Severe theophylline poisoning: charcoal haemoperfusion or haemodialysis?

Aminophylline Induces Two Types of Arrhythmic Events in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes

Cardiac side effects of some pulmonary drugs are observed in clinical practice. Aminophylline, a methylxanthine bronchodilator with documented proarrhythmic action, may serve as an example. Data on the action of aminophylline on cardiac cell electrophysiology and contractility are not available. Hence, this study was focused on the analysis of changes in the beat rate and contraction force of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) and HL-1 cardiomyocytes in the presence of increasing concentrations of aminophylline (10 µM-10 mM in hPSC-CM and 8-512 µM in HL-1 cardiomyocytes). Basic biomedical parameters, namely, the beat rate (BR) and contraction force, were assessed in hPSC-CMs using an atomic force microscope (AFM). The beat rate changes under aminophylline were also examined on the HL-1 cardiac muscle cell line via a multielectrode array (MEA). Additionally, calcium imaging was used to evaluate the effect of aminophylline on intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in HL-1 cardiomyocytes. The BR was significantly increased after the application of aminophylline both in hPSC-CMs (with 10 mM aminophylline) and in HL-1 cardiomyocytes (with 256 and 512 µM aminophylline) in comparison with controls. A significant increase in the contraction force was also observed in hPSC-CMs with 10 µM aminophylline (a similar trend was visible at higher concentrations as well). We demonstrated that all aminophylline concentrations significantly increased the frequency of rhythm irregularities (extreme interbeat intervals) both in hPSC-CMs and HL-1 cells. The occurrence of the calcium sparks in HL-1 cardiomyocytes was significantly increased with the presence of 512 µM aminophylline. We conclude that the observed aberrant cardiomyocyte response to aminophylline suggests an arrhythmogenic potential of the drug. The acquired data represent a missing link between the arrhythmic events related to the aminophylline/theophylline treatment in clinical practice and describe cellular mechanisms of methylxanthine arrhythmogenesis. An AFM combined with hPSC-CMs may serve as a robust platform for direct drug effect screening.

Retrospective evaluation of the use of hemodialysis in dogs with suspected metaldehyde poisoning (2012-2017): 11 cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate dogs treated with hemodialysis for severe metaldehyde intoxication and to compare them with conventionally-managed patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective study (2012-2017).

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Data from 18 dogs with severe metaldehyde intoxication were analyzed. Eleven dogs were treated with intermittent hemodialysis and 7 managed conventionally.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Metaldehyde poisoning was diagnosed based on clinical signs and toxicological analysis or presence of turquoise material in the gastrointestinal content. Clinical signs, additional treatments, dialysis prescription, duration of anesthesia and hospitalization, complications, and outcome were documented. Results were analyzed by t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Dialysis was performed for median (range) 180 min (150-420 min) with median of 2.28 L/kg (1.66-4.48 L/kg) blood volume processed. In the hemodialysis group, anesthesia was discontinued at a median of 3.0 hours (1.5-6.7 h) after starting dialysis. The conventional-group received general anesthesia for a median of 17.5 hours (7.0-30.5 h). No further anticonvulsive treatment was necessary for the hemodialysis group. Time to hospital discharge was shorter in dialyzed dogs (median 18 h; 15-41 h) compared to conventionally treated dogs (median 89 h; 61-168 h; P = 0.0014). Aspiration pneumonia was reported in 5 conventionally treated dogs and none of the dialyzed dogs (P = 0.001). Five dialyzed dogs developed hematoma at the dialysis catheter site. One dog in each group was euthanized.

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis significantly decreases the requirement for anesthesia and length of hospitalization in dogs with metaldehyde intoxication. Aspiration pneumonia occurred less often in dialyzed patients. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the clinical utility of hemodialysis in dogs with metaldehyde poisoning.

Intermittent haemodialysis and sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) for acute theophylline toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Theophylline overdose can result in significant cardiovascular and neurologic toxicity and is potentially fatal. Clearance of theophylline can be enhanced by the administration of multiple-dose activated charcoal (MDAC) and extracorporeal elimination techniques. We report a case of severe theophylline toxicity initially treated with MDAC and intermittent haemodialysis. Subsequent to this, sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) was undertaken. This is a prolonged renal replacement therapy that uses blood and dialysate flow rates between those of intermittent haemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy.

CASE REPORT

A 61-year-old man presented following ingestion of 24 g of theophylline SR (300 mg/kg), 240 mg of diazepam and 2 g of gabapentin. He required intubation and developed a supraventricular tachycardia treated with esmolol, but suffered no seizures. Serum theophylline concentration peaked at 636 μmol/L (55-110) at 9.5 h post-ingestion. Intermittent haemodialysis was performed for 4 h and resulted in a theophylline extraction ratio of 0.57 with elimination half-life of 2.3 h. SLED was subsequently performed on two occasions for 7 h. Theophylline extraction ratio ranged from 0.46 (half-life 5.3 h during the first cycle) to 0.61 (half-life 10.6 h during the second cycle). After cessation of SLED, elimination half-life was 26 h. The patient made an uneventful recovery.

DISCUSSION

Intermittent haemodialysis is the current recommended extracorporeal technique for enhancing theophylline elimination in the absence of charcoal haemoperfusion. However, SLED produced similar apparent extraction ratios with longer associated elimination half-life for theophylline than for intermittent haemodialysis. SLED is undertaken by intensive care unit (ICU) staff and may be a useful extracorporeal elimination technique in cases where access to intermittent haemodialysis, requiring specialist dialysis nursing staff, is limited or may be delayed.

Extracorporeal treatment for theophylline poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning workgroup was created to provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in poisoning. Here, the workgroup presents its systematic review and recommendations for theophylline.

METHODS

After a systematic review of the literature, a subgroup reviewed articles, extracted data, summarized findings, and proposed structured voting statements following a pre-determined format. A two-round modified Delphi method was chosen to reach a consensus on voting statements and the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to quantify disagreement. Anonymous votes were compiled, returned, and discussed. A second vote determined the final recommendations.

RESULTS

141 articles were included: 6 in vitro studies, 4 animal studies, 101 case reports/case series, 7 descriptive cohorts, 4 observational studies, and 19 pharmacokinetic studies, yielding a low-to-very-low quality of evidence for all recommendations. Data on 143 patients were reviewed, including 10 deaths. The workgroup concluded that theophylline is dialyzable (level of evidence = A) and made the following recommendations: ECTR is recommended in severe theophylline poisoning (1C). Specific recommendations for ECTR include a theophylline concentration [theophylline] > 100 mg/L (555 μmol/L) in acute exposure (1C), the presence of seizures (1D), life-threatening dysrhythmias (1D) or shock (1D), a rising [theophylline] despite optimal therapy (1D), and clinical deterioration despite optimal care (1D). In chronic poisoning, ECTR is suggested if [theophylline] > 60 mg/L (333 μmol/L) (2D) or if the [theophylline] > 50 mg/L (278 μmol/L) and the patient is either less than 6 months of age or older than 60 years of age (2D). ECTR is also suggested if gastrointestinal decontamination cannot be administered (2D). ECTR should be continued until clinical improvement is apparent or the [theophylline] is < 15 mg/L (83 μmol/L) (1D). Following the cessation of ECTR, patients should be closely monitored. Intermittent hemodialysis is the preferred method of ECTR (1C). If intermittent hemodialysis is unavailable, hemoperfusion (1C) or continuous renal replacement therapies may be considered (3D). Exchange transfusion is an adequate alternative to hemodialysis in neonates (2D). Multi-dose activated charcoal should be continued during ECTR (1D).

CONCLUSION

Theophylline poisoning is amenable to ECTRs. The workgroup recommended extracorporeal removal in the case of severe theophylline poisoning.

Hemoperfusion for the treatment of poisoning: technology, determinants of poison clearance, and application in clinical practice

Hemoperfusion is an extracorporeal treatment based on adsorption, historically reserved for the treatment of acute poisonings. Its use was popularized in the 1970s after several in vitro and animal experiments had demonstrated its efficacy, and was even preferred over hemodialysis in the management of overdosed patients. With the advent of new and more efficient dialytic modalities, hemoperfusion is now less frequently performed in the Western world. However, hemoperfusion still remains popular in developing countries. The present article reviews the technique of hemoperfusion, the factors influencing poison clearance through adsorption and its current applications.

Drug-induced hyperthermic syndromes: part I. Hyperthermia in overdose

Drugs and natural compounds that affect the thermoregulatory system can induce or contribute to hyperthermia when used in excess. Hyperthermia associated with drug overdose is dangerous and potentially lethal. This article reviews the body's process of maintaining thermodynamic equilibrium, and describes the mechanisms by which it is influenced by sympathomimetic and anticholinergic drugs, salicylates, and thyroid replacement medications. Appropriate treatment strategies such as cooling and the administration of counteractive medications are discussed.

Use of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS™) for the management of acute poisoning with or without liver failure

INTRODUCTION

There is an increasing interest in recent developments in bioartificial and non-bioartificial devices, so called extracorporeal liver assist devices, which are now used widely not only to increase drug elimination, but also to enhance the removal of endogenous substances in acute liver failure. Most of the non-bioartificial techniques are based on the principle of albumin dialysis. The objective is to remove albumin-bound substances that could play a role in the pathophysiology of acute liver failure by dialysing blood against an albumin-containing solution across a high flux permeable membrane. The most widely used device is the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS™).

METHODS

The relevant English and French literature was identified through Medline using the terms, 'molecular adsorbent recirculating system', 'MARS', 'acute liver failure', 'acute poisoning', 'intoxication'. This search identified 139 papers of which 48 reported on a toxic cause for the use of MARS™. Of these 48 papers, 39 specified the substance (eighteen different substances were identified); two papers reported on the same group of patients. BIOARTIFICIAL AND NON-BIOARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS: Bioartificial systems based on porcine hepatocytes incorporated in the extracorporeal circuit are no longer in use due to the possibility of porcine retroviral transmission to humans. Historically, experience with such devices was limited to a few cases of paracetamol poisoning. In contrast, an abundant literature exists for the non-bioartificial systems based on albumin dialysis. The MARS™ has been used more widely than other techniques, such as the one using fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus™). All the extracorporeal liver assist devices are able to some extent to remove biological substances (ammonia, urea, creatinine, bilirubin, bile acids, amino acids, cytokines, vasoactive agents) but the real impact on the patient's clinical course has still to be determined. Improvement in cardiovascular or neurological dysfunction has been shown both in acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure but no impact on mortality has been reported. ACUTE POISONING WITH LIVER FAILURE: Randomized controlled trials are very limited in number and patients poisoned by paracetamol or Amanita phalloides are usually included for outcome analysis in larger groups of acute liver failure patients. Initial results look promising but should be confirmed. Beyond its effect in liver failure, MARS™ could also enhance the elimination of the drug or toxin responsible for the failure, as is described with paracetamol. ACUTE POISONING WITHOUT LIVER FAILURE: Extracorporeal liver assist devices have also been used to promote elimination of drugs that are highly protein bound. Data in various case reports confirm a high elimination of phenytoin, theophylline and diltiazem. However, definite conclusions on the toxicokinetic or clinical efficacy cannot be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of large multicentre randomized trials on the use of MARS™ in patients with acute liver failure, the literature shows clinical and biological benefit from this technique. In drug or toxin-induced acute liver failure, such as paracetamol or mushroom poisoning, MARS™ has been used extensively, confirming in a non-randomized fashion, the positive effect observed in the larger population of acute liver failure patients. Furthermore, as MARS™ has been shown in experimental studies to remove protein-bound substances, it is potentially a promising treatment for patients with acute poisoning from drugs that have high protein-binding capacity and are metabolized by the liver, especially, if they develop liver failure concomitantly.

Metabolic acidosis in the critically ill: part 2. Causes and treatment

The correct identification of the cause, and ideally the individual acid, responsible for metabolic acidosis in the critically ill ensures rational management. In Part 2 of this review, we examine the elevated (corrected) anion gap acidoses (lactic, ketones, uraemic and toxin ingestion) and contrast them with nonelevated conditions (bicarbonate wasting, renal tubular acidoses and iatrogenic hyperchloraemia) using readily available base excess and anion gap techniques. The potentially erroneous interpretation of elevated lactate signifying cell ischaemia is highlighted. We provide diagnostic and therapeutic guidance when faced with a high anion gap acidosis, for example pyroglutamate, in the common clinical scenario 'I can't identify the acid--but I know it's there'. The evidence that metabolic acidosis affects outcomes and thus warrants correction is considered and we provide management guidance including extracorporeal removal and fomepizole therapy.

The Availability and Use of Charcoal Hemoperfusion in the Treatment of Poisoned Patients

BACKGROUND

Charcoal hemoperfusion (CHP) has been one of the preferred methods to enhance the elimination of certain toxins in selected poisoned patients. However, the availability of CHP may be limited because of the expense of cartridges, their narrow indications, and their limited shelf life. Improvements in hemodialysis (HD) technology may contribute to making CHP obsolete. We investigated the availability of CHP in in-hospital HD units at hospitals receiving ambulances dispatched through New York City's emergency response system, hereafter referred to as 911-receiving hospitals, and their recent history of CHP use in poisoned patients.

METHODS

The medical directors or managers of all in-hospital HD units in the 911-receiving hospitals of New York City were contacted by E-mail and/or telephone. Participants were administered a standard survey that included questions regarding the availability of CHP cartridges and the date and indication for last CHP use. Participants at institutions that did not stock CHP cartridges were questioned about their opinions on the utility of CHP.

RESULTS

Forty-two in-hospital HD units were surveyed, of which 34 (81%) completed the survey. Ten units (29%) had CHP cartridges available for immediate use. Each of these 10 units stocked between 1 and 4 adult-size CHP cartridges, and 1 unit stocked 2 pediatric-size CHP cartridges. Nine units had in-date CHP cartridges, and 1 unit had only expired CHP cartridges. Only 3 units performed CHP in the past 5 years (2 units, theophylline poisonings; 1 unit, aluminum overload). In the 24 units without CHP cartridges, 21 directors believed that most common toxins could be removed effectively through HD and thus CHP rarely was indicated. Only 1 director cited expense as a factor in not stocking CHP cartridges. Two directors reported no specific reason for not stocking the cartridges.

CONCLUSION

CHP cartridges are available in only approximately one third of 911-receiving hospitals in New York City. CHP is infrequently performed to enhance toxin elimination in poisoned patients.

Cardiovascular challenges in toxicology

The diagnoses and subsequent treatment of poisoned patients manifesting cardiovascular compromise challenges the most experienced emergency physician. Numerous drugs and chemicals cause cardiac and vascular disorders. Despite widely varying indications for therapeutic use, many agents share a common cardiovascular pharmacologic effect if taken in overdose. Standard advanced cardiac life support protocol care of these patients may not apply and may even result in harm if followed. This chapter discusses com-mon cardiovascular toxins and groups them into their common mechanisms of toxicity. Multiple agents exist that result in human cardiovascular toxicity. The management of the toxicity of each agent should follow a rationale approach. The first step in the care of all poisoned patients focuses on good supportive care.

Extracorporeal therapies for acute intoxications

Intoxications frequently perturb acid-base and electrolyte status, intravascular volume, and renal function. In selected cases, extracorporeal techniques effectively restore homeostasis and augment intoxicant removal. The use of 4-methylpyrazole, an inhibitor of alcohol dehydrogenase, is a new and effective treatment for patients exposed to toxic alcohols. In this section, practical approaches to commonly encountered intoxicants and the use of extracorporeal techniques are critically reviewed.