Gastrointestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Sweden: a nationwide cohort study

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Targeted Treatment of Diseases of Immune Dysregulation

Increasing molecular knowledge of autoinflammatory and autoimmune disorders has enabled more targeted treatment of these conditions. Treatment of inflammasomopathies is often aimed at interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockade, with potential use of other inhibitors targeting cytokines such as IL-18 and IL-6. Interferonopathies and some disorders with overlap features of autoimmunity and autoinflammation may improve with Janus kinase inhibition. Autoimmune conditions may also respond to inhibition of different cytokines, as well as to inhibition of T and B lymphocytes. Effective treatment is increasingly possible through targeted/precision medicine approaches.

Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic(s) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention in RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments yet without, or limited, registry data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine observational studies addressed the safety of DMARDs. Two studies (unclear risk of bias (RoB)) showed an increased risk of serious infections with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Herpes zoster infections occurred more with JAKi than csDMARDs (adjusted HR (aHR): 3.66) and bDMARDs (aHR: 1.9-2.3) (four studies, two low RoB). The risk of malignancies was similar across bDMARDs (five studies) and with tofacitinib compared with bDMARDs (one study, low RoB). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar with bDMARDs and tofacitinib (two studies, one low RoB). Thirty studies reported safety from RCTs, with one, designed to evaluate safety, showing that malignancies (HR (95% CI): 1.48 (1.04 to 2.09)) and MACE (HR (95% CI): 1.33 (0.91 to 1.94)) occurred numerically more frequently with tofacitinib (5 mg and 10 mg doses combined) than with TNFi in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. In this study, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg than with TNFi.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of bDMARDs was further demonstrated. Whether the difference in incidence of malignancies, MACE and VTE between tofacitinib and TNFi applies to other JAKi needs further evaluation.

Comparison of the risk of gastrointestinal perforation between patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide cohort study in Asia

Objectives

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have an increased risk for gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) caused by medications or chronic inflammation. However, the risk of GIP between patients with and without RA remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to clarify it.

Methods

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified patients with and without RA matched at 1:1 ratio by age, sex, and index date between 2000 and 2013 for this study. Comparison of the risk of GIP between the two cohorts was performed by following up until 2014 using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

Results

In total, 11,666 patients with RA and an identical number of patients without RA were identified for this study. The mean age (±standard deviation) and female ratio were 55.3 (±15.2) years and 67.6% in both cohorts. Patients with RA had a trend of increased risk for GIP than patients without RA after adjusting for underlying comorbidities, medications, and monthly income [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99–2.04, p = 0.055]. Stratified analyses showed that the increased risk was significant in the female population (AHR 2.06; 95% CI 1.24–3.42, p = 0.005). Older age, malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol abuse were independent predictors of GIP; however, NSAIDs, systemic steroids, and DMARDs were not.

Conclusion

RA may increase the risk of GIP, particularly in female patients. More attention should be paid in female population and those with independent predictors above for prevention of GIP.

A systematic literature review informing the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment with interleukin-6 pathway inhibition with biological DMARDs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Objectives

Informing an international task force updating the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) selectively targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway in the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Methods

A systematic literature research of all publications on IL-6 axis inhibition with bDMARDs published between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in clinical trials including their long-term extensions and observational studies. Meeting abstracts from ACR, EULAR conferences and results on clinicaltrials.gov were taken into consideration.

Results

187 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Evidence for positive effect of IL-6 inhibition was available in various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, cytokine release syndrome due to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Newcomers like satralizumab and anti-IL-6 ligand antibody siltuximab have expanded therapeutic approaches for Castleman’s disease and neuromyelitis optica, respectively. IL-6 inhibition did not provide therapeutic benefits in psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and certain connective tissue diseases. In COVID-19, tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven to be therapeutic in advanced disease. Safety outcomes did not differ from other bDMARDs, except higher risks of diverticulitis and lower gastrointestinal perforations. Inconsistent results were observed in several studies investigating the risk for infections when comparing TCZ to TNF-inhibitors.

Conclusion

IL-6 inhibition is effective for treatment of several inflammatory diseases with a safety profile that is widely comparable to other bDMARDs.

Rheumatologische Erkrankungen und der Gastrointestinaltrakt

Die meisten rheumatologischen Krankheitsbilder können Einfluss auf den Gastrointestinaltrakt haben. Dabei können intestinale Manifestationen (z. B. rheumatoide Vaskulitis, IgG4-assoziierte Pankreatitis, IgG4-assoziierte Cholangitis, Lupus-Enteritis, Polyarteriitis nodosa, Purpura Schoenlein-Henoch, nekrotisierende Vaskulitis), assoziierte intestinale Erkrankungen (chronisch-entzündliche Darmerkrankungen (CED), Zöliakie) und intestinale Komplikationen der rheumatologischen Erkrankung (z. B. Amyloidose, erosive Refluxerkrankung bei Sklerodermie) bzw. ihrer Behandlung (z. B. NSAR-Magenulcus, MTX-Mukositis, Soor-Ösophagitis, intestinale Tuberkulose, ulzerierende HSV-Ösophagitis, CMV-Kolitis) voneinander abgegrenzt werden. Dadurch kommen gastrointestinale Symptome bei Patienten mit rheumatologischen Erkrankungen sehr häufig vor. Die Diagnosestellung (er)fordert Gastroenterologen im interdisziplinären Behandlungsnetzwerk mit Rheumatologen. Insbesondere bei Behandlung von CED ergeben sich für die überschneidenden Zulassungsindikationen der zur Verfügung stehenden Medikamente in der interdisziplinären Absprache zwischen Rheumatologen und Gastroenterologen synergistische Behandlungsoptionen.

Current and Emerging DMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most prevalent form of inflammatory arthritis. It is a profoundly serious and severe disease that if it goes untreated could have severe consequences to the joints and health of the patient who carries this diagnosis. The treatment of RA has dramatically changed since the year 2000, with the discovery of the TNFis, then other biologics, and finally the JAKi. All these new medications with or without methotrexate in combination, tight control and treat to target have produced a revolution in the outcome of this disease. We reviewed and summarized the treatment options, and the most significant papers for each one of these new drugs. The reader could have a full picture with all the references of the recent publications. We also updated the biosimilar situation in RA, as well as the new drugs that will be coming to the market in the next 5 years.

Risk of Diverticulitis and Gastrointestinal Perforation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tocilizumab Compared to Rituximab or Abatacept

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of diverticulitis and gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) in rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) compared with rituximab (RTX) and abatacept (ABA).

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study using 3 observational French registries on TCZ, RTX and ABA in rheumatoid arthritis. Using a propensity score approach, we compared the risk of diverticulitis or GIP in these patients.

RESULTS

With inverse probability weighting, there was an increased risk of diverticulitis in TCZ treated patients compared with RTX or ABA treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]=3.1 [95% confidence interval 1.5-6.3], p= 0.002). Moreover, patients treated with TCZ had also an increased risk of GIP due to diverticulitis compared with those treated with RTX or ABA (HR = 3.8 [1.1-13.6], p= 0.04), resulting in an overall increased risk of GIP (HR = 2.9 [1.1-7.8], p= 0.03), while no significant increased risk of GIP due to any other aetiology was found in TCZ treated patients. Diverticulitis and GIP occurred earlier with TCZ than other drugs after the last perfusion (p= 0.01), with atypical clinical presentation (slow transit in 30%, p= 0.04) and lower acute-phase reactants at the time of the event (p= 0.005).

CONCLUSION

TCZ for rheumatoid arthritis was associated with increased odds of diverticulitis as well as GIP due to diverticulitis as compared with RTX and ABA. Our study confirms the increased odds of GIP in patients receiving TCZ, which might be explained by an increased risk of diverticulitis with misleading clinical presentation.

SARS-CoV-2: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Host Immune Response

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped, positive-sense RNA coronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected more than 127 million people, 2.7 million deaths globally (as per WHO dashboard, dated 31 March, 2020), the virus is capable of transmitting from human to human via inhalation of infected respiratory droplets or aerosols or contact with infected fomites. Clinically, patients with COVID-19 present with severe respiratory distress syndrome, which is very similar to the presentation of other respiratory viral infections. A huge variation in the host response exists, with the resulting symptoms varying from mild to moderate. Comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, coagulation dysfunction, stroke, malignant tumor and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, as well as age and sex, are associated with severe COVID-19 cases. So far, no targeted therapies have been developed to treat this disease and existing drugs are being investigated for repurposing. This chapter discusses the epidemiology, clinical features of COVID-19, pathogenesis and the innate and adaptive immune response mounted by the host to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. A deeper understanding of the host-pathogen interaction is fundamental to the development of a vaccine.