Submucosal Enhancing Stripe as a Contrast Material-enhanced MRI-based Imaging Feature for the Differentiation of Stage T0-T1 from Early T2 Rectal Cancers

Rectal MR Imaging

MR imaging comprising high-resolution T2-weighted imaging and high b value diffusion-weighted imaging has proven effective in guiding treatment selection and preoperative planning for rectal cancer. In addition to staging, it enables the noninvasive assessment of key bioimaging markers such as extramural vascular invasion, tumor deposits, and the presence and location of mesorectal fascia and anal sphincter involvement. After neoadjuvant therapy, MR imaging offers noninvasive treatment response, complementing endoscopic and digital rectal evaluations. This assessment plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of organ preservation or watch-and-wait strategy in patients who achieve complete clinical response.

Stage pT0-T1 rectal cancers: emphasis on submucosal high intensity on high-resolution T2-weighted imaging and other morphological features

BackgroundIdentification and staging of rectal cancer are mainly based on the difference in signal intensity (SI) between the tumor and normal structures of the intestinal wall on T2-weighted imaging. However, differentiating stage pT0-T1 from pT2 rectal tumors is difficult using routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences.PurposeTo summarize and explore whether MRI findings from routine imaging can help differentiate pT0-T1 from pT2 rectal tumors.Material and MethodsA total of 110 patients with pT0-T2 rectal cancer underwent preoperative pelvic MRI examinations and tumor resection without preoperative chemoradiotherapy. MRI findings of rectal lesions (including tumor location, shape, longitudinal length, maximum cross-section, submucosal high intensity [SHI], extramural fibrotic scarring, wall shrinkage, lesion-to-wall signal intensity ratio, and presence of lymph node with short axis over 3 mm) and clinical characteristics were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses to screen the independent factors associated with pathological results.ResultsOf all the lesions, 32 tumors were proved to be pT0-T1 and 78 tumors were pT2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that tumor shape (odds ratio [OR] = 24.607, P < 0.001), SHI (OR = 6.129, P = 0.002), and extramural fibrotic scarring (OR = 0.110, P = 0.007) were independent factors distinguishing pT0-T1 tumors from pT2 tumors. If the rectal lesion has a cauliflower-like shape with SHI and no extramural fibrotic scarring, it is more likely to be a pT0-T1 tumor.ConclusionThe imaging features obtained from the routine MRI sequence showed potential value for differentiating pT0-T1 from pT2 rectal tumors.

Enhancing the role of MRI in rectal cancer: advances from staging to prognosis prediction

Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the major health challenges worldwide. Accurate staging, restaging, invasiveness assessment, and treatment efficacy evaluation are crucial for its clinical management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a significant role in these processes. However, standard MRI techniques, including T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, have uncertainties in identifying early-stage tumors, high-risk nodules, extramural vascular invasion, and treatment efficacy, potentially leading to inappropriate treatment. Recent advances suggest that the integration of traditional MRI methods, including diffusion-weighted imaging, opposed-phase or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, as well as emerging synthetic MRI, could address these challenges. Additionally, improvements in imaging technology have spurred research into advanced functional MRI techniques such as diffusion kurtosis imaging and amide proton transfer weighted MRI, yielding promising results in RC assessment. Total neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as a new treatment paradigm for locally advanced RC, with neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy offering viable alternatives to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, the lack of standards for the early prediction of patient survival and tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy highlights a critical unmet need in matching therapies to suitable patients. Furthermore, organ preservation strategies after neoadjuvant therapy provide personalized options based on tumor response and patient preferences, yet traditional MRI assessments show significant variability. Radiomics and artificial intelligence hold promise for revealing complex patterns in MRI images associated with patient prognosis and treatment response. This review provides an overview of current MRI advancements in RC assessment and emphasizes how future research can refine tailored treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: Question The accurate diagnosis of early-stage rectal tumors, high-risk nodules, treatment responses, and the early prediction of patient survival and therapeutic outcomes remain an unmet need. Findings Visual MRI has improved staging, restaging, and invasiveness evaluation. Advanced MRI, radiomics and artificial intelligence provide significant potential for tumor characterization and outcome prediction. Clinical relevance Advances in visual MRI are improving routine imaging protocols and radiomics and artificial intelligence show promise in enhancing treatment decisions through precise tumor characterization and outcome prediction.

Role of microenvironment characteristics and MRI radiomics in the risk stratification of distant metastases in rectal cancer: a diagnostic study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the value of tumor stroma ratio (TSR) and radiomic signature from baseline MRI for stratifying the risk of distant metastases (DM) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 302 patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in our hospital between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were randomly allocated into the training and validation cohorts in a ratio of 7:3. Patients were followed-up for more than 3 years postoperatively with metachronous DM as the endpoint. Independent risk factors for DM-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed using Cox regression. The TSR of endoscopic biopsy specimens was scored automatically. Totally 1229 radiomic features of each tumor were extracted from baseline MRI, and the Radscore was calculated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 54.3 (51.6-57.1) months, and the 3-year DMFS was 83.8%. The best cutoff value of the TSR to distinguish a patient's DM risk was 0.477 (Sen=70.8%, Sep=78%, P <0.001). Increased TSR (HR=3.072, P =0.006) and Radscore (HR=719.231, P =0.023), advanced MR-evaluated T stage (HR=2.660, P =0.023) and ypN (HR=2.362, P =0.028) stage were independent risk factors for DMFS. The area under the curve of the combined model was significantly higher than that of the radiomic model ( P =0.013) but without a significant advantage over the TSR model ( P =0.086).

CONCLUSION

TSR of colonoscopic biopsies can independently stratify DM risk in patients with LARC. The TSR model is the most convenient and efficient method for DM risk stratification in LARC.

Rectal Cancer and Lateral Lymph Node Staging: Interobserver Agreement and Success in Predicting Locoregional Recurrence

Objectives: To evaluate the agreement among radiologists in the evaluation of rectal cancer staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant therapy) and assess whether locoregional recurrence can be predicted with this information. Materials and Methods: Pre-neoadjuvant and after-neoadjuvant therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 239 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. The agreement between the MRI findings (localization of tumor involvement, tumor coverage pattern, external sphincter involvement, mucin content of the mass and lymph node, changes in the peritoneum, MRI T stage, distance between tumor and MRF, submucosal sign, classification of locoregional lymph node, and EMVI) was discussed at the September 2023 meeting of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and the interobserver and histopathological findings were examined. The patients were evaluated according to locoregional rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) staging, and re-staging was performed using MRI images after neoadjuvant treatment. The ability of the locoregional and LLN staging system to predict locoregional recurrence was evaluated. Results: Among the parameters examined, for the MRI T stage and distance between the tumor and the MRF, a moderate agreement (kappa values: 0.61-0.80) was obtained, while for all other parameters, the interobserver agreement was notably high (kappa values 0.81-1.00). LLNs during the restaging with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 0.33-4.87, p = 0.004) and a distance between the tumor and the MRF of less than 1 mm with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 1.12-3.94, p = 0.023) affected locoregional recurrence. A multivariable Cox regression test revealed that the restaging of lymph nodes among the relevant parameters had an impact on locoregional recurrence, with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI = 0.32-1.82, p = 0.047). With the LLN staging system, an increase in stage was observed in 37 patients (15.5%), and locoregional recurrence was detected in 33 of them (89.2%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: LLN staging is not only successful in predicting locoregional recurrence among MRI parameters but is also associated with a very high level of interobserver agreement. The presence of positive LLN in the restaging phase is one of the most valuable MRI parameters for poor prognosis.

MR imaging characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe the specific MRI characteristics of different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) METHODS: This prospective study included EC patients who underwent esophageal MRI and esophagectomy between April 2015 and October 2021. Pathomorphological characteristics of EC such as localized type (LT), ulcerative type (UT), protruding type (PT), and infiltrative type (IT) were assessed by two radiologists relying on the imaging characteristics of tumor, especially the specific imaging findings on the continuity of the mucosa overlying the tumor, the opposing mucosa, mucosa linear thickening, and transmural growth pattern. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the consistency between two readers. The associations of imaging characteristics with different pathologic subtypes were assessed using multilogistic regression model (MLR).

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were identified on histopathology with a high inter-reader agreement (ICC = 0.991). LT showed intact mucosa overlying the tumor. IT showed transmural growth pattern extending from the mucosa to the adventitia and a "sandwich" appearance. The remaining normal mucosa on the opposing side was linear and nodular in UT. PT showed correlation with T1 staging and grade 1; IT showed correlation with T3 staging and grades 2-3. Four MLR models showed high predictive performance on the test set with AUCs of 0.94 (LT), 0.87 (PT), 0.96 (IT), and 0.97 (UT), respectively, and the predictors that contributed most to the models matched the four specific characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Different pathologic subtypes of EC displayed specific MR imaging characteristics, which could help predict T staging and the degree of pathological differentiation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Different pathologic subtypes of esophageal carcinoma displayed specific MR imaging characteristics, which correspond to differences in the degree of differentiation, T staging, and sensitivity to radiotherapy, and could also be one of the predictive factors of cause-specific survival and local progression-free rates.

KEY POINTS

Different types of EC had different characteristics on MR images. A total of 91/95 (96%) LTEC showed intact mucosa over the tumor, while masses or nodules are specific to PTEC; 21/27 (78%) ITEC showed a "sandwich" sign; and 33/35 (60%) UTEC showed linear and nodular opposing mucosa. In the association of tumor type with degree of differentiation and T staging, PTEC was predominantly associated with T1 and grade 1, and ITEC was associated with T3 and grades 2-3, while LTEC and UECT were likewise primarily linked with T2-3 and grades 2-3.

Low Rectal Cancers at Initial Staging MRI

Low rectal cancers, which are associated with increased risk of local recurrent disease and poorer prognosis, have unique anatomic considerations and issues for staging and treatment that do not apply to mid and high rectal cancers. Although tumor histology help drive the staging and treatment of all rectal cancers, it is of particular importance in low rectal cancers, which may involve the anal canal, to help establish whether a low rectal mass should be staged and treated as a rectal cancer (ie, adenocarcinoma) or an anal cancer (ie, squamous cell carcinoma). Optimal staging and treatment of rectal cancer are contingent on tumor location and local extent, which help guide management decisions including neoadjuvant therapy and curative surgical treatment strategies. Tumor location in the low rectum and local involvement of the anal canal, sphincter, and pelvic floor help determine whether a patient can undergo sphincter-preserving resection such as a low anterior resection versus abdominoperineal resection to achieve negative surgical margins. Issues exist related to the anatomy and patterns of disease spread that are unique to the low rectum and include how to determine and stage anal sphincter involvement, mesorectal fascia status at the pelvic floor, and nodal status of extramesorectal nodes such as the external iliac and inguinal lymph nodes. For these reasons, it is imperative that radiologists who interpret rectal cancer staging MRI examinations feel comfortable with the unique anatomy of the low rectum and anal canal, nuances of low rectal cancer local disease spread, and treatment paradigms for low rectal cancer. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Gollub in this issue.

Rectal cancer lexicon 2023 revised and updated consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel

The Society of Abdominal Radiology's Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) first published a rectal cancer lexicon paper in 2019. Since that time, the DFP has published revised initial staging and restaging reporting templates, and a new SAR user guide to accompany the rectal MRI synoptic report (primary staging). This lexicon update summarizes interval developments, while conforming to the original lexicon 2019 format. Emphasis is placed on primary staging, treatment response, anatomic terminology, nodal staging, and the utility of specific sequences in the MRI protocol. A discussion of primary tumor staging reviews updates on tumor morphology and its clinical significance, T1 and T3 subclassifications and their clinical implications, T4a and T4b imaging findings/definitions, terminology updates on the use of MRF over CRM, and the conundrum of the external sphincter. A parallel section on treatment response reviews the clinical significance of near-complete response and introduces the lexicon of "regrowth" versus "recurrence". A review of relevant anatomy incorporates updated definitions and expert consensus of anatomic landmarks, including the NCCN's new definition of rectal upper margin and sigmoid take-off. A detailed review of nodal staging is also included, with attention to tumor location relative to the dentate line and locoregional lymph node designation, a new suggested size threshold for lateral lymph nodes and their indications for use, and imaging criteria used to differentiate tumor deposits from lymph nodes. Finally, new treatment terminologies such as organ preservation, TNT, TAMIS and watch-and-wait management are introduced. This 2023 version aims to serve as a concise set of up-to-date recommendations for radiologists, and discusses terminology, classification systems, MRI and clinical staging, and the evolving concepts in diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.

The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained increasing importance in the management of rectal cancer over the last two decades. The role of MRI in patients with rectal cancer has expanded beyond the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system in both staging and restaging scenarios and has contributed to identifying "high" and "low" risk features that can be used to tailor and personalize patient treatment; for instance, selecting the patients for neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) before the total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery based on risk of recurrence. Among those features, the status of the circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), and tumor deposits (TD) have stood out. Moreover, MRI also has played a role in surgical planning, especially when the tumor is located in the low rectum, when the relationship between tumor and the anal canal is important to choose the best surgical approach, and in cases of locally advanced or recurrent tumors invading adjacent pelvic organs that may require more complex surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. As approaches using organ preservation emerge, including transanal local excision and "watch-and-wait", MRI may help in the patient selection for those treatments, follow up, and detection of tumor regrowth. Additionally, potential MRI-based prognostic and predictive biomarkers, such as quantitative and semi-quantitative metrics derived from functional sequences like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), and radiomics, are under investigation. This review provides an overview of the current role of MRI in rectal cancer in staging and restaging and highlights the main areas under investigation and future perspectives.

The Role of Transanal Endoscopic Surgery for Early Rectal Cancer

Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES), which is performed through a variety of transanal endoluminal multitasking surgical platforms, was developed to facilitate endoscopic en bloc excision of rectal lesions as a minimally invasive alternative to radical proctectomy. Although the oncologic safety of TES in the treatment of malignant rectal tumors has been an area of vigorous controversy over the past two decades, TES is currently accepted as an oncologically safe approach for the treatment of carefully selected early and superficial rectal cancers. TES can also serve as both a diagnostic and potentially curative treatment of partially resected unsuspected malignant polyps. In this article, indications and contraindications for transanal endoscopic excision of early rectal cancer lesions are reviewed, as well as selection criteria for the most appropriate transanal excisional approach. Preoperative preparation and surgical technique for complications of TES will be reviewed, as well as recommended surveillance and management of upstaged tumors.