1
|
Kenmoku T, Nakai D, Nagura N, Onuma K, Sukegawa K, Tazawa R, Otake Y, Takahira N, Takaso M. Tenodesis with bone marrow venting under local anesthesia for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis: Results of 2 years of follow-up. JSES Int 2022; 6:696-703. [PMID: 35813152 PMCID: PMC9264004 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypothesis We hypothesized that the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis requires accurate identification of the painful area to promote remodeling of the degenerated extensor insertion and to stabilize the tendon origin during tendon healing. Thus, we performed tenodesis with bone marrow venting under local anesthesia for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis. Methods Twenty patients (21 elbows) were treated with bone marrow venting at the painful area of the lateral epicondyle of the elbow and tenodesis using 2 soft anchors lateral to the capitellum (immediately distal to the painful area) and were followed up for ≥2 years. Patients were assessed using the numerical rating scale for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and objective evaluation included active range of motion. Results The mean preoperative and postoperative pain scores were 7.5 and 0.5, respectively, indicating significant pain relief (P < .001). The mean preoperative and postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were 44.2 and 1.0, respectively (P < .001). Two elbows had a slightly positive Thomsen test at the final visit. No recurrence of intra-articular symptoms induced by synovial fringe impingement was observed. Patients experienced more pain at the bone-tendon junction of extensors than at the tendon parenchyma. Conclusion Tenodesis with bone marrow venting under local anesthesia was effective for subjective patient satisfaction and positive clinical outcomes at ≥2 years of follow-up in patients with recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis. Intra-articular symptoms can be improved by stabilization of the lateral soft tissue without treatment for intra-articular lesions.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lenoir H, Mares O, Carlier Y. Management of lateral epicondylitis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019; 105:S241-S246. [PMID: 31543413 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain. Although also known as tennis elbow, lateral epicondylitis often develops as a work-related condition and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. This article reviews the pathophysiological factors involved in lateral epicondylitis, as well as the tools available for establishing the diagnosis and ruling out other causes of lateral elbow pain. Finally, the non-operative and surgical treatment options are discussed in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert Lenoir
- Chirurgie de l'épaule, du coude et de la main, Centre Ostéo-articulaires des Cèdres, Parc Sud Galaxie, 5, rue des tropiques, 38130 Echirolles, France
| | - Olivier Mares
- Centre hospitalier universitaire Nîmes-Caremeau, place du professeur Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - Yacine Carlier
- Centre de l'Arthrose, Clinique du sport Bordeaux-Mérignac, 2, rue George-Négrevergne, 33700 Mérignac, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nimura A, Fujishiro H, Wakabayashi Y, Imatani J, Sugaya H, Akita K. Joint capsule attachment to the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin: an anatomical study with possible implications regarding the etiology of lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39:219-25. [PMID: 24480683 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2013] [Revised: 11/20/2013] [Accepted: 11/20/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the unique anatomical characteristic of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) origin and points of differentiation from other extensors and to clarify the specific relationship of the ECRB to the underlying structures. METHODS We studied the origin of each extensor macroscopically for its muscular and tendinous parts; to identify the relationship between the ECRB origin and the deeper structures, we also examined the attachment of the joint capsule under the ECRB origin. RESULTS The ECRB simply originated as a tendon without any muscle, whereas other extensors originated as a mixture of tendon and muscle. At the anterior part of the ECRB origin, the thin attachment of the joint capsule (average width, 3.3 mm) lay deep to the ECRB and was distinct. However, at the posterodistal portion, the joint capsule, annular ligament, and supinator were intermingled and originated as a single wide sheet from the humerus (average width, 10.7 mm). CONCLUSIONS The anterior part of the ECRB origin was delicate, because the ECRB origin was purely tendinous, and the attachment of the articular capsule was thin compared with that of the posterodistal attachment. This thin attachment could be an initial factor leading to the development of lateral epicondylitis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The results of the current study may enhance magnetic resonance imaging understanding and may help clarify the etiology of the lateral epicondylitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akimoto Nimura
- Unit of Clinical Anatomy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama; and the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi, Japan
| | - Hitomi Fujishiro
- Unit of Clinical Anatomy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama; and the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Wakabayashi
- Unit of Clinical Anatomy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama; and the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi, Japan
| | - Junya Imatani
- Unit of Clinical Anatomy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama; and the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Sugaya
- Unit of Clinical Anatomy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama; and the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Akita
- Unit of Clinical Anatomy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama; and the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Funabashi Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Funabashi, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|