External validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in a Dutch fast-track clinic

Validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis in Korean patients with giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

We applied the 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Association for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria to Korean patients previously diagnosed with giant cell arteritis (GCA) according to the 1990 ACR criteria and validated its clinical efficiency.

METHODS

Nine patients with GCA were included. The proportion of patients meeting each item of the 1990 ACR criteria and the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria were assessed.

RESULTS

The median age was 65.0 years, and 77.8% of the patients were women. Seven (77.8%) patients had polymyalgia rheumatica. All nine patients were reclassified as having GCA according to the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria. Among the 10 items of the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria, the item contributing the most to the reclassification was elevated acute-phase reactant levels (100%), followed by new temporal headache (77.8%) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography activity throughout the aorta (77.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, for the first time, we demonstrated a concordance rate of 100% between the two criteria in Korean patients previously diagnosed with GCA. Moreover, we also clarified the major contributors to the reclassification according to the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria.

The OMERACT giant cell arteritis ultrasonography score: a potential predictive outcome for assessing the risk of relapse during follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether the OMERACT GCA US Score (OGUS) change after treatment can be used for assessing the probability of relapse.

METHODS

This study was a multicentre retrospective study of GCA patients referred to two US GCA fast-track clinics over 2 years. The patients underwent US evaluation at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months. EULAR criteria for remission and relapse were checked at 3 and 6 months. OGUS changes at 0-3 months and 0-6 months were compared between patients with and without relapse at 6 months, as well as between those with and without remission at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were included (mean age 77.2 years, 55.3% females). Nineteen (26%) patients relapsed at 6 months, of whom 14 (19.1%) showed a minor relapse and 5 (6.8%) a major relapse. EULAR remission at 6 months was achieved in 32 (43.8%) patients. The standardized mean difference in OGUS between baseline and 3 months and between 3 months and 6 months was -0.25 and -0.38, respectively. OGUS significantly improved between baseline and 6 months (1.18 to 0.99, P = 0.004) and from 3-6 months (1.08 to 0.99, P = 0.04) in non-relapsing patients, whereas no significant changes at 3  (1.17 to 1.17; P = 0.736) and 6 months (1.17 to 1.21; P = 0.343) months were observed in those who experienced relapse. The mean 0-6-month OGUS improvement was lower in patients who relapsed (-0.1 to 0.16, P = 0.037). The mean 0-6-months OGUS improvement (decrease) was greater in patients who achieved remission at 6 months (0.28 to -0.07, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The absence of OGUS improvement during follow-up in GCA may be used to assess the probability of relapse and the absence of remission at 6 months.

Performance of the modified 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria without age restriction for discriminating from Takayasu arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability to discriminate giant cell arteritis (GCA) from Takayasu arteritis (TAK) according to the modified 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) GCA classification criteria.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Japanese nationwide retrospective registry were evaluated using the criteria with partial modification; wall thickening of descending thoracic-abdominal aorta were mainly diagnosed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging instead of evaluating with positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. The discriminability of the criteria was evaluated using C-statistic (> 0.7: good ability).

RESULTS

Newly diagnosed patients with GCA (n = 139) and TAK (n = 129) were assessed, and 23.3% of TAK were aged 50 years or older at onset. The sensitivity of the modified 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria with a score ≥ 6 was 82.0%, 68.5%, and 32.1% in all GCA, GCA with large-vessel involvement, and GCA without cranial arteritis, respectively. The specificity of the modified criteria was 96.1% for the 129 TAK as controls. Five patients with late-onset TAK met the modified criteria, and four had cranial signs and symptoms, two had bilateral axillary artery involvement, and four had descending thoracic-abdominal aorta involvement. The discriminability of the criteria was good (C-statistic: 0.986, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.976-0.996) and remained good after excluding age (C-statistic: 0.927, 95% CI: 0.894-0.961). The discriminability of a set of large-vessel lesions (bilateral axillary artery and descending thoracic-abdominal aorta) and inflammatory markers was markedly decreased with poor C-statistic value (C-statistic: 0.598, 95% CI: 0.530-0.667). Discriminability was improved after adding polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (C-statistic: 0.757, 95% CI: 0.700-0.813) or age (C-statistic: 0.913, 95%CI: 0.874-0.951) to the set of large-vessel lesions. In GCA patients with a score ≤ 5, 52% had bilateral subclavian and/or axillary artery involvement.

CONCLUSION

The modified 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria well performed in classifying GCA and TAK without PET-CT in routine clinical practice. A set of items included in the modified GCA classification criteria had good discriminative ability for GCA and TAK, even when age was excluded. However, age restriction or PMR was required to distinguish GCA without cranial lesions from TAK.

The impact of histopathological criteria for definite vasculitis in giant cell arteritis: retrospective analysis of temporal artery biopsies

Histopathological findings associated with definite vasculitis in temporal artery biopsy (TAB) defined in 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) was published in 2022. We aimed to evaluate the TAB of our GCA patients for histopathological findings associated with definite vasculitis. Patients who were diagnosed with GCA by clinicians and underwent TAB between January 2012 and May 2022 were included. Hospital electronic records and patients' files were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 90 patients' pathology reports were evaluated by a pathologist and a rheumatologist. In cases where microscopic findings were not specified in the pathology reports, histopathologic specimens were re-evaluated (n = 36). A standard checklist was used for histopathological findings of definite vasculitis. Patients were divided into two groups; (i) definite vasculitis-GCA and (ii) non-definite-GCA group, and the clinical and demographic characteristics for all patients were compared. The mean age of patients was 69.8 (± 8.5) years and 52.2% were female. In the first evaluation, 66 (73.3%) patients had a diagnosis of vasculitis according to pathology reports. In the re-evaluation of biopsy specimens, at least one definite finding of vasculitis was observed in TAB of 10/24 (41.6%) patients whose microscopic findings were not specified in the pathology reports. The ROC analysis showed that biopsy length had diagnostic value in predicting the diagnosis of definite vasculitis (AUC: 0.778, 95% CI: 0.65-0.89, p < 0.001). In those with a biopsy length of ≥ 1 cm, sensitivity was 76.5%, specificity was 64.3%, and PPV value was 92. In multivariate analysis, the most significant factor associated with definite vasculitis was biopsy length (OR: 1.18 (1.06-1.31), p = 0.002). Microscopic findings were reported in over 70% of patients. Reinterpretation of results according to a standard check-list improved the impact of TAB in the diagnosis of GCA. A biopsy length ≥ 1 cm was found to contribute towards a definitive histopathological vasculitis diagnosis.

Diagnosing vasculitis with ultrasound: findings and pitfalls

Rheumatologists are increasingly utilizing ultrasound for suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TAK). This enables direct confirmation of a suspected diagnosis within the examination room without further referrals. Rheumatologists can ask additional questions and explain findings to their patients while performing ultrasound, preferably in fast-track clinics to prevent vision loss. Vascular ultrasound for suspected vasculitis was recently integrated into rheumatology training in Germany. New European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations prioritize ultrasound as the first imaging tool for suspected GCA and recommend it as an imaging option for suspected TAK alongside magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Ultrasound is integral to the new classification criteria for GCA and TAK. Diagnosis is based on consistent clinical and ultrasound findings. Inconclusive cases require histology or additional imaging tests. Robust evidence establishes high sensitivities and specificities for ultrasound. Reliability is good among experts. Ultrasound reveals a characteristic non-compressible 'halo sign' indicating intima-media thickening (IMT) and, in acute disease, artery wall oedema. Ultrasound can further identify stenoses, occlusions and aneurysms, and IMT can be measured. In suspected GCA, ultrasound should include at least the temporal and axillary arteries bilaterally. Nearly all other arteries are accessible except the descending thoracic aorta. TAK mostly involves the common carotid and subclavian arteries. Ultrasound detects subclinical GCA in over 20% of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients without GCA symptoms. Patients with silent GCA should be treated as GCA because they experience more relapses and require higher glucocorticoid doses than PMR patients without GCA. Scores based on intima-thickness (IMT) of temporal and axillary arteries aid follow-up of GCA, particularly in trials. The IMT decreases more rapidly in temporal than in axillary arteries. Ascending aorta ultrasound helps monitor patients with extracranial GCA for the development of aneurysms. Experienced sonologists can easily identify pitfalls, which will be addressed in this article.

Cranial involvement in giant cell arteritis

Since its first clinical description in 1890, extensive research has advanced our understanding of giant cell arteritis, leading to improvements in both diagnosis and management for affected patients. Imaging studies have shown that the disease frequently extends beyond the typical cranial arteries, also affecting large vessels such as the aorta and its proximal branches. Meanwhile, advances in comprehending the underlying pathophysiology of giant cell arteritis have given rise to numerous potential therapeutic agents, which aim to minimise the need for glucocorticoid treatment and prevent flares. Classification criteria for giant cell arteritis, as well as recommendations for management, imaging, and treat-to-target have been developed or updated in the last 5 years, and current research encompasses a broad spectrum covering basic, translational, and clinical research. In this Series paper, we aim to discuss the current understanding of giant cell arteritis with cranial manifestations, describe the clinical approach to this condition, and explore future directions in research and patient care.

Incidence and clinical manifestations of giant cell arteritis in Spain: results of the ARTESER register

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the incidence of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in Spain and to analyse its clinical manifestations, and distribution by age group, sex, geographical area and season.

METHODS

We included all patients diagnosed with GCA between 1 June 2013 and 29 March 2019 at 26 hospitals of the National Health System. They had to be aged ≥50 years and have at least one positive results in an objective diagnostic test (biopsy or imaging techniques), meet 3/5 of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria or have a clinical diagnosis based on the expert opinion of the physician in charge. We calculated incidence rate using Poisson regression and assessed the influence of age, sex, geographical area and season.

RESULTS

We identified 1675 cases of GCA with a mean age at diagnosis of 76.9±8.3 years. The annual incidence was estimated at 7.42 (95% CI 6.57 to 8.27) cases of GCA per 100 000 people ≥50 years with a peak for patients aged 80-84 years (23.06 (95% CI 20.89 to 25.4)). The incidence was greater in women (10.06 (95% CI 8.7 to 11.5)) than in men (4.83 (95% CI 3.8 to 5.9)). No significant differences were found between geographical distribution and incidence throughout the year (p=0.125). The phenotypes at diagnosis were cranial in 1091 patients, extracranial in 337 patients and mixed in 170 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to estimate the incidence of GCA in Spain at a national level. We found a predominance among women and during the ninth decade of life with no clear variability according to geographical area or seasons of the year.

Giant cell temporal arteritis: a clinicopathological study with emphasis on unnecessary biopsy

Introduction

Temporal artery (TA) biopsy is commonly used for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, a positive biopsy is no longer mandatory for diagnosis. This study aims to correlate the histopathological findings of TA biopsies in suspected cases of GCA to the clinical presentation in an ophthalmic tertiary eye care center to draw useful conclusions and advocate the possible implementation of guidelines for TA biopsy.

Methods

Data was collected from patients' medical records including, demographics, clinical data, and histopathological findings and diagnosis. The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/ European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria have been used and partially adopted as a guide to compare the variables between TA biopsy-positive and negative groups as well as the TA biopsy-positive group and the group of patients with TA biopsy showing atherosclerosis.

Results

Out of the total 35 patients who underwent a TA biopsy during the period of 23 years, 22.9% of patients had histopathological findings consistent with GCA and 42.9% had TA atherosclerotic changes, while the remaining 34.3% had histologically unremarkable TA. The mean age of all patients was 66 ± 10.9 years. Slightly more than half were females (54.3%) and the remaining were males (45.7%). In the group with positive TA biopsies, the mean age was 71 ± 8.4 years with a higher female predominance (female-to-male ratio of 5:3). The mean diagnostic clinical score used in our study was higher (7.5 ± 2.33) in the GCA-positive group when compared to the other groups with statistical significance (mean of 4.85 ± 2.01 in patients with overall GCA-negative biopsies and 5.13 ± 2.10 in the group with atherosclerosis). Other three clinical variables that were found to be statistically significant in the GCA biopsy-positive group were scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, and optic nerve pallor.

Discussion

The mean age (71 ± 8.4 years) and the female predominance of GCA in our group of patients with positive TA biopsy (62.5%) was like other reports. In our study 22.9% of performed TA biopsies over the period of the study were positive confirming the diagnosis of GCA on histological exam, which was similar to another report and is considered to be relatively low. The incorporation of increased clinically focused assessments and algorithms, with the aid of the ACR/EULAR criteria, may decrease the frequency of TA biopsies that carries unnecessary cost and risk of procedure-related morbidity. We highly recommend applying the age of ≥ 50 years as an initial criterion for diagnosis, followed by the consideration of the statistically significant clinical features: scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, and optic nerve pallor.

Giant Cell Arteritis after COVID-19 Vaccination with Long-Term Follow-Up: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic vasculitis that primarily affects the elderly, and can cause visual impairment, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been substantial. Although vaccination programs have been a key defense strategy, concerns have arisen regarding post-vaccination immune-mediated disorders and related risks. We present a case of GCA after COVID-19 vaccination with 2 years of follow-up. A 69-year-old woman experienced fever, headaches, and local muscle pain two days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Elevated inflammatory markers were observed, and positron emission tomography (PET) revealed abnormal uptake in the major arteries, including the aorta and subclavian and iliac arteries. Temporal artery biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of GCA. Treatment consisted of pulse therapy with methylprednisolone, followed by prednisolone (PSL) and tocilizumab. Immediately after the initiation of treatment, the fever and headaches disappeared, and the inflammation markers normalized. The PSL dosage was gradually reduced, and one year later, a PET scan showed that the inflammation had resolved. After two years, the PSL dosage was reduced to 3 mg. Fourteen reported cases of GCA after COVID-19 vaccination was reviewed to reveal a diverse clinical picture and treatment response. The time from onset of symptoms to GCA diagnosis varied from two weeks to four months, highlighting the challenge of early detection. The effectiveness of treatment varied, but was generally effective similarly to that of conventional GCA. This report emphasizes the need for clinical vigilance and encourages further data collection in post-vaccination GCA cases.