Endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion

Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment in acute vertebrobasilar occlusions: Pooled analysis of the French and German Stroke Registries

INTRODUCTION

Whether intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) provides additional benefit in eligible patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT) remains an open question.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a pooled analysis using data from two national stroke registries, the ETIS registry in France and GSR-ET registry in Germany. Patients who underwent EVT for vertebral and/or basilar artery occlusions from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. The primary efficacy outcome was a favorable shift toward better functional outcomes on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days. Safety outcomes included 90-days mortality and symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation (sICH). Comparisons between IVT + EVT and direct EVT groups were made combining inverse propensity score matching, probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and regression models.

RESULTS

Among 2028 patients treated during the study period, 797 (39.2%) received IVT before EVT, while 1231 (60.7%) had EVT alone. After IPTW matching, we compared 211 patients treated with IVT + EVT to 260 direct EVT patients. Patients in the IVT + EVT group had a favorable shift across the 90-day mRS distribution (common aOR 1.43 per 1-point mRS improvement, 95% CI 1.01-2.04; p = 0.046), higher odds of 90-day favorable functional outcome (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.00-2.44; p = 0.049) and lower odds of 90-day mortality (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99; p = 0.045). IVT was not associated with increased risk of sICH (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 0.62-4.35; p = 0.313).

DISCUSSION

This registry-based study suggests a potential benefit of IVT before EVT in eligible patients with vertebrobasilar occlusions. Conclusion: Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings and to validate the benefits of IVT in this clinical context.

Thrombectomy Alone or Alongside Intravenous Thrombolysis in Managing Acute Ischemic Stroke Caused by Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether the combination of endovascular treatment (EVT) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) results in a more favorable functional outcome than EVT alone in managing cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Thus, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of 2 approaches-direct endovascular treatment (DEVT) and bridging therapy (IVT plus EVT)-in patients with acute BAO presenting within 4.5 hours of stroke onset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 153 patients with acute BAO presenting within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Of these patients, 65 (42.5%) and 88 (57.5%) underwent DEVT and bridging therapy, respectively. The primary outcome was defined as good functional outcome (mRS, 0-3) at 90 days. Additionally, preoperative clinical features, thrombectomy attempts, successful reperfusion rates, incidences of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

At 90 days, the rate of good functional outcome was comparable between the DEVT (44.6%) and bridging-therapy (39.8%) groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.55-2.31; P = .753). The bridging-therapy group exhibited a lower percentage of patients requiring ≥3 attempts of stent retrieval (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.93; P = .034). Preoperative clinical features, rate of successful reperfusion, sICH, and mortality were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BAO-induced AIS, DEVT demonstrates a comparable functional outcome to bridging therapy within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, but IVT reduces the number of thrombectomy attempts.

Thrombectomy versus combined thrombolysis for acute basilar artery occlusion: a secondary analysis of the ATTENTION trial

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the outcomes of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with those of direct MT in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of direct endovascular treatment (EVT) and bridging IVT followed by EVT in Chinese patients with acute basilar artery occlusion BAO.

METHODS

This subanalysis derived from the prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial of the ATTENTION study, included 221 patients with acute BAO categorized into two groups based on whether they received bridging IVT before MT: MT alone or combined IVT+MT. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score distribution at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included mRS scores within different ranges (0-1, 0-2, and 0-3) at the 90-day point and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at 24 hours and 3 days post-intervention. Safety outcomes encompassed intracranial hemorrhage incidence based on the Heidelberg classification criteria (any intracerebral hemorrhage) and mortality assessment at 90 days.

RESULTS

Direct and bridging IVT before EVT yielded similar primary outcomes. No significant difference in 90-day mRS scores (median, 4.5 vs 4; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79 to 1.15]; p=0.624) was observed between the two groups. Regarding safety outcomes, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of death within 90 days or any intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute BAO, those treated with bridging IVT before EVT did not demonstrate any advantages in enhanced safety and efficacy outcomes compared with those treated with direct EVT.

European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the acute management of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). These guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the ESO and according to the GRADE methodology. Although BAO accounts for only 1%-2% of all strokes, it has very poor natural outcome. We identified 10 relevant clinical situations and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions, based on which a systematic literature search and review was performed. The working group consisted of 10 voting members (five representing ESO and five ESMINT) and three non-voting junior members. The certainty of evidence was generally very low. In many PICOs, available data were scarce or lacking, hence, we provided expert consensus statements. First, we compared intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to no IVT, but specific BAO-related data do not exist. Yet, historically, IVT was standard of care for BAO patients who were also included (albeit in small numbers) in IVT trials. Non-randomised studies of IVT-only cohorts showed high proportion of favourable outcomes. Expert Consensus suggests using IVT up to 24 h unless otherwise contraindicated. We further suggest IVT plus endovascular treatment (EVT) over direct EVT. EVT on top of best medical treatment (BMT) was compared to BMT alone within 6 and 6-24 h from last seen well. In both time windows, we observed a different effect of treatment depending on (a) the region where the patients were treated (Europe vs. Asia), (b) on the proportion of IVT in the BMT arm, and (c) on the initial stroke severity. In case of high proportion of IVT in the BMT group and in patients with NIHSS below 10, EVT plus BMT was not found better than BMT alone. Based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest EVT + BMT over BMT alone (i.e. based on results of patients with at least 10 NIHSS points and a low proportion of IVT in BMT). For patients with an NIHSS below 10, we found no evidence to recommend EVT over BMT. In fact, BMT was non-significantly better and safer than EVT. Furthermore, we found a stronger treatment effect of EVT + BMT over BMT alone in proximal and middle locations of BAO compared to distal location. While recommendations for patients without extensive early ischaemic changes in the posterior fossa can, in general, follow those of other PICOs, we formulated an Expert Consensus Statement suggesting against reperfusion therapy in those with extensive bilateral and/or brainstem ischaemic changes. Another Expert Consensus suggests reperfusion therapy regardless of collateral scores. Based on limited evidence, we suggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as the first-line strategy of mechanical thrombectomy. As an Expert Consensus, we suggest rescue percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting after a failed EVT procedure. Finally, based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest add-on antithrombotic treatment during EVT or within 24 h after EVT in patients with no concomitant IVT and in whom EVT was complicated (defined as failed or imminent re-occlusion, or need for additional stenting or angioplasty).

Efficacy and safety of thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO)-induced posterior circulation ischemic stroke.

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute BAO, using an updated meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared the efficacy and safety of EVT with and without IVT in the treatment of acute BAO ischemic stroke. The extracted data included sample size, patient age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 and 0-3, mortality rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Results

Five studies that included a total of 1,578 patients (594 IVT + EVT vs. 984 EVT), met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that bridging IVT was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (41% vs. 34%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68, p = 0.006). Furthermore, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVT + EVT group than in the direct EVT group (25% vs. 30%; OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003), with low heterogeneity observed (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.78). However, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the rates of sICH (5% vs. 6%; OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52-1.39, p = 0.53), SAH (3% vs. 3%; OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.39-2.22, p = 0.87), perforation (2% vs. 3%; OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95, p = 0.51), and dissection (3% vs. 2%; OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.13-7.14, p = 0.98).

Conclusion

Bridging IVT in conjunction with EVT was associated with better functional outcomes and reduced mortality rates in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to BAO compared to EVT alone, without an increased risk of sICH, SAH, perforation, and dissection. In addition, the benefit of bridging IVT to EVT appeared to be more pronounced in European patients than in Asian patients compared to EVT alone. However, the conclusions of this study are not definitive and require validation through large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to draw more robust conclusions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024531363.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the acute management of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). These guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the ESO and according to the GRADE methodology.Although BAO accounts for only 1-2% of all strokes, it has very poor natural outcome. We identified 10 relevant clinical situations and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions, based on which a systematic literature search and review was performed. The working group consisted of 10 voting members (five representing ESO and five representing the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT)) and three non-voting junior members. The certainty of evidence was generally very low. In many PICOs, available data were scarce or lacking, hence, we provided expert consensus statements.First, we compared intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to no IVT, but specific BAO-related data do not exist. Yet, historically, IVT was standard of care for BAO patients who were also included (although in small numbers) in IVT trials. Non-randomized studies of IVT-only cohorts showed a high proportion of favorable outcomes. Expert Consensus suggests using IVT up to 24 hours unless otherwise contraindicated. We further suggest IVT plus endovascular treatment (EVT) over direct EVT. EVT on top of best medical treatment (BMT) was compared with BMT alone within 6 and 6-24 hours from last seen well. In both time windows, we observed a different effect of treatment depending on a) the region where the patients were treated (Europe vs Asia), b) on the proportion of IVT in the BMT arm, and c) on the initial stroke severity. In case of high proportion of IVT in the BMT group and in patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score below 10, EVT plus BMT was not found better than BMT alone. Based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest EVT+BMT over BMT alone (this is based on results of patients with at least 10 NIHSS points and a low proportion of IVT in BMT). For patients with an NIHSS score below 10, we found no evidence to recommend EVT over BMT. In fact, BMT was non-significantly better and safer than EVT. Furthermore, we found a stronger treatment effect of EVT+BMT over BMT alone in proximal and middle locations of BAO compared with distal location. While recommendations for patients without extensive early ischemic changes in the posterior fossa can, in general, follow those of other PICOs, we formulated an Expert Consensus Statement suggesting against reperfusion therapy in those with extensive bilateral and/or brainstem ischemic changes. Another Expert Consensus suggests reperfusion therapy regardless of collateral scores. Based on limited evidence, we suggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as the first-line strategy of mechanical thrombectomy. As an Expert Consensus, we suggest rescue percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting after a failed EVT procedure. Finally, based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest add-on antithrombotic treatment during EVT or within 24 hours after EVT in patients with no concomitant IVT and in whom EVT was complicated (defined as failed or imminent re-occlusion, or need for additional stenting or angioplasty).

Meta-analysis of clinical and safety profiles after reperfusion therapy in acute posterior circulation strokes: insights and implications

BACKGROUND

Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) accounts for approximately 20% of all acute ischemic strokes. The optimal reperfusion therapy for PCS management remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and bridging therapy in PCS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of 19 studies examining reperfusion therapy outcomes in PCS patients, including 9765 individuals. We pooled prevalence data and assessed associations between reperfusion therapies and clinical, safety, and recanalization outcomes using random-effects models.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of reperfusion therapies post-acute PCS was 39% for IVT, 54% for EVT, and 48% for bridging therapy. EVT was associated with significantly higher odds of favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Score [mRS] 0-3) at 90 days compared to standard medical therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 5.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.07-15.59; P = 0.001). Conversely, bridging therapy was linked to reduced odds of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days compared to EVT (OR = 0.35; 95% CI=0.26-0.47; P < 0.001). Bridging therapy was also significantly associated with lower odds of good functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) (OR = 0.25; 95% CI=0.11-0.54; P < 0.001), reduced risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.26; 95% CI=0.07-0.68; P = 0.009), lower mortality (OR = 0.13; 95% CI=0.04-0.44; P = 0.001), and less successful recanalization (OR = 0.35; 95% CI=0.13-0.94; P = 0.038) relative to EVT.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis underscores the favorable outcomes associated with EVT in PCS cases. With notable reperfusion rates, understanding factors influencing PCS outcomes can inform patient selection and prognostic considerations.

Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a well-established approach for acute ischemic stroke. Whether bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before EVT confers any benefits remains uncertain. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of direct EVT with or without bridging IVT in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study enrolled 647 patients with acute BAO who underwent either bridging IVT before EVT or direct EVT from the BASILAR registry. The primary outcome was an independent functional outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1), favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-3), and mortality rate at 90 days, as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful reperfusion between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

Direct EVT and bridging IVT before EVT exhibited similar primary outcomes (27.3% vs 27.7%, respectively) and distributions of mRS scores at 90 days. Moreover, rates of sICH and 90-day mortality were not significantly different between the two groups (7.3% vs 6.0%, adjusted OR (aOR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.86, P=0.84 for sICH; 46.8% vs 43.7%, aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.38, P=0.53 for mortality).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute BAO, functional outcomes were similar between those treated with bridging IVT before EVT and those treated with direct EVT, and there was no difference between the two groups in terms of sICH and mortality rates.

Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The benefit and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains unclear. This article aims to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in acute BAO stroke patients.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant literature pertaining to patients with acute BAO who underwent endovascular thrombectomy alone or intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular thrombectomy (bridging therapy), until January 10, 2024. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. The safety outcome was mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 h. Effect sizes were computed as risk ratio (RR) with random-effect models. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023462293).

RESULTS

A total of 528 articles were obtained through the search and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Finally, 2 RCTs and 10 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that the endovascular thrombectomy alone group had a lower rate of functional independence compared to the bridging therapy group (29% vs 38%; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, p < 0.001), lower independent ambulation (39% vs 45%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.98, p = 0.01), and higher mortality (36% vs 28%, RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.37, p = 0.001). However, no differences were detected in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (6% vs 4%; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.74-1.71, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy seemed to led to better functional independence, independent ambulation, and lower risk of mortality without increasing the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage compared to endovascular thrombectomy alone. However, given the non-randomized nature of this study, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Introducing the Futile Recanalization Prediction Score (FRPS): A Novel Approach to Predict and Mitigate Ineffective Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate the Futile Recanalization Prediction Score (FRPS), a novel tool designed to predict the severity risk of FR and aid in pre- and post-EVT risk assessments. Methods: The FRPS was developed using a rigorous process involving the selection of predictor variables based on clinical relevance and potential impact. Initial equations were derived from previous meta-analyses and refined using various statistical techniques. We employed machine learning algorithms, specifically random forest regression, to capture nonlinear relationships and enhance model performance. Cross-validation with five folds was used to assess generalizability and model fit. Results: The final FRPS model included variables such as age, sex, atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia, cognitive impairment, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), onset-to-puncture time, sICH, and NIHSS score. The random forest model achieved a mean R-squared value of approximately 0.992. Severity ranges for FRPS scores were defined as mild (FRPS < 66), moderate (FRPS 66-80), and severe (FRPS > 80). Conclusions: The FRPS provides valuable insights for treatment planning and patient management by predicting the severity risk of FR. This tool may improve the identification of candidates most likely to benefit from EVT and enhance prognostic accuracy post-EVT. Further clinical validation in diverse settings is warranted to assess its effectiveness and reliability.

Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Posterior cerebral artery occlusion (PCAo) can cause long-term disability, yet randomized controlled trials to guide optimal reperfusion strategy are lacking. We compared the outcomes of PCAo patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to patients treated with IVT alone.

METHODS

From the multicenter retrospective Posterior cerebraL ArTery Occlusion (PLATO) registry, we included patients with isolated PCAo treated with reperfusion therapy within 24 hours of onset between January 2015 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Other outcomes comprised 3-month excellent (mRS 0-1) and independent outcome (mRS 0-2), early neurological improvement (ENI), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). The treatments were compared using inverse probability weighted regression adjustment.

RESULTS

Among 724 patients, 400 received EVT+/-IVT and 324 IVT alone (median age 74 years, 57.7% men). The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 7, and the occluded segment was P1 (43.9%), P2 (48.3%), P3-P4 (6.1%), bilateral (1.0%), or fetal posterior cerebral artery (0.7%). Compared to IVT alone, EVT+/-IVT was not associated with improved functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.43). EVT increased the odds for ENI (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.12), sICH (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.23-6.72), and mortality (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.95).

CONCLUSION

Despite higher odds for early improvement, EVT+/-IVT did not affect functional outcome compared to IVT alone after PCAo. This may be driven by the increased risk of sICH and mortality after EVT.

IV Thrombolysis in Basilar Artery Occlusion: Outcomes and Comparison With Endovascular Thrombectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recanalization is considered a prerequisite for favorable outcome in basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has been successfully used for eligible patients with BAO well beyond the 4.5-hour time window but has been largely underrepresented in the best medical management arms in recent randomized controlled trials of recanalization therapy in BAO. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients with BAO treated with IVT only and to compare IVT with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

METHODS

This observational single-center, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with BAO treated with IVT and/or EVT up to 48 hours of symptom onset during 1995-2022. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) at 3 months collected by a stroke physician by phone. In the first part, we described the outcomes and factors associated with functional outcome in the IVT-only cohort during 1995-2022. In the second part, we used doubly robust inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment models to compare functional outcome of patients treated with IVT vs EVT+/-IVT during 2010-2022.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort of 376 patients with acute BAO treated with recanalization therapy, 245 (65.2%) received only IVT. In the IVT-only cohort, most patients had moderate-to-severe clinical presentation (median NIH Stroke Scale 18) but no extensive early ischemic changes in the posterior circulation on admission. Half of them had onset-to-treatment time over 6 hours. 46.5% of the IVT-treated patients achieved 3-month favorable functional outcome, whereas mortality was 35.9%. sICH occurred in 11.1%. In a multivariable analysis, younger age, milder symptom severity, and less baseline ischemic changes predicted favorable functional outcome. In the 2010-2022 cohort, when compared with patients treated with EVT+/-IVT (n = 121), the IVT-only cohort (n = 122) had higher odds for favorable functional outcome (IVT 58.2% vs EVT 43.0% (aOR 2.82 [95% CI 1.31-6.05]).

DISCUSSION

IVT alone produced outcomes comparable with those in recent trials of endovascular BAO recanalization. Furthermore, in head-to-head comparison in our cohort, the IVT-only approach was more often associated with favorable outcome than EVT+/-IVT. Thus, it should not be overlooked as the first-line recanalization therapy in acute BAO, even in longer time windows.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that tPA is as effective as thrombectomy for basilar artery thrombosis.

Bridging therapy improves functional outcomes and reduces 90-day mortality compared with direct endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute posterior ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether bridging therapy can achieve better neurologic outcomes than direct endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with posterior ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with posterior artery occlusion treated with bridging therapy vs. EVT. Efficacy was assessed based on functional independence at 90 days and successful recanalization, whereas safety was assessed by mortality, rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and occurrence of any hemorrhage. All data were analyzed with Review Manager software v5.3 and the risk of bias was determined using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies with a total of 3278 patients (1211 in the bridging therapy group and 2067 in the EVT group). Patients in the bridging group had a better functional outcome at 90 days, as evidenced by a higher proportion with a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 compared with the EVT group (odds ratio (OR) = 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54-2.19, P < 0.01), while no difference in mRS score of 0-3 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.96-1.45, P = 0.11). Patients in the bridging therapy group also had lower 90-day mortality rate (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59-0.95, P = 0.02). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of successful recanalization (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.74-1.25, P = 0.77), sICH (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.86-1.89, P = 0.24), and hemorrhage (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.60-2.50, P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with posterior ischemic stroke, bridging therapy may be superior to EVT in achieving a good functional outcome and lowering the mortality without increasing the risks of hemorrhage.

Endovascular thrombectomy for basilar-artery occlusion: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Background and purpose

Basilar-artery occlusion (BAO) usually accounts for devastating neurologic sequelae, poor prognosis, and even death. While endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the most successful treatment for anterior circulation stroke with large vessel occlusion, its effectiveness in treating acute BAO is still debatable. Our aim is to compare the efficacy and safety between EVT and conservative medical treatment (CMT) in BAO.

Methods

Up until May 2022, relevant literature was gathered using searches in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes were defined as good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) at 3 months between EVT and CMT groups. The secondary outcomes included mortality at 3 months, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and any ICH.

Results

Eight studies involving 3733 patients with BAO were enrolled 2573 individuals underwent EVT, and the remaining 1160 patients received CMT. Compared with CMT, EVT achieved more favorable functional outcome (odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.55, I2 = 54%, p = 0.05) in BAO. The good functional outcome showed a similar tendency (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97-1.57, I2 = 63%, p = 0.02) as well. EVT decreased mortality at 3 months (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93, I2 = 31 %, p = 0.19), although having a tendency to cause symptomatic ICH (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.38-6.18, I2 = 22 %, p = 0.27).

Conclusions

EVT in BAO provides superior functional outcomes and less mortality compared with CMT. Even though EVT has the propensity to cause symptomatic ICH, EVT nevertheless improved posterior circulation stroke.

Efficacy and safety of bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy for tandem lesions in acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current studies have concluded that MT (Mechanical Thrombectomy) is safe and effective for tandem lesions (TL). However, The benefit of bridging therapy for TL is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety between bridging therapy and direct thrombectomy of tandem lesions.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy among TL patients with regards to symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage(sICH), Parenchymal hemorrhage (PH), 3-month mortality, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score within 3 months, successful reperfusion, and excellent reperfusion. The meta-analysis of proportions was conducted with a common effects model.

RESULT

Five studies (n = 1198 patients) were identified for the systematic review. For safety outcomes, the bridging group had no significant difference in the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.49-1.25, P = 0.31) and the rate of PH (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.39-1.13, P = 0.13) but significantly lower rate of 3-month mortality (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.37-0.75, P = 0.0004) compared to the direct thrombectomy group. In terms of efficacy outcomes, the bridging therapy group had a significantly higher rate of 3- month good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.38-2.24, P < 0.00001) and successful recanalization (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27-2.25, P = 0.0003) but no significant difference in the rate of excellent recanalization(OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.91-1.59, P = 0.19) in patients with TL compared to direct thrombectomy group.

CONCLUSION

Bridging therapy is effective in improving the 3-month functional prognosis and increasing the rate of arterial recanalization without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with TL compared to direct thrombectomy. A large multicentre clinical RCT is expected, as are advanced intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy techniques.

Bridging thrombolysis improves survival rates at 90 days compared with direct mechanical thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1096 patients

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of MT, with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), in acute BAO through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.

METHODS

Systematic searches of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were undertaken on August 1, 2022. Good functional outcome defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were 90-day mortality, successful post-thrombectomy recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

RESULTS

Three studies reporting 1096 patients with BAO AIS were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences in good functional outcome were detected between the two groups (RR=1.28 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.92); p=0.117). However, specifically patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) benefited from bridging IVT (OR=2.52 (95% CI 1.51 to 4.22); p<0.001) with better functional outcomes. There was a significantly lower 90-day mortality rate for patients who underwent bridging IVT compared with MT alone (RR=0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.80); p=0.008). No significant differences were detected in rates of post-treatment recanalization (RR=1.01 (95% CI 0.35 to 2.91); p=0.954), sICH (RR=0.96 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.42); p=0.724), and SAH (RR=0.93 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.83); p=0.563).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AIS due to BAO, bridging IVT was associated with lower mortality rates at 90 days, compared with direct MT. There were no improved functional outcomes or increased sICH or SAH between both arms, However, patients with LAA benefited from bridging IVT, with better functional outcomes.

Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolytics in Basilar Artery Occlusion

OBJECTIVE

Two randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients suffering from a stroke due to a basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use before EVT was low in these trials, questioning the added value of this treatment in this setting. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of EVT alone compared to IVT + EVT in stroke patients with a BAO.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT in 21 centers in France between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. We included patients with BAO and/or intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and compared patients treated with EVT alone versus IVT + EVT after propensity score (PS) matching. Variables selected for the PS were pre-stroke mRS, dyslipidemia, diabetes, anticoagulation, admission mode, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, type of anesthesia, and time from symptom onset to puncture. Efficacy outcomes were good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages and all-cause mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 385 patients, 243 (134 EVT alone and 109 IVT + EVT) were included after PS matching. There was no difference between EVT alone and IVT + EVT regarding good functional outcome (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] labeling = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-2.37, p = 0.45) and functional independence (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI, 0.79-2.85, p = 0.21). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality were also similar between the two groups (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.10-1.79, p = 0.24 and aOR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.29-1.10, p = 0.09, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

In this PS matching analysis, EVT alone seemed to lead to similar neurological recovery than IVT + EVT, with comparable safety profile. However, given our sample size and the observational nature of this study, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:596-604.

Posterior circulation ischaemic stroke diagnosis and management

This narrative review provides an overview of the posterior circulation and the clinical features of common posterior circulation stroke (PCS) syndromes in the posterior arterial territories and how to distinguish them from mimics. We outline the hyperacute management of patients with suspected PCS with emphasis on how to identify those who are likely to benefit from intervention based on imaging findings. Finally, we review advances in treatment options, including developments in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and the principles of medical management and indications for neurosurgery. Observational and randomised clinical trial data have been equivocal regarding EVT in PCS, but more recent studies strongly support its efficacy. There have been concomitant advances in imaging of posterior stroke to guide optimal patient selection for thrombectomy. Recent evidence suggests that clinicians should have a heightened suspicion of posterior circulation events with the resultant implementation of timely, evidence-based management.

Clinically Ineffective Reperfusion After Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Endovascular treatment is a highly effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. However, in clinical practice, nearly half of the patients do not have favorable outcomes despite successful recanalization of the occluded artery. This unfavorable outcome can be defined as having clinically ineffective reperfusion. The objective of the review is to describe clinically ineffective reperfusion after endovascular therapy and its underlying risk factors and mechanisms, including initial tissue damage, cerebral edema, the no-reflow phenomenon, reperfusion injury, procedural features, and variations in postprocedural management. Further research is needed to more accurately identify patients at a high risk of clinically ineffective reperfusion after endovascular therapy and to improve individualized periprocedural management strategies, to increase the chance of achieving favorable clinical outcomes.

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy vs. Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients in A “Stroke Belt” Region of Southern Europe

The aim of this 4-year observational study is to analyze the outcomes of stroke patients treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) compared to bridging therapy (BT) (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] + BT) based on 3-month outcomes, in real clinical practice in the "Stroke Belt" of Southern Europe. In total, 300 patients were included (41.3% dMT and 58.6% BT). The frequency of direct referral to the stroke center was similar in the dMT and BT group, whereas the time from onset to groin was longer in the BT group (median 210 [IQR 160–303] vs. 399 [IQR 225–675], p = 0.001). Successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) and hemorrhagic transformation were similar in both groups. The BT group more frequently showed excellent outcomes at 3 months (32.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that BT was independently associated with excellent outcomes (OR 2.7. 95% CI,1.2–5.9, p = 0.02) and lower mortality (OR 0.36. 95% CI 0.16–0.82, p = 015). Conclusions: Compared with dMT, BT was associated with excellent functional outcomes and lower 3-month mortality in this real-world clinical practice study conducted in a region belonging to the “Stroke Belt” of Southern Europe. Given the disparity of results on the benefit of BT in the current evidence, it is of vital importance to analyze the convenience of its use in each health area.

First-pass effect in patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion undergoing thrombectomy: insights from the PERSIST registry

BACKGROUND

Achieving rapid and complete vascular recanalization in patients with acute large vessel occlusion can significantly improve patients' prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the potential contribution of the first-pass effect (FPE) to the clinical outcome of patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) caused by VBAO in a multicentered retrospective registry dataset. FPE was defined as successful recanalization [modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b/3 as modified FPE (mFPE); mTICI 3 as true FPE (tFPE)] after one pass of the device without rescue therapy. The baseline characteristics and procedural and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was used to explore the predictors of FPE and the relationship between FPE and 90-day prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 508 patients (age, 63.7 ± 13.1 years, male, 71.6%) were finally included, 29.9% (152/508) of whom achieved mFPE, and 21.1% (107/508) of whom achieved tFPE. FPE was significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes, regardless of mFPE [odds ratio (OR): 0.601, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.370-0.977, p = 0.040] and tFPE (OR: 0.547, 95% CI: 0.318-0.940, p = 0.029). The use of contact aspiration, favorable collateral status, cardioembolic etiology, and basilar artery occlusion were statistically significant predictors of mFPE and tFPE, whereas hypertension was a negative predictor. Intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) prior to EVT was a positive predictor of mFPE but not of tFPE.

CONCLUSION

FPE was associated with significantly favorable outcomes in EVT patients with VBAO. The predictors of FPE include infarct etiology, the site of occlusion, collateral status, EVT strategies, and IV rt-PA bridging strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2000033211.

Endovascular Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Intracranial artery atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the most common causes of stroke. Endovascular therapy including balloon angioplasty alone (BA), balloon-mounted stent (BMS), or self-expanding stent (SES) was an important alternative to treat symptomatic ICAS refractory to medical treatment, while none of the three subtypes has been established to be the primary option. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine both the safety and efficacy and establish a hierarchy of different endovascular therapies on symptomatic ICAS. Major databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies comparing outcomes of three different endovascular approaches and other comparable non-endovascular therapies for symptomatic ICAS patients published from 1 January 2000 to 1 November 2021. Primary outcomes included short-term mortality or stroke rate (peri-procedural, or mean follow-up ≤ 3 months), and long-term mortality or stroke rate (mean follow-up ≥ 6 months). Pairwise and network meta-analyses based on the above systematic review were conducted. A total of 19 eligible studies involving 3386 patients treated with 4 different approaches (BA, SES, BMS, and medical treatment) were analyzed. For primary outcome, BA had the highest ranking (SUCRA value 78), followed by BMS (SUCRA value 21.5) and SES (SUCRA value 13.1). The short-term mortality or stroke rate was significantly lower in the BA group compared to SES (OR = 2.50; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.57; p = 0.026) or BMS (OR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.96; p = 0.038). Other primary and secondary outcomes were no different among all three types of endovascular therapy. Overall, the studies were of good methodological quality and the consistency was acceptable across all network meta-analyses. BA offers the highest level of safety outcomes in terms of short-term mortality or stroke in treating symptomatic patients with intracranial artery stenosis, compared to SES and BMS, which needs to be confirmed in future studies. Trial registration in PROSPERO database: CRD42018084055.

Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard medical treatment for stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is superior to standard medical treatment (SMT) for stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of EVT with SMT for treating BAO patients.

METHODS

Papers were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was favorable functional outcomes at 3 months (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤3). A random effect model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per outcome.

RESULTS

Five articles, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four observational cohort studies, comprising 1484 patients (1024 in the EVT group and 460 in the SMT group), were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated no significant differences between the EVT and SMT groups in achieving favorable functional outcomes at 3 months (RR=1.63, 95% CI 0.90, 2.96; p=0.11). However, patients in the EVT group had higher rates for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (RR=6.22, 95% CI 2.06 to 18.76; p=0.001) but lower mortality at 3 months (RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.91; p=0.007) than patients in the SMT group.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with BAO, EVT and SMT did not differ significantly in achieving favorable functional outcomes at 3 months, but BAO patients treated with EVT might have lower mortality at 3 months. RCTs are warranted to further assess the efficacy and safety of EVT for BAO patients.