Implementation of an enhanced recovery program in pediatric laparoscopic colorectal patients does not worsen analgesia despite reduced perioperative opioids: a retrospective, matched, non-inferiority study

Evolution of enhanced recovery for children undergoing elective intestinal surgery

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have been widely adopted in adult populations, with over 30 years of experience demonstrating the effectiveness of these protocols in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. In the last decade, ERPs have been applied to pediatric populations across multiple subspecialties. The objective of this manuscript is to explore the evolution of how ERPs have been implemented and adapted specifically for pediatric populations undergoing GI surgery, predominantly for inflammatory bowel disease. The reported findings reflect a thorough exploration of the literature, including initial surveys of practice/readiness assessments, consensus recommendations of expert panels, and data from a rapidly growing number of single center studies. These efforts have culminated in a national prospective, multicenter trial evaluating clinical and implementation outcomes for enhanced recovery in children undergoing GI surgery. In short, this historical and clinical review reflects on the evolution of ERPs in pediatric surgery and expounds upon the next steps needed to apply ERPs to future pediatric populations.

Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for the Perioperative Management of Pediatric Colorectal Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for the management of pediatric colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledgement Infrastructure (CNKI) from its inception until 20 May 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, and power analysis was calculated using G∗Power 3.1.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1298 patients were included for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis suggested that ERAS protocol significantly lessened intraoperative fluids (mean difference [MD], -3.11; 95% confidence interval, -4.99 to -1.22) and postoperative opioid usage (MD, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.08 to -0.26), shortened time to bowel return (MD, -12.02; 95% CI, -20.03 to -4.02), first enteral nutrition (MD, -20.88; 95% CI, -28.34 to -13.42) and oral intake (MD, -1.40; 95% CI, -1.96 to -0.84), lowered readmission rate in 30 days (relative risk [RR], 0.61, 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.90), shortened length of hospital stay (MD, -1.50; 95% CI, -1.25 to -1.09), and reduced in-hospital costs (MD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.18); however, there was a comparable rate of postoperative complications between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis significantly changed the result of the readmission rate in 30 days. The statistical power of all outcomes ranged from 26.84% to 99.44%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate the beneficial role of the ERAS protocol in accelerating rehabilitation, shortening the length of hospital stay, and decreasing in-hospital costs among pediatric patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

LEVEL V.

Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been proven valuable for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who received traditional surgery. While for those receiving minimally invasive surgery (MIS), its efficacy and safety remain debatable. Materials and Methods: Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane libraries, and Web of science, were searched for relevant articles from their inception to February 23, 2022. Eligible articles were subjected to quality assessment and data extraction. The comparison between ERAS and traditional care (TC) was performed. Primary outcomes of this study were postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, time to the first anal exhaust, and defecation. Results: Thirteen cohort studies covering 4308 patients were included. Patients in the ERAS group had significantly shorter LOS (weight mean differences [WMD]: -1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.33 to -1.45; P < .001), lower incidence of postoperative complications (risk ratios [RR]: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.5-0.88; P < .001), lower 30-day readmission rate (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.92; P < .05), and shorter time to the first defecation (WMD: -1.93; 95% CI: -3.26 to -0.59; P < .001), but unimproved mortality, reoperation rate, and time to the first anal exhaust (P > .05) compared with those in the TC group. Conclusions: ERAS was effective and safe for CRC patients receiving MIS from a real-world perspective. Hence, the implementation of ERAS should be recommended for minimally invasive CRC surgery. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CRD42022321333.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of transversus abdominis plane block with compound lidocaine hydrochloride injection on postoperative pain and opioid consumption and gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy

Introduction

Incorporation of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block into multimodal analgesia has been emphasized in Enhanced Recovery protocols (ERPs). However, benefit is limited in clinical practice. A potential explanation is the short duration of analgesia of standard local anesthetics. Herein, this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial evaluated whether TAPB with long-acting compound lidocaine hydrochloride injection reduces postoperative pain.

Methods

164 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparotomy under sevoflurane anesthesia randomly received ultrasound-guided TAP block with either saline, or ropivacaine, or compound lidocaine before anesthesia induction. The postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) was evaluated by pain 11-point numerical rating scale. We also recorded sufentanil consumptions, time to first flatus, side-effects and hospital stay after surgery.

Results

We reported that pain scores at rest at postoperative 3h in group 0.375% ropivacaine was lower than that in group saline [mean 2.4 (SD 1.2) vs. 3.0 (1.0), p = 0.036]. Compared with saline, 0.4% and 0.6% compound lidocaine caused lower pain scores at rest at postoperative 12h [2.8 (0.9) vs. 2.1 (0.9) and 2.0 (0.9), p = 0.016 and p = 0.006]. Sufentanil usage for the first postoperative 48h was lower in group 0.6% compound lidocaine than group saline [24.2 (5.4) vs. 45.6 (7.5) µg, p  < 0.001]. Time to first flatus and hospital stay after surgery was shortest and the incidence of postoperative nausea was lowest in patients receiving 0.6% compound lidocaine.

Conclusion

TAP block with 0.6% compound lidocaine hydrochloride injection attenuates postoperative pain, reduces opioid consumption, accelerates gastrointestinal function recovery, and shortens length of hospital stay in patients after gynecological laparotomy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04938882.

Baseline assessment of enhanced recovery after pediatric surgery in mainland China

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a clinical pathway that optimizes perioperative management based on evidence-based medicine. ERAS has been gradually introduced to pediatric surgery in recent years. However, there are limited reports on its overall implementation. We aimed to determine the implementation of ERAS in patients who received pediatric surgery in mainland China.

METHODS

We designed a questionnaire involving 17 key ERAS elements and sent the questionnaire to 66 chiefs of pediatric surgery distributed throughout 31 provinces in mainland China to obtain a baseline assessment of the assimilation of ERAS protocols in the care of congenital biliary dilatation (CBD).

RESULTS

A total of 66 questionnaires were collected. The range of elements implemented at participating centers was 4-16, with a mean of 10.23. The least commonly practiced elements were administration of non-opioid preoperative analgesia (6 centers, 9.09%), prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] (9 centers, 13.64%), and postoperative pain management (26 centers, 39.39%).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of elements differed from center to center. Measures relying primarily on anesthesiologists had lower execution. The adherence to ERAS elements was often inhibited by a lack of institutional support, poor knowledge of ERAS protocols, and difficulties in coordinating multidisciplinary care, as well intransigence in changing surgical practices out of fear of liability for poor outcomes.

The effect of an enhanced recovery protocol in pediatric patients who undergo colostomy closure and Malone procedures

PURPOSE

Pediatric colorectal studies have shown enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols can safely improve outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes of children with colorectal conditions who underwent colostomy closure or Malone procedure.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of children who underwent colostomy closure or Malone procedure between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Differences in outcomes between pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts were tested. A sub-analysis based on procedure type was performed.

RESULTS

There were 96 patients included: 22 prior to ERAS implementation and 74 after. Patients who underwent ERAS had shorter mean time (hours) to oral intake, mean days until regular diet, post-operative opioid volume, and median length of stay (p < 0.05). There was no difference in complication rates in the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohort (12.2 vs 9.1%, p = 0.99). Patients who underwent colostomy closure after ERAS had lower post-operative opioid use, but no differences were seen in those who underwent Malone.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an ERAS protocol resulted in quicker time to oral intake, normal diet, and decreased opioid use without increasing complication rates. Differences seen based on procedure type may reflect that the effect of an ERAS protocol is procedure specific.

Implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery protocols in pediatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review examines the feasibility and safety of implementing Enhanced recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols in children.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane library for papers describing ERAS implementation in children between January 2000 and January 2021. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The meta-analysis was done using R Software (Ver 4.0.2). p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, describing a total of 1723 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. An average of 15 (range 11-16) relevant components were implemented with an overall compliance close to 84%. The time to initiate feeds and reach full enteral nutrition was reduced in ERAS group with mean difference (MD) of - 21.20 h (95% CI - 22.80, - 19.59, p < 0.01), and - 2.20 days (95% CI - 2.72, - 1.71, p < 0.01), respectively. The use of opioids for postoperative analgesia was reduced with MD of -0.86 morphine equivalents mg/kg (95% CI - 1.40, - 0.32, p < 0.01). The length of hospital stay showed a significant reduction with MD of -2.54 days (95% CI - 2.94, - 2.13, p < 0.01). There was no difference in the complication and readmission rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

ERP implementation in pediatric perioperative care is a viable option in a variety of surgical settings. There is clear evidence of a decrease in hospital stay duration with no increase in complication or readmission rates. The length of hospital stay reduced in inverse proportion to the number of ERAS elements implemented. Parental satisfaction is increased by initiating enteral feeding early, minimizing catheter and drain use, and reducing opioid use.

Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely implemented after minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current evidence available on ERAS after MIS in children.

METHODS

Using a defined search strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus), we performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for studies reporting on ERAS after MIS (thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, retroperitoneoscopy) in children (1975-2019). This study was registered with PROSPERO-international prospective register of systematic reviews. A meta-analysis was conducted using comparative studies for length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and readmission rates.

RESULTS

Of 180 abstracts screened, 20 full-text articles were analyzed, and 9 were included in our systematic review (1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies), involving a total number of 531 patients. ERAS has been applied to laparoscopy for digestive (n = 7 studies) or urologic surgeries (n = 1), as well as thoracoscopy (n = 1). Mean LOS was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, -1.12 days, 95%IC: -1.5 to -0.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference in complication rates between ERAS children and control children (5 studies, 13% vs 14%, OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.49-1.44, p = 0.52). The 30-day readmission rate was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, 4% vs 10%, OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.18-0.66, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the evidence regarding ERAS in MIS is scarce, these protocols seem safe and effective, by decreasing LOS and 30-day readmission rate, without increasing post-operative complication rates.