Spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus; review of the literature and report of three new cases

Prognostic factors of esophageal perforation and rupture leading to mortality: a retrospective study

Background

Esophageal perforation and rupture (EPR) is a serious, potentially life-threatening condition. However, no treatment methods have been established, and data concerning factors affecting mortality are limited. This report presents the prognostic factors of mortality in EPR based on experience in the management of such patients.

Methods

For this retrospective analysis, 79 patients diagnosed as having EPR between 2006 and 2016 and managed at Gyeongsang National University Hospital were examined. The management method was determined in accordance with the location and size of the EPR, laboratory findings, and radiological findings. Thirty-nine patients were treated with surgery; and 40, with nonsurgical management.

Results

The most common cause of EPR was foreign body (fish bone or meat bone), followed by vomiting, iatrogenic causes, and trauma. Thirty-nine patients underwent primary repair of EPR, of whom 4 patients died. Forty patients underwent nonsurgical management, of whom 3 patients died. The remaining patients were discharged. Mortality correlated with the size of the EPR (> 25 mm) and the segmented neutrophil count percentage (> 86.5%) in the white blood cell test and differential.

Conclusions

The mortality risk was increased when the EPR size and the segmented neutrophil count percentage in the white blood cell test and differential was high. Delayed diagnosis, which was considered an important predictive factor in previous investigations, was not statistically significant in this study.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

The insidious presentation and challenging management of esophageal perforation following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions

Diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the esophagus or adjacent organs are responsible for nearly half of all esophageal perforations. If not recognized at the time of the injury, iatrogenic esophageal perforations can present insidiously and lead to delay in diagnosis, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. Acute clinical awareness is vital for prompt diagnosis, which is usually confirmed with contrast esophagography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. After establishment of diagnosis, treatment should be promptly initiated and include fluid-volume resuscitation, cessation of oral intake, nasogastric tube insertion, broad-spectrum antibiotics and analgesia. Primary repair, when feasible, is the treatment of choice. Additional procedures beyond primary repair, such as relief of concomitant obstruction, may be necessary if there is underlying esophageal pathology. Drainage alone can be performed for perforations of the cervical esophagus that cannot be visualized. Esophageal T-tube placement or exclusion and diversion techniques are appropriate in clinically unstable patients and in cases where primary repair is precluded either due to preexisting esophageal disease or extensive esophageal damage. Esophagectomy should be performed in patients with malignancy, end-stage benign esophageal disease or extensive esophageal damage that precludes repair. Endoscopic techniques, including stenting, clipping or vacuum therapy, can be used in select cases. Finally, nonoperative management should be reserved for patients with contained esophageal perforations, limited extraluminal soilage and no evidence of systemic inflammation.

Laparoscopic Management of Boerhaave's syndrome: a case report with an intraoperative video

Background

Boerhaave’s syndrome involves a sudden elevation in the intraluminal pressure of the esophagus, causing a transmural perforation. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Its treatment is challenging, and early surgical intervention is the most crucial prognostic element.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 32 year-old male who presented after severe emesis with an acute onset of epigastric pain. He was diagnosed with Boerhaave’s syndrome. Displaying signs of shock mandated immediate surgical exploration with laparoscopic primary repair.

Conclusion

The golden period of the first 24 hrs of the event still applies to cases of esophageal perforation. The scarcity of these cases makes a comparison between the various treatment methods difficult. Our data support the use of laparoscopic intervention with primary repair as the mainstay of treatment for the management of esophageal perforation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-019-0576-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome)

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome) is a highly morbid condition traditionally associated with poor outcomes. The Pittsburgh perforation severity score (PSS) accurately predicts risk of morbidity, length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Operative management is indicated among patients with medium (3-5) or high (> 5) PSS; however, the role of minimally invasive surgery remains uncertain.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with Boerhaave's syndrome with intermediate or high PSS managed via a thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed. Demographics, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten patients (80% male) with a mean age of 61.3 years (range 37-81) were included. Two patients had intermediate and eight had high PSS (7.9 ± 2.8, range 4-12). The mean time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 27 ± 12 h and APACHE II score was 13.6 ± 4.9. Thoracoscopic debridement and primary repair was performed in eight cases, with two perforations repaired primarily over a T-tube. Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy was performed in all patients. Critical care LOS was 8.7 ± 6.8 days (range 3-26), while inpatient LOS was 23.1 ± 12.5 days (range 14-46). Mean comprehensive complications index was 42.1 ± 26.2, with grade IIIa and IV morbidity in 60% and 10%, respectively. One patient developed dehiscence at the primary repair, which was managed non-operatively. In-hospital and 90-day mortality was 10%.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgical management of spontaneous esophageal perforation with medium to high perforation severity scores is feasible and safe, with outcomes which compare favorably to the published literature.

Esophageal Perforation: A Common Clinical Problem with Many Different Management Options

Esophageal perforation is a complex clinical entity that has multiple etiologies and variability in presentation, making it challenging to diagnose and treat. The mortality of esophageal perforation has improved because therapies have evolved. Whereas primary repair is the standard of care, multiple treatments may be employed successfully. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of suspected or confirmed esophageal perforation that were admitted to the thoracic surgery service at our institution between January 2011 and June 2016. We reviewed the charts of 61 patients. Twenty-three underwent primary repair, 13 underwent stent placement, 12 underwent drainage, 12 underwent medical management, and one underwent exclusion and diversion. All patients were included in the final analysis except the singular patient who underwent diversion. Overall mortality was 4.9 per cent. None of the studied variables were found to be associated with mortality (P > 0.05). Factors associated with choice of treatment were age (P < 0.0005), Charlson Index (P = 0.032), etiology (P < 0.0005), and location (P = 0.005). The application of different management options is based on a thorough understanding time course, patient anatomy, severity of presentation, and underlying disease process.

Open surgery versus stent placement in failed primary surgical treatment of esophageal perforation - a single institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is an accepted method to manage esophageal perforation, but in many cases it may result in failure. This paper compares the efficacy of surgical treatment and stenting in patients after previous surgical intervention for esophageal perforation.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study was performed in a group of patients treated for esophageal perforation admitted to our centre from 2010 to 2015. Seventy eight patients (76.5%) with esophageal perforation received surgical treatment. In this group of patients, the mean time between perforation and treatment was 80.6 h (24-240 h). Spontaneous and iatrogenic perforation was observed in 33 (42.3%) and 45 (57.7%) patients, respectively. Partial esophageal resection was performed in 11 cases (14.1%). The perforation site was sutured in the remaining 67 patients (85.9%). Surgical treatment failed in 29 cases (37.2%).

RESULTS

In patients with failed previous surgical treatment, revision surgery was performed in 14 patients (48.3%) (group A), and a large-diameter self-expandable stent was implanted in 15 cases (51.7%) (group B). Perforation in the thoracic and distal esophagus was observed in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (64.3%) patients from group A, and in 7 (46.7%) and 8 (53.3%) patients from group B, respectively. The mean intubation time in both groups was 30.3 and 12.5 days (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean daily drainage within five days after the intervention was 350 mL in group A, and 500 mL in group B (p < 0.02). In both groups hospitalisation time was 41.5 and 19.4 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Six patients died (42.8%) following revision surgery, and 2 (13.3%) patients died after stent implantation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intubation time, hospitalization, and the rate of fatal complications in patients who underwent stent implantations were significantly lower compared to reoperated patients; however, the rate of prolonged drainage was lower in patients who underwent revision surgery. In conclusion, stent implantation is a significantly superior method to treat persistent leakage following failure of previous surgical treatment.

Successful closure of spontaneous esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) by endoscopic ligation with snare loops

Introduction

Spontaneous esophageal rupture is a rare condition with a high mortality rate, and it is generally treated by surgery. In the present report, successful non-surgical closure of spontaneous esophageal rupture by endoscopic ligation with snare loops in a patient with pyopneumothorax and septicemia is presented.

Case description

The case of an 80-year-old man patient with spontaneous esophageal rupture who was cured by endoscopic ligation with snare loops is reported. The patient was admitted with severe chest pain. Chest CT scan revealed pneumomediastinum, and an upper gastrointestinal series using gastrografin showed leakage of contrast medium from the lower esophagus. Therefore, a diagnosis of spontaneous esophageal rupture to the thorax was made. Since the family refused surgery, the patient was treated conservatively. Since extensive blood in the stool was noted on day 5, an emergency endoscopic examination was performed. Clipping was performed around the perforation, and the clips were ligated with snare loops. The patient was discharged on day 83 without recurrence.

Discussion and evaluation

We suggest that endoscopic ligation with snare loops should be chosen for elderly people and high-risk cases.

Norman Barrett (1903-1979): Unorthodox pioneer of thoracic and oesophageal surgery

It is an interesting quirk of medical history that the legacy of Norman Barrett most ostensibly lies in the name of a disease the he was quite emphatically wrong about, at least when he first described it. Indeed, there are those who argue to remove the eponym in favour of the title 'Columnar Lined Epithelium', in part because of what little Barrett actually had to do with the correct initial characterisation of this disease. Yet the sum of Norman Barrett's contributions to modern medicine is much more than a mistaken characterisation of a pathological process. Barrett was truly a pioneer of chest surgery in the UK - a speciality in its embryonic stages when he first qualified. He was also renowned as a teacher and academic of the highest calibre. In tracing the story of his life we can see how his natural attributes, life experiences and keen appreciation of the arts (especially history) facilitated personal success and such sharp insight into the vagaries of modern academic medicine.

Hypopharyngeal fistula complicating difficult thyroidectomy for invasive papillary cancer

Thyroidectomy is associated with certain known complications, including recurrent laryngeal or superior laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcaemia due to hypoparathyroidism. Other much rarer complications include oesophageal injury with oesophageal fistula formation. In this report, we describe the clinical course of a patient with an invasive papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent total thyroidectomy and developed hypopharyngeal fistula in the immediate postoperative period, a complication that has never been reported previously following thyroidectomy. Under conservative treatment, the fistula closed within two weeks and the patient was referred, in good condition, to the oncologist for completion of therapy.

Times and Trends in the Treatment of Spontaneous Perforation of the Esophagus: From Herman Boerhaave to the Present Age

Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus is a rare devastating condition, which was first described by Herman Boerhaave in 1724. Only a handful of cases were recorded during the 18th and 19th centuries. Diagnosis was usually obtained on autopsy. Only in 1914 Irving Walker achieved the first antemortem diagnosis of spontaneous rupture of the esophagus. The dawn of thoracic surgery during the first decades of the 20th century opened up the way for operative cure. More than 200 years after Boerhaave's initial report, Barrett as well as Clagett and Olsen independently accomplished the first successful surgical treatment by primary repair of the esophageal lesion in 1947. Since those pioneer days, various suggestions for proper treatment have been made ranging from conservative, nonoperative means to extended procedures such as esophagectomy. Invention of minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic measures has further broadened the spectrum of available therapeutic options. The aim of this history article is to outline the development of diagnosis and management of spontaneous rupture of the esophagus from the age of Herman Boerhaave to the present times.

Norman Barrett (1903-79): unorthodox pioneer of thoracic and oesophageal surgery

It is an interesting quirk of medical history that the legacy of Norman Barrett most ostensibly lies in the name of a disease the he was quite emphatically wrong about, at least when he first described it. Indeed, there are those who argue to remove the eponym in favour of the title 'Columnar Lined Epithelium', in part because of what little Barrett actually had to do with the correct initial characterization of this disease. Yet the sum of Norman Barrett's contributions to modern medicine is much more than a mistaken characterization of a pathological process. Barrett was truly a pioneer of chest surgery in the UK - a specialty in its embryonic stages when he first qualified. He was also renowned as a teacher and academic of the highest calibre. In tracing the story of his life we can see how his natural attributes, life experiences and keen appreciation of the arts (especially history) facilitated personal success and such sharp insight into the vagaries of modern academic medicine.

Esophageal perforation: clinical patterns and outcomes from a patient cohort of Western Norway

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation is a rare, often life-threatening condition, and management remains challenging.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive patients with esophageal perforation treated at two university hospitals between 2000 and 2010. Pertinent data from hospital records were retrieved for statistical calculations and evaluation of perforation score.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients [47% female, median age 62 years (range 15-88)] were included. The annual incidence was 4.7/1,000,000. Perforations were spontaneous in 14 patients (30%), iatrogenic in 25 (53%), and caused by trauma and foreign body impaction in 8 patients (17%). ASA score (p = 0.004), perforation localization (p = 0.001), diagnostic delay (p = 0.002), and perforation score (p < 0.001) differed significantly between patient groups with different etiology, but not between groups with different outcomes. Early diagnosis (≤24 h) was significantly associated with a low perforation score (p = 0.033). A non-operative approach was employed in 26 patients (55%) - more commonly for proximally localized perforations (p = 0.045). The non-operative group showed lower severe complication rates (p = 0.033), shorter ICU stays (p < 0.001) and durations of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.022). The overall 30-day mortality was 23.4%.

CONCLUSION

Careful clinical evaluation and appropriate, individualized treatment are important. The high mortality may be partly explained by the underlying disease and the complexity of the clinical condition in many patients.

Management of spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus (Boerhaave’s syndrome): Single centre experience of 18 cases

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous oesophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) is rare, and carries a high attendant risk of mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective eight-year review from a tertiary unit.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were managed, with a mean age of 57 (39 - 88 years). Eight patients presented early and underwent surgery, seven with primary closure and one with exclusion and diversion. There was one death in this group. Ten patients were managed conservatively. In this group, two underwent an oesophagectomy because of failed conservative measures, and four had an endoprosthesis inserted. One patient died in this group on the first admission, but two patients with stents in situ died from massive bleeding relating to an aorto-oesophageal fistula at 39 days and 189 days respectively following presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention remains the gold standard when the diagnosis is made early. For late diagnoses, this series suggests caution in the use of endoprostheses.

Anatomy of the Boerhaave syndrome

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus (Boerhaave syndrome) occurs almost invariably at the same anatomic site. A weakness of the distal esophageal wall is suspected but has not been confirmed by anatomic studies. The aim of this work was to determine the existence of a structural abnormality in the esophageal wall.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In six fresh human cadavers, the left lung was removed and the esophagus was insufflated in situ with air until it burst. The mucosa of the specimens was stripped off, allowing the fibers of the inner muscular coat to be seen. In addition a specimen from a patient who died from this cause was submitted to the same procedure.

RESULTS

The site of the experimental rupture matched the clinical case. The tear was located at the margin of contact between "clasp" and oblique fibers, and extends upwards.

CONCLUSIONS

The connective tissue of the junction between clasp and oblique fibers appears to constitute a weak point in the lower esophagus.

Bouveret meets Boerhaave

Rarely, biliary-enteric fistula can result in duodenal obstruction or Bouveret's syndrome. Boerhaave's syndrome is a distal esophageal rupture in the setting of severe emesis. This case is the first reported successful management of these clinical scenarios occurring simultaneously and highlights important features in presentation, diagnosis, and surgical treatment.

Hemoperitoneum secondary to avulsed short gastric arteries after vomiting: the first documented case in North America

This is the first documented case in North America wherein a 26-year-old man presented to the emergency room with hemoperitoneum secondary to avulsed short gastric arteries after violent emesis.

Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation

Esophageal perforation remains a devastating event that is difficult to diagnose and manage. The majority of injuries are iatrogenic and the increasing use of endoscopic procedures can be expected to lead to an even higher incidence of esophageal perforation in coming years. Accurate diagnosis and effective treatment depend on early recognition of clinical features and accurate interpretation of diagnostic imaging. Outcome is determined by the cause and location of the injury, the presence of concomitant esophageal disease, and the interval between perforation and initiation of therapy. The overall mortality associated with esophageal perforation can approach 20%, and delay in treatment of more than 24 hours after perforation can result in a doubling of mortality. Surgical primary repair, with or without reinforcement, is the most successful treatment option in the management of esophageal perforation and reduces mortality by 50% to 70% compared with other interventional therapies.

Delayed presentation of esophageal perforation simulating paraesophageal hernia

Generally, benign lesions, which make up the majority of mediastinal tumors and cysts, are asymptomatic; however, they may produce clinical findings. We report on a patient with presumed silent esophageal perforation whose clinical and radiologic assessment was suggestive of massive paraesophageal hiatus hernia. However, surgery revealed a paraesophageal cyst and histology was reported as acute organizing pleurisy. A reasonable, tentative, preoperative diagnosis for each mediastinal lesion can be frequently made by considering its location in the mediastinum, the age of the patient, the presence or absence of local or constitutional symptoms and signs, and the association of a specific systemic disease state. However, the precise nature of a lesion in the mediastinum, as elsewhere, cannot be determined without histologic examination of the tissue. To our knowledge, this unusual clinical case is not been reported in the literature.

Norman Barrett, "doyen of esophageal surgery"

Images

Boerhaave's syndrome

Boerhaave's syndrome or spontaneous oesophageal perforation, is a potentially lethal and frequently elusive medical condition which presents not only a diagnostic but also a therapeutic challenge. It is insufficiently considered in diagnostic hypotheses, yet may be confirmed or excluded by simple methods such as an erect chest film and a contrast study of the oesophagus. Errors in diagnosis are usually caused by unawareness of its varied and atypical presentations or failure to consider its possibility in acute cardiothoracic and upper gastrointestinal conditions. Early aggressive surgical intervention in the form of open and wide mediastinal and chest drainage, with or without oesophageal repair, resection or exclusion, offers the patient the best chance of survival against this otherwise invariably fatal event. Nonoperative therapy consisting of antibiotics, nil oral regimen, nasogastric tube suction, pleural drainage, H2 receptor blockers and either a feeding enterostomy or total parenteral nutrition, may also be appropriate in selected patients. It is probable that the condition is more common than is generally supposed. All clinicians need to be aware of this lethal disease, its frequently unusual presentations and the importance of early diagnosis.

SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF THE OESOPHAGUS

Since the first report by Barrett, in 1947, of successful suture of a spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus, many survivals from this disaster have been reported. Unfortunately the condition is still frequently not diagnosed at an early stage. The history is usually characteristic, with sudden severe retrosternal or interscapular pain following vomiting. When this story is accompanied by rapid respiration and surgical emphysema in the supraclavicular areas, or mediastinal emphysema on radiographs, the diagnosis is certain, although there are pitfalls as the following case illustrates.

Chest pain

Images

Boerhaave's syndrome presenting with abdominal pain and right hydropneumothorax

This case of Boerhaave's Syndrome had several unusual features including a delayed presentation and right-sided esophageal perforation. The patient's initial episode of hematemesis may have been caused by a small mucosal laceration in the area of the Barrett's lesion that later ruptured. On the other hand, if initially there was an esophageal rupture, it did not violate the parietal pleura or mediastinum. The overlying pleura remained intact until digested by gastric contents, thereby causing a right-sided hydropneumo thorax and a marked increase in symptoms, which promoted the patient to come to the ED. Because the patient initially appeared stable and had a history of emesis 4 days before presentation, and because an initial chest X-ray interpretation overlooked the right-sided apical pneumothorax, Boerhaave's Syndrome was not considered initially. Aspiration pneumonia, pancreatitis, alcoholic gastritis, or active peptide ulcer disease were in our initial differential. It was only after the repeat chest X-ray, which more obviously showed the pneumothorax, and insertion of the chest tube that the correct diagnosis was made. Had the pneumothorax not been overlooked initially, the diagnosis may have been made earlier. It is apparent from this case and a review of the literature that Boerhaave's Syndrome is an uncommon clinical entity and has varying modes of presentation, making the diagnosis a difficult clinical challenge. Boerhaave's Syndrome should be considered in all ill-appearing patients presenting with the combination of gastrointestinal and respiratory complaints. The single most important test may be the upright chest X-ray. However, if it is normal, and there is a high index of suspicion, esophagograms and or chest CT may be required to demonstrate the lesion. Because survival is directly related to the time to diagnosis and treatment, a high clinical suspicion can decrease the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with Boerhaave's Syndrome.

Avulsion of short gastric arteries caused by vomiting

A case is presented describing a new, potentially life threatening complication of vomiting after a 21 year old man presented in shock with a haemoperitoneum caused by violent, self induced emesis.

Boerhaave revisited: spontaneous esophageal perforation as a diagnostic masquerader

Spontaneous perforation of the esophagus (Boerhaave syndrome) is an emergency that requires early diagnosis if death or serious prolonged illness is to be averted. The cases of three patients with spontaneous esophageal perforation simulating other primary diagnoses are described. The respective referral diagnoses were pericarditis, lung abscess, and pancreatitis. Each case was characterized by severe illness, and by delay in diagnosis despite multiple consultations. Two patients died. The literature is reviewed and the causes of delay in diagnosis are analyzed. More than 40 years after the first report of successful surgical repair, spontaneous esophageal perforation is insufficiently considered in diagnostic hypotheses, yet may be confirmed or excluded by simple methods. All clinicians need to be alert to this lethal disease, and to be aware of its frequent atypical presentations.

Oesophageal ruptures and perforations--a review

Oesophageal ruptures or tears carry a high mortality if they are not recognized and if therapy is delayed. This is so particularly for cases of spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus which carry a higher mortality and morbidity than do cases of iatrogenic injuries. With the widespread use of fibreoptic oesophagogastroscopy, which has been accompanied by the therapeutic manipulation of strictures and tumours, the number of iatrogenic perforations has increased substantially. We report our experience with 23 oesophageal perforations or ruptures that were seen over a 15-year period. The results of both the surgical and the conservative management of such lesions were excellent and were based on the clinical condition of the patient and on the extent of the extravasation of contrast media. Our results show that not all cases of oesophageal perforations require immediate surgical exploration and that the results of surgical treatment are excellent if the diagnosis is made early.

A surgically recovered case of spontaneous rupture of the esophagus--the significance of preoperative esophagoscopy for direct suture

A 65-year-old man with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus survived with a direct suture of the esophagus 15 hours after the onset of symptoms. Endoscopic examination of the esophagus was especially of great help in determining the surgical procedure in this patient, and we want to stress the importance of prompt diagnosis and immediate surgery for this disease.

Diagnosis and management of spontaneous transmural rupture of the oesophagus (Boerhaave's syndrome)

The presentation, diagnosis and management of 14 cases of spontaneous transmural oesophageal rupture have been reviewed. Analysis suggested that the classical triad of vomiting, chest pain and subcutaneous emphysema was rare (1/14) and therefore misleading. Abdominal pain and tenderness obscured the clinical picture; the temporal relationship of pain to vomiting varied and subcutaneous emphysema was uncommon (4/14). Consequently, only two cases were correctly diagnosed on presentation and diagnosis in the others was markedly delayed (average 4 days). Contrast swallow examination, when eventually performed, was diagnostic. Twelve patients underwent repair: four under 24 h, who all survived and eight over 24 h, amongst whom there were one (12.5 per cent) operative and two (25 per cent) late deaths. Conservative management was successful in the remaining two cases. Oesophageal fistula, empyema and incorrect initial surgery were common and serious complications. Management options are reviewed and their relative merits considered.

Esophageal perforation

Esophageal perforation can be caused by any instrument, device, or foreign body reaching the hypopharynx. Diagnosis remains difficult. If esophageal perforation is suspected, Gastrografin (meglucamine diatrizoate) swallow study, eventually followed by barium swallow study, is the most useful diagnostic test. Absolute rules cannot be made about the selection of nonoperative or surgical treatment. If diagnosed early, cervical or thoracic esophageal perforations can sometimes be treated conservatively if there are no signs of systemic sepsis. Recurrent leakage after surgical closure is not unusual. Local tissue flaps can reinforce the closure, particularly after delayed operation, thereby often avoiding the necessity for a reoperation or an esophageal exclusion.

Mallory-Weiss syndrome: an unusual complication of ipecac-induced emesis

A young presented to the emergency department after ingesting multiple drugs. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding developed after emesis was induced with syrup of ipecac. A small Mallory-Weiss tear of the cardioesophageal junction was found at endoscopy. This case is presented to alert physicians to this uncommon complication of ipecac-induced emesis.