Initial antihypertensive agent effects on acute blood pressure after intracerebral haemorrhage

Ginsenoside Rd and chrysophanol: Modulating the serine-glycine-one-carbon pathway to enhance neuroprotection in intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating neurological disorder characterized by oxidative stress, inflammatory cascades, and metabolic dysregulation. Ginsenoside Rd (G-Rd) and chrysophanol (Chr), two natural compounds with antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, have demonstrated neuroprotective potential, however, their mechanisms in ICH remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of G-Rd and Chr against heme-induced injury in HT22 cells and in a rat model of ICH, with a focus on oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and metabolic regulation.

METHODS

In vitro, HT22 cells were exposed with heme (10 μmol/L, 12 h) to simulate ICH injury, followed by treatment with G-Rd and Chr (80 μmol/L). Reactive oxygen species (ROS), apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential, and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10) were assessed using flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, and ELISA. In vivo, ICH was induced in rats via collagenase injection. Neurological function, hematoma volume, histopathology, and metabolic enzymes (SOD, MDA, NAD+, Ca2+-ATPase) were evaluated. Western blotting was used to analyze key enzymes in the serine-glycine-one‑carbon (SGOC) pathway.

RESULTS

G-Rd and Chr significantly suppressed ROS production (P < 0.05), downregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6; P < 0.01), and inhibited apoptosis (P < 0.01) in HT22 cells. Both compounds restored mitochondrial membrane potential and alleviated cellular damage. In the ICH rat model, combined treatment improved neurological scores by 45 % (P < 0.01), decreased hematoma volume by 38 % (P < 0.01), and restored metabolic homeostasis through modulation of SGOC pathway enzymes (PHGDH, PSAT1, PSPH, SHMT2; P < 0.05). Synergistic effects were observed in both hematoma resolution and neuroprotection.

CONCLUSION

G-Rd and Chr confer neuroprotection in ICH through antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and metabolic regulatory mechanisms. Their synergistic efficacy underscores their promise as therapeutic candidates, meriting further investigation of their molecular targets and translational potential.

Postoperative Blood Pressure Goals After Craniotomy for Tumor Resection: A National Survey

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Acute hypertension can occur in 90% of postcraniotomy patients for tumor resection, and 60% to 90% of patients require treatment with antihypertensive agents. Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage is a major driver of morbidity and mortality after craniotomy for tumor resection, and perioperative hypertension is believed to be a risk factor. Many neurosurgeons impose postoperative blood pressure (BP) goals to mitigate this risk, but there is little evidence to guide the selection of a specific target BP, leading to a wide variation in patient care. In this article, we have conducted a national survey to report the current practices regarding postoperative BP management.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of academic neurosurgical programs by distributing a 10-item questionnaire to neurosurgical residents of each accredited national neurosurgical residency training program (n = 117). Responses were collected over 3 months, from July 2023 to September 2023. Analysis was performed at the program level; for programs with multiple responding residents, the responses of the senior residents were retained.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 66 residents at 45 institutions. Forty-two programs set postoperative BP goals using systolic blood pressure (SBP) as a parameter, and 2 used mean arterial pressure. Among programs using an SBP goal, most programs kept a goal SBP of <140 mm Hg (41%-43% depending on the tumor type), followed by SBP <160 mm Hg (36%-39%). Most programs maintained this goal until the morning of the first postoperative day. Intravenous nicardipine (n = 12, 27%) and labetalol (n = 12, 27%) were the most frequently administered medications to maintain BP goals.

CONCLUSION

Most of the academic neurosurgical programs use a postoperative SBP goal after craniotomy for tumor resection. Programs are evenly divided between goals of SBP <140 mm Hg and SBP <160 mm Hg. The variability among programs indicates clinical equipoise between these 2 approaches in the context of a future clinical trial.

Blood Pressure Management in Intracerebral Haemorrhage: when, how much, and for how long?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

When compared to ischaemic stroke, there have been limited advances in acute management of intracerebral haemorrhage. Blood pressure control in the acute period is an intervention commonly implemented and recommended in guidelines, as elevated systolic blood pressure is common and associated with haematoma expansion, poor functional outcomes, and mortality. This review addresses the uncertainty around the optimal blood pressure intervention, specifically timing and length of intervention, intensity of blood pressure reduction and agent used.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent pivotal trials have shown that acute blood pressure intervention, to a systolic target of 140mmHg, does appear to be beneficial in ICH, particularly when bundled with other therapies such as neurosurgery in selected cases, access to critical care units, blood glucose control, temperature management and reversal of coagulopathy. Systolic blood pressure should be lowered acutely in intracerebral haemorrhage to a target of approximately 140mmHg, and that this intervention is generally safe in the ICH population.

Synergistic promotion of angiogenesis after intracerebral hemorrhage by ginsenoside Rh2 and chrysophanol in rats

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a debilitating condition characterized by the rupture of cerebral blood vessels, resulting in profound neurological deficits. A significant challenge in the treatment of ICH lies in the brain's limited capacity to regenerate damaged blood vessels. This study explores the potential synergistic effects of Ginsenoside Rh2 and Chrysophanol in promoting angiogenesis following ICH in a rat model.

METHODS

Network pharmacology was employed to predict the potential targets and pathways of Ginsenoside Rh2 and Chrysophanol for ICH treatment. Molecular docking was utilized to assess the binding affinity between these compounds and their respective targets. Experimental ICH was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats through stereotactic injection of type VII collagenase into the right caudate putamen (CPu). The study encompassed various methodologies, including administration protocols, assessments of neurological function, magnetic resonance imaging, histological examination, observation of brain tissue ultrastructure, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), immunofluorescence staining, Western blot analysis, and statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Network pharmacology analysis indicated that Ginsenoside Rh2 and Chrysophanol may exert their therapeutic effects in ICH by promoting angiogenesis. Results from animal experiments revealed that rats treated with Ginsenoside Rh2 and Chrysophanol exhibited significantly improved neurological function, reduced hematoma volume, and diminished pathological injury compared to the Model group. Immunofluorescence analysis demonstrated enhanced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and CD31, signifying augmented angiogenesis in the peri-hematomal region following combination therapy. Importantly, the addition of a VEGFR2 inhibitor reversed the increased expression of VEGFR2 and CD31. Furthermore, Western blot analysis revealed upregulated expression of angiogenesis-related factors, including VEGFR2, SRC, AKT1, MAPK1, and MAPK14, in the combination therapy group, but this effect was abrogated upon VEGFR2 inhibitor administration.

CONCLUSION

The synergistic effect of Ginsenoside Rh2 and Chrysophanol demonstrated a notable protective impact on ICH injury in rats, specifically attributed to their facilitation of angiogenesis. Consequently, this research offers a foundation for the utilization of Ginsenosides Rh2 and Chrysophanol in medical settings and offers direction for the advancement of novel pharmaceuticals for the clinical management of ICH.

A randomized controlled trial: Comparing blood pressure reduction in hyperacute phase of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage by continuous nicardipine infusion with or without a preceding nicardipine bolus dose

Objectives

To determine whether addition of an intravenous bolus dose before continuous nicardipine infusion would improve blood pressure reduction in the hyperacute phase in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Design

Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Setting

One academic emergency department (ED) in Bangkok, Thailand.

Participants

Adult patients with spontaneous ICH presented to the ED between June 30, 2022, and July 15, 2023.

Interventions

The bolus group (n = 31) received an intravenous bolus dose of nicardipine before nicardipine continuous infusion, whereas the non-bolus group (n = 31) was given a placebo and nicardipine continuous infusion.

Main outcomes

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) within the first hour (being measured every 5 min), neurological deterioration, and infusion dosage at 60 min were assessed.

Results

Basic characteristic features including the mean baseline SBP were not significantly different between the two groups. At 10 min after treatment initiation, the bolus group had a significant decrease in SBP (32.1 ± 13.6 vs 22.3 ± 18.5 mmHg; p-value = 0.020). Moreover, the target SBP of 180 mmHg could be achieved within 10 min in the bolus group compared with 15 min in the non-bolus group. However, the overall mean SBPs were not significantly different, with 152 ± 12 mmHg in the bolus group compared with 150 ± 15 mmHg in the non-bolus group (p-value = 0.564). None of the patients in both groups had neurological deterioration over the first hour of the treatment. The infusion dosages of nicardipine at 1 h were 6.2 mg/h (5.9, 7.7 mg/h) and 6.8 mg/h (5.9, 8.4 mg/h) in the bolus and non-bolus groups, respectively (p-value = 0.618).

Conclusions

Administering a 1-mg bolus dose of nicardipine before continuous nicardipine infusion notably reduces SBP at 10 min. However, the overall SBP does not exhibit a significant decline during the hyperacute phase of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.