A double mass extinction at the end of the paleozoic era

Three tests based on fossil data indicate that high rates of extinction recorded in the penultimate (Guadalupian) stage of the Paleozoic era are not artifacts of a poor fossil record. Instead, they represent an abrupt mass extinction that was one of the largest to occur in the past half billion years. The final mass extinction of the era, which took place about 5 million years after the Guadalupian event, remains the most severe biotic crisis of all time. Taxonomic losses in the Late Permian were partitioned among the two crises and the intervening interval, however, and the terminal Permian crisis eliminated only about 80 percent of marine species, not 95 or 96 percent as earlier estimates have suggested.

The Triassic timescale: new constraints and a review of geochronological data

A review of geochronological data underlying the geological timescale for the Triassic yields a significantly different timescale calibration than that published in the most recent compilation (Geologic TimeScale 2004). This is partly due to the availability of new radio–isotopic data, but mostly because strict selection criteria are applied and complications arising from biases (both systematic and random) are accounted for in this contribution. The ages for the base and the top of the Triassic are constrained by U–Pb ages to 252.3 and 201.5 Ma, respectively. These dates also constrain the ages of major extinction events at the Permian–Triassic and Triassic–Jurassic boundaries, and are statistically indistinguishable from ages obtained for the Siberian Traps and volcanic products from the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, respectively, suggesting a causal link. Ages for these continental volcanics, however, are mostly from the K–Ar (40Ar/39Ar) system, which requires accounting and correcting for a systematic bias of c. 1% between U–Pb and 40Ar/39Ar isotopic ages (the 40Ar/39Ar ages being younger).

Robust age constraints also exist for the Induan–Olenekian boundary (251.2 Ma) and the Early–Middle Triassic (Olenekian–Anisian) boundary (247.2 Ma), resulting in a surprisingly short duration of the Early Triassic, which has implications for the timing of biotic recovery and major changes in ocean chemistry during this time. Furthermore, the Anisian–Ladinian boundary is constrained to 242.0 Ma by new U–Pb and 40Ar/39Ar ages. Radio–isotopic ages for the Late Triassic are scarce, and the only reliable and biostratigraphically-controlled age is from an upper Carnian tuff dated to 230.9 Ma, yielding a duration of more than 35 Ma for the Late Triassic. All of these ages are from U–Pb analyses applied to zircons with uncertainties at the permil level or better. The resulting compilation can only serve as a guideline and must be considered a snapshot, resolving some of the issues mainly associated with inaccurate and misinterpreted data in previous publications. However, further advances will require revision of some of the data presented here.