Availability of thyroid protective lead shields and their use by trainee orthopaedic surgeons

Thyroid Peroxidase Antibody (TPO) as a Predictor of Radiation Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Among Nurses and Technicians Working in Mansoura Specialized Medical Hospital: Cross Sectional Study

Background::

Thyroid gland is a probable goal tissue for radiation-related injury. Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation leads to thyroid dysfunction and exposure to high dose may lead to thyroid carcinoma.

Objective::

Evaluation of the role of Thyroid peroxidase antibody as a predictor for thyroid dysfunction among nurses and technicians in the radiology department in Mansoura Specialized Medical hospital (MSMH).

Subjects and Methods::

Subjects were Nurses and technicians who are working in (MSMH) with persistent daily duty in the last 3 years and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All subjects included in the study were recruited in one month and divided into two groups; Group 1: 50 subjects who were working in radiology, coronary angiography and ERCP unit, Radiation -exposed group. Group 2: 33 subjects who were working in In-patient departments and in out- patient clinics and not exposed to any type of radiation. Non fasting blood sample was taken from all enrolled subjects for measurement of TSH and Anti-TPO.

Results::

TPO was positively and significantly correlated to age, TSH, duration of radiology/ y (r=0.388, 0.364, 0.342respectively) p value <0.05. Roc curve was done to detect the sensitivity and specificity of TSH in relation to TPO that revealed the cutoff value of TSH > 1.69 with Sensitivity and Specificity. PPV, NPV and accuracy at cutoff >1.69 were 70.6%, 51.5%, 42.8%, 77.3% and 58%.

Conclusion::

Working personnel with positive anti TPO and their TSH levels are more than 1.69 associated with symptoms of hypothyroidism, a trial of treatment is mandatory to relieve symptoms.

The compliance with and knowledge about radiation protection in operating room personnel: a cross-sectional study with a questionnaire

INTRODUCTION

Radiation protection is becoming more important with an ongoing increase in radiation exposure due to the use of X-rays in minimally invasive procedures in orthopaedic and trauma surgeries. However, sufficient education in medical physics and radiation protection can often be improved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire consisting of four questions about personal data and ten questions about radiation protection was distributed to lead consultants, consultants, residents, medical students, and medical technical assistants at two institutions, a level 1 trauma center and a children's hospital.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 83 participants. The compliance with radiation protection, i.e., usage of a dosimetry, an apron, and a thyroid shield on a regular basis was only seen in 54 %. Participants from the trauma center wore a dosimeter and thyroid shield significantly more often. The regular use of a thyroid shield differed significantly between job positions. It was observed in 80 % of students, but only 15 % of technical assistants. Only 65 % of all knowledge questions were answered correctly. There was a discrepancy between incorrectly answered knowledge questions (35 %) and those marked as uncertain (20 %). Different job positions did not have an impact on the answers to the questions in most instances.

CONCLUSIONS

The compliance with and the knowledge about radiation protection seems to be unnecessarily low in trauma physicians and technical assistants. The discrepancy in falsely answered questions and those marked as uncertain may suggest that participants may overestimate their knowledge about radiation protection, which is potentially harmful due to the increased radiation exposure. Therefore, we advocate a quick and valuable training of trauma surgeons and medical staff addressing the important preventive measures, some of which are illustrated in the present study. These consist of wearing dosimetry and protection devices, reduction in X-ray duration, preferably antero-posterior C-arm positioning with the image intensifier close to the patient and the surgeon, maximal distance, collimation, and increased voltage. Furthermore, the use of visual feedback on complex and potentially hazardous radiation facts may be useful for training purposes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with a questionnaire.

Radiation exposure to hand surgeons' hands: a practical comparison of large and mini C-arm fluoroscopy

PURPOSE

To determine and compare the radiation exposure to surgeons' hands with large and mini C-arm fluoroscopy in a practical, clinically based model.

METHODS

Two hand surgeons monitored radiation exposure to their hands with a ring dosimeter over a 14-month period using large and mini C-arm fluoroscopic units. One surgeon performed all cases with a large C-arm unit in a hospital setting, and the other performed all cases with mini C-arms in surgical centers. For each case, fluoroscopic time, the output displayed by the unit, radiation by time, and ring dosimeter absorption were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 160 consecutive cases were reviewed with 71 cases and 89 cases in the large and mini C-arm groups, respectively. The median output displayed by the large C-arm was 0.7 mGy/case, and the median output displayed by the mini C-arm was 10.0 mGy/case. With output as a product of time, the median calculated values were 0.02 mGy/s for the large C-arm group and 0.28 mGy/s for the mini C-arm group. Cumulative ring dosimeter absorption to the surgeons' hands was found to be 380 mrem for 71 cases in the large C-arm group versus 1,000 mrem for 89 cases in the mini C-arm group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our model, the use of the mini C-arm resulted in more than a 10-fold increase in the rate of output and approximately double the dosimeter absorption to the surgeon's hand compared with the large C-arm. Although it has been shown that the mini C-arm produces less radiation scatter, in a practical model, it may not be a safer alternative with respect to the surgeon's hands. Based on these findings, we recommend that surgeons be more aware of radiation exposure risk, know their C-arm unit's specifications, and try to minimize radiation exposure.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Trauma team radiation exposure: the potential need for dosimetry monitoring

OBJECTIVES

Australian radiation regulations require routine monitoring of health-care workers who might receive a whole-body effective radiation dose in excess of 1 mSv/year. In Australian hospitals, routine monitoring with a dosimeter is recommended for levels beyond 300 microSv/year. We aimed to determine the potential radiation exposure to trauma team members and whether routine personal radiation dosimetry should be recommended.

METHOD

An anthropomorphic mannequin with a radiation detector was placed at five locations around the resuscitation bed. Three sets of standard trauma-series X-rays were performed, and the exposure was measured and averaged at each location. These data were then extrapolated to estimate the potential radiation equivalence at the level of the thyroid gland for staff working in each of the locations over a 1 year period with and without personal protective equipment.

RESULTS

The total dose ranged from 1.2 to 20.5 microSv for a single trauma patient. The highest recorded dose was at the location of the circulation doctor during pelvic X-ray. Based on these data, it would take only 15 trauma patients per year for a team member to be potentially exposed to the level at which routine dosimetry is usually recommended, should no personal protective equipment be used. The use of a lead gown and a lead gown with a thyroid collar reduced exposure by four- and ninefold, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the possibility of significant ionizing radiation exposure for unprotected trauma team members. Dosimeter use by trauma team personnel needs to be reviewed based on local protocols and patient numbers.

Thyroid disorders in employees of a nuclear power plant

BACKGROUND

The thyroid gland is a potential target organ for radiation-related damage. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the association between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and the risk of autoimmune thyroid disease as well as thyroid nodules and dysfunction in workers of a former nuclear power station.

METHODS

Seventy-one male power station workers 38 to 57 years of age who had been exposed to a lifetime dose in the upper allowed range (accumulated lifetime dose 70 to 400 mSv) were compared to a population-based sample of 670 males who were not exposed to occupational radiation. Thyroid ultrasound was performed by the same observers. Laboratory parameters were analyzed in a central laboratory.

RESULTS

After controlling analyses for age and further relevant confounders no significant differences with respect to thyroid nodules and markers of autoimmune thyroid disease were detected between exposed and nonexposed individuals. However, nuclear power plant employees had higher odds for elevated serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels than the reference group (odds ratio 4.54; 95% confidence interval 1.43; 13.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Workers of a nuclear power plant with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation within the upper allowed dose range have an increased risk of elevated serum TSH levels. Further studies are required to confirm possible effects of occupational exposure to radiation on thyroid function.

Ionising radiation exposure to orthopaedic trainees: the effect of sub-specialty training

INTRODUCTION

We monitored image intensifier use by orthopaedic trainees to assess their exposure to ionising radiation and to investigate the influence of sub-specialty training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five different orthopaedic registrars recorded their monthly image intensifier screening times and exposure doses for all cases (trauma and elective), for a combined total of 12 non-consecutive months. Radiation exposure was monitored using shoulder and waist film badges worn both by surgeons and radiographers screening their cases.

RESULTS

Registrars in spinal sub-specialties were exposed to significantly higher doses per case and cumulative doses per month than non-spinal trainees (P < 0.05), but significantly lower screening times per case (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in cumulative screening times per month (P > 0.05). Regression analysis for all surgeons showed a significant relationship between shoulder film badge reading and cumulative dose exposed per month (P < 0.05), but not for cumulative screening time. Shoulder film badge recordings were significantly higher for spinal compared with non-spinal registrars (P < 0.05), although all badges were below the level for radiation reporting. Only one radiographer badge recorded a dose above threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst the long-term effects of sub-reporting doses of radiation are not fully understood, we consider that this study demonstrates that trainees should not be complacent in accepting inadequate radiation protection. The higher doses encountered with spinal imaging means that sub-specialty trainees should be alerted to the risk of their increased exposure. The principle of minimising radiation exposure must be maintained by all trainees at all times.

Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with autoimmune thyroid disease

CONTEXT

The thyroid gland is a potential target organ for radiation-related damage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the analysis was to investigate the association between occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD).

DESIGN

Our design was the cross-sectional Study of Health in Pomerania.

SETTING

The setting was the general community.

SUBJECTS

Analyses were performed in a population-based sample of 4299 subjects. Among them, 160 persons reported a history of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

AITD was defined as the combined presence of hypoechogenicity in thyroid ultrasound and antithyroxiperoxidase antibodies greater than 200 IU/ml.

RESULTS

Females with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation had more often AITD than nonexposed females (10.0 vs. 3.4%; P < 0.05). This association persisted after adjustment for relevant confounders (odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-10.31; P < 0.05). In males, there were too few subjects who fulfilled the criteria of AITD, but the association between the exposure to radiation and hypoechogenicity of the thyroid gland barely missed statistical significance (odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-5.26; P = 0.08). In both females and males, subjects who reported a length of exposure of more than 5 yr exhibited the highest risk of the endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that occupational exposure to ionizing radiation is related to the risk of AITD. The usage of thyroid protection shields by radiation workers is strongly recommended.