[Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy - Two Weeks of Immobilization Sufficient]

BACKGROUND

Diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) as surgical treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome is standardized nowadays with good to very good results. In contrast, a wide spectrum of different postoperative treatment regimens can be found in the current literature. The results after USO with modern, angular stable implants with immobilization for 2 weeks are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective database analysis identified 49 patients (31 women, 18 men, mean age 37.6 years) with a total of 51 USO over a 13-year period and were followed up for 73.5 (15.9-192.9). All USO were obliquely sawed and stabilized with palmar locking implants. The wrist was immobilized postoperatively in 30° extension in a dorsal forearm splint for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All USO showed load-stable consolidation signs after an average of 7.0 (SD 1.9; 4.9-14.1) weeks. Wrist range of motion was significantly improved in extension/flexion from 107.6° (60-155) preoperatively to 123.7° (80-160) postoperatively and in ulnar/radial deviation from 55.1° (25-90) to 60.8° (30-90) (p<0.05). Pain level was significantly reduced from 3.2 (0-8) to 0.1 (0-2) at rest and from 7.3 (4-10) to 1.2 (0-9) under weight bearing (p<0.01). A total of 5 complications (9.8%) were noted. Nonunion was not found.

CONCLUSION

By using angular stable implants to stabilize a USO, the duration of immobilization can be reduced to 2 weeks without compromising bone healing.

Outcomes of ulna shortening osteotomy: a cohort analysis of 106 patients

Background

Ulna shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) aims to improve pain and function by unloading the ulnar carpus. Previous studies often lack validated patient-reported outcomes or have small sample sizes. The primary objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported pain and hand function at 12 months after USO for UIS. Secondary objectives were to investigate the active range of motion, grip strength, complications, and whether outcomes differed based on etiology.

Materials and methods

We report on 106 patients with UIS who received USO between 2012 and 2019. In 44 of these patients, USO was performed secondary to distal radius fracture. Pain and function were measured with the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Active range of motion and grip strength were measured before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Complications were scored using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Complications in Hand and Wrist conditions (ICHAW) tool.

Results

The PRWHE total score improved from a mean of 64 (SD = 18) before surgery to 40 (22) at 3 months and 32 (23) at 12 months after surgery (P  < 0.001; effect size Cohen’s d = −1.4). There was no difference in the improvement in PRWHE total score (P = 0.99) based on etiology. Also, no clinically relevant changes in the active range of motion were measured. Independent of etiology, mean grip strength improved from 24 (11) before surgery to 30 (12) at 12 months (P  = 0.001). Sixty-four percent of patients experienced at least one complication, ranging from minor to severe. Of the 80 complications in total, 50 patients (47%) had complaints of hardware irritation, of which 34 (32%) had their hardware removed. Six patients (6%) needed refixation because of nonunion.

Conclusion

We found beneficial outcomes in patients with UIS that underwent USO, although there was a large variance in the outcome and a relatively high number of complications (which includes plate removals). Results of this study may be used in preoperative counseling and shared decision-making when considering USO.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10195-021-00621-8.

Ulna shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: Impact of distal radioulnar joint morphology on clinical outcome

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is based on ulnocarpal decompression, which may be achieved by ulna shortening osteotomy. The aim is to restore zero or negative ulnar variance. Tolat et al. described 3 distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) morphologic types: vertical, oblique and reverse. Joint type has been thought to influence the clinical result of shortening, especially in the reverse type.

HYPOTHESIS

DRUJ type does not influence clinical results in ulna shortening osteotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-nine wrists were operated on in 27 patients: 13 female, 14 male; mean age at surgery, 43 years (range, 18-72 years). In 20 cases, UIS was idiopathic and in 7 post-traumatic. Mean preoperative ulnar variance was 3.6mm (range, 2-18mm). The osteotomy was fixed by screwed plate.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (27 wrists) were assessed at a mean 64 months (range, 18 months to 13 years). There were no cases of infection or hematoma. DRUJ was type 1 (vertical) in 6 cases (22%), type 2 (oblique) in 14 (52%) and type 3 (reverse) in 7 (26%). Mean postoperative pain score on VAS was 0.7/10 (range, 0-4); 9 wrists remained painful. Mean Quick-DASH was 16.9 (range, 0-48) and mean PRWE 21.9 (range, 16.9-59). Thirteen patients were very satisfied, 11 satisfied, 1 moderately satisfied, and 2 dissatisfied. Mean postoperative ulnar variance was -0.1mm (range, -4 to +8mm). Three wrists developed osteoarthritis, all following traumatic UIS. There were no significant correlations between DRUJ type and other clinical or radiological parameters.

DISCUSSION

Ulna shortening osteotomy has proven efficacy in UIS. The literature reports excellent or good results in 75% of cases. In the present study, 96% of patients considered themselves cured or improved by surgery, and none reported worsening. Ulna shortening osteotomy can be used in all 3 DRUJ types; DRUJ coronal morphology does not impact clinical result.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-retrospective study.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy as a treatment of symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome after malunited distal radius fractures

A malunited distal radius fracture can lead to symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome, which is a common cause for ulnar-sided wrist pain. If conservative treatment fails and symptoms persist after an arthroscopic ulnocarpal debridement, ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is the treatment of choice. Since the first USO described by Milch in 1941 after a malunited Colles fracture, many techniques have been described varying in surgical approach, type of osteotomy and osteosynthesis material used. Many studies demonstrated good to very good functional results after USO, reporting, however, a delayed union or non-union rate up to 18%. A modern, low profile, locking plate showed in our short-term study very good functional results and no implant-associated complications, in particular no non-union.

Ultrasound-guided transection of the interosseous membrane of the forearm

We sought to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound-guided transection of the interosseous membrane of the forearm. The study involved ten forearms from five fresh cadavers. An ultrasound scanner (Toshiba™ Aplio V®, Toshigi, Japan) with a linear probe (Toshiba™ PLT-805AT 8Mhz) and a 25-cm long Kemis® knife (NewClip Technics™, Cholet, France), which was specially created for this study, were used. An approach to the distal and proximal radioulnar joint was made before the transection. The induced muscle hernia sign and the radius joystick test were performed to confirm the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided transection. Complete dissection of the posterior surface of the forearm was done to check for complications and evaluate the quality of the transection. We registered nine complete transections of the interosseous membrane. The muscular hernia sign was present in all the cases performed. The joystick test was positive in eight cases. One forearm had a vascular complication. This ultrasound-guided interosseous membrane transection technique is feasible and effective with limited vascular and nerve risks. A prospective clinical study is required to validate this anatomical work.

Distal Ulnar Metaphyseal Wedge Osteotomy for Ulnar Abutment Syndrome

Background  Ulnar shortening osteotomy of the diaphysis is a common and effective surgical procedure for ulnar abutment syndrome. However, this procedure has some disadvantages, such as a long period until union and a relatively high nonunion rate. To overcome these disadvantages, we have developed distal ulnar metaphyseal wedge osteotomy. The purpose of this article is to describe the technique and to report its clinical results. Patients and Methods  Distal ulnar metaphyseal wedge osteotomy consists of resection of the wedge fragment at the distal ulnar metaphysis, compressing the distal fragment of the ulna toward the radial-proximal direction and fixation with a Herbert type headless screw. We performed this procedure for 58 patients with ulnar abutment syndrome, and the clinical data of 43 patients who were followed for > 6 months were analyzed. We evaluated range of motion, grip strength, and HAND20 which is a validated subjective scoring system in Japan. Results  All patients experienced relief from their ulnar wrist pain, and bone union was achieved within an average of 2.6 months. The range of dorsiflexion improved from 63° preoperatively to 69° postoperatively, grip strength compared with the contralateral hand improved from 77% preoperatively to 87% postoperatively, and HAND20 improved from 41.3 points preoperatively to 22.4 points postoperatively. Discussion  This procedure has advantages especially in early bone union. This procedure should be taken into consideration as one of the options to treat ulnar abutment syndrome.