MR angiography after renal revascularization: spectrum of expected anatomic results and postintervention complications

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) in the evaluation of vascular complications of renal transplantation

Vascular complications associated with renal transplantation merit urgent investigation since they are often correctable, and timely intervention can help salvage the graft kidney. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) is a promising non-invasive technique, uses relatively non-nephrotoxic contrast agents and can rapidly demonstrate the underlying lesion in most instances. In this pictorial review we present the spectrum of abnormalities, as well as the pitfalls of interpretation of CE-MRA, that we encountered in 41 cases where there was clinical suspicion of vascular complications of renal transplantation. We believe that CE-MRA is a valuable, non-invasive screening technique in these cases, and further investigation and management of these patients can be confidently tailored to the results of the CE-MRA study.

Value of MR angiography before percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty and stent placement

PURPOSE

To determine the benefit of preprocedural three-dimensional gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography before percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty and stent placement (PTRA/S) in terms of procedural success, iodinated contrast material load, and procedure duration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over an 18-month period, 39 patients underwent attempted percutaneous renal angioplasty with or without stent placement. A total of 48 renal arteries were treated (40 cases of atherosclerosis, one of stent restenosis, five of fibromuscular dysplasia, and two of transplant stenosis). Preprocedural Gd-enhanced MR angiography was available in 16 procedures (41%). Procedural outcome, complications, iodinated contrast material load, number of diagnostic angiographic runs, and total procedure duration were each compared between two subgroups: patients who had preprocedural Gd-enhanced MR angiography ("prior MR angiography group") and those who did not ("no MR angiography" group).

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful. The two groups were equivalent in terms of age and disease pattern. However, technical complexity of the procedure was judged to be high in five of 16 procedures in the prior MR angiography group compared to three of 23 procedures in the no MR angiography group (P =.16). Bilateral or dual interventions were performed in six of 16 procedures in the prior MR angiography group compared to three of 23 in the no MR angiography group (P =.075). Iodinated contrast material load was significantly lower in the prior MR angiography group than in the no MR angiography group (68.7 mL +/- 28.4 vs 119.1 mL +/- 49.2 mL;P <.0008). The number of diagnostic angiographic runs before interventions were also significantly lower in the prior MR angiography group (1.2 +/- 0.4 vs 2.6 +/- 0.7; P <.0001). Overall procedure duration was comparable between the two groups (91.9 +/- 47.8 vs 112.2 +/- 49.4;P =.2).

CONCLUSION

Preprocedural planning with use of Gd-enhanced MR angiography significantly reduces the iodinated contrast material requirement during percutaneous renal artery interventions. It can also significantly shorten procedure duration.

Evaluation and treatment of renal artery stenosis: impact on blood pressure and renal function

The conventional non-invasive tests to diagnose renal artery stenosis in a general hypertensive population are not accurate enough for screening purposes. Magnetic resonance angiography might become the new gold standard, with the advantages of the absence of contrast toxicity, good accuracy, and information on flow characteristics. With regard to the treatment of hypertension in patients with renal artery stenosis, intervention is advised only when blood pressure cannot be controlled by at least three antihypertensive drugs. Patency after stenting is superior to angioplasty, although its clinical benefit has not been proved. As for renal function, evidence - although from uncontrolled studies - for the preservation of renal function by intervention is accumulating, especially in those patients with bilateral stenosis or stenosis in a single functioning kidney.