1
|
Bilger S, Koechlin L, Gahl B, Miazza J, Vöhringer L, Berdajs D, Rüter F, Reuthebuch O. Introduction of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in a Cardiac Surgery Center. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025. [PMID: 39870086 DOI: 10.1055/a-2509-0430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as an integral part of value-based healthcare have important potential for clinical issues, e.g., for shared decision-making, data are limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to report initial results when introducing PROMs in the setting of cardiac surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were included. Three questionnaires (Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 [SAQ-7], Rose Dyspnea Scale [RDS], and Patient Health Questionnaire 2 [PHQ-2]) were either administered via iPad (in-hospital) or via a web-based tool (at home). Baseline PROMs were completed at admission. Follow-ups were conducted at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. We investigated the probability of improvement using multilevel, mixed-effects, ordered logistic regression. RESULTS Overall, 99 patients answered the questionnaires preoperatively, 84 of whom answered at least one questionnaire postoperatively. No patient died within the hospitalization. Median (IQR) length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 1.0 (1.0 to 2.0) days. In all dimensions of any PROMs questionnaire, OR was above 1, indicating that most patients reported improvement 1 to 2 years after surgery by at least 1 grade. In the exploratory analysis we found age ≥75 years positively associated with a significantly greater improvement of the SAQ-7 angina frequency and SAQ-7 quality of life score. Length of stay in the ICU showed no significant association with any PROMs at midterm follow-up. CONCLUSION In patients undergoing CABG, after a decline within 30 days postoperatively, quality of life-related outcomes improved markedly in a midterm follow-up compared with the preoperative state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina Bilger
- Department of Quality Management and Value-based Healthcare, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Luca Koechlin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Brigitta Gahl
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Surgical Outcome Research Center Basel, University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jules Miazza
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Luise Vöhringer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Denis Berdajs
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Florian Rüter
- Department of Quality Management and Value-based Healthcare, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Reuthebuch
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang W, Wang Y, Luo Z, Zhang X, Yang M, Su J, Guo Y, Yu P. A Three-Day Prehabilitation Program is Cost-Effective for Preventing Pulmonary Complications after Heart Valve Surgery: A Health Economic Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2024; 25:323. [PMID: 39355593 PMCID: PMC11440420 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2509323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background While prehabilitation (pre surgical exercise) effectively prevents postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), its cost-effectiveness in valve heart disease (VHD) remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a three-day prehabilitation program for reducing PPCs and improving quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in Chinese VHD patients. Methods A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial featuring concealed allocation, blinded evaluators, and an intention-to-treat analysis. In total, 165 patients scheduled for elective heart valve surgery at West China Hospital were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group participated in a three-day prehabilitation exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist while the control group received only standard preoperative education. Postoperative hospital costs were audited through the Hospital Information System, and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire was used to provide a 12-month estimation of QALY. Cost and effect differences were calculated through the bootstrapping method, with results presented in cost-effectiveness planes, alongside the associated cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). All costs were denominated in Chinese Yuan (CNY) at an average exchange rate of 6.73 CNY per US dollar in 2022. Results There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital costs (8484 versus 9615 CNY, 95% CI -2403 to 140) or in the estimated QALYs (0.909 versus 0.898, 95% CI -0.013 to 0.034) between the intervention and control groups. However, costs for antibiotics (339 versus 667 CNY, 95% CI -605 to -51), nursing (1021 versus 1200 CNY, 95% CI -330 to -28), and electrocardiograph monitoring (685 versus 929 CNY, 95% CI -421 to -67) were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The CEAC indicated that the prehabilitation program has a 92.6% and 93% probability of being cost-effective in preventing PPCs and improving QALYs without incurring additional costs. Conclusions While the three-day prehabilitation program did not significantly improve health-related quality of life, it led to a reduction in postoperative hospital resource utilization. Furthermore, it showed a high probability of being cost-effective in both preventing PPCs and improving QALYs in Chinese patients undergoing valve surgery. Clinical Registration Number This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/) with the registration identifier ChiCTR2000039671.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuqiang Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zeruxin Luo
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiu Zhang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Mengxuan Yang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianhua Su
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yingqiang Guo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Pengming Yu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borregaard B, Bruvik SM, Dahl J, Ekholm O, Bekker-Jensen D, Sibilitz KL, Zwisler AD, Lauck SB, Pedersen SS, Norekvål T, Riber LPS, Møller JE. Psychometric Properties of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in a Surgical Population of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2023; 209:165-172. [PMID: 37898098 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
The 12-item version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) was originally developed for patients with heart failure but has been used and tested among patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Whether the instrument is suitable for patients with AS who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is currently unknown. Thus, we aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the KCCQ-12 before and after SAVR among patients with severe AS. We conducted a prospective cohort of 184 patients with AS who completed the KCCQ-12 and the EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Levels before and 4 weeks after surgery. Construct validity was investigated with hypothesis testing and an analysis of Spearman's correlation between the two instruments. Structural validity was investigated with explorative and confirmatory factor analyses and reliability with Cronbach's α. All analyses were conducted on data from the two time points (preoperatively and four weeks after surgery). The hypothesis testing revealed how the New York Heart Association class was significantly correlated with the preoperative KCCQ-12 total score (higher New York Heart Association class, worse score). A longer length of hospital stay and living alone were significantly associated with poorer postoperative KCCQ-12 total score. KCCQ-12 and EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Levels were moderately correlated in most domains/the total score/Visual Analogue Scale score. Principal component analyses revealed two 3-factor structures. The confirmatory factor analyses did not support the original model at any time point. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.22 to 0.84 in three preoperative factors and from 0.39 to 0.76 in the postoperative factors. The total Cronbach's α was 0.83 for the suggested preoperative 3-factor model and 0.83 for the postoperative model. In conclusion, the Danish version of the KCCQ-12 tested in a population of patients with AS who underwent SAVR appears to have acceptable construct validity, whereas structural validity cannot be confirmed for the original four-factor model. Overall reliability is good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt Borregaard
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | - Jordi Dahl
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ola Ekholm
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Ann Dorthe Zwisler
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, Nyborg, Denmark
| | - Sandra B Lauck
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Susanne S Pedersen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tone Norekvål
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars P Schødt Riber
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jacob Eifer Møller
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Breel JS, de Klerk ES, Strypet M, de Heer F, Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Eberl S. What Really Matters to Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection-A Survey of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Dutch National Aortic Dissection Advocacy Group. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6584. [PMID: 37892723 PMCID: PMC10607692 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) almost always requires emergency surgery, and postoperative complications are common. Quality assurance systems tend to measure only the hard outcomes, e.g., complications and mortality. Our aim was to assess the health-related quality of life of TAAAD survivors. (2) Methods: An anonymized, Dutch language, web-based survey was sent out to all of the participants of the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Dutch National Aortic Dissection (DNAD) advocacy group via their own representatives. The survey was divided into five sections: patient information, global satisfaction, surgery, including complications, and the recovery period. (3) Results: Ninety members of the DNAD group attended the meeting. Seventy-five (83%) participated in the survey, and the responses from 61 (81%) were available for analysis. Despite hindrances in their daily life (complications, changes in physical, cognitive, and social functioning), patients were satisfied with their treatment, and all would undergo the procedure again. In addition they requested better post-discharge guidance and communication (4) Conclusion: The emphasis lies in equipping patients with knowledge about potential outcomes and effective coping strategies. This underscores the importance of communication and expectation management, in line with established literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S. Breel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.S.B.); (E.S.d.K.); (M.S.); (H.H.); (S.E.)
| | - Eline S. de Klerk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.S.B.); (E.S.d.K.); (M.S.); (H.H.); (S.E.)
| | - Magnus Strypet
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.S.B.); (E.S.d.K.); (M.S.); (H.H.); (S.E.)
| | - Frederiek de Heer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Henning Hermanns
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.S.B.); (E.S.d.K.); (M.S.); (H.H.); (S.E.)
| | - Markus W. Hollmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.S.B.); (E.S.d.K.); (M.S.); (H.H.); (S.E.)
| | - Susanne Eberl
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.S.B.); (E.S.d.K.); (M.S.); (H.H.); (S.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shiwani MA, Chico TJA, Ciravegna F, Mihaylova L. Continuous Monitoring of Health and Mobility Indicators in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Review of Recent Technologies. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:5752. [PMID: 37420916 PMCID: PMC10300851 DOI: 10.3390/s23125752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases kill 18 million people each year. Currently, a patient's health is assessed only during clinical visits, which are often infrequent and provide little information on the person's health during daily life. Advances in mobile health technologies have allowed for the continuous monitoring of indicators of health and mobility during daily life by wearable and other devices. The ability to obtain such longitudinal, clinically relevant measurements could enhance the prevention, detection and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various methods for monitoring patients with cardiovascular disease during daily life using wearable devices. We specifically discuss three distinct monitoring domains: physical activity monitoring, indoor home monitoring and physiological parameter monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ali Shiwani
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
| | - Timothy J. A. Chico
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK
| | - Fabio Ciravegna
- Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Lyudmila Mihaylova
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kornowski R. Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2023; 9:119-127. [PMID: 34370009 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In today's medical ecosystem, it is vital to measure the outcomes that are most important to the patients. As such, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) can be an essential metric to deliver high-quality cardiovascular care, particularly in the subset of patients who remain disappointed with their outcomes. PROMS should be a reproducible and reflective report of what is fundamental to a patient over time and across treatments with proper standards in the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the collected data. These reports can also be sensitive to changes, whether improvements or deteriorations in the quality of care and medical attitude, but a lack of standardization makes it difficult to draw robust conclusions and compare findings across treatments. As a research tool, PROMS can have a significant prognostic prominence, offering a powerful instrument of comparison between different treatment modalities. With the information technology (IT) abilities of today, we can leverage mobile tools and powerful computer systems to perform sophisticated data analysis using patient-derived data and randomization. This may eliminate guesswork and generate impactful metrics to better inform the decision-making process. PROMS analysed by proper standardized algorithms can avoid physician bias and be integrated into the hospital teamwork. Therefore, there is a strong need for integration of PROMS into the evaluation of cardiovascular interventions and procedures, and establishment of international standards in the analyses of patient-reported outcomes and quality of life data to address this need and develop therapeutic recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Kornowski
- Rabin Medical Center, Belinson & Hasharon Hospitals, Petach Tikva & The Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saeed S, Skaar E, Romarheim A, Chambers JB, Bleie Ø. Shared Decision-Making and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Valvular Heart Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:863040. [PMID: 35463777 PMCID: PMC9024058 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-centered health care emphasizes shared decision-making (SDM), incorporating both clinical evidence and patient preferences and values. SDM is important in heart valve disease, both because there might be more than one treatment option and due to the importance of adherence after intervention. We aimed to describe patient information and involvement in decision-making about care and recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in valve interventions. The opinion piece and recommendations are based upon literature review and our own experience from specialist valve clinics. Before a valve intervention, adequate patient information, discussion of the various treatment options and exploring patient preferences, in line with the concept of SDM, may improve post-intervention quality of life. After intervention, patients with prosthetic heart valves require adequate counseling and close follow-up to make them more confident and competent to manage their own health, as well as to maintain the efficacy of treatment provided. PROMs inform SDM before and improve care after valve intervention, focusing on outcomes beyond mortality and morbidity. SDM may improve post-intervention quality of life. Formal PROMs questionnaires inform SDM, quantify patient centered changes and should be used more often in clinical practice and research. A thorough assessment of baseline frailty status in patients scheduled for valve intervention is essential and may affect postoperative outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahrai Saeed
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Skaar
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Andrea Romarheim
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - John B. Chambers
- Cardiothoracic Centre, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Øyvind Bleie
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bull C, Teede H, Watson D, Callander EJ. Selecting and Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Assess Health System Performance. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2022; 3:e220326. [DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bull
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Diane Watson
- Bureau of Health Information, New South Wales Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily J. Callander
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Whiteley J, Toolan C, Shaw M, Perin G, Palmer K, Al-Rawi O, Modi P. Patient-reported outcome measures after mitral valve repair: a comparison between minimally invasive and sternotomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 32:433-440. [PMID: 33831215 PMCID: PMC8906694 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare patient-reported outcome measures of minimally invasive (MI) to sternotomy (ST) mitral valve repair. METHODS We included all patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery via either a right mini-thoracotomy (MI) or ST over a 36-month period. Patients were asked to complete a modified Composite Physical Function questionnaire. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures were compared between 2 propensity-matched groups (n = 47/group), assessing 3 domains: 'Recovery Time', 'Postoperative Pain' (at day 2 and 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks) and 'Treatment Satisfaction'. Composite scores for each domain were subsequently constructed and multivariable analysis was used to determine whether surgical approach was associated with domain scores. RESULTS The response rate was 79%. There was no mortality in either group. In the matched groups, operative times were longer in the MI group (P < 0.001), but postoperative outcomes were similar. Composite scores for Recovery Time [ST 51.7 (31.8-62.1) vs MI 61.7 (43.1-73.9), P = 0.03] and Pain [ST 65.7 (40.1-83.1) vs MI 79.1 (65.5-89.5), P = 0.02] significantly favoured the MI group. Scores in the Treatment Satisfaction domain were high for both surgical approaches [ST 100 (82.5-100) vs MI 100 (95.0-100), P = 0.15]. The strongest independent predictor of both faster recovery parameter estimate 12.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-18.3, P < 0.001] and less pain parameter estimate 7.6 (95% CI 0.7-14.5, P = 0.03) was MI surgery. CONCLUSIONS MI surgery was associated with faster recovery and less pain; treatment satisfaction and safety profiles were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Whiteley
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Caroline Toolan
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matthew Shaw
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Giordano Perin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kenneth Palmer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Omar Al-Rawi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Modi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The quality of life (QoL) concept now includes new aspects related to patients’ well-being because QoL has become more of a personal perception than an an objective and measurable entity. Here, we discuss the principal aspects of QoL-related aspects in urology and andrology by using a narrative review. Some aspects concerning the QoL are essential when managing uro-andrological patients. The aim of treatments should not only include the absence of disease or symptoms relief but also the improvement of a patient’s QoL with regard to his/her internal status and relationship with others. In this sense, any therapeutic approach should be based on the patient’s perspectives and not only on the instrumental and laboratory findings. Finally, we discussed the role of a patient’s sexual partner adding an extra dimension to the patient-centerd approach as part of the QoL concept in andrology.
Collapse
|
11
|
Borregaard B, Dahl JS, Lauck SB, Ryg J, Berg SK, Ekholm O, Hendriks JM, Riber LPS, Norekvål TM, Møller JE. Association between frailty and self-reported health following heart valve surgery. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2020; 31:100671. [PMID: 33235899 PMCID: PMC7670239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Knowledge about the association between frailty and self-reported health among patients undergoing heart valve surgery remains sparse. Thus, the objectives were to I) describe changes in self-reported health at different time points according to frailty status, and to II) investigate the association between frailty status at discharge and poor self-reported health four weeks after discharge among patients undergoing heart valve surgery. Methods In a prospective cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing heart valve surgery, including transapical/transaortic valve procedures were included. Frailty was measured using the Fried score, and self-reported health using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions 5-Levels Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).To investigate the association between frailty and self-reported health, multivariable logistic regression models were used. Analyses were adjusted for sex, age, surgical risk evaluation (EuroScore) and procedure and presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Frailty was assessed at discharge in 288 patients (median age 71, 69% men); 51 patients (18%) were frail. In the multivariable analyses, frailty at discharge remained significantly associated with poor self-reported health at four weeks, OR (95% CI): EQ-5D-5L Index 3.38 (1.51-7.52), VAS 2.41 (1.13-5.14), and KCCQ 2.84 (1.35-5.97). Conclusion Frailty is present at discharge in 18% of patients undergoing heart valve surgery, and being frail is associated with poor self-reported health at four weeks of follow-up. This supports a clinical need to address the unique risk of frail patients among heart valve teams broadly, and not only to measure frailty as a marker of operative risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt Borregaard
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.,Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Jordi S Dahl
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Sandra B Lauck
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Canada.,University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jesper Ryg
- University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Selina K Berg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Jeroen M Hendriks
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.,College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Australia.,Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Lars P S Riber
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Tone M Norekvål
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Norway.,Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | - Jacob E Møller
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.,The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of telephone follow-up and 24/7 hotline on 30-day readmission rates following aortic valve replacement -A randomized controlled trial. Int J Cardiol 2020; 300:66-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
13
|
What to expect after open heart valve surgery? Changes in health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 2019; 29:1247-1258. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02400-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
14
|
Briffa N. The employment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to communicate the likely benefits of surgery. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2018; 9:263-266. [PMID: 30147385 PMCID: PMC6101006 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s132746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Decision aids as part of shared care are underutilized in surgery. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) are rapidly gaining interest as useful tools for various purposes in all fields of surgery. In this article, the author describes how PROMS can be used as decision aids in shared care between patients and health care workers, including surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman Briffa
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK,
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oterhals K, Haaverstad R, Nordrehaug JE, Eide GE, Norekvål TM. Self-reported health status, treatment decision and survival in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis in a Western Norway population undergoing conservative treatment: a cross-sectional study with 18 months follow-up. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016489. [PMID: 28827255 PMCID: PMC5629730 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Revised: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate symptoms and self-reported health of patients conservatively treated for aortic stenosis (AS) and to identify factors associated with treatment decision and patient outcomes. DESIGN A cross-sectional survey with an 18-month follow-up. SETTING One tertiary university hospital in Western Norway. PARTICIPANTS In all, 1436 patients were diagnosed with AS between 2000 and 2012, and those 245 still under conservative treatment in 2013 were included in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were symptoms and self-reported health status. Secondary outcomes were treatment decision and patient survival after 18 months. RESULTS A total of 136 patients with mean (SD) age 79 (12) years, 52% men responded. Among conservatively treated patients 77% were symptomatic. The symptom most frequently experienced was dyspnoea. Symptomatic patients reported worse physical and mental health compared with asymptomatic patients (effect size 1.24 and 0.74, respectively). In addition, symptomatic patients reported significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression compared with asymptomatic patients. However, symptom status did not correlate with haemodynamic severity of AS. After 18 months, 117 (86%) were still alive, 20% had undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 7% transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). When adjusting for age, gender, symptomatic status, severity of AS and European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE), patients with severe AS had more than sixfold chance of being scheduled for AVR or TAVI compared with those with moderate AS (HR 6.3, 95% CI 1.9 to 21.2, p=0.003). Patients with EuroSCORE ≥11 had less chance for undergoing AVR or TAVI compared with those with EuroSCORE ≤5 (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.46, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS Symptoms affected both physical and mental health in conservatively treated patients with AS. Many patients with symptomatic severe AS are not scheduled for surgery, despite the recommendations in current guidelines. The referral practice for AVR is a path for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjersti Oterhals
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rune Haaverstad
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Erik Nordrehaug
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Geir Egil Eide
- Department of Research and Development, Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Tone M Norekvål
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hahn RT. Current transcatheter devices to treat functional tricuspid regurgitation with discussion of issues relevant to clinical trial design. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 6:240-247. [PMID: 28706866 DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.03.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Functional or secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has seen increased attention in recent times as relationships with clinically-relevant outcomes have come to light. Despite the association of increased mortality with significant TR, the disease remains under-recognized and thus relatively untreated. In addition, the disease itself has not been extensively studied and the interactions between annular dilatation, right heart disease and pulmonary hypertension are poorly understood. However, the high mortality and recurrence rate with current surgical replacement or repair techniques is well recognised, opening the door to transcatheter therapies for functional TR. The current perspective reviews the rationale for transcatheter solutions, describes some of the current approaches and discusses the ongoing questions of a poorly-studied condition which may limit the design of clinical trials for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca T Hahn
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hahn RT, Meduri CU, Davidson CJ, Lim S, Nazif TM, Ricciardi MJ, Rajagopal V, Ailawadi G, Vannan MA, Thomas JD, Fowler D, Rich S, Martin R, Ong G, Groothuis A, Kodali S. Early Feasibility Study of a Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:1795-1806. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
18
|
Greater pre-operative anxiety, pain and poorer function predict a worse outcome of a total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25:3403-3410. [PMID: 27734110 PMCID: PMC5644683 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Around 10-30 % of patients are dissatisfied with the results of their total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This review aimed to identify and evaluate the predictors of outcome measured by the three domains of health-related quality of life (pain, stiffness and function). The focus was on pre-operative psychological factors as related to other patient-related variables. METHODS A systematic search was performed using the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SciFinder, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, Lilacs, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. The quality of identified studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Cohort checklist. RESULTS Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. From these, nine patient-related predictors of outcome were identified (depression, anxiety, age at surgery, gender (being female), medical co-morbidities, BMI, level of education, pre-operative pain severity and pre-operative knee function). Greater anxiety, pre-operative pain and function were the most significant factors to predict a poorer outcome of a TKA. The results of depression, gender (female), medical co-morbidities, BMI and level of education were variable among the included studies. There was very little evidence to support older age at operation as a predictor of poorer outcome. CONCLUSION Patients experiencing high levels of pain before surgery should be informed of the chances of improvement by having a TKA. A validated psychological screening tool that separates depression and anxiety is recommended as part of the pre-operative assessment stage. Patients presenting with symptoms of depression and anxiety should be identified and consulted before a TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|