Factors associated with clinical and sub-clinical anal human papillomavirus infection in homosexual men

High prevalent human papillomavirus infections of the oral cavity of asymptomatic HIV-positive men

Background

Incidence of anal and oral infections with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is increasing, particularly among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive (HIV+) men. HPV type 16 has exhibited the highest incidence and only limited data is available on other prevalent types, variants of HPV16, as well as associated factors. We were interested in identifying prevalent HPV types, variants of type 16, as well as factors associated with HPV16 infections in the oral cavity of HIV+ men who have sex with men (MSM).

Methods

A cross-sectional study of oral cavity samples from HIV+ MSM, that in a previous study were identified as positive for HPV16 in the anal canal. Cells from the oral cavity (102 samples, paired with 102 from the anal canal of same patient) were used to extract DNA and detect HPV infections using INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra II, and PCR. From these, 80 samples (paired, 40 anal and 40 oral) were used to identify variants of type 16 by sequencing. Statistical differences were estimated by the X² test, and p values equal to or less than 0.05 were considered significant. SPSS ver. Twenty-four statistical software (IBM Corp) was used.

Results

We found a high prevalence of High-Risk HPV (HR-HPV) and Low-Risk HPV (LR-HPV). Patients were positive in the oral cavity for HR types; 16, 39 and 18 (80.4, 61.8 and 52.9% respectively) and LR types 11 and 6 (53.9 and 34.3% respectively). Surprisingly, only European variants of type 16 were found in the oral cavity, although American Asian (22.5%) and African (2.5%) variants were identified in the anal canal. The analysis showed that CD4 counts could be the most important risk factor associated with HR-HPV infections in the oral cavity, anal canal or both anatomical regions. The risk of infection of the oral cavity with type 18 increased in men diagnosed with HIV for more than 6 years.

Conclusions

Prevalence of both HR and LR HPV’s in the oral cavity of Mexican HIV+ MSM is very high. The fact that only European variants of HPV16 were found in the oral cavity suggest a possible tropism not previously described.

Prevalence of Anal Human Papillomavirus Infection and Risk Factors among HIV-positive Patients in Tokyo, Japan

Background

Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, particularly multiple HPV types, is recognized as a necessary cause of anal cancer. However, a limited number of studies have reported the prevalence of anal HPV infection in Asia. We determined the prevalence, genotypes, and risk factors for anal HPV infection in Japanese HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM), heterosexual men, and women.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 421 HIV-positive patients. At enrollment, we collected data on smoking, alcohol, co-morbidities, drugs, CD4 cell counts, HIV RNA levels, highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) duration, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and serological screening (syphilis, hepatitis B virus, Chlamydia trachomatis, Entamoeba histolytica). Anal swabs were collected for oncogenic HPV genotyping.

Results

Oncogenic HPV rate was 75.9% in MSM, 20.6% in heterosexual men, and 19.2% in women. HPV 16/18 types were detected in 34.9% of MSM, 17.7% of heterosexual men, and 11.5% of women. Multiple oncogenic HPV (≥2 oncogenic types) rate was 54.6% in MSM, 8.8% in heterosexual men, and 0% in women. In univariate analysis, younger age, male sex, MSM, CD4 <100, HIV viral load >50,000, no administration of HAART, and having ≥2 sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were significantly associated with oncogenic HPV infection, whereas higher smoking index and corticosteroid use were marginally associated with oncogenic HPV infection. In multivariate analysis, younger age (OR, 0.98 [0.96–0.99]), MSM (OR, 5.85 [2.33–14.71]), CD4 <100 (OR, 2.24 [1.00–5.01]), and having ≥2 STIs (OR, 2.81 [1.72–4.61]) were independently associated with oncogenic HPV infection. These 4 variables were also significant risk factors for multiple oncogenic HPV infection.

Conclusions

Among Japanese HIV-infected patients, approximately two-thirds of MSM, one-fifth of heterosexual men, and one-fifth of women have anal oncogenic HPV infection. Younger age, MSM, ≥2 STIs, and immunosuppression confer a higher risk of infection with oncogenic HPV and multiple oncogenic types.

Anal warts and anal intradermal neoplasia

For the last five millennia we have been dealing with the annoyance of verrucas. Anogenital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the most common sexually transmitted disease in the United States and is increasing in incidence. As in other gastrointestinal conditions, HPV infection can lead to a stepwise transition from normal cells to dysplastic cells and then to invasive anal cancer. Knowledge of the natural history of HPV infection, risk factors, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic methods gives us the tools to adequately prevent, evaluate, treat, and counsel our patients. In this review, the authors detail the diagnosis, management, and treatment of anal condyloma and anal intraepithelial neoplasia with a focus on prevention, early detection, and treatment using current data and technology.

Blind sampling is superior to anoscope guided sampling for screening for anal intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVES

Anal cytology smears are either collected "blind" (swab inserted 4 cm into anal canal and rotated) or guided through an anoscope (transformation zone visualised and then sampled). We compared these smear techniques with respect to sample quality and patient acceptability.

METHODS

Using a paired, random sequence clinical trial, 151 homosexual men (n = 95 HIV positive) underwent both smear techniques at a single visit; smear order was randomised and specimens were read blind. Both techniques utilised a Dacron swab, with water lubrication. Cytological specimens were prepared using a liquid based collection method (ThinPrep). The outcome measures were cytological specimen adequacy, cytological classification, presence of rectal columnar, squamous and metaplastic cells, contamination, patient comfort and acceptability, and volume of fluid that remained after the ThinPrep procedure.

RESULTS

Regardless of smear order, guided smears were less likely to detect higher grade abnormalities than blind smears (15 v 27 cases, p = 0.001). Controlling for smear order, guided smears were more likely to be assessed as "unsatisfactory" for cytological assessment (OR 6.93, 95% CI 1.92 to 24.94), and contain fewer squamous (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.94) and metaplastic cells (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.54) than blind smears; there were no other statistically significant differences between techniques. Regardless of smear technique, first performed smears were more likely to detect a higher grade abnormality than second performed smears (23 v eight cases, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Blind cytology smears are superior to anoscope guided smears for screening for anal neoplasia in homosexual men.

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV positive people

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature on HIV associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN).

METHODS

A comprehensive Medline/Pubmed search was performed for the years 1980-2001 (January) for articles pertaining to HIV associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia. From the MeSH terms "anal intraepithelial neoplasia" and "anal cancer" the following subheadings were used: HIV, homosexual men, HPV, Epidemiology, Etiology, Mortality, Diagnosis, Screening, Drug Therapy, Surgical Therapy, Radio Therapy, Risk factors, ASIL. The search was limited to "human" for all searches. In the absence of enough "randomised controlled trials" the search was extended to clinical trials, reviews, and case reports. One analysis on cost effectiveness and two abstracts presented at 12th World AIDS Conference and 6th Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections were included. The 44 publications referred to originate from the United Kingdom (9), the United States (26), and Denmark (5), with one each from Switzerland, Germany, Australia, and France. The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews yielded 11 complete reviews for "anal cancer" and none for "anal intraepithelial neoplasia." The textbook of AIDS-related cancers and their treatment was consulted. We also included our personal experience from the treatment of patients at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, one of the largest centres for the management of HIV disease in Europe.

CONCLUSION

Routine anal cytological screening followed by appropriate management of AIN is an important issue for HIV infected patients. The natural history of AIN has not been fully established and this prevents clinicians from defining clear management protocols. There is early evidence that the benefits of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in terms of restoring immune function and reducing opportunistic infections and some neoplasms may not extend to regression of AIN. Under these circumstances it might be predicted that AIN and subsequent progression to invasive anal cancer would rise as HAART prolongs the lives of seropositive people. However, routine anal cytological screening will surely have to await an effective proved intervention for AIN and this would seem to be a pressing clinical goal.

Changes in HPV infection in patients with anogenital warts and their partners

OBJECTIVES--To investigate the relationship between clinical findings and the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in a range of anatomical sites in patients with and without anogenital warts. SUBJECTS--Men and women with a clinical diagnosis of anogenital warts, or a current partner with anogenital warts. SETTING--A department of genitourinary medicine in central London. METHODS--The anogenital areas of the patients were thoroughly examined using a colposcope before and after application of acetic acid. Different types of specimens were taken from a variety of anatomical sites. Superficial skin sampling was performed by the application of slides covered with "Superglue" (SG) to clinically normal and abnormal areas of anogenital skin. The presence of human cells in the SG samples was confirmed by detection of the beta-globin gene using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HPV DNA was extracted from the specimens and amplified by using consensus primers with the PCR. HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31 and 33 were identified by Southern blotting followed by hybridisation. RESULTS--In women, HPV DNA was detected in 83% of wart biopsies, 29% of cervical biopsies, 36% of cervical scrapes, 25% of urethral loop specimens, 37% of vaginal washes and 33% of rectal swab specimens. In men, HPV DNA was detected in 67% of wart biopsies, 37% of urethral loop specimens and 12% of rectal swab specimens. Of the SG samples containing the beta-globin gene, 49% from women and 50% from men contained HPV DNA. HPV DNA was not detected in buccal scrapes and serum samples from women or men. Of all specimens with detectable HPV DNA, there was evidence of a single HPV type in 41%, multiple types in 48% and undetermined types in 11%. Samples taken from different sites of a patient tended to have HPV types in common. Sexual partners, however, did not consistently have HPV types in common. CONCLUSIONS--HPV DNA was distributed widely in the anogenital area, in warts, acetowhite areas and clinically normal skin. The SG technique was well tolerated by patients and produced results consistent with other findings. Sampling from a single site of the genitalia on one occasion may significantly underestimate the infection rate with HPV. Multifocal infection of the anogenital area with HPV should be taken into consideration when interpreting epidemiological studies and management strategies.

Anal intercourse: a risk factor for anal papillomavirus infection in women?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether anal intercourse is a risk factor for anal HPV infection in women.

DESIGN

Results derived from clinical examination, anal cytology and HPV DNA hybridisation were correlated with data obtained from a questionnaire administered to the patients at the time of their clinical examination.

SETTING

A sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic in Sydney, Australia.

SUBJECTS

31 women attending the clinic for HPV related problems.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A thorough history was elicited from each woman followed by physical examination of the anogenital region. Cervical and anal scrapes were collected for cytology and HPV DNA hybridisation. Of the 15 women who practised anal intercourse, a total of 12 (80%) had either clinical or subclinical HPV infection. Seven had overt anal warts, situated either internally or externally in the anal canal; and further 5 women had evidence of subclinical HPV infection as determined by positive cytological and/or HPV DNA hybridisation results on their anal scrapes. The women who did not have a history of anal intercourse had a lower (7/16, 43%), but not statistically significant, rate of anal HPV infection: five had anal warts and two had subclinical evidence of infection. No correlations were found between anal HPV infection and genital (cervical, vulval or vaginal) HPV infection; nor between the HPV typing patterns of women in either group.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained from these women do not indicate a close relationship between anal intercourse and the presence of detectable anal HPV infection.