Cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnosis and management

Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cardiac sarcoidosis is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy that results from granulomatous inflammation of the myocardium and may present with high-grade conduction disease, ventricular arrhythmias, and right or left ventricular dysfunction. Over the past several decades, the prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis has increased. Definitive histological confirmation is often not possible, so clinicians frequently face uncertainty about the accuracy of diagnosis. Hence, the likelihood of cardiac sarcoidosis should be thought of as a continuum (definite, highly probable, probable, possible, low probability, unlikely) rather than in a binary fashion. Treatment should be initiated in individuals with clinical manifestations and active inflammation in a tiered approach, with corticosteroids as first-line treatment. The lack of randomized clinical trials in cardiac sarcoidosis has led to treatment decisions based on cohort studies and consensus opinions, with substantial variation observed across centers. This scientific statement is intended to guide clinical practice and to facilitate management conformity by providing a framework for the diagnosis and management of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Sarcoid Heart Disease: Review of Current Knowledge

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease with the potential of multiple organ system involvement and its etiology remains unknown. Cardiac involvement is associated with worse clinical outcome, and has been reported to be 20-30% in white and as high as 58% in Japanese populations with sarcoidosis. Clinical manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis highly depend on the extent and location of granulomatous inflammation. The most frequent presentations include heart block, tachyarrhythmia, or heart failure. Endomyocardial biopsy is the most specific diagnostic test, but has poor sensitivity due to often patchy involvement. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis remains challenging due to nonspecific imaging findings. Both 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can be used to evaluate cardiac sarcoidosis, but evaluate different stages of the disease process. FDG-PET detects metabolically active inflammatory cells while cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement reveals areas of myocardial necrosis and fibrosis. Aggressive therapy of symptomatic cardiac sarcoidosis is often sought due to the high risk of sudden death and/or progression to heart failure. Prednisone 20-40 mg a day is the recommended initial treatment. In refractory or severe cases, higher doses of prednisone, 1-1.5 mg/kg/d (or its equivalent) and addition of a steroid-sparing agent have been utilized. Methotrexate is added most commonly. Long-term improvement has been reported with the use of a combination of weekly methotrexate and prednisone versus prednisone alone. After initiation of treatment, a cardiac FDG-PET scan may be performed 2-3 months later to assess treatment response.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multi-system disorder with an unknown etiology that can affect the cardiac tissue, resulting in Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS). The majority of these CS cases are clinically silent, and when there are symptoms, the symptoms are vague and can have a lot in common with other common cardiac diseases. These symptoms can range from arrhythmias to heart failure. If CS goes undetected, it can lead to detrimental outcomes for patients. Diagnosis depends on timely utilization of imaging modalities and non-invasive testing, while in some cases, it does necessitate biopsy. Early diagnosis and treatment with immunosuppressive agents are crucial, and it is essential that follow-up testing be performed to ensure resolution and remission. This manuscript provides an in-depth review of CS and the current literature regarding CS diagnosis and treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nonischemic Myocardial Disease with Clinical Manifestations (Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Already Excluded)

Nonischemic cardiomyopathies encompass a broad spectrum of myocardial disorders with mechanical or electrical dysfunction without evidence of ischemia. There are five broad variants of nonischemic cardiomyopathies; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Variant 1), restrictive or infiltrative cardiomyopathy (Variant 2), dilated or unclassified cardiomyopathy (Variant 3), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (Variant 4), and inflammatory cardiomyopathy (Variant 5). For variants 1, 3, and 4, resting transthoracic echocardiography, MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast, and MRI heart function and morphology without contrast are the usually appropriate imaging modalities. For variants 2 and 5, resting transthoracic echocardiography and MRI heart function and morphology without and with contrast are the usually appropriate imaging modalities. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Clinical Features and Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an unusual, but potentially harmful, manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis (SA), a chronic disease characterized by organ involvement from noncaseating and nonnecrotizing granulomas. Lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes are usually the sites that are most frequently affected, but no organ is spared and CS can affect a variable portion of SA patients, up to 25% from post-mortem studies. The cardiovascular involvement is usually associated with a bad prognosis and is responsible for the major cause of death and complications, particularly in African American patients. Furthermore, the diagnosis is often complicated by the occurrence of non-specific clinical manifestations, which can mimic the effect of more common heart disorders, and imaging and biopsies are the most valid approach to avoid misdiagnosis. This narrative review summarizes the main clinical features of CS and imaging findings, particularly of CMR and 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) that can give the best cost/benefit ratio in terms of the diagnostic approach. Imaging can be very useful in replacing the endomyocardial biopsy in selected cases, to avoid unnecessary, and potentially dangerous, invasive maneuvers.

Ten Questions Cardiologists Should Be Able to Answer About Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Case-Based Approach and Contemporary Review

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory multisystemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Cardiac sarcoidosis might be life-threatening and its diagnosis and treatment remain a challenge nowadays. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of cardiac sarcoidosis and, through 10 practical clinical questions and real-life challenging case scenarios, summarize the main clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, imaging findings, and contemporary treatment.

Critical Care of Patients With Cardiopulmonary Complications of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease defined by the presence of aberrant granulomas affecting various organs. Due to its multisystem involvement, care of patients with established sarcoidosis becomes challenging, especially in the intensive care setting. While the lungs are typically involved, extrapulmonary manifestations also occur either concurrently or exclusively within a significant proportion of patients, complicating diagnostic and management decisions. The scope of this review is to focus on what considerations are necessary in the evaluation and management of patients with known sarcoidosis and their associated complications within a cardiopulmonary and critical care perspective.

Sudden death in cardiac sarcoidosis: an analysis of nationwide clinical and cause-of-death registries

Aims

The present study was done to assess the role of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among the presenting manifestations of and fatalities from cardiac sarcoidosis (CS).

Methods and results

We analysed altogether 351 cases of CS presenting from year 1998 through 2015 in Finland. There were 262 patients with a clinical diagnosis and treatment of CS, 27 patients with an initial lifetime diagnosis of giant cell myocarditis that was later converted to CS, and 62 cases detected at autopsy and identified by screening >820 000 death certificates from the national cause-of-death registry. The total case series comprised 253 females and 98 males aged on average 52 years at presentation. High-grade atrioventricular block was the most common first sign of CS (n = 147, 42%) followed by heart failure (n = 58, 17%), unexpected fatal (n = 38) or aborted (n = 12) SCD (14%), and sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 48, 14%). Severe coronary artery disease was found at autopsy concomitant with CS in four of the 38 cases presenting with fatal SCD. Of all deaths recorded till the end of 2015, 64% (n = 54/84) were unexpected SCDs from CS that had either been silent during life or defied all attempts at diagnosis. The Kaplan–Meier estimate (95% CI) of survival from symptom onset was 85% (80–90%) at 5 years and 76% (68–84%) at 10 years.

Conclusion

Together fatal and aborted SCD constitute 14% of the presenting manifestations of CS. Nearly two-thirds of all fatalities from CS are caused by undiagnosed granulomas in the heart.

Heterogeneity of myocardial 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake is a typical feature in cardiac sarcoidosis: a study of 231 patients

Aims

The goal of the investigation was to evaluate whether a semi-quantitative method reflecting myocardial 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake heterogeneity has added value in addition to visual analysis in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS).

Methods and results

This retrospective analysis included 271 consecutive patients suspected of CS attending cardiac positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) at our institution between 2007 and 2013. Visual analysis of PET-CT and semi-quantitative analysis of heterogeneity [coefficient of variation (CoV)] of myocardial FDG uptake were performed. The presence of CS and initial symptoms were verified from patient data. The criteria for CS included histological verification from the myocardium or from an extracardiac site. Thirty cancer patients without cardiac disease were included as controls. CS was diagnosed in 48/231 (20.8%) of analysed patients. Of these, 13 (27.1%) had no extracardial signs of the disease and 30 (62.5%) had FDG positive mediastinal lymph nodes. Visual analysis of PET-CT identified 48.9% of the CS patients. We found a cut-off value of 0.184 for CoV to have the best accuracy to detect CS from a patient population with suspected CS (75.0% sensitivity and 51.4% specificity). Compared to controls, CoV identified CS patients with a good accuracy (68.8% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity). CS patients with FDG positive mediastinal lymph nodes had higher CoV than CS patients without lymph node involvement (0.282 vs. 0.208, P = 0.016). CS patients with more severe initial symptoms had a higher CoV than patients with more benign symptoms (0.283 vs. 0.195, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

CoV provides a good addition to visual analysis of cardiac FDG PET-CT in diagnosis of CS. As a semi-quantitative measure, it reduces intra-observer variability. It also seems to indicate more severe disease, but to confirm this, prospective studies are needed.

Management of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis: challenges and solutions

Background

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multisystem disease of unknown etiology characterized by noncaseating granulomas that most often involves the lungs, but frequently has extrapulmonary manifestations, which might be difficult to treat in individual patients.

Objective

To review different disease manifestations, focusing on extrapulmonary organ systems, and to provide treatment options for refractory cases.

Materials and methods

We performed a literature search using Medline and Google Scholar for individual or combined keywords of “sarcoidosis, extrapulmonary, treatment, kidney, neurosarcoidosis, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, transplantation, musculoskeletal, rheumatology, arthritis, and skin”. Peer-reviewed articles, including review articles, clinical trials, observational trials, and case reports that were published in English were included. References from retrieved articles were also manually searched for relevant articles.

Results and conclusion

Isolated involvement of a single organ or organ system is rare in sarcoidosis, and thus all patients must be thoroughly evaluated for additional disease manifestations. Cardiac sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis may be life-threatening. Clinicians need to assess patients comprehensively using clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histopathological data to recommend competently the best and least toxic treatment option for the individual patient.