used to account for determinants of outcome in patients with or without RIS. The study outcomes included 3 months modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (HT).

RESULTS

420 patients with a refractory anterior occlusion were included, of which 101 were treated with RIS (mean age 69 years). Favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was more frequent in patients with a patent stent at day 1 (53% vs 6%, P<0.001), which was independently associated with an early dual antiplatelet regimen (P<0.05). In the propensity matched sample, patients treated with RIS versus without RIS had similar rates of favorable outcomes (36.8% vs 30.3%, P=0.606). Patients with RIS showed a favorable shift in the overall mRS distributions (common adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.91, P=0.006). Symptomatic HT was marginally more frequent in the RIS group (9% vs 3%, P=0.07), and there was no difference in 3-month mortality.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with a refractory intracranial occlusion despite at least three thrombectomy passes, RIS may be associated with an overall shift towards more favorable clinical outcome, and no significant increase in the odds of symptomatic HT or death.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of acute ischemic stroke worldwide. Patients with acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying ICAD (ICAD-LVO) often do not achieve successful recanalization when undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone, requiring rescue treatment, including intra-arterial thrombolysis, balloon angioplasty, and stenting. Therefore, early detection of ICAD-LVO before the procedure is important to enable physicians to select the optimal treatment strategy for ICAD-LVO to improve clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of ICAD-LVO is challenging in the absence of consensus diagnostic criteria on noninvasive imaging and early digital subtraction angiography. In this review, we summarize the clinical and diagnostic criteria, prediction of ICAD-LVO prior to the procedure, and EVT strategy of ICAD-LVO and provide recommendations according to the current literature.

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy after Emergency Stenting in Patients Exhibiting Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Associated with Large-vessel Occlusion with and without Intravenous Infusion of Tirofiban

PURPOSE

Intracranial rescue stent angioplasty is a bailout strategy for acute stroke patients in cases of unsuccessful endovascular thrombectomy due to underlying atherosclerotic stenosis. However, there is no consensus on a preprocedural and intraprocedural antiplatelet regimen. The aim of this single-centre study was to compare the safety and efficacy of emergency stenting in patients exhibiting intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related acute large-vessel occlusion with or without peri-interventional intravenous infusion of tirofiban.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 78 patients who were treated with rescuestent angioplasty between 2010 and 2019 due to acute ischaemic stroke. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received peri-interventional intravenous tirofiban and those who did not receive tirofiban. We compared clinical safety and functional outcomes in both treatment groups with symptomatic haemorrhage as the primary endpoint. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate the association between tirofiban and outcome measures.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were treated with intravenous tirofiban (47.4%), and 41 patients did not receive intravenous tirofiban (52.6%). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of symptomatic haemorrhage (16.2% in the tirofiban group versus 14.6% in the control group, p = 0.847). The 3-month mortality (21.6% in the tirofiban group versus 17.1% in the control group, p = 0.611) and good functional outcomes according to the modified Rankin scale (45.9% versus 34.1%, p = 0.289) were comparable.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that the application of tirofiban for rescue stenting after failed mechanical thrombectomy is safe.

Rescue stenting after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy to treat acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion

Background

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) is refractory to reperfusion because of the underlying intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS), and this condition often requires salvage methods such as balloon angioplasty and rescue stenting (RS). In this study, we investigated the short-term outcomes of RS after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of 127 patients who underwent MT for acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion in our hospital between August 2018 and January 2022. The degree of recanalization was evaluated immediately after the treatment by Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI). The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used 90 days after treatment to evaluate the neurological functions. In addition, the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and postoperative mortality within 90 days of treatment were calculated.

Results

Among the 127 patients, 86 patients (67.7%) had revascularization (mTICI 2b-3) immediately after MT (non-RS group), and RS was performed in 41 patients (32.3%) after MT failure (RS group). No difference in the sICH rate was observed between the two groups (17.1 vs. 16.3%, p = 0.91). There was a slightly higher mortality rate in the RS group (14.6 vs. 12.8%, p = 0.71); however, the difference was not significant. There was no difference in the proportion of patients in the RS and non-RS groups who had a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (48.8 vs. 52.3%, p = 0.76).

Conclusions

Rescue stenting after MT failure might be a feasible rescue modality for treating acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion.

The relationship between vertebrobasilar artery calcification and intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusion in thrombectomy

Background and purpose

Distinguishing between intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusion (ICAS-O) and non-ICAS-O can benefit strategies of identifying the need for surgical plans prior to thrombectomy. We investigated the association between vertebrobasilar artery calcification (VBAC) and ICAS-O in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy.

Methods

Patients were recruited from a prospective single-center registration study who had undergone thrombectomy between October 2017 and October 2021. The enrolled patients were divided into ICAS-O and non-ICAS-O, as determined by the intraarterial therapy process. The occurrences of VBAC were recorded on intracranial non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scans before thrombectomy. The association between VBAC and ICAS-O was assessed using binary logistic regression.

Results

A total of 2732 patients who had undergone digital subtraction angiography were reviewed, and 314 thrombectomy patients (mean age: 65.4 years, 36.6% female) with NCCT were enrolled in this study. VBAC was detected before thrombectomy in 113 (36%) out of 314 patients. Age, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with VBAC, and a higher frequency of VBAC was identified in patients presenting posterior circulation. ICAS-O accounts for 43% (135/314) in eligible patients. From multivariable analyses, VBAC was identified as an independent predictor of ICAS-O (adjusted odds ratio, 6.16 [95% CI, 2.673–14.217], P &lt; 0.001). Meanwhile, the (VBAC[+] atrial fibrillation[-]) group displayed higher rates of ICAS-O than the (VBAC[-] atrial fibrillation [-]) group (P &lt; 0.001).

Conclusions

We demonstrated that VBAC is an independent risk factor for ICAS-O in patients who underwent thrombectomy. Patients free of atrial fibrillation with VBAC have more trend to be ICAS-O.

European Stroke Organisation guidelines on treatment of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation guideline is to provide clinically useful evidence-based recommendations on the management of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). The guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the European Stroke Organisation guidelines and according to GRADE methodology. ICAD represents a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, and patients affected by this condition are exposed to a high risk for future strokes and other major cardiovascular events, despite best medical therapy available. We identified 11 relevant clinical problems affecting ICAD patients and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions. The first two questions refer to the asymptomatic stage of the disease, which is being increasingly detected thanks to the routine use of noninvasive vascular imaging. We were not able to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal detection strategy and management of asymptomatic ICAD, and further research in the field is encouraged as subclinical ICAD may represent a big opportunity to improve primary stroke prevention. The second block of PICOs (3-5) is dedicated to the management of acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke caused by ICAD, a clinical presentation of this disease that is becoming increasingly relevant and problematic, since it is associated with more refractory endovascular reperfusion procedures. An operational definition of probable ICAD-related LVO is proposed in the guideline. Despite the challenging context, no dedicated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified, and therefore the guideline can only provide with suggestions derived from observational studies and our expert consensus, such as the escalated use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors and angioplasty/stenting in cases of refractory thrombectomies due to underlying ICAD. The last block of PICOs is devoted to the secondary prevention of patients with symptomatic ICAD. Moderate-level evidence was found to recommend against the use of oral anticoagulation as preferred antithrombotic drug, in favor of antiplatelets. Low-level evidence based our recommendation in favor of double antiplatelet as the antithrombotic treatment of choice in symptomatic ICAD patients, which we suggest to maintain during 90 days as per our expert consensus. Endovascular therapy with intracranial angioplasty and or stenting is not recommended as a treatment of first choice in high-grade symptomatic ICAD (moderate-level evidence). Regarding neurosurgical interventions, the available evidence does not support their use as front line therapies in patients with high-grade ICAD. There is not enough evidence as to provide any specific recommendation regarding the use of remote ischemic conditioning in ICAD patients, and further RCTs are needed to shed light on the utility of this promising therapy. Finally, we dedicate the last PICO to the importance of aggressive vascular risk factor management in ICAD, although the evidence derived from RCTs specifically addressing this question is still scarce.