1
|
He R, Bhat S, Varghese C, Rossaak J, Keane C, Baraza W, Wells CI. Interventions to Improve Patient Care on Surgical Ward Rounds: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2023; 47:3159-3174. [PMID: 37857927 PMCID: PMC10694108 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ward rounds are an essential component of surgical and perioperative care. However, the relative effectiveness of different interventions to improve the quality of surgical ward rounds remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of various ward round interventions among surgical patients. METHODS A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and PsycInfo databases was performed on 7 October 2022 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. All studies investigating surgical ward round quality improvement strategies with measurable outcomes were included. Data were analysed via narrative synthesis based on commonly reported themes. RESULTS A total of 28 studies were included. Most were cohort studies (n = 25), followed by randomised controlled trials (n = 3). Checklists/proformas were utilised most commonly (n = 22), followed by technological (n = 3), personnel (n = 2), and well-being (n = 1) quality improvement strategies. The majority of checklist interventions (n = 21, 95%) showed significant improvements in documentation compliance, staff understanding, or patient satisfaction. Other less frequently reported ward round interventions demonstrated improvements in communication, patient safety, and reductions in patient stress levels. CONCLUSIONS Use of checklists, technology, personnel, and well-being improvement strategies have been associated with improvements in ward round documentation, communication, as well as staff and patient satisfaction. Future studies should investigate the ease of implementation and long-term durability of these interventions, in addition to their impact on clinically relevant outcomes such as patient morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben He
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sameer Bhat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora MidCentral, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jeremy Rossaak
- Department of General Surgery, Tauranga Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Bay of Plenty, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Celia Keane
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Wal Baraza
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cameron I Wells
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The First Modified Delphi Consensus-Building Exercise on Surgical Ward Rounds in the United Kingdom National Health Service. World J Surg 2023; 47:1348-1357. [PMID: 36811667 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06945-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ward round is an integral part of everyday surgical practice. It is a complex clinical activity that requires both sound clinical management and communication skills. This study reports the results of a consensus-building exercise on the common aspects of the general surgical ward rounds. METHODS The consensus-building committee involving a range of stakeholders from 16 United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service trusts took part in this consensus exercise. The members discussed and suggested a series of statements concerning surgical ward round. An agreement of ≥ 70% among members was regarded as a consensus. RESULTS Thirty-two members voted on 60 statements. There was a consensus on fifty-nine statements after the first round of voting, and one statement was modified before it reached consensus in the second round. The statements covered nine sections: a preparation phase, team allocation, multidisciplinary approach to the ward round, structure of the round, teaching considerations, confidentiality and privacy, documentation, post-round arrangements, and weekend round. There was a consensus on spending time to prepare for the round, a consultant-led round, involvement of the nursing staff, an MDT round at the beginning and end of the week, a minimum of 5 min allocated to each patient, utilisation of a round checklist, afternoon virtual round, and a clear handover and plan for the weekend. CONCLUSION The consensus committee achieved agreement on several aspects concerning the surgical ward rounds in the UK NHS. This should help improve the care of surgical patients in the UK.
Collapse
|
3
|
A Structured Rounding Proforma in the Hyper Acute Stroke Unit (HASU): A Quality Improvement Project. J Healthc Qual 2023; 45:10-18. [PMID: 36584114 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Strokes affect 100,000 patients annually in the United Kingdom. These patients are often complex and require multidisciplinary team input, hence why they are often treated within dedicated and highly specialized "hyper acute stroke units". However, such specialist care can prove challenging to recently qualified or more junior doctors, who may miss pertinent aspects of the history or examination within the daily patient rounding documentation. Building on evidence-based practice using structured rounds and checklists, this quality improvement aimed to improve adherence of documentation for 20 predetermined key components of a stroke round by introducing a structured daily stroke rounding proforma. Adherence to documentation for the 20 components improved with the introduction of the stroke rounding proforma, with seven components demonstrating statistically significant positive changes in documentation rates, p < .05. Qualitative feedback was collected to aid in the development and acceptability of the proforma. Our study concluded a structured daily stroke rounding proforma can improve adherence to documentation in stroke care. Chiefly, the proforma was of greatest benefit to junior members of the medical team, particularly as an aid memoire.
Collapse
|
4
|
Treloar EC, Ting YY, Kovoor JG, Ey JD, Reid JL, Maddern GJ. Can Checklists Solve Our Ward Round Woes? A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2022; 46:2355-2364. [PMID: 35781840 PMCID: PMC9436887 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06635-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate and thorough surgical ward round documentation is crucial for maintaining quality clinical care. Accordingly, checklists have been proposed to improve ward round documentation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the literature investigating the use of checklists to improve surgical ward round documentation. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched on August 16, 2021. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. We included English studies that investigated the use of checklists during ward rounds in various surgical subspecialties compared to routine care, where the rates of documentation were reported as outcomes. We excluded studies that used checklists in outpatient, non-surgical, or pediatric settings. Due to heterogeneity of outcome measures, meta-analysis was precluded. This study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021273735) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) reporting guidelines. RESULTS A total of 206 studies were identified, only 9 were suitable for inclusion. All included studies were single-center observational studies, spanning across seven surgical specialties. Rates of documentation on 4-23 parameters were reported. Documentation for all measured outcomes improved in 8/9 studies; however, statistical analyses were not included. There was a high risk of bias due to the nature of observational studies. CONCLUSION Ward round checklists can serve as a useful tool to improve inpatient care and safety. Currently, there is no high-level evidence showing the effectiveness of checklists on ward round documentation. The synthesis of results indicates that further high-quality research is imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie C Treloar
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Ying Yang Ting
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Joshua G Kovoor
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Jesse D Ey
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Jessica L Reid
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|