1
|
Kim H, Park S, Kang H, Kang N, Levy DT, Cho SI. Modeling the future of tobacco control: Using SimSmoke to explore the feasibility of the tobacco endgame in Korea. Tob Induc Dis 2023; 21:147. [PMID: 37954490 PMCID: PMC10632939 DOI: 10.18332/tid/174127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We used a simulation model to assess the feasibility of reaching the tobacco endgame target (reducing the smoking prevalence to below 5% by 2050) and explored potential implementation strategies. METHODS The impact of strengthened tobacco-control policies on smoking prevalence was analyzed using Korea SimSmoke, a discrete-time Markov process. We considered the effects of various scenarios from 2023 and predictions were conducted until 2050. To confirm the stability of the results, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out by increasing and decreasing parameter estimates. RESULTS The implementation of tobacco-control policies in accordance with the WHO MPOWER (Μonitor tobacco use and prevention policies; Protect people from tobacco smoke; Offer help to quit tobacco smoking; Warn of the dangers of tobacco; Enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship; Raise taxes on tobacco) measures were insufficient to achieve the tobacco endgame objective of 5% by 2050. The overall predicted smoking prevalence in 2050 is 4.7% if all policies are fully implemented in accordance with the FCTC guidelines together with a complete ban on the sale of cigarettes to people born after 2003 and annual 10% increases in price. Sensitivity analyses using the varying policy effect assumptions demonstrated the robustness of the simulation results. CONCLUSIONS For a substantive reduction in smoking prevalence, it is essential to strongly implement the MPOWER strategy. Beyond this foundational step, the eradication of smoking requires a paradigm shift in the perception of conventional tobacco-control policies, including a tobacco-free generation strategy and radical increases in the price of tobacco products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Kim
- Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Susan Park
- Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heewon Kang
- Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Naeun Kang
- Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - David T. Levy
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, United States
| | - Sung-il Cho
- Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Puljević C, Morphett K, Hefler M, Edwards R, Walker N, Thomas DP, Khan MA, Perusco A, Le Grande M, Cullerton K, Ait Ouakrim D, Carstensen G, Sellars D, Hoek J, Borland R, Bonevski B, Blakely T, Brolan C, Gartner CE. Closing the gaps in tobacco endgame evidence: a scoping review. Tob Control 2022; 31:365-375. [PMID: 35241614 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tobacco endgame policies aim to rapidly and permanently reduce smoking to minimal levels. We reviewed evidence syntheses for: (1) endgame policies, (2) evidence gaps, and (3) future research priorities. DATA SOURCES Guided by JBI scoping review methodology, we searched five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science) for evidence syntheses published in English since 1990 on 12 policies, and Google for publications from key national and international organisations. Reference lists of included publications were hand searched. STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Inclusion criteria were broad to capture policy impacts (including unintended), feasibility, public and stakeholder acceptability and other aspects of policy implementation. DATA EXTRACTION We report the results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. DATA SYNTHESIS Eight policies have progressed to evidence synthesis stage (49 publications): mandatory very low nicotine content (VLNC) standard (n=26); product standards to substantially reduce consumer appeal or remove the most toxic products from the market (n=1); moving consumers to reduced risk products (n=8); tobacco-free generation (n=4); ending sales (n=2); sinking lid (n=2); tax increases (n=7); and restrictions on tobacco retailers (n=10). Based on published evidence syntheses, the evidence base was most developed for a VLNC standard, with a wide range of evidence synthesised. CONCLUSIONS VLNC cigarettes have attracted the most attention, in terms of synthesised evidence. Additional focus on policies that reduce the availability of tobacco is warranted given these measures are being implemented in some jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheneal Puljević
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kylie Morphett
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marita Hefler
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Richard Edwards
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Natalie Walker
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Addiction Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David P Thomas
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Md Arifuzzaman Khan
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Perusco
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Michael Le Grande
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine Cullerton
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Driss Ait Ouakrim
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georgia Carstensen
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Sellars
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet Hoek
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Ron Borland
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Billie Bonevski
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- College for Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tony Blakely
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claire Brolan
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Coral E Gartner
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence on Achieving the Tobacco Endgame, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nghiem N, Knight J, Mizdrak A, Blakely T, Wilson N. Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk. Sci Rep 2019; 9:19562. [PMID: 31862895 PMCID: PMC6925295 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55372-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death internationally. We aimed to model the impact of CVD preventive double therapy (a statin and anti-hypertensive) by clinician-assessed absolute risk level. An established and validated multi-state life-table model for the national New Zealand (NZ) population was adapted. The new version of the model specifically considered the 60–64-year-old male population which was stratified by risk using a published NZ-specific CVD risk equation. The intervention period of treatment was for five years, but a lifetime horizon was used for measuring benefits and costs (a five-year horizon was also implemented). We found that for this group offering double therapy was highly cost-effective in all absolute risk categories (eg, NZ$1580 per QALY gained in the >20% in 5 years risk stratum; 95%UI: Dominant to NZ$3990). Even in the lowest risk stratum (≤5% risk in 5 years), the cost per QALY was only NZ$25,500 (NZ$28,200 and US$19,100 in 2018). At an individual level, the gain for those who responded to the screening offer and commenced preventive treatment ranged from 0.6 to 4.9 months of quality-adjusted life gained (or less than a month gain with a five-year horizon). Nevertheless, at the individual level, patient considerations are critical as some people may decide that this amount of average health gain does not justify taking daily medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhung Nghiem
- BODE3 Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | - Josh Knight
- University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anja Mizdrak
- BODE3 Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Tony Blakely
- BODE3 Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nick Wilson
- BODE3 Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Otavova M, Van Oyen H, Yokota RTC, Charafeddine R, Joossens L, Molenberghs G, Nusselder WJ, Boshuizen HC, Devleesschauwer B. Potential impact of reduced tobacco use on life and health expectancies in Belgium. Int J Public Health 2019; 65:129-138. [PMID: 31781804 PMCID: PMC7049546 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01315-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated the potential impact of reduced tobacco use scenarios on total life expectancy and health expectancies, i.e., healthy life years and unhealthy life years. METHODS Data from the Belgian Health Interview Survey 2013 were used to estimate smoking and disability prevalence. Disability was based on the Global Activity Limitation Indicator. We used DYNAMO-HIA to quantify the impacts of risk factor changes and to compare the "business-as-usual" with alternative scenarios. RESULTS The "business-as-usual" scenario estimated that in 2028 the 15-year-old men/women would live additional 50/52 years without disability and 14/17 years with disability. The "smoking-free population" scenario added 3.4/2.8 healthy life years and reduced unhealthy life years by 0.79/1.9. Scenarios combining the prevention of smoking initiation with smoking cessation programs are the most effective, yielding the largest increase in healthy life years (1.9/1.7) and the largest decrease in unhealthy life years (- 0.80/- 1.47). CONCLUSIONS Health impact assessment tools provide different scenarios for evidence-informed public health actions. New anti-smoking strategies or stricter enforcement of existing policies potentially gain more healthy life years and reduce unhealthy life years in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Otavova
- Unit of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark.,Interdisciplinary Center on Population Dynamics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Herman Van Oyen
- Department of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Rue J Wytsman 14, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Renata T C Yokota
- Department of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Rue J Wytsman 14, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rana Charafeddine
- Department of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Rue J Wytsman 14, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luk Joossens
- Association of European Cancer Leagues, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Wilma J Nusselder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendriek C Boshuizen
- Department of Statistics, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Brecht Devleesschauwer
- Department of Epidemiology and public health, Sciensano, Rue J Wytsman 14, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|