Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

Interventional Radiology for Rheumatic Diseases

Imaging plays a key role in the management of rheumatological pathologies, also as guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures, as it can provide better accuracy and safety compared to palpation-guided interventions. Inflammatory and degenerative conditions nonresponsive to systemic treatment may benefit from intra-articular and periarticular administration of drugs, with therapeutic and symptomatic actions or providing a bridge for surgery. Desired effects include reduction of inflammation and pain and improvement of physical function of patients. Training and knowledge of indications, appropriate procedures, contraindications, and side effects are necessary to obtain maximum accuracy and safety in performing interventional procedures.

Ultrasound verification of palpation-based dry needling techniques of rotator cuff muscles: a prospective feasibility trial

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using ultrasound to verify the placement of narrow-gauge dry needles within the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles utilizing palpation-based dry needle techniques.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study with 10 participants recruited. Each participant had a dry needle placed within the infraspinatus and supraspinatus muscles by a trained physical therapist utilizing palpation-based methods. Following needle placement, ultrasound examination was then performed to determine the feasibility of needle tip visualization within the targeted tissues.

RESULTS

The needle tip was successfully visualized on ultrasound in 19/20 cases. The needle tip accurately resided in the targeted muscle tissue in each of the 19 cases it was successfully visualized.

CONCLUSIONS

Narrow-gauge dry needles used in physical therapy practice can be consistently visualized in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles using ultrasound imaging. Also, the palpation method utilized is an accurate means of guiding dry needles into the targeted rotator cuff muscles. These are significant findings because most physical therapy clinics do not have the benefit of real-time imaging guidance and must rely solely on palpation-based needling methods.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in the treatment of adult patients with shoulder pain.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US-guided versus landmark CS injection regarding visual analogue scale (VAS), functional scores, disability scores, abduction degree, and side effects. The data were pooled as mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using R software (meta package 4.9-0) for windows. Subgroup analysis and leave-one-out analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs, with a total of 1010 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate favored the US-guided over landmark CS injection in terms of the mean change of VAS between 6 weeks and baseline (SMD = - 0.48, 95% CI [- 0.79, - 0.17]), the shoulder functional scores (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]) and shoulder abduction degree (MD = 8.78, 95% CI [3.11, 14.46]). Whilst no significant difference was found between the compared group regarding the overall shoulder disability scores (SMD = - 0.51, 95% CI (- 1.25, 0.22]) and side effects (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.15, 1.34]). None of the eligible study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the US-guided method compared with the landmark method for CS injection.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed that US-guided CS injection was effective in the treatment of various shoulder diseases. Further research on the cost-effectiveness of US-guided CS methods is needed.

Clinical examination, ultrasound assessment and aspiration of knee effusion in primary knee osteoarthritis patients

BACKGROUND

To assess the diagnostic performance of clinical examination and ultrasound (US) assessment of knee effusion in primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients. Furthermore, the success rate for effusion aspiration and the factors related to it were investigated.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with primary KOA-induced knee effusion clinically or sonographically. The affected knee of each patient was subjected to clinical examination and US assessment using the ZAGAZIG effusion and synovitis ultrasonographic score. Patients with confirmed effusion and consented to aspiration were prepared for direct US-guided aspiration under complete aseptic techniques.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine knees were examined. During visual inspection, swelling was detected in 80.7% of knees and effusion was confirmed by US in 67.8% of knees. Visual inspection was the most sensitive at 90.54% while bulge sign was the most specific at 65.71%. Only 48 patients (61 knees) consented to aspiration procedure; 47.5% had grade III effusion, and 45.9% had grade III synovitis. Successful aspiration was achieved in 77% of knees. Two needle types were used; a 22 gauge / 3.5-inch spinal needle in 44 knees and an 18 gauge/ 1.5-inch needle in 17 knees, with a success rate of 90.9% and 41.2%, respectively. Aspirated amount of synovial fluid correlated positively with effusion grade (r_s=0.455, p < 0.001) and negatively with synovitis grade on US (r_s = - 0.329, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The superiority of the US over clinical examination in detecting knee effusion suggests that US should be used routinely to confirm the presence of effusion. Long needles (spinal needle) may have a higher success rate of aspiration than shorter needles.

EULAR points to consider for the use of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based Points to Consider (PtC) for the use of imaging modalities to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

METHODS

European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) standardised operating procedures were followed. A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve data on the role of imaging modalities including ultrasound (US), fluoroscopy, MRI, CT and fusion imaging to guide interventional procedures. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the task force (25 participants consisting of physicians, healthcare professionals and patients from 11 countries) developed PtC, with consensus obtained through voting. The final level of agreement was provided anonymously.

RESULTS

A total of three overarching principles and six specific PtC were formulated. The task force recommends preference of imaging over palpation to guide targeted interventional procedures at peripheral joints, periarticular musculoskeletal structures, nerves and the spine. While US is the favoured imaging technique for peripheral joints and nerves, the choice of the imaging method for the spine and sacroiliac joints has to be individualised according to the target, procedure, expertise, availability and radiation exposure. All imaging guided interventions should be performed by a trained specialist using appropriate operational procedures, settings and assistance by technical personnel.

CONCLUSION

These are the first EULAR PtC to provide guidance on the role of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with RMDs.

Current Practice of Imaging-Guided Interventional Procedures in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Results of a Multinational Multidisciplinary Survey

Objectives: To investigate opinion and routine practice of specialists from different disciplines on imaging techniques for interventional procedures related to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Methods: An English-language questionnaire was developed by an international working group and distributed to health care providers of various disciplines involved in the care of people with RMDs via an online survey tool (SoSci Survey®) from December 2019 to May 2020. Results: A total of 1,105 respondents from 56 countries completed the survey, over 60% of participants were rheumatologists. The majority of respondents (88%) performed interventional procedures in RMDs patients and 90% of them used imaging guidance. Ultrasonography was the most frequently used technique, particularly among rheumatologists. X-ray and computed tomography were mainly used by radiologists. A discrepancy emerged between the importance assigned to certain items such as the availability of a second operator and their actual implementation in clinical practice. Local barriers, lack of resources and facilities were mentioned as the most relevant obstacles in this regard. Lack of training on imaging and/or imaging guided procedures did not emerge as a barrier to perform such interventions; in fact, 19% of respondents performing the procedures indicated not to have received adequate training in this field. Conclusions: This is the first multinational multidisciplinary survey exploring in detail the opinions and practice on imaging guidance for interventional procedures in RMDs. A harmonization of protocols based on international guidelines, along with adequate training programmes and interventions on barriers at national/local levels are the main unmet needs requiring attention.