CT scan incidental findings in trauma patients: does it impact hospital length of stay?

CT pan-scanning versus targeted imaging among older adults after ground level falls

Background

Ground level falls (GLFs) among older adults are responsible for millions of injuries. Routine pan-scanning (CT imaging of the head, chest, abdomen and pelvis) is commonly employed; however, we lack robust evidence of its benefit. We investigated whether pan-scanning identifies a larger proportion of patients with significant injury or injury requiring procedural intervention and hypothesized resuscitation area findings-including radiographs, ultrasound, and external signs of injury-would detect these injuries.

Methods

We queried our institutional trauma registry data for patients ≥65 years presenting to our level 1 trauma center after GLFs. Our primary outcome was injury requiring procedural intervention. LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression models were fit using cross-validation to identify predictors of significant injury to the head, chest, and pelvis/lower extremity from patient characteristics and resuscitation area findings.

Results

598 patients were included, among whom 17% underwent pan-scan. External signs of injury were associated with increased odds of significant injury in the head (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.16), chest (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.45 to 1.46), and extremity/pelvis (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10). Chest (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.23) and pelvic X-ray (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.33 to 1.40) were also associated with increased odds of significant injury. 17 patients required procedural interventions for head injuries and 2 for the chest. No patients had a significant injury requiring any procedures for the abdomen.

Conclusions

Our study suggests resuscitation area findings may direct targeted imaging in the chest and abdomen/pelvis, but whether individual risk and institutional burden associated with pan-scanning is outweighed by its ease requires further study.

Level of evidence study type

Prognostic and Epidemiological, Level IV.

Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings in chest and abdominopelvic CT scans of trauma patients; A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Imaging may inadvertently reveal pathologies unrelated to their performing purpose, known as incidental findings (IF). This study aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical significance, and documentation of IFs in chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans of trauma patients.

METHODS

This observational study was conducted at two urban level-1 trauma centers from March 2019 through April 2022. Official radiology reports of trauma patients who underwent chest and/or abdominopelvic CT scans at the emergency department (ED) were explored, and IF were extracted. Predictive factors of the presence of IFs and their documenting were investigated.

RESULTS

Out of 656 chest and 658 abdominopelvic CT scans, 167 (25.37%) and 212 (32.31%) scans harbored at least one IF, respectively. Patients with IFs tended to be of higher age and female in both chest (age: 48 [IQR: 35-62] vs. 34 [IQR: 25-42.5]; female: 31.14% vs 14.66%, p < 0.001 for both) and abdominopelvic CT scans (age: 41 [IQR: 30-57.5] vs 33 [IQR: 25-43], female: 26.42% vs. 13.96%, p < 0.001 for both). As for documentation of significant IFs, only 49 of 112 chest IFs (43.8%) and 55 of 176 abdominopelvic IFs (31.3%) were documented. Investigating factors associated with documentation of clinically significant IFs, shorter length of hospital stay (1.5 (IQR: 0-4) vs. 3 (IQR: 2-8), p = 0.003), and discharging by ED physicians (documentation rate: 13.2% vs 42.6%, p < 0.001) were associated with poorer documentation of IFs only in abdominopelvic scans.

CONCLUSION

CT imaging in ED trauma patients often reveals incidental findings, especially in older patients. Over 50% of these findings are clinically significant, yet they are frequently ignored and not documented. Physicians need to be more vigilant in recognizing and documenting these incidental findings and informing patients of the need for further evaluation.

Diagnostic utility of whole-body computed tomography/pan-scan in trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis study

Trauma is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. It is crucial to diagnose trauma patients quickly to provide effective treatment interventions in such conditions. Whole-body computed tomography (WBCT)/pan-scan is an imaging technique that enables a faster and more efficient diagnosis for polytrauma patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of WBCT in diagnosing injuries in polytrauma patients. We will also assess its impact on the mortality rate and length of hospital stay among trauma centers between patients who underwent WBCT and those who did not (non-WBCT). Twenty-seven studies meeting our inclusion criteria were selected among PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The criteria were centered on the significance of WBCT/pan-scan application in trauma patients. Stata version 15 was used to perform statistical analysis on the data. The authors have also used I2 statistics to evaluate heterogeneity. Egger and Begg's tests were performed to rule out any publication bias. Total of twenty-seven studies including 68,838 trauma patients with a mean age of 45.0 ± 24.7 years were selected. Motor vehicle collisions were the most common cause of blunt injuries (80.0%). Head, neck, and face injuries were diagnosed in 44% (95% CI, 0.28-0.60; I2 = 99.8%), 6% (95% CI, 0.02-0.09; I2 = 97.2%), and 9% (95% CI, 0.05-0.13; I2 = 97.1%), respectively. Chest injuries were diagnosed by WBCT in 39% (95% CI, 0.28-0.51; I2 = 99.8%), abdominal injuries in 23% (95% CI, 0.03-0.43; I2 = 99.9%) of cases, spinal injuries 19% (95% CI, 0.11-0.27; I2 = 99.4%), extremity injuries 33% (95% CI, 0.23-0.43; I2 = 99.2%), and pelvic injuries 11% (95% CI, 0.04-0.18; I2 = 97.4%). A mortality odd ratio of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.83-1.06; I2 = 40.1%) was calculated while comparing WBCT and non-WBCT groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide insight into the possible safety, efficacy, and efficiency of WBCT/pan-scan as a diagnostic tool for trauma patients with serious injuries, regardless of their hemodynamic status. In patients with serious injuries from trauma, whether or not there are indicators of hemodynamic instability, our recommended approach is to, wherever possible, perform a WBCT without stopping the hemostatic resuscitation. By using this technology, the optimal surgical strategy for these patients can be decided upon without causing any delays in their final care or greatly raising their radiation dose.

Incidental Findings in Trauma Patients: How Big is the Challenge?

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of incidental findings (IFs) identified during workup of trauma patients and the effectiveness with which they were documented and communicated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all trauma patients ≥15 y of age in 2018, who underwent at least one computed tomography scan. Patients' Electronic Medical Record was reviewed for the presence of IFs. IFs were classified in three categories: category 1, which includes highly significant findings requiring attention during hospitalization; category 2, which warrants attention in an outpatient basis; and category 3, which includes nonsignificant findings that require no follow-up.

RESULTS

836 patients were identified, of which 582 had at least one IF. Of the patients with IFs; 14 (2.4%) were category 1, 138 (23.7%) were category 2, and 569 (97.8%) met category 3 criteria. All category 1 patients received appropriate documentation of their IFs. Of patients with category 2 findings, only 13% had documentation of the IFs. Patients with IFs had longer length of stay (P: 0.04) and lower probability of being discharged to home (P < 0.01) compared to patients with no IFs. Only 12.5% of the patients admitted to trauma surgery service received an outpatient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

There was timely documentation and intervention for all patients with category 1 IFs. However, 87% of patients with category 2 IFs had inadequate documentation of the IF and outpatient follow-up. Outpatient follow-up of IFs poses a challenge for trauma patients partially due to their discharge disposition.

Incidental Computed Tomography Findings Among Traumatized Adults: A One-Year Analysis at a Trauma Center

Background Computed tomography (CT) for patients with trauma represents a widely accepted diagnostic method. Non-trauma-related incidentalomas or incidental findings are commonly depicted based on CT examination. Our study aimed to assess the frequency of incidental findings on CT scans among traumatized adult patients during one year at a trauma center. Methods We performed a retrospective case review of all adult patients triaged at the King Abdullah Medical Complex trauma service in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 31 May 2022 and 30 May 2023. Patients under the age of 18 were excluded from the study. Patients who could not complete radiographic studies due to deterioration in condition, patients with missing CT scan reports, and transfer patients who had CT scans done at outside facilities were excluded. Demographic data, including age, sex, type of trauma, and type of CT, were recorded. All CT studies were reviewed for incidental findings. Results A total of 106 incidental findings were discovered in 99 patients. The rate of incidental findings for one year was 1.87%. The average age was 41.19 ± 17.90 years, with 73 (73.7%) male and 26 (26.3%) female patients. In trauma classifications, road traffic accidents were the most common (59.60%), followed by falls (33.33%), penetrating trauma (3.03%), and others. A high number of scans for the whole body (56.57%); face, brain, and cervix (13.13%); chest and abdomen/pelvis (11%); and spine (5.05%) had incidental findings. Genitourinary-related incidental findings were observed in 27.36% of patients, followed by craniospinal (16.98%), pulmonary (12.26%), hepatobiliary (9.43%), endocrine (9.43%), and musculoskeletal (5.66%). Conclusion In trauma centers, incidental findings are frequently discovered during CT imaging. In contrast, our center has a lower incidental finding rate. A whole-body CT scan yielded more incident findings than a selective one. The incidental findings are prevalent in the genitourinary system and higher in young male patients. It is important to properly document, communicate, and follow up on these incidental discoveries.

The Observation of Pediatric Skull Fractures Without an Associated Brain Injury in a Non-Trauma Center

Introduction Young children experiencing head trauma are prone to skull fractures. Pediatric skull fractures are distinct from adults as they have a greater capacity to undergo remodeling. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether children with isolated skull fractures without an underlying brain injury and normal neurological exam require a transfer to a tertiary hospital with pediatric neurosurgery service. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to review children under five years old presenting to the emergency department of a non-pediatric trauma center with an isolated skull fracture resulting from head trauma without intracerebral hemorrhage between 2015 and 2021. The inclusion criteria consisted of children who have isolated skull fractures without underlying injuries and normal neurological examination. We reviewed these patients' injury characteristics, disposition, and clinical outcomes. The t-test and chi-square were used for evaluating the groups and evaluating the transfer to a dedicated trauma care facility. Results We identified 26 children who had isolated skull fractures with no underlying brain injury and normal neurological examination. The two most common mechanisms of injury were falls (64%) and motor vehicle collisions (MVC) (11%). The median age of patients was six months old. The location of the skull fractures was as follows: parietal (46%), occipital (19%), temporal (15%), frontal (7.7%), occipital + parietal (7.7%), and parietal + frontal (3.8%). Four fractures were depressed (15%) and the remainder were non-displaced. Eleven children with skull fractures (42%) were transferred to a designated pediatric trauma center and the remaining 58% were hospitalized for observation and monitored at the primary hospital. None of the children with skull fractures required intubation or other advanced interventions. Conclusion In this relatively limited sample, approximately one-third of the children with isolated skull fractures without brain injury were managed successfully in a non-tertiary care center. However, none of them required surgical intervention. Thus, we propose that patients akin to those in this study can be observed at a local hospital without being transferred to a pediatric trauma center.

Incidental Findings on Computerized Tomography Images of Trauma Cases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of incidental findings (IFs) on computed tomography (CT) scans of trauma admissions, examine associations between IFs and gender and age-groups, and discuss the management strategies.

METHODS

The CT reports were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate IFs. Cases were divided into five age-groups (0-19, 20- 39, 40-59, 60-79,≥80). IFs were classified as "Group 1": congenital anomalies that do not require further investigation, non-degenerative/minor degenerative findings; "Group 2": findings that do not require immediate intervention, require outpatient follow-up/in case of symptoms; and "Group 3": findings that require immediate intervention/further investigation.

RESULTS

There were 2385 CT scans and 1802 incidental findings (IFs) in 783 trauma cases. CT scans with IFs constituted 50.2%. The percentage of IFs was 75.6% in males and 24.4% in females, and they occurred in 4.8%, 27.6%, 44.3%, 20.9%, and 2.4% of age groups 1 to 5, respectively. Group 1 had 34.6%, group 2 had 54.6%, and group 3 had 10.8% IFs. There was not any significant association between the classification and gender or age-groups. In terms of organs, IFs of the thyroid and gall bladder & bile ducts were significantly higher among females (P=0.044 and P<0.001, respectively), while IFs in the head & neck region were significantly higher in males (P<0.001). Incidental findings in the kidney, liver, adrenal gland, and vascular structures differed significantly across age-groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant relationships between the classification of IFs and gender or age-groups. However, the distribution of IFs was significantly associated with gender and age-groups in terms of organs. Healthcare professionals should consider this relationship when following up and treating patients.

Incidental Radiology Findings on Computed Tomography Studies in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

An incidental finding is defined as a newly discovered mass or lesion detected on imaging performed for an unrelated reason. The identification of an incidental finding may be an opportunity for the early detection of a serious medical condition, including a malignancy. However, little is known about the prevalence of incidental findings in the emergency department (ED) setting and the strategies that can be used to mitigate the risk associated with them in the ED. This study aimed to estimate the overall prevalence of incidental findings and to summarize the currently described measures to mitigate the risks associated with incidental findings.

METHODS

On November 22, 2020, a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus was performed for studies that were published in peer-reviewed journals and reported the prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomography (CT) scans in patients in the ED. Patients who received CT scans that included the head, neck, chest, or abdomen/pelvis were included. The study characteristics, overall prevalence of incidental findings, prevalence of incidental findings by body region, and prespecified subgroups were extracted. The criteria used for risk stratification within individual studies were also extracted. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,385 studies were identified, and 69 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies represented 147,763 ED encounters or radiology reports across 16 countries, and 83% of studies were observational, cross-sectional studies. A total of 35 studies (50.7%) were in trauma patients. A large degree of heterogeneity was observed across the included studies. The overall pooled prevalence estimate for any incidental finding was 31.3% (95% confidence interval 24.4% to 39.1%). We found great variation in the methods described to mitigate the risk associated with incidental findings, including a lack of standardized risk stratification, inconsistent documentation practices, and only a small subset of studies describing prospective interventions aimed at improving the recognition and management of incidental findings from the ED.

CONCLUSION

In patients in the ED receiving CT scans, incidental findings are commonly encountered across a broad range of ED chief complaints. This review highlights the existence of great heterogeneity in the definitions used to classify incidental findings. Future studies are needed to determine a clinically feasible categorization standard or terminology for commonly encountered incidental findings in the ED setting to standardize classification and documentation.

Tertiary Survey in the Days of Modern Imaging: Assessing the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Injuries on Tertiary Survey in a Level 2 Trauma Centre

Aim: To determine the utility of tertiary survey (TS) in patients subjected to whole-body CT (WBCT) or selective CT (SCT) following trauma.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients admitted to a level 2 trauma centre following the introduction of a standardised TS form in 2017. The initial imaging protocol (WBCT versus selective CT versus x-ray), subsequently requested imaging, standardised injury data, and length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Clinically significant injuries were defined as those with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 1 on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).

Results: Five hundred and seven patients were included. The rate of additional significant injuries at the time of TS was 1.18% (n=6), each requiring conservative management only. There was no significant difference in injury detection based on the initial imaging protocol; however, there were three near-misses identified. Of these patients, two underwent selective CT and one was subjected to a plain film series, with clinically significant injuries identified early upon completion of trauma imaging. Overall, 2.9% (n=15) of patients had completed trauma imaging during the same admission. WBCT was associated with higher ISS and length of stay (p<0.05). After controlling for ISS, there was no difference in length of stay between imaging modalities except in those patients with an ISS of 0 (no clinically significant injuries), who appeared to have longer admissions if subject to WBCT (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The rate of missed injuries identified at TS is low. The imaging modality did not alter this. This may allow for the omission of the tertiary survey and earlier discharge in many trauma patients.

Incidental CT Findings in the Elderly with Low-Energy Falls: Prevalence and Implications

Background: Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in trauma care, with increasing implementation during the emergency work-up of elderly patients with low-energy falls (LEF). The prevalence of incidental findings (IFs) resulting from CT imaging and requiring down-stream actions in this patient cohort is unknown. We have investigated the prevalence and urgency of IFs from emergency CT examinations in these patients. Methods: A total of 2871 patients with LEF and emergency CT examinations were consecutively included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of IFs; the secondary endpoint was their urgency. Results: The median age was 82 years (64.2% were women). IFs were identified in 73.9% of patients, with an average of 1.6 IFs per patient. Of all IFs, 16.4% were classified as urgent or relevant, predominantly in the abdomen, chest and neck. Increasing age was associated with the prevalence of an IF (odds ratio: 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.042–1.064). Significantly more IFs were found in female patients (75.2% vs. 71.5%). Conclusion: IFs resulting from CT examinations of the elderly are frequent, but in more than 8 out of 10, they are harmless or currently asymptomatic. For the benefit of an accurate diagnosis of traumatic lesions, concerns about IFs with respect to disease burden, further work-up and resource utilisation might be disregarded.

Computed Tomography Scan Utilization in Pediatric Trauma: Impact on Length of Stay and Incidence of False Positive Findings

INTRODUCTION

Computerized tomography (CT) scans are the mainstay of diagnostic imaging in blunt trauma. Particularly in pediatric trauma, utilization of CT scans has increased exponentially in recent years. Concerns regarding radiation exposure to this vulnerable population have resulted in increased scrutiny of practice. What is not known is if liberal imaging practices decrease length of stay by eliminating the need for clinical observation, and the impact of false-positive rates from liberal use of CT scanning on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Medical records from a nonaccredited pediatric trauma center with a practice of liberal imaging were reviewed over a 2-year period. Total CT scans obtained were recorded, in addition to length of stay, age, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Rates of clinically significant imaging findings were recorded, as were false positive findings and complications of imaging.

RESULTS

Out of 735 children, 58% underwent CT scanning, and if scanned, received an average of 2.4 studies. Clinically significant findings were documented in 20% of head CTs, 2% of cervical spine CTs, 3.5% of chest CTs, 24% of facial CTs, and 14.7% of abdominal CTs. False-positive findings were found in 1.5% of head CTs, 1.2% of cervical spine CTs, 2.4% of chest CTs, and 2.5% of abdominal CTs. Liberal CT scanning was not associated with decreased length of stay. In contrast, obtaining CT scans on more than 4 body regions was independently predictive of longer length of stay, independent of ISS.

CONCLUSIONS

False-positive rates of CT scans for trauma were low in this cohort. However, when scanning the cervical spine or the chest, for every 2 clinically significant findings obtained, there was at least one false positive result, calling into question the practice of liberal imaging of these regions. Liberal utilization of CT scan did not allow for more rapid discharge home, and for more than 4 CTs was independently associated with longer hospital stay.

Multi-detector computed tomography in traumatic abdominal lesions: value and radiation control

Background, The context

A prospective study was conducted involving 81 patients (mean age, 20.79 years) with abdominal trauma who underwent ultrasonography and post-contrast CT on MDCT scanner. The total DLP for each patient was reviewed, and the effective dose was calculated. Purpose of the study to: explore the role of MDCT in assessing traumatic abdominal lesions, demonstrate radiation dose delivered by MDCT, and describe specific CT technical features to minimize radiation.

Results

The spleen was the most commonly injured organ (49.4%) followed by liver (39.5%) and kidney (24.7%). Pancreatic injury occurred in seven patients, whereas only two patients had intestinal injuries. One patient had adrenal injury. Minimal, mild and moderate free intra-peritoneal fluid collection was detected in 21 (25.9%), 47 (58%) and 10 (12.3%) patients, respectively. Only three (3.7%) patients had no collection. One patient had active uncontrolled bleeding and died. Radiation dose was below the detrimental level (calculated effective dose), with optimal image quality.

Conclusions

MDCT is sensitive to all types of traumatic abdominal lesions. Not only in determining the injury, but also in its grading. MDCT has affected the treatment directions, spotting a focus on conservative treatment by raising the diagnostic confidence. FAST cannot be the sole imaging modality. The individual radiation risk is small but real. Advancements in medical imaging reduce radiation risk.

Determinants of time-to-disposition in patients who underwent CT for pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study

Background

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common life-threatening medical emergency that needs prompt diagnosis and management. Providing urgent care is a key determinant of quality in the emergency department (ED) and time-based targets have been implemented to reduce length of stay and overcrowding. The study aimed to determine factors that are associated with having a time-to-disposition of less than 4 h in patients with suspected PE who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CT-PA) to confirm the diagnosis.

Methods

After obtaining approval from the ethics committee, we conducted a retrospective observational study by examining CT-PA scans that was performed to rule out PE in all adult patients presenting at the ED between January 2018 and December 2019. Demographic information and clinical information, as well as arrival and disposition times were collected from electronic health records. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify the independent factors associated with meeting the 4-h target in the ED.

Results

In total, the study involved 232 patients (76 men and 156 women). The median length of stay in the ED was 5.2 h and the 4-h target was achieved in 37% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a positive CT-PA scan for PE was independently associated with meeting the four-hour target in the ED (odds ratio [OR]: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1–4.8). Furthermore, Hemoptysis was the only clinical symptom that served as an independent factor associated with meeting the 4-h target in the ED (OR: 10.4; 95% CI: 1.2–90.8).

Conclusion

Despite the lower number of staff and higher volume of patients on weekends, patients who presented on weekends had shorter stays and were more likely to meet the 4-h target. Careful clinical assessment, prior to requesting a CT-PA scan, is crucial, since negative CT-PA scans may be associated with failure to meet the 4-h target.

Selective Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging is Superior to Liberal CT Imaging in the Hemodynamically Normal Pediatric Blunt Trauma Patient

BACKGROUND

The optimal imaging strategy in hemodynamically stable pediatric blunt trauma remains to be defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences between selective and liberal computed tomography (CT) strategy in a pediatric trauma population with respect to radiation exposure and outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of hemodynamically stable blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 y) who were admitted to a Level I trauma center between 2013-2016. Patients were stratified into selective and liberal imaging cohorts. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups. Outcomes included radiation dose, hospital and ICU length of stay, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 485 patients included, 176 underwent liberal and 309 selective CT imaging. The liberal cohort were more likely to be severely injured (ISS>15: 34.1 versus 8.4%, P< 0.001). The odds of exposure to a radiation dose of >15 mSv were higher with liberal scanning in patients with both ISS > 15 (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.76-5.19, P< 0.001) and ISS ≤ 15 (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.19-8.44, P < 0.001). Adjusted outcomes regarding mortality, ICU length of stay, and complications were similar between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Selective CT imaging in hemodynamically stable blunt pediatric trauma patients was associated with reduced radiation exposure and similar outcomes when compared to a liberal CT strategy.

Dental Trauma on whole Body Trauma CT-An underreported finding

Background

The prevalence of dental injuries (DI) in polytrauma patients is unknown. The purpose of our study was to identify the frequency of dental injuries on whole body CTs acquired in a trauma setting and to estimate how often they are correctly reported by the radiologist.

Methods

In the time period between 2006 and 2018 the radiological database of one university hospital was screened for whole-body trauma CTs. A total of 994 CTs were identified and re-evaluated.

Results

Dental injuries were identified in 127 patients (12.8% of patients). There were 27 women (21.3%) and 100 men (78.7%) with a mean age of 51.0 ± 18.9 years (range 10–96 years). Regarding localization, most findings involved the molars (n = 107, 37.4%), followed by the incisors (n = 81, 28.3%), premolars (n = 59, 20.6%) and canines (n = 39, 13.7%). Most common findings were as follows: luxations (n = 49, 45.8%), followed by crown fractures (n = 46, 43%), root fractures (n = 10, 9.3%), extrusions (n = 1, 0.9%), and intrusions (n = 1, 0.9%). Only 15 findings (11.8% of all patients with dental injuries) were described in the original radiological reports.

Conclusion

DI had a high occurrence in polytrauma patients. A high frequency of underreported dental trauma findings was identified. Radiologists reporting whole-body trauma CT should be aware of possible dental trauma to report the findings adequately.

Diagnostic accuracy, yield, and comparative effectiveness of whole-body computed tomography in blunt trauma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Controversies emerge over routine performances of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in patients with blunt polytrauma. The existing randomized and non-randomized evidence is inconclusive, and during observations of non-trauma, incidental findings, detected by WBCT, have left uncertainty regarding their consequences and optimal management. Additionally, previous meta-analyses have failed to address the limitations of primary studies and issues associated with incidental findings. Therefore, we planned a new systematic review to address these points.

METHODS

We will search the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception to December 31, 2020, with no language restriction and perform full-text evaluation of potentially relevant articles. We will include prospective and retrospective studies with a single-gate design that assessed diagnostic accuracy and/or yield of WBCT to detect traumatic injuries, and studies that assessed incidental findings detected by WBCT. Additionally, we will include randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies that assessed the effectiveness of WBCT against conventional care, including selective computed tomography (CT). Studies of patients of all ages with blunt traumatic injuries, assessed at an emergency department, will be included. Two reviewers will extract data and rate the study validity via standard quality assessment tools. The primary outcome of interest will be reduction in mortality. Our secondary outcomes will include diagnostic accuracy and yield, detection of incidental findings and clinical outcomes associated with these detections, and improvement in other non-mortality clinical outcomes. We will qualitatively assess study, patient, and intervention characteristics and clinical outcomes. If appropriate, we will perform random-effects model meta-analyses to obtain summary estimates. Finally, we will assess the certainty of evidence by the grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not applicable, as this is a secondary analysis of publicly available data. The review results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020187852.

Creating an Incidental Pulmonary Nodule Safety-Net Program

Pulmonary nodules are a frequent, incidental finding on CT scans, ranging from up to 8.4% on abdominal scans and up to 48% on CT angiograms. Incidental findings are sometimes disregarded or overshadowed by critical situations and may not be disclosed or documented on discharge. The costs and risks associated with incidental findings are not insignificant, including the risk of a delayed diagnosis of lung cancer. A medical center commitment to prevent overlooked incidental pulmonary nodules led to the development of an incidental pulmonary nodule program. The program, led by an advanced practice nurse, established processes to identify patients with incidental lung nodules on CT scans and developed criteria for further follow-up with the primary care provider and the patient. Improvements with consistent use of Fleischner guidelines in scan reports by radiologists and increased ownership in informing patients of incidental nodules by ED and trauma providers have occurred. As the frequency of chest CT imaging is increasing, the number of incidental nodules identified will also increase. A lung nodule surveillance process would greatly benefit every lung nodule clinic or hospital system for management of pulmonary nodules.

Should We Report Incidental Low-Density Liver Lesions with Benign Features? A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of Trauma CT Scans

Background Many incidental liver lesions are benign and require no additional workup. Investigation of such lesions can have a negative impact of both the patient and health care system. However, the impact of how radiologists report these incidental lesions is not clear. We aimed to investigate how reporting of incidental liver lesions on trauma computed tomography (CT) scan affects follow-up.

Methods This is a retrospective single-center analysis of body CT scans performed following abdominal trauma. Information was collected on the reporting of incidental low-density liver lesions and any additional imaging performed.

Results A total of 3,595 trauma body CT scan reports were reviewed. Incidental liver lesions were identified in 527 (15%) patients, with 347 (10%) fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Additional imaging was requested by the referring doctor for 43 out of 285 patients (15%) when lesions were mentioned in the body of the report only, compared with 41 out of 62 patients (66%) when mentioned in the conclusion (odds ratio [OR] = 10.99, p < 0.0001). When additional imaging was recommended in the report, follow-up was arranged for 36 out of 52 patients (69%), compared with 48 out of 285 patients (16%) when it was not suggested (OR = 11.58, p < 0.0001). Additional imaging was requested for 84 of the 347 patients (24%), with 24 of these performed at our institution. All patients followed-up at our institution were diagnosed with a benign lesion.

Conclusion Reporting incidental hypodense liver lesions in the conclusion or specifically recommending further additional imaging, both led to significantly increased likelihood of additional imaging being performed. Radiologists who encounter such lesions should consider excluding them from the conclusion if there are no malignant features or patient risk factors.

Incidental findings on emergency CT scans: Predictive factors and medico-economic impact

PURPOSE

The main objective was to evaluate types and predictive factors of incidental findings (IFs) on multidetector computed tomographies (MDCTs) performed for an emergency department (ED). The secondary aim was to analyze additional investigations, their benefits, side effects, costs and the final diagnoses.

METHOD

One thousand consecutive patients over 18 years old who underwent an MDCT in the ED of our institution from January 2011 to November 2011 were retrospectively included, accounting for 300 head MDCTs and 700 other MDCTs. The following criteria were collected in patient electronic medical records: IFs (divided into low and high clinical significance), body areas covered, availability of a prior imaging, radiologist's experience and subspecialty, additional investigations, their outcomes and costs.

RESULTS

Among the 1000 included patients, 232 had at least one IF and 122 had at least one IF of high clinical significance (IFCS). There were 340 IFs and 150 IFCSs. A significant association with the presence of at least one IF was noted for older patients, less-experienced radiologists, no subspecialty of the radiologist, the abdominopelvic area, and the absence of prior imaging. Eighteen IFs generated additional investigations in our institution, including five invasive samplings and three surgical operations, with two diagnoses of malignancy (a gastrointestinal stromal tumor and a Bosniak IV cystic renal lesion). One benign iatrogenic complication occurred. Total cost of these investigations was €41,247 (with an average of €2292 per IF investigated).

CONCLUSION

IFs on emergency MDCTs were frequent, rarely severe, rarely iatrogenic and relatively expensive.

Incidental hepatic steatosis in radiology reports: a survey of emergency department clinicians' perspectives and current practice

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic steatosis is a relatively common incidental finding on computed tomography (CT) studies performed for patients in the emergency department (ED). The aim of our survey was to explore the preferences and perspectives of emergency physicians regarding reporting of incidental findings with a focus on hepatic steatosis.

METHODS

A prospective web-based questionnaire was conducted and distributed electronically to emergency clinicians with anonymous collection of responses.

RESULTS

A total of 236 responses were received. The true response rate could not be determined due to different methods of electronic distribution. However, there was an estimated representation of 8.3% for ED physicians and 2.5% for trainees. The median time spent on the survey was less than 3 minutes. Seventy-seven per cent answered yes to giving an incidental finding more significance if mentioned in the conclusion section. More than half of respondents (60.2%) reported that they would like hepatic steatosis to be mentioned in a CT report while 30% reported that it was irrelevant in the emergency setting and 10% reported that they did not want it mentioned in the report. The majority (83.1%) reported that they would include this finding in the discharge summary for GP follow-up and less than half (44.1%) would mention it to patients.

CONCLUSION

Our survey highlights the importance of clear communication between radiologists and ED physicians when incidental findings are encountered. Radiologists play an important role in alerting ED physicians and clinicians who have access to patients' radiology reports to the presence of incidental findings including hepatic steatosis.