P304 Complications Related To Tracheostomy Tube Change: Evaluation Of Practice

Analysis of avoidable cardiopulmonary resuscitation incidents with a part-time rapid response system in place

Background:

Although a rapid response system (RRS) can reduce the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in general wards, avoidable CPR cases still occur. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and causes of avoidable CPR.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all adult patients who received CPR between April 2013 and March 2016 (35 months) at a tertiary teaching hospital where a part-time RRS was introduced in October 2012. Four experts reviewed all of the CPR cases and determined whether each event was avoidable.

Results:

A total of 192 CPR cases were identified, and the incidence of CPR was 0.190 per 1,000 patient admissions. Of these, 56 (29.2%) were considered potentially avoidable, with the most common cause being doctor error (n=32, 57.1%), followed by delayed do-not-resuscitate (DNR) placement (n=12, 21.4%) and procedural complications (n=5, 8.9%). The percentage of avoidable CPR was significantly lower in the RRS operating time group than in the RRS non-operating time group (20.7% vs. 35.5%; P=0.026). Among 44 avoidable CPR events (excluding cases related to DNR issues), the rapid response team intervened in only three cases (6.8%), and most of the avoidable CPR cases (65.9%) occurred during the non-operating time.

Conclusions:

A significant number of avoidable CPR events occurred with a well-functioning, part-time RRS in place. However, RRS operation does appear to lower the occurrence of avoidable CPR. Thus, it is necessary to extend RRS operation time and modify RRS activation criteria. Moreover, policy and cultural changes are needed prior to implementing a full-time RRS.

The efficacy of tracheostomy tube changes by speech-language pathologists: A retrospective review

Background/Aims:

The number of tracheostomised patients in the acute care setting are increasing, resulting in an equal need of providers who can safely change tracheostomy tubes without complications. The objective of this retrospective study was to ascertain if trained speech-language pathologists were able to safely and efficiently perform tracheostomy tube changes in the acute care setting with minimal adverse events.

Methods:

Our retrospective case series spans from June 2010 to March 2015 and was completed at an academic hospital with a level 1 trauma designation. A total of 107 consecutive referrals undergoing a tracheostomy tube change, with a speech-language pathologist, were identified. Success was defined as the placement of the tracheostomy tube into the tracheal lumen with confirmation of placement. Only complications occurring at the time of the tracheostomy tube change were considered and were defined as an airway loss event: oxygen desaturation <85%; uncontrollable bleeding >5mL; and the inability to perform the attempted tracheostomy tube change for any other reason.

Results:

All of the tracheostomy tubes changes were performed at the bedside at a mean of 13 days post tracheotomy (range 3–28). A total of 106 (99%) of 107 tracheostomy tubes changes were successfully completed without complications; 83 (79%) of the tracheostomy tubes changes performed were the initial tracheostomy tubes change completed post tracheotomy. The remaining 23 (21%) were a combination of either the second or third change. One, (less than 1%), of the procedures was attempted and discontinued before the removal of the tracheostomy tubes, and referred back to the surgical services and was successfully managed with no untoward effects to the patient.

Conclusions:

This is the first study to audit the outcome of speech-language pathologists' ability to successfully change a tracheostomy tube. The findings suggest that specially trained speech-language pathologists, acting as part of a multi-disciplinary care team, have the potential to safely change tracheostomy tubes in an acute care setting with the availability of immediate physician and respiratory therapy support. Additional clinical benefits of the speech-language pathologist changing tracheostomy tubes may include earlier facilitation of communication, decannulation and initiation of nutrition/hydration.