Vascular Deformation Mapping for CT Surveillance of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Growth

Identifying heterogeneous micromechanical properties of biological tissues via physics-informed neural networks

The heterogeneous micromechanical properties of biological tissues have profound implications across diverse medical and engineering domains. However, identifying the full-field heterogeneous elastic properties of soft materials using traditional computational and engineering approaches is fundamentally challenging due to difficulties in estimating local stress fields. Recently, there has been a growing interest in using data-driven models to learn full-field mechanical responses such as displacement and strain from experimental or synthetic data. However, research studies on inferring the full-field elastic properties of materials, a more challenging problem, are scarce, particularly for large deformation, hyperelastic materials. Here, we propose a physics-informed machine learning approach to identify the elastic modulus distribution in nonlinear, large deformation hyperelastic materials. We evaluate the prediction accuracies and computational efficiency of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) on inferring the heterogeneous material parameter maps across three nonlinear materials with structural complexity that closely resemble real tissue patterns, such as brain tissue and tricuspid valve tissue. Our improved PINN architecture accurately estimates the full-field elastic properties of three hyperelastic constitutive models, with relative errors of less than 5% across all examples. This research has significant potential for advancing our understanding of micromechanical behaviors in biological materials, impacting future innovations in engineering and medicine.

Mechanisms of Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital heart disease and exposes patients to an increased risk of aortic dilation and dissection. Aortic dilation is a slow, silent process, leading to a greater risk of aortic dissection. The prevention of adverse events together with optimization of the frequency of the required lifelong imaging surveillance are important for both clinicians and patients and motivated extensive research to shed light on the physiopathologic processes involved in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. Two main research hypotheses have been consolidated in the last decade: one supports a genetic basis for the increased prevalence of dilation, in particular for the aortic root, and the second supports the damaging impact on the aortic wall of altered flow dynamics associated with these structurally abnormal valves, particularly significant in the ascending aorta. Current opinion tends to rule out mutually excluding causative mechanisms, recognizing both as important and potentially clinically relevant.

Three-Dimensional Characterization of Aortic Root Motion by Vascular Deformation Mapping

The aorta is in constant motion due to the combination of cyclic loading and unloading with its mechanical coupling to the contractile left ventricle (LV) myocardium. This aortic root motion has been proposed as a marker for aortic disease progression. Aortic root motion extraction techniques have been mostly based on 2D image analysis and have thus lacked a rigorous description of the different components of aortic root motion (e.g., axial versus in-plane). In this study, we utilized a novel technique termed vascular deformation mapping (VDM(D)) to extract 3D aortic root motion from dynamic computed tomography angiography images. Aortic root displacement (axial and in-plane), area ratio and distensibility, axial tilt, aortic rotation, and LV/Ao angles were extracted and compared for four different subject groups: non-aneurysmal, TAA, Marfan, and repair. The repair group showed smaller aortic root displacement, aortic rotation, and distensibility than the other groups. The repair group was also the only group that showed a larger relative in-plane displacement than relative axial displacement. The Marfan group showed the largest heterogeneity in aortic root displacement, distensibility, and age. The non-aneurysmal group showed a negative correlation between age and distensibility, consistent with previous studies. Our results revealed a strong positive correlation between LV/Ao angle and relative axial displacement and a strong negative correlation between LV/Ao angle and relative in-plane displacement. VDM(D)-derived 3D aortic root motion can be used in future studies to define improved boundary conditions for aortic wall stress analysis.

Registry of Aortic Diseases to Model Adverse Events and Progression (ROADMAP) in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Study Design and Rationale

Purpose

To describe the design and methodological approach of a multicenter, retrospective study to externally validate a clinical and imaging-based model for predicting the risk of late adverse events in patients with initially uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD).

Materials and Methods

The Registry of Aortic Diseases to Model Adverse Events and Progression (ROADMAP) is a collaboration between 10 academic aortic centers in North America and Europe. Two centers have previously developed and internally validated a recently developed risk prediction model. Clinical and imaging data from eight ROADMAP centers will be used for external validation. Patients with uTBAD who survived the initial hospitalization between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, with follow-up until 2020, will be retrospectively identified. Clinical and imaging data from the index hospitalization and all follow-up encounters will be collected at each center and transferred to the coordinating center for analysis. Baseline and follow-up CT scans will be evaluated by cardiovascular imaging experts using a standardized technique.

Results

The primary end point is the occurrence of late adverse events, defined as aneurysm formation (≥6 cm), rapid expansion of the aorta (≥1 cm/y), fatal or nonfatal aortic rupture, new refractory pain, uncontrollable hypertension, and organ or limb malperfusion. The previously derived multivariable model will be externally validated by using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling.

Conclusion

This study will show whether a recent clinical and imaging-based risk prediction model for patients with uTBAD can be generalized to a larger population, which is an important step toward individualized risk stratification and therapy.Keywords: CT Angiography, Vascular, Aorta, Dissection, Outcomes Analysis, Aortic Dissection, MRI, TEVAR© RSNA, 2022See also the commentary by Rajiah in this issue.

Validation of a robust method for quantification of three-dimensional growth of the thoracic aorta using deformable image registration

PURPOSE

Accurate assessment of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) growth is important for appropriate clinical management. Maximal aortic diameter is the primary metric that is used to assess growth, but it suffers from substantial measurement variability. A recently proposed technique, termed vascular deformation mapping (VDM), is able to quantify three-dimensional aortic growth using clinical computed tomography angiography (CTA) data using an approach based on deformable image registration (DIR). However, the accuracy and robustness of VDM remains undefined given the lack of ground truth from clinical CTA data, and, furthermore, the performance of VDM relative to standard manual diameter measurements is unknown.

METHODS

To evaluate the performance of the VDM pipeline for quantifying aortic growth, we developed a novel and systematic evaluation process to generate 76 unique synthetic CTA growth phantoms (based on 10 unique cases) with variable degrees and locations of aortic wall deformation. Aortic deformation was quantified using two metrics: area ratio (AR), defined as the ratio of surface area in triangular mesh elements and the magnitude of deformation in the normal direction (DiN) relative to the aortic surface. Using these phantoms, we further investigated the effects on VDM's measurement accuracy resulting from factors that influence the quality of clinical CTA data such as respiratory translations, slice thickness, and image noise. Lastly, we compare the measurement error of VDM TAA growth assessments against two expert raters performing standard diameter measurements of synthetic phantom images.

RESULTS

Across our population of 76 synthetic growth phantoms, the median absolute error was 0.063 (IQR: 0.073-0.054) for AR and 0.181 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.214-0.143 mm) for DiN. Median relative error was 1.4% for AR and3.3 % $3.3\%$ for DiN at the highest tested noise level (contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR] = 2.66). Error in VDM output increased with slice thickness, with the highest median relative error of 1.5% for AR and 4.1% for DiN at a slice thickness of 2.0 mm. Respiratory motion of the aorta resulted in maximal absolute error of 3% AR and 0.6 mm in DiN, but bulk translations in aortic position had a very small effect on measured AR and DiN values (relative errors< 1 % $< 1\%$ ). VDM-derived measurements of magnitude and location of maximal diameter change demonstrated significantly high accuracy and lower variability compared to two expert manual raters (p < 0.03 $p<0.03$ across all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

VDM yields an accurate, three-dimensional assessment of aortic growth in TAA patients and is robust to factors such as image noise, respiration-induced translations, and differences in patient position. Further, VDM significantly outperformed two expert manual raters in assessing the magnitude and location of aortic growth despite optimized experimental measurement conditions. These results support validation of the VDM technique for accurate quantification of aortic growth in patients and highlight several important advantages over diameter measurements.