Hyperechogenic intimal lesions and wall thickness of the temporal and facial arteries in elderly patients with arterial occlusions of the eye

A Clinical Probability-Based, Stepwise Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: Study Protocol and Baseline Characteristics of the First 50 Patients Included in the Prospective Validation Study with Focus on Cranial Symptoms

Background: Early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is crucial to avoid loss of vision, but detailed headache characteristics of GCA have been poorly studied. Clinical prediction rules have shown promise in guiding management decisions in suspected GCA. Methods: This is a prospective, monocentric cohort study on patients ≥50 years of age with suspected GCA. The diagnostic efficacy and safety of a previously published prediction rule embedded in a stepwise diagnostic algorithm is compared to the final clinical diagnosis incorporating the results of temporal artery biopsy (TAB). The protocol of the ongoing study is presented in detail. Based on an interim analysis of the first 50 included patients, characteristics of cranial symptoms of patients with positive and negative TAB are compared, and a modification of the original prediction rule is presented. Results: TAB was positive in 23 and negative in 26 cases. In one patient, the TAB specimen contained no arterial segment, so this patient was excluded from the interim analysis. Headache was more commonly located temporally and bilaterally. Cranial ischemic symptoms and superficial temporal artery-related symptoms were more common in patients with positive TAB. The quality and intensity of headaches did not differ significantly between groups. As the original prediction rule misclassified a single patient who eventually had a positive TAB, the clinical prediction rule was modified. Conclusions: Given the limited sensitivity and specificity of cranial symptoms, a stepwise diagnostic algorithm based on the modified prediction rule may facilitate clinical decision-making in suspected GCA.

[Imaging of large vessel vasculitis]

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are the most important primary large vessel vasculitides. A rapid and reliable confirmation of the diagnosis is necessary to prevent ischemic complications. Patients with extracranial GCA and TAK often present with unspecific symptoms. Since 2018 the EULAR has recommended imaging as an alternative to histology for confirming the diagnosis. Ultrasound is particularly recommended as the primary imaging modality for cranial GCA. Alternatively, MRI and PET can be used for the diagnostics of temporal arteritis. Ultrasound is also valuable for extracranial GCA, alternatively MRI, CT or PET-CT can be used. This review discusses the current status of imaging techniques in large vessel vasculitis as well as the advantages and disadvantages. The focus is on ultrasound, which is increasingly being used as the primary diagnostic modality due to its excellent diagnostic quality, wide availability, noninvasiveness, and patient friendliness. Technical aspects, prerequisites, and normal and pathological findings are also presented. Finally, an outlook is given on promising new developments, such as scores for evaluating disease progression and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Vaskulitis mimics

Idiopathische Vaskulitiden sind seltene entzündliche Systemerkrankungen, die nach der Chapel-Hill Konsensus-Nomenklatur nach der Größe der prädominant betroffenen Gebiete von Blutgefäßen (große, mittelgroße, kleine Gefäße und Gefäße variabler Größe) eingeteilt werden. Vaskulitis mimics sind Syndrome, die ein ähnliches klinisches Bild hervorrufen oder leicht mit einer idiopathischen Vaskulitis verwechselt werden und teils sogar ein Krankheitsbild, das klinisch und histologisch einer Vaskulitis gleicht, auslösen können. Die Zahl der Vaskulitis mimics ist groß, je nach betroffenem Gefäßgebiet kommen hereditäre Erkrankungen des Bindegewebes, genetisch bedingte Immundefekt- und Autoinflammationssyndrome, infektiöse Erkrankungen, seltene entzündliche Systemerkrankungen, Tumorerkrankungen, medikamenteninduzierte Syndrome und zahlreiche weitere infrage. In diesem Review wird eine Auswahl klassischer Imitatoren von Vaskulitiden, orientiert an der Größe der betroffenen Blutgefäße präsentiert und Konstellationen, die typische „Fallstricke“ in der klinischen Abklärung darstellen können, diskutiert.

Cranial giant cell arteritis mimickers: A masquerade to unveil

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large-vessel vasculitis that affects cranial and extra-cranial arteries. Extra-cranial GCA presents mainly with non-specific symptoms and the differential diagnosis is very broad, while the cranial form has more typical clinical picture and physicians have a lower threshold for diagnosis and treatment. Although temporal artery biopsy (TAB) has an established role, ultrasound (US) is being increasingly used as the first-line imaging modality in suspected GCA. Vasculitides (especially ANCA-associated), hematological disorders (mainly amyloidosis), neoplasms, infections, atherosclerosis and local disorders can affect the temporal arteries or might mimic the symptoms of cranial GCA and produce US and TAB findings that resemble those of temporal vasculitis. Given that prompt diagnosis is essential and proper treatment varies significantly among these diseases, in this review we aimed to collectively present disorders that can masquerade cranial GCA.

Local and systemic reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were launched in December 2020. Vaccination of patients with rheumatic diseases is recommended, as they are considered at higher risk of severe COVID-19 than the general population. Patients with rheumatic disease have largely been excluded from vaccine phase 3 trials. This study explores the safety and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 among patients with rheumatic diseases. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), median age 58.8 years, 285 subjects in total, were vaccinated twice with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech). Questionnaires on reactogenicity matching the original phase 3 study were answered seven days after completed vaccination. The majority of SLE and RA patients experienced either local (78.0%) or systemic reactions (80.1%). Only 1.8% experienced a grade-4 reaction. Compared to the original study, we found more frequent fatigue [Odds ratio (OR) 2.2 (1.7-2.8)], headache [OR 1.7 (1.3-2.2)], muscle pain [OR 1.8 (1.4-2.3)], and joint pain [OR 2.3 (1.7-3.0)] in patients. In contrast, the use of antipyretics was less frequent [OR 0.5 (0.3-0.6)]. Patients with SLE and RA experience reactogenicity to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. Reactogenicity was more frequent in patients, however, not more severe compared with healthy controls.