CT-like images in MRI improve specificity of erosion detection in patients with hand arthritis: a diagnostic accuracy study with CT as standard of reference

Current and future role of CT and advanced CT applications in inflammatory arthritis in the clinic and trials

Computed tomography (CT) has traditionally been underutilized in the imaging of inflammatory arthritis due to its limitations in assessing soft tissue inflammation and concerns over radiation exposure. However, recent technological advancements have positioned CT as a more viable imaging modality for arthritis, offering high specificity and sensitivity in detecting structural bone changes. However, advances in ultra-low-dose CT protocols and AI-driven image reconstruction have significantly reduced radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic quality. Dynamic CT and spectral CT techniques, including dual-energy CT (DECT), have broadened CT's application in assessing dynamic joint instabilities and visualizing inflammatory changes through material-specific imaging. Techniques such as CT subtraction imaging and iodine mapping have enhanced the detection of active soft-tissue inflammation, virtual non-calcium reconstructions, and the detection of bone marrow edema. Possible CT applications span various forms of arthritis, including gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD), psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis. Beyond its diagnostic capabilities, CT's ability to provide detailed structural assessment positions is a valuable tool for monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response, particularly in clinical trials. While MRI remains superior for soft tissue evaluation, CT's specificity for bone-related changes and its potential for integration into routine arthritis management warrant further exploration and research. This review explores the current and emerging roles of CT in arthritis diagnostics, with a focus on novel applications and future potential.

Imaging Updates in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common chronic inflammatory arthritis, primarily characterized by proliferative synovitis of the small joints of the appendicular skeleton. Rapidly evolving treatment regimens for rheumatoid arthritis patients, including conventional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, promise improved quality of life and prognosis. These treatments necessitate earlier clinical detection of rheumatoid arthritis, a goal that has forever changed the role of imaging in this pursuit. This review discusses the dominant imaging modalities in state-of-the-art rheumatoid arthritis management: radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. It focuses on hand and wrist evaluation, with key relevant findings detected by each modality and recent evidence supporting them. Emerging techniques are also described in this discussion to understand likely future radiologic contributions to rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and management.

CT-like images based on T1-weighted gradient echo MRI sequences for the assessment of fractures of the hand and wrist compared to CT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of a 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo (3D T1GRE) computed tomography (CT)-like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence for detecting and assessing wrist and hand fractures compared to conventional CT.

METHODS

Subjects with acute wrist or hand fracture in CT underwent additional 3 T MRI including a CT-like 3D T1GRE sequence and were compared to patients without fractures. Two radiologists assessed fracture morphology on both modalities according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthese (AO) and graded image quality and diagnostic confidence on a 5-point Likert scale. Besides diagnostic test evaluation, differences in image quality and diagnostic confidence between CT-like MRI and CT were calculated using the Wilcoxon test. Agreement of AO classification between modalities and readers was assessed using Cohen's Kappa.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with 43 fractures and 43 controls were included. Image quality (3D T1GRE 1.19 ± 0.37 vs. CT 1.22 ± 0.42; p = 0.65) and diagnostic confidence (3D T1GRE 1.28 ± 0.53 vs. CT 1.28 ± 0.55; p = 1.00) were rated excellent for both modalities. Regarding the AO classification, intra- (rater 1 and rater 2, κ = 0.89; 95% CI 0.80-0.97) and interrater agreement were excellent (3D T1GRE, κ = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93; CT, κ = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94). CT-like MRI showed excellent sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for fracture detection (reader 1: 1.00, 0.92, 0.96; reader 2: 0.98, 0.94, 0.96).

CONCLUSION

CT-like MRI is a comparable alternative to CT for assessing hand and wrist fractures, offering the advantage of avoiding radiation exposure.

Computed tomography-current status and future directions for arthritis imaging

Applications of computed tomography (CT) in arthritis imaging have rapidly expanded in recent years due to ongoing technical developments. Dual-energy CT (DECT) has become indispensable in clinical practice, particularly for diagnosing gouty arthritis and assessing bony structural changes. Technological innovations such as low-dose CT and state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms reduce radiation exposure while maintaining image quality and short acquisition times. This review explores the growing role of CT in arthritis imaging. Recent innovations have extended DECT's utility beyond gout diagnosis to the detection of inflammatory changes in various arthritic conditions. Postprocessing techniques such as the generation of subtraction images and iodine maps provide valuable insights into tissue perfusion and inflammatory activity, crucial for arthritis management. DECT can distinguish calcium from uric acid crystals, facilitating the differential diagnosis of various crystal arthropathies in a variety of clinical settings. This ability is particularly valuable in distinguishing between different clinical conditions in patients with inflammatory joint changes within a single imaging examination. Moreover, the advent of four-dimensional CT promises a better assessment of dynamic joint instabilities and ligament injuries, especially in the wrist. Overall, DECT offers a comprehensive approach to arthritis imaging, from the detection of structural changes to the assessment of active inflammation in joints and tendons. Continuous advances in CT technology, including photon-counting CT, hold promise for further improving diagnostic accuracy and expanding the role of CT in arthritis imaging and therapy monitoring.

Unlocking the Temporomandibular Joint: CT, MRI, and Arthroscopic Correlation

The temporomandibular joint constitutes a synovial connection between the mandible and the skull base and plays a pivotal role in functions such as jaw movement, chewing, and verbal and emotional expression. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction is observed in about 30% of the population, with a higher prevalence in young to middle-aged women. Interestingly, a majority of individuals affected do not report pain, and only 5%-10% of symptomatic cases necessitate therapeutic intervention. The most common temporomandibular joint disorder manifests as pain in the masticatory muscles and is referred to as myofascial syndrome. However, articular disorders are also very common, usually due to disk displacement and degenerative or inflammatory arthropathies. Less frequently, the temporomandibular joint may be affected by a range of congenital and acquired conditions such as trauma and neoplasms. Imaging becomes necessary for the small percentage of patients who do not respond to conservative management or when there is uncertainty in the diagnosis. A comprehensive understanding of the normal imaging appearance of the temporomandibular joint as well as the wide range of potential pathologic conditions is essential for conducting an accurate radiologic assessment. Moreover, collaboration among multidisciplinary teams and the correlation of imaging findings with arthroscopic observations are crucial to advancing the diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Comparing CT-Like Images Based on Ultra-Short Echo Time and Gradient Echo T1-Weighted MRI Sequences for the Assessment of Vertebral Disorders Using Histology and True CT as the Reference Standard

BACKGROUND

Several magnetic resonance (MR) techniques have been suggested for radiation-free imaging of osseous structures.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic value of ultra-short echo time and gradient echo T1-weighted MRI for the assessment of vertebral pathologies using histology and computed tomography (CT) as the reference standard.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

Fifty-nine lumbar vertebral bodies harvested from 20 human cadavers (donor age 73 ± 13 years; 9 male).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Ultra-short echo time sequence optimized for both bone (UTEb) and cartilage (UTEc) imaging and 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence (T1GRE) at 3 T; susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) gradient echo sequence at 1.5 T. CT was performed on a dual-layer dual-energy CT scanner using a routine clinical protocol.

ASSESSMENT

Histopathology and conventional CT were acquired as standard of reference. Semi-quantitative and quantitative morphological features of degenerative changes of the spines were evaluated by four radiologists independently on CT and MR images independently and blinded to all other information. Features assessed were osteophytes, endplate sclerosis, visualization of cartilaginous endplate, facet joint degeneration, presence of Schmorl's nodes, and vertebral dimensions. Vertebral disorders were assessed by a pathologist on histology.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Agreement between T1GRE, SWI, UTEc, and UTEb sequences and CT imaging and histology as standard of reference were assessed using Fleiss' κ and intra-class correlation coefficients, respectively.

RESULTS

For the morphological assessment of osteophytes and endplate sclerosis, the overall agreement between SWI, T1GRE, UTEb, and UTEc with the reference standard (histology combined with CT) was moderate to almost perfect for all readers (osteophytes: SWI, κ range: 0.68-0.76; T1GRE: 0.92-1.00; UTEb: 0.92-1.00; UTEc: 0.77-0.85; sclerosis: SWI, κ range: 0.60-0.70; T1GRE: 0.77-0.82; UTEb: 0.81-0.92; UTEc: 0.61-0.71). For the visualization of the cartilaginous endplate, UTEc showed the overall best agreement with the reference standard (histology) for all readers (κ range: 0.85-0.93).

DATA CONCLUSIONS

Morphological assessment of vertebral pathologies was feasible and accurate using the MR-based bone imaging sequences compared to CT and histopathology. T1GRE showed the overall best performance for osseous changes and UTEc for the visualization of the cartilaginous endplate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Deep-learning-based image quality enhancement of CT-like MR imaging in patients with suspected traumatic shoulder injury

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-like MR images reconstructed with an algorithm combining compressed sense (CS) with deep learning (DL) in patients with suspected osseous shoulder injury compared to conventional CS-reconstructed images.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (12 women, mean age 46 ± 14.9 years) with suspected traumatic shoulder injury were prospectively enrolled into the study. All patients received MR imaging of the shoulder, including a CT-like 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo (T1 GRE) sequence and in case of suspected fracture a conventional CT. An automated DL-based algorithm, combining CS and DL (CS DL) was used to reconstruct images of the same k-space data as used for CS reconstructions. Two musculoskeletal radiologists assessed the images for osseous pathologies, image quality and visibility of anatomical landmarks using a 5-point Likert scale. Moreover, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared to CT, all acute fractures (n = 23) and osseous pathologies were detected accurately on the CS only and CS DL images with almost perfect agreement between the CS DL and CS only images (κ 0.95 (95 %confidence interval 0.82-1.00). Image quality as well as the visibility of the fracture lines, bone fragments and glenoid borders were overall rated significantly higher for the CS DL reconstructions than the CS only images (CS DL range 3.7-4.9 and CS only range 3.2-3.8, P = 0.01-0.04). Significantly higher SNR and CNR values were observed for the CS DL reconstructions (P = 0.02-0.03).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of traumatic shoulder pathologies is feasible using a DL-based algorithm for reconstruction of high-resolution CT-like MR imaging.

Synthetic CT in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Repeated computed tomography (CT) examinations increase patients' ionizing radiation exposure and health costs, making an alternative method desirable. Cortical and trabecular bone, however, have short T2 relaxation times, causing low signal intensity on conventional magnetic resonance (MR) sequences. Different techniques are available to create a "CT-like" contrast of bone, such as ultrashort echo time, zero echo time, gradient-echo, and susceptibility-weighted image MR sequences, and artificial intelligence. This systematic review summarizes the essential technical background and developments of ultrashort echo time, zero echo time, gradient-echo, susceptibility-weighted image MR imaging sequences and artificial intelligence; presents studies on research and clinical applications of "CT-like" MR imaging; and describes their main advantages and limitations. We also discuss future opportunities in research, which patients would benefit the most, the most appropriate situations for using the technique, and the potential to replace CT in the clinical workflow.

The value of MRI for detecting subclinical joint inflammation in clinically suspect arthralgia

In the last decade, much research has focused on the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the symptomatic phase preceding the onset of clinical arthritis. Observational studies on imaging have revealed that subclinical joint inflammation in patients with arthralgia at risk for RA precedes and predicts the onset of clinically apparent arthritis. Moreover, the results of two placebo-controlled randomised proof-of-concept trials in patients with arthralgia and MRI-detected subclinical inflammation studies will soon be available. The initial results are encouraging and suggest a beneficial effect of DMARD treatment on subclinical inflammation. Since this may increase the necessity to detect subclinical joint inflammation in persons with arthralgia that are at risk for RA, we will here review what has been learnt about subclinical inflammation in at-risk individuals by means of imaging. We will focus on MRI as this method has the best sensitivity and reproducibility. We evaluate the prognostic value of MRI-detected subclinical inflammation and assess the lessons learnt from MRIs about the tissues that are inflamed early on and are associated with the clinical phenotype in arthralgia at risk for RA, for example, subclinical tenosynovitis underlying pain and impaired hand function. Finally, because long scan times and the need for intravenous-contrast agent contribute to high costs and limited feasibility of current MRI protocols, we discuss progress that is being made in the field of MRI and that can result in a future-proof way of imaging that is useful for assessment of joint inflammation on a large scale, also in a society with social distancing due to COVID-19 restrictions.