Suspect anaphylaxis following intravenous buprenorphine administration in a dog

Clinical characteristics of two-hundred thirty-two dogs (2006-2018) treated for suspected anaphylaxis in Perth, Western Australia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical features of dogs treated for suspected anaphylaxis in Perth, Western Australia.

DESIGN

Single-centre observational case series with retrospective and prospective phases.

METHODS

This was a two-phase study of dogs with clinical suspicion of anaphylaxis presenting to the emergency service of a university teaching hospital. Dogs required evidence of, and appropriate treatment of, a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction as well as two or more organs affected (or cardiovascular signs alone) to be included. Phase 1 includes retrospective case series of 186 dogs (March 2006-December 2018). Phase 2 includes prospective descriptive case series of 46 dogs (October 2017-July 2018) focused on clinical signs.

RESULTS

In phase 1, 88 (47%) dogs had evidence of insect exposure prior to the acute event. One hundred forty (75%) dogs had dermatological signs, 141 (76%) had gastrointestinal signs and 129 (69%) had cardiovascular signs. Ninety-two (49%) dogs had vasoconstrictive shock (5 with bradycardia), 24 (13%) had vasodilatory shock, 8 (4%) had mixed vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive shock and 5 (3%) had unclassifiable shock. On focused abdominal ultrasound, 42 of 71 (59%) dogs had gallbladder wall oedema and 3 of 71 (4%) dogs had peritoneal free fluid. In phase 2, the distributions of insect exposure, organ dysfunction and sonographic abnormalities were similar to phase 1.

CONCLUSION

Dogs presenting with suspected anaphylaxis showed a broad range of presentations. Dermatological signs were absent in a proportion of dogs, vasoconstrictive shock was more frequent than vasodilatory and unique features of shock were identified. This study highlights the challenges of diagnosis based on presenting features alone.

A Suspected Anaphylactoid Reaction to Propofol in a Dog

Anaphylactoid reactions to anaesthetic drugs are rarely reported in veterinary medicine. The aim of this report is to describe a suspected anaphylactic reaction to propofol in a 14 years old Shih-Tzu undergoing general anaesthesia for ovariohysterectomy due to a pyometra. The anesthetic protocol included intramuscular methadone for premedication and fentanyl, midazolam and propofol intravenously for co-induction. At endotracheal intubation, the glottis appeared subjectively thickened. Shortly after induction and endotracheal intubation, desaturation, hypercapnia and bradycardia occurred; chest compliance at manual ventilation was poor and peripheral pulses were weak. The procedure was aborted. Pulmonary oedema was diagnosed at thoracic radiography and a cardiogenic origin was excluded via echocardiography. Fluid therapy and glucocorticoids were administered, and mechanical ventilation was started in the intensive care unit. Two hours later, the owner opted for euthanasia due to financial constraints.