1
|
Webers C, Grimm S, van Tubergen A, van Gaalen F, van der Heijde D, Joore M, Boonen A. The value of correctly diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis for patients and society. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023; 62:152242. [PMID: 37451047 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the value of diagnosing axSpA, by comparing health and costs associated with available diagnostic algorithms and perfect diagnosis. METHODS Using data from SPACE and other cohorts, a model was developed to estimate health (quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs) and costs (healthcare consumption and work productivity losses) of different diagnostic algorithms for axSpA amongst patients with low back pain referred to a rheumatologist, over a 60-year horizon. The model combined a decision-tree (diagnosis) with a state-transition model (treatment). The three algorithms (Berlin [BER, highest specificity], Modification 1 [M1; less strict inflammatory back pain (IBP) criterion] and Modification 2 [M2; IBP not mandatory as entry criterion, highest sensitivity]) were compared. Changes in sensitivity/specificity were explored and the value of perfect diagnosis was investigated. RESULTS For each correctly diagnosed axSpA patient, up to 4.7 QALYs and €60,000 could be gained/saved, considering a societal perspective. Algorithm M2 resulted in more health and lower costs per patient (24.23 QALYs; €157,469), compared to BER (23.96 QALYs; €159,423) and M1 (24.15 QALYs; €158,417). Hypothetical improvements in M2 sensitivity resulted in slightly more value compared to improvements in specificity. Perfect diagnosis can cost €7,500 per patient and still provide enough value. CONCLUSION Correct diagnosis of axSpA results in substantial health and cost benefits for patients and society. Not requiring IBP as mandatory for diagnosis of axSpA (algorithm M2) provides more value and would be preferable. A considerably more expensive diagnostic algorithm with better accuracy than M2 would still be considered good value for money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Sabine Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Floris van Gaalen
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Manuela Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Butink MHP, Webers C, Verstappen SMM, Falzon L, Betteridge N, Wiek D, Woolf AD, Stamm TA, Burmester GR, Bijlsma JWJ, Christensen R, Boonen A. Non-pharmacological interventions to promote work participation in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the EULAR taskforce on healthy and sustainable work participation. RMD Open 2023; 9:rmdopen-2022-002903. [PMID: 36596655 PMCID: PMC10098260 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise the evidence on effectiveness of non-pharmacological (ie, non-drug, non-surgical) interventions on work participation (sick leave, work status and presenteeism) in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). METHODS A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal observational studies (LOS) was performed. Qualitative (RCTs/LOS) and quantitative (RCTs) evidence syntheses were conducted. Mixed-effects restricted maximum likelihood models were used to combine effect estimates, using standardised mean differences (SMDs) as the summary measure for each outcome domain separately, with a negative SMD favouring the intervention over comparator. Subgroup analyses were performed for type of RMD, risk status at baseline regarding adverse work outcomes and intervention characteristics. RESULTS Of 10 153 records, 64 studies (37 RCTs and 27 LOS; corresponding to k=71 treatment comparisons) were included. Interventions were mostly conducted in clinical settings (44 of 71, 62%). Qualitative synthesis suggested clear beneficial effects of 7 of 64 (11%) interventions for sick leave, 1 of 18 (6%) for work status and 1 of 17 (6%) for presenteeism. Quantitative synthesis (37 RCTs; k=43 treatment comparisons) suggested statistically significant but only small clinical effects on each outcome (SMDsick leave (95% CI)=-0.23 (-0.33 to -0.13; k=42); SMDwork status=-0.38 (-0.63 to -0.12; k=9); SMDpresenteeism=-0.25 (-0.39 to -0.12; k=13)). CONCLUSION In people with RMDs, empirical evidence shows that non-pharmacological interventions have small effects on work participation. Effectiveness depends on contextual factors such as disease, population risk status, intervention characteristics and outcome of interest, highlighting the importance of tailoring interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten H P Butink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne M M Verstappen
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Falzon
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Dieter Wiek
- Patient Research Partner, EULAR/PARE, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Anthony D Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, Frederiksberg Hospital Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands .,Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boonen A, Putrik P, Marques ML, Alunno A, Abasolo L, Beaton D, Betteridge N, Bjørk M, Boers M, Boteva B, Fautrel B, Guillemin F, Mateus EF, Nikiphorou E, Péntek M, Pimentel Santos F, Severens JL, Verstappen SMM, Walker-Bone K, Wallman JK, Ter Wee MM, Westhovens R, Ramiro S. EULAR Points to Consider (PtC) for designing, analysing and reporting of studies with work participation as an outcome domain in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80:1116-1123. [PMID: 33832966 PMCID: PMC8372378 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical studies with work participation (WP) as an outcome domain pose particular methodological challenges that hamper interpretation, comparison between studies and meta-analyses. OBJECTIVES To develop Points to Consider (PtC) for design, analysis and reporting of studies of patients with inflammatory arthritis that include WP as a primary or secondary outcome domain. METHODS The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary taskforce with 22 experts including patients with rheumatic diseases, from 10 EULAR countries and Canada, identified methodologic areas of concern. Two systematic literature reviews (SLR) appraised the methodology across these areas. In parallel, two surveys among professional societies and experts outside the taskforce sought for additional methodological areas or existing conducting/reporting recommendations. The taskforce formulated the PtC after presentation of the SLRs and survey results, and discussion. Consensus was obtained through informal voting, with levels of agreement obtained anonymously. RESULTS Two overarching principles and nine PtC were formulated. The taskforce recommends to align the work-related study objective to the design, duration, and outcome domains/measurement instruments of the study (PtC: 1-3); to identify contextual factors upfront and account for them in analyses (PtC: 4); to account for interdependence of different work outcome domains and for changes in work status over time (PtC: 5-7); to present results as means as well as proportions of patients reaching predefined meaningful categories (PtC: 8) and to explicitly report volumes of productivity loss when costs are an outcome (PtC:9). CONCLUSION Adherence to these EULAR PtC will improve the methodological quality of studies evaluating WP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Boonen
- Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Internal Medicine, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Universiteit Maastricht Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Polina Putrik
- Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Internal Medicine, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Universiteit Maastricht Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mary Lucy Marques
- Rheumatologist, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Alessia Alunno
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Perugia Department of Medicine, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lydia Abasolo
- Department of Rheumatology, Instituto de Investigation Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dorcas Beaton
- Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit, St Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mathilda Bjørk
- Pain and Rehabilitation Center, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Maarten Boers
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science; Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boryana Boteva
- Patients with Arthritis and Rheumatism (PARE) working group, European League Against Rheumatism, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- PEPITES teams, Pierre Louis Institute for Epidemiology and Public Health, Inserm UMR 1136, Paris, France
- Rheumatology Dept, Pitié Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University / Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, Fance
| | - Francis Guillemin
- APEMAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
- CIC Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU Nancy, Inserm, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Elsa F Mateus
- Portuguese League Against Rheumatic Diseases (LPCDR) and Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon, Portugal
- People with Arthritis and Rheumatism (PARE), European League Against Rheumatism, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College of London, London, UK
- Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Márta Péntek
- Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fernando Pimentel Santos
- Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental EPE Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Johannes L Severens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management and iMTA, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne M M Verstappen
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Karen Walker-Bone
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, MRC Life course Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Johan Karlsson Wallman
- Department of Clinical sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marieke M Ter Wee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and immunology, AI&I, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René Westhovens
- Dept of Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nikiphorou E, Carvalho PD, Boonen A, Fautrel B, Richette P, Machado PM, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Ramiro S. Sick leave in early axial spondyloarthritis: the role of clinical and socioeconomic factors. Five-year data from the DESIR cohort. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001685. [PMID: 34172511 PMCID: PMC8237733 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the occurrence of sick leave (SL) and the impact of clinical and socioeconomic factors on SL in early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS Patients with a clinical diagnosis of axSpA from the DEvenir des Spondyloarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes (DESIR) cohort with work-related data and up to 5-year follow-up were studied. Incidence, time to first SL and potential role of baseline and time-varying clinical and socioeconomic factors (age, gender, ethnicity, education, job type, marital and parental status) were analysed. Univariable analyses, followed by collinearity and interaction tests, guided subsequent multivariable time-varying Cox survival model building. RESULTS In total, 704 axSpA patients were included (mean (SD) age 33.8 (8.6); 46% men). At baseline, 80% of patients were employed; of these, 5.7% reported being on SL. The incidence of SL among those at risk during the study period (n=620, 88%) was 0.05 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.06) per 1000 days of follow-up. Mean (SD) time to first SL was 806 (595) days (range: 175-2021 days). In multivariable models, male gender (HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.86)) and higher education (HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.95)) were associated with lower hazard of SL, while higher disease activity (HR 1.49 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.13)), older age, smoking and use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors were associated with higher hazard of SL. CONCLUSIONS In this early axSpA cohort of young, working-age individuals, male gender and higher education were independently associated with a lower hazard of SL, whereas older age and higher disease activity were associated with higher hazard of SL. The findings suggest a role of socioeconomic factors in adverse work outcomes, alongside active disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Nikiphorou
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Rheumatology, Leiden, The Netherlands .,Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pedro D Carvalho
- Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.,Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Sorbonne University - Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Dept of Rheumatology. Pierre Louis Institute for Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM UMRS 1136, PEPITES Teams, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Richette
- Université de Paris, Hopital Lariboisière, Department of Rheumatology, INSERM U1132, Paris, France
| | - Pedro M Machado
- Centre for Rheumatology & Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Desirée van der Heijde
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Rheumatology, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Landewé
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Rheumatology, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Burg L, Sepriano A, Landewé R, Geuskens G, Ottenheijm R, Dinant GJ, Boonen A. Comparative construct validity of three presenteeism instruments in workers with musculoskeletal complaints: a prospective cohort study. RMD Open 2021; 6:rmdopen-2020-001281. [PMID: 32868452 PMCID: PMC7507893 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the construct validity of three presenteeism instruments, using health and economic outcomes as external references, among working persons reporting musculoskeletal complaints. METHODS Data from the prospective Study on Transitions in Employment, Ability and Motivation were used. Presenteeism measurement comprised a global rating of work-ability, and two instruments indicating at-work productivity, and was assessed yearly over 6 years of follow-up. Longitudinal associations between measures of health and subsequent presenteeism, and between presenteeism and subsequent days of sick leave were assessed using generalised estimating equation models. The effect of groups of contextual factors (socio-demographic, lifestyle, personal and work-related factors) was investigated by assessing the change in explained variability. RESULTS In total, 4523 persons were analysed. The association between physical health and work-ability was stronger than both at-work productivity measures; 10 points increase in physical health (0-100, higher is better) was associated with 0.79 points (95% CI 0.75 to 0.84) better work-ability (0-10, higher is better) in the subsequent year. Besides, work-ability best predicted sick leave; one point higher work-ability was associated with 4 days less sick leave (95% CI -5.09 to -3.63) the subsequent year. Personal factors improved model fit for models on health and work-ability, but conflicting results were seen for both at-work productivity instruments. CONCLUSION Work-ability showed higher construct validity against health and economic outcomes as compared to at-work productivity, which shows that work-ability is different to productivity (losses). Personal factors are especially relevant when interpreting the relation between health and work-ability or self-reported quantity of work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart van der Burg
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands .,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+) and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Robert Landewé
- Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Goedele Geuskens
- TNO, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon Ottenheijm
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Dinant
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+) and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cooksey R, Rahman MA, Kennedy J, Brophy S, Choy E. Biologic use in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients: a descriptive epidemiological study using linked, routine data in Wales, UK. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5:rkab042. [PMID: 34632260 PMCID: PMC8496109 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkab042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES PsA and AS are chronic diseases associated with significant morbidities. National and international management guidelines include treatment with biologic therapies to improve outcomes and quality of life. There are limited real-world data on the patients' journey from symptom onset to diagnosis and treatment in the UK. We use real-life, linked health data to explore patient pathways and the impact of biologics on patient outcomes. METHODS Data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank in Wales were used to assess diagnosis and treatment of patients ≥18 years of age with at least one International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code present for PsA/AS in rheumatology clinic data and at least one Read code present in primary care records. We investigated the use of biologics while exploring demographics, comorbidities and surgical procedures of 641 AS patients and 1312 PsA patients. RESULTS AS patients were significantly younger at diagnosis and were predominantly male. The average time from presenting symptoms to diagnosis of AS and PsA was 7.9 (s.d. 5.5) and 9.3 (s.d. 5.5) years, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving biologic treatment was significantly higher in AS (46%) compared with PsA patients (28.8%); of these, 23.1% of AS and 22.2% of PsA patients stopped/switched a biologic. There was a significant reduction in primary care involvement, sick notes and disability living allowance for both AS and PsA patients following biologic initiation. CONCLUSION This real-world descriptive study confirms that patients treated with biologics have reduced disability and time off work despite being initiated ∼13 years after the first symptoms and 6 years after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Cooksey
- Division of Infection and Immunity, CREATE Centre, Section of
Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University,
Cardiff
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical
School, Swansea
- National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing
Research, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Kennedy
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical
School, Swansea
| | - Sinead Brophy
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical
School, Swansea
- National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing
Research, Swansea, UK
| | - Ernest Choy
- Division of Infection and Immunity, CREATE Centre, Section of
Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University,
Cardiff
- National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing
Research, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beckers E, Webers C, Boonen A, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van Tubergen A. Validation and implementation of a patient-reported experience measure for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis in the Netherlands. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2889-2897. [PMID: 32318970 PMCID: PMC7497348 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05076-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To test the psychometric properties of the United Kingdom’s Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to implement this questionnaire in daily practice in the Netherlands. Methods After a forward-backward translation procedure into Dutch, the CQRA-PREM was tested into two quality registries in daily practice. Face validity was assessed with focus group interviews. Feasibility was evaluated through completion times and interpretability of domain scores through floor and ceiling effects. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficients) and homogeneity (corrected item-total correlations) were determined. Divergent validity was assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rs) between the average scores of domains and outcome measures. The CQRA-PREM was implemented in daily practice, and the results were used in quality improvement cycles. Results Face validity of the CQRA-PREM was good. The CQRA-PREM was completed by 282 patients with SpA and 376 with RA. Median time to complete the CQRA-PREM was 4.7 min. Ceiling effects were found in three out of seven domains. Internal consistency of nearly all domains was considered good (0.65 ≤ α ≤ 0.95). Thresholds for homogeneity were exceeded within three domains (rp > 0.7), suggesting item redundancy. Divergent validity showed that nearly all domains of the CQRA-PREM were at most weakly correlated with outcomes measures (− 0.3 ≤ rs ≤ 0.3). The CQRA-PREM could identify areas of improvement for providing patient-centered care. Conclusion The CQRA-PREM has acceptable psychometric properties and has shown to be a useful tool in evaluating quality of care from the patients’ perspective in the Netherlands. Trial registration SpA-Net is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR6740). Key Points • The Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) is a valid measure for assessing patient-centeredness of rheumatology care. • The Dutch version of the CQRA-PREM shows acceptable psychometric properties. • The CQRA-PREM shows to be a useful tool in Plan-Do-Check-Act quality improvement cycles in the Netherlands. • The CQRA-PREM can be used for benchmarking and quality improvement of rheumatology services. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10067-020-05076-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Beckers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Webers C, Vanhoof L, Leue C, Boonen A, Köhler S. Depression in ankylosing spondylitis and the role of disease-related and contextual factors: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21:215. [PMID: 31639012 PMCID: PMC6805406 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-019-1995-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have a higher prevalence of depression compared to the general population. Comorbid depression in AS likely has a multifactorial origin. While several disease-related and contextual factors have been associated with depressive symptoms in AS, a comprehensive model of their interrelations is currently lacking. Such a model could help understand the mechanisms leading to, or maintaining, depression in AS. The objectives of the current study were to determine which factors are associated with depressive symptoms in AS and to understand their underlying relationships. METHODS Data from a cross-sectional survey-based multicentre study were used. Potential determinants included both contextual and disease-related factors. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Subscale (HADS-D). Direct and indirect associations between risk factors and the latent depressive symptom outcome were explored using structural equation modelling. A final model was selected based on model fit criteria and clinical plausibility. RESULTS Among 245 patients, median HADS-D score was 3 (interquartile range 1-6), and 44 patients (18%) had a HADS-D score ≥ 8, indicating possible depression. In the final model, contextual factors significantly associated with depressive symptoms were male gender, being employed, lower income, lower mastery and worse satisfaction with social role participation. Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was the only disease-related factor that was associated with depressive symptoms, acted only indirectly via mastery, and its standardized total effect on depressive symptoms was smaller than that of several contextual factors. Mastery had a central role in the path diagram and mediated the effects of BASDAI, income and satisfaction with social role participation on depressive symptoms. The final model explained 64% of the variance in the depression outcome. CONCLUSIONS Both contextual and disease-related factors are associated with depressive symptoms in AS. Mastery, the extent to which one feels in control over life and disease, has a key role in this process. Results support a relevance of self-efficacy in disease management and patient education. In order to improve patients' mental health, research is warranted whether mastery and its relation with depression can be modified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Webers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Laura Vanhoof
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carsten Leue
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Webers C, Ramiro S, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, van den Bosch F, Dougados M, van Tubergen A, Boonen A. Sick leave and its predictors in ankylosing spondylitis: long-term results from the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000766. [PMID: 30564453 PMCID: PMC6269643 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the occurrence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-related sick leave (SL) over 6 12 years and explore factors predicting first and recurrent SL. Methods Data from employed patients from the Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study were used. At each visit, patients indicated the occurrence of SL (yes/no) in the previous inter-assessment period. Cox regressions predicted a first episode of SL. Generalised estimating equations (GEE) explored the association between SL and (time-lagged) predictors. To investigate whether SL predicts new SL, SL in the first year was included as covariate in a separate analysis. Results 139 patients (76% males, mean (SD) age 38.7 (10.0) years) were at risk for SL for an average period of 7.9 years, of whom 88 (63%) reported any SL. In both the Cox baseline predictors model (HR (95% CI)) and the time-varying GEE models (OR (95% CI)), AS Disease Activity Score (1.67, 1.23 to 2.28 (HR); 1.48, 1.07 to 2.03 (OR)); Bath AS Disease Activity Index (1.33, 1.18 to 1.51 (HR); 1.31, 1.15 to 1.49 (OR)), Bath AS Functional Index (1.17, 1.02 to 1.34 (HR); 1.31, 1.16 to 1.47 (OR)) and comorbidity at baseline (GEE only, 1.52, 1.00 to 2.29 (OR)) were associated with SL in separate models, but only in patients with low educational attainment. SL in the first year was an independent predictor of SL over time (OR: 2.62 to 8.37 in different models, all p<0.05). Conclusion Disease activity and physical function predicted first and recurrent SL, but only in patients with low educational attainment. Prior SL results in future SL, and SL should therefore be a signal for support to prevent future adverse work outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casper Webers
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Filip van den Bosch
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital and University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology, Paris Descartes University and Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Department of INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|