FeNO monitoring to adjust treatment in asthma: has it come of age?

A comparative study of the RuiBreath and NIOX VERO analyzers for detecting fractional exhaled nitric oxide

Background

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement is a reliable, noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. Portable FeNO analyzers facilitate the assessment of airway inflammation in primary care. Differences between analyzers from different manufacturers are not comparable. Here, we aimed to compare the FeNO values obtained by a new portable device (RuiBreath, Guangzhou Ruipu Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China) to those obtained by the widely used NIOX VERO portable analyzer (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden) in patients with asthma.

Methods

This prospective validation study enrolled patients (≥14 years old) with asthma over a 2-month period (July and August 2019) at the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital. At least one valid FeNO measurement was obtained using each analyzer for all the participants.

Results

There were 197 participants in this study. The FeNONIOX and FeNORuiBreath values significantly differed (P=0.016). After log-transformation, a difference was found only when the FeNONIOX was <25 ppb (P<0.001). The FeNONIOX and FeNORuiBreath values had a significant correlation (r=0.938, P<0.001), which was confirmed by the Altman-Bland plot. Using a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, when using 49 ppb as the cut-off point for the two devices in identifying patients with symptomatic asthma symptoms, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.42 and 0.88, respectively, by NIOX, and 0.40 and 0.89, respectively, by RuiBreath.

Conclusions

This is the first report of FeNO values obtained by the new portable RuiBreath FeNO analyzer. The FeNORuiBreath values are reliable and directly comparable with the FeNONIOX values.

Measurement of FeNO in asthma: what the hospital doctor needs to know

Asthma is the commonest chronic lung disease. Airway inflammation is a central component of asthma but clinical symptoms of asthma and standard spirometry are insensitive in reflecting the underlying inflammatory processes. Measurement of the fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO) is a quantitative, non-invasive and safe method of measuring airway inflammation. Advances in technology and standardization have made FeNO measurements simple, enabling their use as a biomarker alongside traditional clinical tools in the assessment and management of asthma. Specifically, it can predict responsiveness to steroids and also newer biological therapy, predict future risk of exacerbation and help highlight treatment non-adherence, making it a useful asset to personalized medicine.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Values in Indigenous Australians 3 to 16 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) levels can identify eosinophilic asthma phenotypes. We aimed to determine Feno values of healthy Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) Australians, differences between these Indigenous ethnic groups, and appropriateness of published cutoff values.

METHODS

We measured Feno levels in 1,036 Indigenous Australians (3-16 years of age). Participants were classified into healthy (ie, no asthma or atopy history) or asthmatic and/or atopic groups.

RESULTS

Median Feno values and distribution did not differ between Indigenous ethnicities. For healthy participants < 12 years of age (n = 390), 7.2% of our cohort fell into the inflammatory zone of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and British Thoracic Society (BTS)/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines (cutoff 35 parts per billion [ppb]), but only 3.8% fell into this category when using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines (50 ppb). Similarly, when using the NICE and BTS/SIGN guidelines (40 ppb) for participants 12 to 16 years of age (n = 213), more healthy participants fell into the inflammatory zone compared with the ATS and GINA guidelines (50 ppb) (9.9% vs 4.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Feno values for healthy Indigenous Australians children (3-16 years of age) are likely higher than published white-based values. The GINA recommended cutoff value (> 50 ppb) appears the most appropriate for identifying healthy Indigenous children but requires confirmation from a larger study.