Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary samples from women

Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics

Screening of urine specimens from men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection by a commercial PCR assay (AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) is a sensitive and specific noninvasive diagnostic assay. Since screening of women for C. trachomatis infection with the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test has been limited to use with endocervical swab specimens, we conducted an evaluation of the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test for the detection of C. trachomatis using female urine samples and compared the results of those obtained by in vitro culture and PCR of endocervical swab specimens. For 713 men we compared the performance of AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test with urine specimens with that of culture of urethral specimens. For specimens that were PCR positive and culture negative, two additional tests were used to resolve the discrepancies: direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) of sediment from a spun endocervical specimen culture vial and major outer membrane protein-based PCR of the sediment from the endocervical specimen culture vial. Of 525 urine specimens from females, 67 (12.8%) were PCR positive, and 41 (7.8%) endocervical specimens from the 525 women were culture positive. After resolution of the discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity of the urine PCR was 93.3%, whereas the sensitivity of endocervical swab specimen culture was 67.3%. Of 468 female endocervical swab specimens, 47 (10.0%) had a positive PCR result and 33 (7.0%) were culture positive. The resolved sensitivity of the endocervical swab specimen PCR was 86%. Of 415 matched female urine and endocervical swab specimens, there were 49 confirmed infections; 30 (61.2%) specimens were positive by culture of the endocervical swab specimen, 40 (81.6%) were positive by confirmed endocervical swab specimen PCR, 43 (87.8%) were positive by confirmed urine PCR, and all 49 (100%) were positive by either endocervical swab specimen PCR or urine PCR. For men, the resolved sensitivity of the urine PCR was 88%, and the sensitivity of culture was only 50.7%. These results indicate that urine PCR is highly sensitive for the detection of C. trachomatis in both women and men and provides a noninvasive technique for routine screening for chlamydial infection.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice urine samples

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis is frequently overlooked as a cause of dysuria and urinary frequency in general practice patients.

AIM

This study set out to determine the impact of performing chlamydial antigen detection on sterile pyuria samples from patients aged 16-65 years and which were submitted to a hospital microbiology laboratory by general practitioners in the Winchester health district for routine microbiological investigations.

METHOD

Chlamydial antigen detection was performed by enzyme immunoassay and direct immunofluorescence. The cost of performing the test was estimated. In the first year of the study (1991) questionnaires were sent to general practitioners whose patients had a positive test result.

RESULTS

A total of 1025 samples of sterile pyuria were received at the laboratory between January 1991 and March 1993. Chlamydial antigen was detected in 54 samples (5%); 22 men and 32 women aged between 16 and 57 years (mean 25 years). The detection rate was highest in the 16-20 years age group (22% of men had a positive sample and 7% of women). Completed questionnaires from 27 general practitioners revealed that 59% of their patients were referred to the genitourinary clinic for treatment and contact tracing. The others were treated by the general practitioner. The cost of the screening programme per cure in this population was estimated to be 246 pounds.

CONCLUSION

C trachomatis is a significant pathogen which may go unrecognized and untreated. The cost, medically and financially, of screening for this pathogen and treating infected patients and contacts is likely to be less than ignoring it, particularly if screening is confined to the 16-30 years age group. General practitioners should consider the diagnosis of chlamydial infection in young adult patients with sterile pyuria, and microbiology laboratories should screen sterile pyuria samples for chlamydial antigen.