Prognosis of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation and reduced ejection fraction

Impact of Mitral Regurgitation Etiology on Mitral Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: From the CUTTING-EDGE Registry

BACKGROUND

Although >150,000 mitral TEER procedures have been performed worldwide, the impact of MR etiology on MV surgery after TEER remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to compare outcomes of mitral valve (MV) surgery after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) stratified by mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology.

METHODS

Data from the CUTTING-EDGE registry were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeries were stratified by MR etiology: primary (PMR) and secondary (SMR). MVARC (Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium) outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were evaluated. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (IQR: 1.1-25.8 months) after surgery.

RESULTS

From July 2009 to July 2020, 330 patients underwent MV surgery after TEER, of which 47% had PMR and 53.0% had SMR. Mean age was 73.8 ± 10.1 years, median STS risk at initial TEER was 4.0% (IQR: 2.2%-7.3%). Compared with PMR, SMR had a higher EuroSCORE, more comorbidities, lower LVEF pre-TEER and presurgery (all P < 0.05). SMR patients had more aborted TEER (25.7% vs 16.3%; P = 0.043), more surgery for mitral stenosis after TEER (19.4% vs 9.0%; P = 0.008), and fewer MV repairs (4.0% vs 11.0%; P = 0.019). Thirty-day mortality was numerically higher in SMR (20.4% vs 12.7%; P = 0.072), with an observed-to-expected ratio of 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9-5.3) overall, 2.6 (95% CI: 1.2-4.0) in PMR, and 4.6 (95% CI: 2.6-6.6) in SMR. SMR had significantly higher 1-year mortality (38.3% vs 23.2%; P = 0.019). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the actuarial estimates of cumulative survival were significantly lower in SMR at 1 and 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of MV surgery after TEER is nontrivial, with higher mortality after surgery, especially in SMR patients. These findings provide valuable data for further research to improve these outcomes.

Cardiac computed tomography based analysis of mitral annulus, coronary sinus and left circumflex artery in patients with mitral regurgitation: Implications for transcatheter mitral annuloplasty techniques

INTRODUCTION

CT imaging analysis of mitral annulus (MA), coronary sinus (CS) and left circumflex artery (LCX) is critical to transcatheter mitral annuloplasty (TMA), which, however, is scantly reported. We aimed to comprehensively assess MA, CS and LCX anatomy and geometry in mitral regurgitation (MR) based on 3-D reconstruction of cardiac CT images.

METHODS

Patients with primary or secondary MR and patients without MR were recruited and underwent cardiac CT examination. MR severity was evaluated by echocardiography. 3-D reconstruction of cardiac CT images was done by the Mimics Research 21.0 software. A MA-centered two dimensional coordinate system, a CS plane, a MA plane and a series of auxiliary planes along the posterior MA were created for the measurement of parameters defining MA, CS and LCX anatomy and geometry during the cardiac cycle.

RESULTS

The secondary MR group had a significantly higher MA perimeter index than the other two groups during the cardiac cycle. The CS diameters at most sites, and the posterior MA radian were substantially greater in the two MR groups. Distances between the CS and MA at some locations were significant different among the three groups. The secondary MR group had a significantly smaller CS-MA plane angle than the other two groups during systole, and than control group during diastole. The site where the CS crossed LCX was pinpointed.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive information from this study may help improve the results of TMA and enhance the design of devices for a better annuloplasty effect.

The Prognostic Role of Mitral Valve Regurgitation Severity and Left Ventricle Function in Acute Heart Failure

Aims: Data about the prognostic interplay between mitral regurgitation MR and left ventricular (LV) function in the outcome of patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF) are scarce. We evaluated the prognostic impact of MR severity and LV function on mortality and on recurrent heart failure hospitalization (re-HFH) in patients admitted with AHF. Methods and Results: In total, 6843 patients admitted with AHF were evaluated: 2521 patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% (reduced LVEF), 1238 of them (51%) having ≥moderate MR; and 4322 with LVEF > 40% (preserved LVEF), 1175 of them (27%) having ≥moderate MR. One-year mortality and re-HFH rates were higher in patients with ≥moderate MR unrelated to the baseline LV function (p = 0.028 and p < 0.001, respectively). After multivariable analysis, only reduced LVEF, and not the severity of MR, predicted mortality risk (HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 1.12−1.53] for patients with reduced LV function and ≤mild MR; HR: 1.44 [95% CI: 1.25−1.67] for patients with reduced LV function and ≥moderate MR); p < 0.001 for both. There was an increased risk for re-HFH in each group (HR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.17−1.52] for patients with preserved LV function and ≥moderate MR; HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 1.15−1.51] for patients with reduced LV function and mild MR; and HR: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.45−1.88] for patients with reduced LV function and ≥moderate MR); p < 0.001 for all. Conclusions: In patients admitted with AHF, the LV function is the main prognostic determinant for mortality after 1 year. Significant (≥moderate) MR is associated with an increased risk of recurrent hospitalization.

Survival of patients with mild secondary mitral regurgitation with and without mild tricuspid regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Mild secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is considered clinically benign when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved, but evidence on survival associated with mild SMR in normal LVEF is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent echocardiogram in a healthcare network between 2013 and 2018. We compared the survival of 4 groups: no valvular abnormalities (group 1), trace SMR with trace or mild TR (group 2), mild SMR with trace or no TR (group 3), and mild SMR with mild TR (group 4). A Cox proportional hazard model evaluated hazard of death in groups 2-4 compared with group 1, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and LVEF. The same comparisons were repeated in a subgroup of patients with preserved LVEF.

RESULTS

Among the 16,372 patients of mean age 61 (51-71) years and 48% women, there were 8,132 (49.7%) group 1 patients, 1,902 (11.6%) group 2 patients, 3,017 (18.4%) group 3 patients, and 3,321 (20.3%) group 4 patients. Compared with group 1, group 4 had significantly increased adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR]:1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]1.12-1.31), p<0.001) while groups 2 and 3 did not show a significantly different hazard of death. In those with preserved LVEF, the hazard was also significantly higher in group 4 compared with group 1 (HR1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.26, p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Mild SMR with mild TR, irrespective of LVEF, was associated with worse survival compared with patients without any valvular abnormalities. Patients with mild SMR may require closer monitoring even with normal LVEF.

Insights into functional mitral regurgitation using transillumination rendering

Secondary mitral regurgitation has been originally explained by tethering of the structurally normal mitral leaflets or by mitral annular dilation after atrial remodeling. Advances in echocardiography have provided more insights into functional anatomy of the mitral valve leaflets as active participants in this entity.

Impact of mitral regurgitation on cardiovascular hospitalization and death in newly diagnosed heart failure patients

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) carries a poor prognosis, and the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is not well understood. This analysis aimed to estimate the incremental effect of MR in patients newly diagnosed with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were analysed. Included patients had at least one inpatient or two outpatient HF claims. A 6 month post-period after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. HF patients were separated into three cohorts: without MR (no MR), not clinically significant MR (nsMR), and significant MR (sMR). Time-to-event analyses were modelled to estimate the clinical burden of disease. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or cardiovascular (CV)-related admission. Secondary outcomes were death and CV hospitalization alone. All models controlled for baseline demographics and co-morbidities. Patients with sMR were at significantly higher risk of either death or CV admission compared with patients with no MR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.39]. When evaluating death alone, patients with sMR had significantly higher risk of death (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.43) compared with patients with no MR. When evaluating CV admission alone, patients with MR were at higher risk of hospital admission vs. patients with no MR, and the magnitude was dependent upon the MR severity: sMR (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.38-1.74) and nsMR (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08-1.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the clinical burden of incident HF patients. Time to death and CV hospitalizations are increased when MR is clinically significant.

Dynamic Augmentation of Left Ventricle and Mitral Valve Function With an Implantable Soft Robotic Device

Left ventricular failure is strongly associated with secondary mitral valve regurgitation. Implantable soft robotic devices are an emerging technology that enables augmentation of a native function of a target tissue. We demonstrate the ability of a novel soft robotic ventricular assist device to dynamically augment left ventricular contraction, provide native pulsatile flow, simultaneously reshape the mitral valve apparatus, and eliminate the associated regurgitation in an Short-term large animal model of acute left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The development of aortic valve stenosis is strongly associated with older adults. Patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis frequently have heart failure (HF). We investigated the predictors of mortality after TAVI according to the presence of HF, and specifically HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample registry from January 2011 to September 2015 using the ICD-9 codes. Patients with HF who underwent TAVI were classified according to whether they were diagnosed with HFrEF or HFpEF. The principal outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for potential baseline confounders. Among 11,609 patients undergoing TAVI, 6,368 (54.9%) had baseline HF, including 4,290 (67.4%) with HFpEF and 2,078 (32.6%) with HFrEF. In TAVI patients with HF, in-hospital mortality was also not significantly different in those with HFrEF compared with HFpEF (3.66% vs 3.17%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.53; p = 0.38). Polyvalvular heart disease was an additional independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in HFrEF, whereas age, liver disease, and the absence of depression and anemia were additional independent predictors of mortality in HFpEF. In conclusion, baseline HF in patients undergoing TAVI is prevalent and is more commonly due to HFpEF than HFrEF. Mortality is similar in those with HFrEF and HFpEF. Knowledge of the specific predictors of mortality after TAVI in HF patients may be useful for patient selection and prognostic guidance.

Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

To compare percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).

Background

Many patients with HF and FMR are not suitable for surgical valve replacement and remain symptomatic despite maximal OMT. PMVR has recently emerged as an alternative solution.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to address this question. Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched for randomized (RCT) and nonrandomized studies comparing PMVR with OMT in patients with HF and FMR. Primary endpoint was all-cause midterm mortality (at 1 and 2 years). Secondary endpoints were 30-day mortality and cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalizations, at maximum follow-up. Studies including mixed cohort of degenerative and functional MR were allowed initially but were excluded in a secondary sensitivity analysis for each of the study's end points. This meta-analysis was performed following the publication of two RCTs (MITRA-FR and COAPT).

Results

Eight studies (six observational, two RCTs) comprising 3,009 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In comparison with OMT, PMVR significantly reduced 1-year mortality (RR: 0.70 [0.56, 0.87]; p=0.002; I²=47.6%), 2-year mortality (RR: 0.63 [0.55, 0.73]; p<0.001; I²=0%), and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.32 [0.23, 0.44]; p<0.001; I²=0%). No significant difference between PMVR+OMT and OMT was noted in HF hospitalization (HR: 0.69 [0.40, 1.20]; p=0.19; I²=85%) and 30-day mortality (RR: 1.13 [0.68, 1.87]; p=0.16; I²=0%).

Conclusions

In comparison with OMT, PMVR significantly reduces 1-year mortality, 2-year mortality, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with HF and severe MR.

Secondary mitral regurgitation: percutaneous edge-to-edge repair on the cutting edge?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Secondary mitral regurgitation commonly complicates heart failure. Although the evidence for its management is most robust for treating the underlying cardiomyopathy, treatment aimed at additionally reducing the severity of mitral regurgitation with a percutaneous edge-to-edge device, MitraClip, has recently emerged.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the use of contemporary evidence-based heart failure therapies, patients with secondary mitral regurgitation and heart failure continue to remain at high risk for adverse clinical events; in both the MITRA-FR and COAPT trials, an extremely high event rate was evident in the medically managed arms over the respective 12-24-month follow-up. Data supporting the use of MitraClip to mitigate adverse outcomes in secondary mitral regurgitation is, however, conflicting. In MITRA-FR no difference was noted between MitraClip compared with the medically managed arm for the composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization at 12 months. However, in COAPT, a significant reduction in the rate of heart failure re-hospitalization over 2 years was evident with MitraClip compared with medical therapy alone.

SUMMARY

Recommendations exist for the use of MitraClip in patients with primary mitral regurgitation and prohibitive surgical risk. However, with the divergent results of two recent high-quality randomized trials, its role in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation remains controversial.