Endogenous adenosine release is involved in the control of heart rate in rats

Changes in gap junction proteins Connexin30.2 and Connexin40 expression in the sinoatrial node of rats with dexmedetomidine-induced sinus bradycardia

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is widely used, and its most common side effect is bradycardia. The complete mechanism through which Dex induces bradycardia has not been elucidated. This research investigates the expression of gap junction proteins Connexin30.2 (Cx30.2) and Connexin40 (Cx40) within the sinoatrial node of rats with Dex-induced sinus bradycardia.

METHODS

Eighty rats were randomly assigned to five groups. Saline was administered to rats in Group C. In the other four groups, the rats were administered Dex to induce bradycardia. In groups D₁ and D₂, the rats were administered Dex at a loading dose of 30 μg.kg^-1 and 100 μg.kg^-1 for 10 min, then at 15 μg.kg^-1.h^-1 and 50 μg.kg^-1.h^-1 for 120 min separately. The rats in group D₁A and D₂A were administered Dex in the same way as in group D₁ and D₂; however, immediately after the administration of the loading dose, 0.5 mg atropine was administered intravenously, and then at 0.5 mg.kg^-1.h^-1 for 120 min. The sinoatrial node was acquired after intravenous infusion was completed. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses were performed to measure mRNA and protein expression of Cx30.2 and Cx40, respectively.

RESULTS

The expression of Cx30.2 increased, whereas the expression of Cx40 decreased within the sinoatrial node of rats with Dex-induced sinus bradycardia. Atropine reversed the effects of Dex on the expression of gap junction proteins.

CONCLUSION

Dex possibly altered the expression of gap junction proteins to slow down cardiac conduction velocity in the sinoatrial node.

The Role of Adenosine and Its Degradation Enzymes - Adenosinedeaminase and Adenosinekinase in Pathogenesis of Vasovagal Syncope

INTRODUCTION

Adenosine is mediator regulating physiological and pathological processes in organism. It probably plays a role in pathogenesis of vasovagal syncopes (VVS), too. Adenosine, its receptors and degradation enzymes- adenosinedeaminase (ADA) and adenosinekinase (ADK), are called the adenosinergic system.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate serum levels of adenosine, ADA and ADK in patients with tilt-induced VVS and compare them to tlit-negative controls. Secondary aim was to compare the levels between the types of VVS and correlate them with hemodynamic parameters.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Altogether 132 individuals were involved in this study (age 39,88±15,64 years, 51 males). All patients underwent head up tilt test (HUTT) in differential diagnosis of syncope. Blood sampling was performed before and after HUTT. Baseline and stimulated serum levels of adenosine, ADA and ADK were evaluated by ELISA method.

RESULTS

HUTT was positive in 91 patients (HUTT+), 41 individuals were negative (HUTT-). HUTT+ patients had higher baseline and stimulated adenosine levels, when compared to HUTT- population. The rise in adenosine was higher in HUTT+ group. On the other hand, the increase of ADA was significantly higher in HUTT- subjects. Among HUTT+ group, the highest adenosine was found during vasodepressoric VVS.

CONCLUSION

Adenosinergic system may play role in pathogenesis of VVS. Patients with VVS have higher adenosine levels, that may be caused by attenuated degradation. Adenosine seems to be involved predominantly in vasodepressoric type of VVS. Further research evaluating complex function of adenosinergic system in these patients is needed.

Adenosine, Adenosine Receptors and Neurohumoral Syncope: From Molecular Basis to Personalized Treatment

Adenosine is a ubiquitous nucleoside that is implicated in the occurrence of clinical manifestations of neuro-humoral syncope (NHS). NHS is characterized by a drop in blood pressure due to vasodepression together with cardio inhibition. These manifestations are often preceded by prodromes such as headaches, abdominal pain, feeling of discomfort or sweating. There is evidence that adenosine is implicated in NHS. Adenosine acts via four subtypes of receptors, named A1 (A1R), A2A (A2AR), A2B (A2BR) and A3 (A3R) receptors, with all subtypes belonging to G protein membrane receptors. The main effects of adenosine on the cardiovascular system occurs via the modulation of potassium ion channels (IK Ado, K ATP), voltage-gate calcium channels and via cAMP production inhibition (A1R and A3R) or, conversely, through the increased production of cAMP (A2A/BR) in target cells. However, it turns out that adenosine, via the activation of A1R, leads to bradycardia, sinus arrest or atrioventricular block, while the activation of A2AR leads to vasodilation; these same manifestations are found during episodes of syncope. The use of adenosine receptor antagonists, such as theophylline or caffeine, should be useful in the treatment of some forms of NHS. The aim of this review was to summarize the main data regarding the link between the adenosinergic system and NHS and the possible consequences on NHS treatment by means of adenosine receptor antagonists.

Blockade of adenosine A1 receptor in nucleus tractus solitarius attenuates baroreflex sensitivity response to dexmedetomidine in rats

The α₂-adrenergic receptor (α₂-AR) agonist dexmedetomidine increases baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). In the current study, we examined the potential role of adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) within the nucleus tractus solitaries (NTS) in such a response. Briefly, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and randomly received microinjection of selective A1R antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 0.1 pmol/1 μl) or saline vehicle into the right NTS. Ten min after the microinjection, dexmedetomidine infusion started at a rate of 30 μg/kg over 15 min followed by infusion at 15 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 for 105 min, or 100 μg/kg over 15 min followed by infusion at 50 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 for 105 min. BRS was examined using a standard phenylephrine method prior to infusion (T₀), 60 min (T₁) and 120 min (T₂) after dexmedetomidine infusion started. Adenosine concentration in plasma and brainstem was measured with high-performance liquid chromatography with vs. without α₂-AR antagonist atipamezole pretreatment (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Dexmedetomidine increased BRS at both 30 (T₀: 0.55 ± 0.25 vs. T₁: 2.45 ± 0.37, T₂: 2.26 ± 0.56 ms/mmHg, P < 0.05) and 100 μg/kg (T₀: 0.63 ± 0.24 vs. T₁: 6.21 ± 1.87, T₂: 6.30 ± 2.12 ms/mmHg, P < 0.05). DPCPX pretreatment obliterated BRS response to 100-μg/kg dexmedetomidine. At 100 μg/kg, dexmedetomidine increased adenosine concentration in plasma (0.23 ± 0.11 to 0.45 ± 0.07 μg/ml, P < 0.05) and brainstem (1.46 ± 0.30 to 2.52 ± 0.22 μg/ml, P < 0.05); such effect was blocked by atipamezole pretreatment. Western blot analysis showed α₂-AR up-regulation by 100-μg/kg dexmedetomidine, which can be prevented by DPCPX. Double-labeling with glial fibrillary acidic protein showed α₂-AR up-regulation in astrocytes in the NTS. These results suggest that dexmedetomidine enhances baroreflex sensitivity, possibly by increasing adenosine in NTS and α₂-AR expression in astrocytes.

Caffeine Supplementation for 4 Days Does Not Induce Tolerance to the Ergogenic Effects Promoted by Acute Intake on Physiological, Metabolic, and Performance Parameters of Cyclists: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Study

The present study investigated whether the caffeine supplementation for four days would induce tolerance to the ergogenic effects promoted by acute intake on physiological, metabolic, and performance parameters of cyclists. A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design was employed, involving four experimental trials; placebo (4-day)-placebo (acute)/PP, placebo (4-day)-caffeine (acute)/PC, caffeine (4-day)-caffeine (acute)/CC and caffeine (4-day)-placebo (acute)/CP. Fourteen male recreationally-trained cyclists ingested capsules containing either placebo or caffeine (6 mg∙kg-1) for 4 days. On day 5 (acute), capsules containing placebo or caffeine (6 mg∙kg-1) were ingested 60 min before completing a 16 km time-trial (TT). CC and PC showed improvements in time (3.54%, ES = 0.72; 2.53%, ES = 0.51) and in output power (2.85%, ES = 0.25; 2.53%, ES = 0.20) (p < 0.05) compared to CP and PP conditions, respectively. These effects were accompanied by increased heart rate (2.63%, ES = 0.47; 1.99%, ES = 0.34), minute volume (13.11%, ES = 0.61; 16.32%, ES = 0.75), expired O2 fraction (3.29%, ES = 0.96; 2.87, ES = 0.72), lactate blood concentration (immediately after, 29.51% ES = 0.78; 28.21% ES = 0.73 recovery (10 min), 36.01% ES = 0.84; 31.22% ES = 0.81), and reduction in expired CO2 fraction (7.64%, ES = 0.64; 7.75%, ES = 0.56). In conclusion, these results indicate that caffeine, when ingested by cyclists in a dose of 6 mg∙kg-1 for 4 days, does not induce tolerance to the ergogenic effects promoted by acute intake on physiological, metabolic, and performance parameters.

Ameliorating effects of sacral neuromodulation on gastric and small intestinal dysmotility mediated via a sacral afferent-vagal efferent pathway

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In a recent study of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for colonic inflammation, a possible spinal-vagal pathway was implicated. The aim of this study was to provide evidence for such a pathway by investigating the effects of SNS on dysmotility of the stomach and duodenum that are not directly innervated by the sacral efferents.

METHODS

Twenty-seven rats were chronically implanted with wire electrodes for SNS and gastrointestinal slow waves. SNS was performed in several acute sessions to investigate its effects on gastric/duodenal slow waves and emptying/transit impaired by glucagon and rectal distention (RD).

RESULTS

(a) SNS increased the percentage of normal gastric slow waves impaired by glucagon (from 53.9% to 77.0%, P < .0001) and RD (from 64% to 78%, P = .037). This improvement was abolished by atropine. (b) Similar effects were observed with SNS on duodenal slow waves, which was also blocked by atropine. (c) SNS normalized delayed gastric emptying induced by glucagon (control: 61.3%, glucagon: 44.3%, glucagon + SNS: 65.8%) and RD (control: 61.3%, RD: 46.7%, RD + SNS: 64.3%). It also normalized small intestinal transit delayed by RD (P = .001, RD + SNS vs RD; P = .9, RD + SNS vs control). (4) Both glucagon and RD induced an increase in the sympathovagal ratio (P = .007, glucagon vs baseline; P < .001, RD vs baseline) and SNS decreased the ratio (P = .006, glucagon + SNS vs glucagon; P = .04, RD + SNS vs RD).

CONCLUSIONS

Neuromodulation of the sacral nerve improves gastric and small intestinal pacemaking activity and transit impaired by glucagon and RD by normalizing the sympathovagal balance via a retrograde neural pathway from the sacral nerve to vagal efferents.

Inhibition of Adenosine Pathway Alters Atrial Electrophysiology and Prevents Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Adenosine leads to atrial action potential (AP) shortening through activation of adenosine 1 receptors (A₁-R) and subsequent opening of G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels. Extracellular production of adenosine is drastically increased during stress and ischemia.

Objective

The aim of this study was to address whether the pharmacological blockade of endogenous production of adenosine and of its signaling prevents atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

The role of A₁-R activation on atrial action potential duration, refractoriness, and AF vulnerability was investigated in rat isolated beating heart preparations (Langendorff) with an A₁-R agonist [2-chloro-N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), 50 nM] and antagonist [1-butyl-3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-(3-noradamantyl)xanthine (PSB36), 40 nM]. Furthermore, to interfere with the endogenous adenosine release, the ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) inhibitor was applied [5′-(α,β-methylene) diphosphate sodium salt (AMPCP), 500 μM]. Isolated trabeculae from human right atrial appendages (hRAAs) were used for comparison.

Results

As expected, CCPA shortened AP duration at 90% of repolarization (APD₉₀) and effective refractory period (ERP) in rat atria. PSB36 prolonged APD₉₀ and ERP in rat atria, and CD73 inhibition with AMPCP prolonged ERP in rats, confirming that endogenously produced amount of adenosine is sufficiently high to alter atrial electrophysiology. In human atrial appendages, CCPA shortened APD₉₀, while PSB36 prolonged it. Rat hearts treated with CCPA are prone to AF. In contrast, PSB36 and AMPCP prevented AF events and reduced AF duration (vehicle, 11.5 ± 2.6 s; CCPA, 40.6 ± 16.1 s; PSB36, 6.5 ± 3.7 s; AMPCP, 3.0 ± 1.4 s; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

A₁-R activation by intrinsic adenosine release alters atrial electrophysiology and promotes AF. Inhibition of adenosine pathway protects atria from arrhythmic events.

Research progress on adenosine in central nervous system diseases

As an endogenous neuroprotectant agent, adenosine is extensively distributed and is particularly abundant in the central nervous system (CNS). Under physiological conditions, the concentration of adenosine is low intra- and extracellularly, but increases significantly in response to stress. The majority of adenosine functions are receptor-mediated, and primarily include the A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors (A1R, A2AR, A2BR, and A3R). Adenosine is currently widely used in the treatment of diseases of the CNS and the cardiovascular systems, and the mechanisms are related to the disease types, disease locations, and the adenosine receptors distribution in the CNS. For example, the main infarction sites of cerebral ischemia are cortex and striatum, which have high levels of A1 and A2A receptors. Cerebral ischemia is manifested with A1R decrease and A2AR increase, as well as reduction in the A1R-mediated inhibitory processes and enhancement of the A2AR-mediated excitatory process. Adenosine receptor dysfunction is also involved in the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), depression, and epilepsy. Thus, the adenosine receptor balance theory is important for brain disease treatment. The concentration of adenosine can be increased by endogenous or exogenous pathways due to its short half-life and high inactivation properties. Therefore, we will discuss the function of adenosine and its receptors, adenosine formation, and metabolism, and its role for the treatment of CNS diseases (such as cerebral ischemia, AD, depression, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and sleep disorders). This article will provide a scientific basis for the development of novel adenosine derivatives through adenosine structure modification, which will lead to experimental applications.

Pharmacological Modulation of Vagal Nerve Activity in Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases are life-threatening illnesses with high morbidity and mortality. Suppressed vagal (parasympathetic) activity and increased sympathetic activity are involved in these diseases. Currently, pharmacological interventions primarily aim to inhibit over-excitation of sympathetic nerves, while vagal modulation has been largely neglected. Many studies have demonstrated that increased vagal activity reduces cardiovascular risk factors in both animal models and human patients. Therefore, the improvement of vagal activity may be an alternate approach for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, drugs used for vagus nerve activation in cardiovascular diseases are limited in the clinic. In this review, we provide an overview of the potential drug targets for modulating vagal nerve activation, including muscarinic, and β-adrenergic receptors. In addition, vagomimetic drugs (such as choline, acetylcholine, and pyridostigmine) and the mechanism underlying their cardiovascular protective effects are also discussed.

Mechanisms involved in adenosine pharmacological preconditioning-induced cardioprotection

Adenosine is a naturally occurring breakdown product of adenosine triphosphate and plays an important role in different physiological and pathological conditions. Adenosine also serves as an important trigger in ischemic and remote preconditioning and its release may impart cardioprotection. Exogenous administration of adenosine in the form of adenosine preconditioning may also protect heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Endogenous release of adenosine during ischemic/remote preconditioning or exogenous adenosine during pharmacological preconditioning activates adenosine receptors to activate plethora of mechanisms, which either independently or in association with one another may confer cardioprotection during ischemia-reperfusion injury. These mechanisms include activation of K_ATP channels, an increase in the levels of antioxidant enzymes, functional interaction with opioid receptors; increase in nitric oxide production; decrease in inflammation; activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) channels; activation of kinases such as protein kinase B (Akt), protein kinase C, tyrosine kinase, mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinases such as ERK 1/2, p38 MAP kinases and MAP kinase kinase (MEK 1) MMP. The present review discusses the role and mechanisms involved in adenosine preconditioning-induced cardioprotection.

Caffeine affects autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure recovery after aerobic exercise in young adults: a crossover study

The post-exercise recovery period is associated with changes in autonomic modulation, which can promote an intercurrent-favorable environment. Caffeine has the ability to release catecholamines, but its effects after exercises is little explored. The present study aims to evaluate the acute effects of caffeine on the autonomic control and cardiorespiratory parameters after moderate intensity aerobic exercise. 32 young males (23,59 ± 3,45 years) were submitted to two protocols: Placebo and Caffeine, consisting of 15 minutes of rest, 30 minutes of exercise on a treadmill to 60% on VO2peak, followed by 60 minutes of recovery. Heart rate variability indices and cardiorespiratory parameters were determined at different times during the protocols. The RMSSD and SD1 indices recovered faster in placebo (p < 0.05). The systolic blood pressure differences were found from the 1st to the 5th minute of recovery with the caffeine protocol and from the 1st and 3rd minute with the placebo, whereas, for diastolic blood pressure, significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed only for the caffeine protocol at the 1st and 3rd minutes of recovery. Caffeine was shown to be capable of delaying parasympathetic recovery but did not influence the behavior of the respiratory rate, oxygen saturation or frequency-domain HRV indices.