Intrinsic Neuromuscular Fatigability in Humans: The Critical Role of Stimulus Frequency

Electrically evoked contractions provide insight into intrinsic neuromuscular fatigability and also represent a valuable technique to maintain muscle mass in a clinical setting. To appropriately investigate intrinsic fatigability and design optimal stimulation protocols, it would seem to be crucial to stimulate the muscle at a frequency equivalent to the mean motor unit discharge rate expected at the target force level.

The inclusion of interstimulus interval variability does not mitigate electrically-evoked fatigue of the knee extensors

PURPOSE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) is used to activate muscles when volitional capacity is impaired but potential benefits are limited by rapid force loss (fatigue). Most TES fatigue protocols employ constant-frequency trains, with stimuli at a fixed interstimulus interval (ISI); however, a brief ISI between the first two pulses (variable-frequency train, VFT) to maximize the catchlike property of muscle can attenuate fatigue development. The purpose of this study was to investigate if a VFT that simulates intrinsic variability of voluntary motor unit discharge rates would also mitigate fatigue, owing to the sensitivity of muscle to acute activation history.

METHODS

On two visits, 24 healthy adults (25.3 ± 3.7 years; 12 females) received 3 min of intermittent TES to the quadriceps of the dominant leg. Trains of eight pulses at 10 Hz were delivered with a constant (100 ms) or variable ISI (80-120 ms). Contractile impulse, rate of force development (RFD), and rate of relaxation (RFR) were determined for each tetanus RESULTS: During fatigue and recovery, contractile impulse did not differ between protocols (p ≥ 0.796) and sexes (p ≥ 0.493), with values of 77 ± 17% control at task end and 125 ± 19% control 2 min later. RFD and RFR also showed no effect of the protocol (p ≥ 0.310) or participant sex (p ≥ 0.119). Both measures slowed (38 ± 23% and 33 ± 22%, respectively) but dissociated during recovery as RFD remained 16 ± 18% below control at 5 min, whereas RFR recovered to control by 30 s (101 ± 22%).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to expectations, the VFT protocol did not attenuate fatigue development, which suggests no benefit to mimicking the inherent variability of motor unit discharge rates.