MRI Shows Lung Perfusion Changes after Vaping and Smoking

Altered insular functional activity among electronic cigarettes users with nicotine dependence

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) use, especially among youngsters, has been on the rise in recent years. However, little is known about the long-term effects of the use of e-cigs on brain functional activity. We acquired the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data from 93 e-cigs users with nicotine dependence and 103 health controls (HC). The local synchronization was analyzed via the regional homogeneity (ReHo) method at voxel-wise level. The functional connectivity (FC) between the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), the ventral tegmental area (VTA), and the insula was calculated at ROI-wise level. The support vector machining classification model based on rs-fMRI measures was used to identify e-cigs users from HC. Compared with HC, nicotine-dependent e-cigs users showed increased ReHo in the right rolandic operculum and the right insula (p < 0.05, FDR corrected). At the ROI-wise level, abnormal FCs between the NAcc, the VTA, and the insula were found in e-cigs users compared to HC (p < 0.05, FDR corrected). Correlation analysis found a significant negative correlation between ReHo in the left NAcc and duration of e-cigs use (r = -0.273, p = 0.008, FDR corrected). The following support vector machine model based on significant results of rs-fMRI successfully differentiates chronic e-cigs users from HC with an accuracy of 73.47%, an AUC of 0.781, a sensitivity of 67.74%, and a specificity of 78.64%. Dysregulated spontaneous activity and FC of addiction-related regions were found in e-cigs users with nicotine dependence, which provides crucial insights into the prevention of its initial use and intervention for quitting e-cigs.

Evidence and unresolved questions in pulmonary hypertension: Insights from the 5th French Pulmonary Hypertension Network Meeting

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) continues to present significant challenges to the medical community, both in terms of diagnosis and treatment. The advent of the updated 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines has introduced pivotal changes that reflect the rapidly advancing understanding of this complex disease. These changes include a revised definition of PH, updates to the classification system, and treatment algorithm. While these guidelines offer a critical framework for the management of PH, they have also sparked new discussions and questions. The 5th French Pulmonary Hypertension Network Meeting (Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 2023), addressed these emergent questions and fostering a deeper understanding of the disease's multifaceted nature. These discussions were not limited to theoretical advancements but extended into the practical realms of patient management, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in applying the latest guidelines to clinical practice.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lung Perfusion

"Lung perfusion" in the context of imaging conventionally refers to the delivery of blood to the pulmonary capillary bed through the pulmonary arteries originating from the right ventricle required for oxygenation. The most important physiological mechanism in the context of imaging is the so-called hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV, also known as "Euler-Liljestrand-Reflex"), which couples lung perfusion to lung ventilation. In obstructive airway diseases such as asthma, chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), and asthma, HPV downregulates pulmonary perfusion in order to redistribute blood flow to functional lung areas in order to conserve optimal oxygenation. Imaging of lung perfusion can be seen as a reflection of lung ventilation in obstructive airway diseases. Other conditions that primarily affect lung perfusion are pulmonary vascular diseases, pulmonary hypertension, or (chronic) pulmonary embolism, which also lead to inhomogeneity in pulmonary capillary blood distribution. Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques either dependent on exogenous contrast materials, exploiting periodical lung signal variations with cardiac action, or relying on intrinsic lung voxel attributes have been demonstrated to visualize lung perfusion. Additional post-processing may add temporal information and provide quantitative information related to blood flow. The most widely used and robust technique, dynamic-contrast enhanced MRI, is available in clinical routine assessment of COPD, CF, and pulmonary vascular disease. Non-contrast techniques are important research tools currently requiring clinical validation and cross-correlation in the absence of a viable standard of reference. First data on many of these techniques in the context of observational studies assessing therapy effects have just become available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

MR Perfusion Imaging of the Lung

Lung perfusion assessment is critical for diagnosing and monitoring a variety of respiratory conditions. MRI perfusion provides a radiation-free technique, making it an ideal choice for longitudinal imaging in younger populations. This review focuses on the techniques and applications of MRI perfusion, including contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI and non-CE methods such as arterial spin labeling (ASL), fourier decomposition (FD), and hyperpolarized 129-Xenon (129-Xe) MRI. ASL leverages endogenous water protons as tracers for a non-invasive measure of lung perfusion, while FD offers simultaneous measurements of lung perfusion and ventilation, enabling the generation of ventilation/perfusion mapsHyperpolarized 129-Xe MRI emerges as a novel tool for assessing regional gas exchange in the lungs. Despite the promise of MRI perfusion techniques, challenges persist, including competition with other imaging techniques and the need for additional validation and standardization. In conditions such as cystic fibrosis and lung cancer, MRI has displayed encouraging results, whereas in diseases like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, further validation remains necessary. In conclusion, while MRI perfusion techniques hold immense potential for a comprehensive, non-invasive assessment of lung function and perfusion, their broader clinical adoption hinges on technological advancements, collaborative research, and rigorous validation.

Review of quantitative and functional lung imaging evidence of vaping-related lung injury

Introduction

The pulmonary effects of e-cigarette use (or vaping) became a healthcare concern in 2019, following the rapid increase of e-cigarette-related or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI) in young people, which resulted in the critical care admission of thousands of teenagers and young adults. Pulmonary functional imaging is well-positioned to provide information about the acute and chronic effects of vaping. We generated a systematic review to retrieve relevant imaging studies that describe the acute and chronic imaging findings that underly vaping-related lung structure-function abnormalities.

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken on June 13th, 2023 using PubMed to search for published manuscripts using the following criteria: [("Vaping" OR "e-cigarette" OR "EVALI") AND ("MRI" OR "CT" OR "Imaging")]. We included only studies involving human participants, vaping/e-cigarette use, and MRI, CT and/or PET.

Results

The search identified 445 manuscripts, of which 110 (668 unique participants) specifically mentioned MRI, PET or CT imaging in cases or retrospective case series of patients who vaped. This included 105 manuscripts specific to CT (626 participants), three manuscripts which mainly used MRI (23 participants), and two manuscripts which described PET findings (20 participants). Most studies were conducted in North America (n = 90), with the remaining studies conducted in Europe (n = 15), Asia (n = 4) and South America (n = 1). The vast majority of publications described case studies (n = 93) and a few described larger retrospective or prospective studies (n = 17). In e-cigarette users and patients with EVALI, key CT findings included ground-glass opacities, consolidations and subpleural sparing, MRI revealed abnormal ventilation, perfusion and ventilation/perfusion matching, while PET showed evidence of pulmonary inflammation.

Discussion and conclusion

Pulmonary structural and functional imaging abnormalities were common in patients with EVALI and in e-cigarette users with or without respiratory symptoms, which suggests that functional MRI may be helpful in the investigation of the pulmonary health effects associated with e-cigarette use.

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

BACKGROUND

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are handheld electronic vaping devices which produce an aerosol by heating an e-liquid. People who smoke, healthcare providers and regulators want to know if ECs can help people quit smoking, and if they are safe to use for this purpose. This is a review update conducted as part of a living systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of using electronic cigarettes (ECs) to help people who smoke tobacco achieve long-term smoking abstinence, in comparison to non-nicotine EC, other smoking cessation treatments and no treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialized Register to 1 February 2023, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO to 1 July 2023, and reference-checked and contacted study authors.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included trials in which people who smoke were randomized to an EC or control condition. We also included uncontrolled intervention studies in which all participants received an EC intervention as these studies have the potential to provide further information on harms and longer-term use. Studies had to report an eligible outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methods for screening and data extraction. Critical outcomes were abstinence from smoking after at least six months, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). We used a fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences. Where appropriate, we pooled data in pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 88 completed studies (10 new to this update), representing 27,235 participants, of which 47 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of the included studies, we rated ten (all but one contributing to our main comparisons) at low risk of bias overall, 58 at high risk overall (including all non-randomized studies), and the remainder at unclear risk. There is high certainty that nicotine EC increases quit rates compared to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.93; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 2544 participants). In absolute terms, this might translate to an additional four quitters per 100 (95% CI 2 to 6 more). There is moderate-certainty evidence (limited by imprecision) that the rate of occurrence of AEs is similar between groups (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.17; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 2052 participants). SAEs were rare, and there is insufficient evidence to determine whether rates differ between groups due to very serious imprecision (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.60; I2 = 32%; 6 studies, 2761 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is moderate-certainty evidence, limited by imprecision, that nicotine EC increases quit rates compared to non-nicotine EC (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.96; I2 = 4%; 6 studies, 1613 participants). In absolute terms, this might lead to an additional three quitters per 100 (95% CI 1 to 7 more). There is moderate-certainty evidence of no difference in the rate of AEs between these groups (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.11; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 1840 participants). There is insufficient evidence to determine whether rates of SAEs differ between groups, due to very serious imprecision (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.79; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 1412 participants; low-certainty evidence). Due to issues with risk of bias, there is low-certainty evidence that, compared to behavioural support only/no support, quit rates may be higher for participants randomized to nicotine EC (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.25; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 5024 participants). In absolute terms, this represents an additional four quitters per 100 (95% CI 2 to 5 more). There was some evidence that (non-serious) AEs may be more common in people randomized to nicotine EC (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.32; I2 = 41%, low-certainty evidence; 4 studies, 765 participants) and, again, insufficient evidence to determine whether rates of SAEs differed between groups (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34; I2 = 23%; 10 studies, 3263 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Results from the NMA were consistent with those from pairwise meta-analyses for all critical outcomes, and there was no indication of inconsistency within the networks. Data from non-randomized studies were consistent with RCT data. The most commonly reported AEs were throat/mouth irritation, headache, cough, and nausea, which tended to dissipate with continued EC use. Very few studies reported data on other outcomes or comparisons, hence, evidence for these is limited, with CIs often encompassing both clinically significant harm and benefit.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is high-certainty evidence that ECs with nicotine increase quit rates compared to NRT and moderate-certainty evidence that they increase quit rates compared to ECs without nicotine. Evidence comparing nicotine EC with usual care/no treatment also suggests benefit, but is less certain due to risk of bias inherent in the study design. Confidence intervals were for the most part wide for data on AEs, SAEs and other safety markers, with no difference in AEs between nicotine and non-nicotine ECs nor between nicotine ECs and NRT. Overall incidence of SAEs was low across all study arms. We did not detect evidence of serious harm from nicotine EC, but the longest follow-up was two years and the number of studies was small. The main limitation of the evidence base remains imprecision due to the small number of RCTs, often with low event rates. Further RCTs are underway. To ensure the review continues to provide up-to-date information to decision-makers, this review is a living systematic review. We run searches monthly, with the review updated when relevant new evidence becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the review's current status.

A Comprehensive Review on the Impacts of Smoking on the Health of an Individual

Long-term smoking for several years has been known to cause severe ailments in humans from the beginning. Even after knowing that this dangerous addiction is a life-threatening deal, still, ironically, the prevalence of smoking is more or less not getting reduced to a desirable extent. Those who smoke are becoming miserable because of their habit of smoking. Still, on the other hand, due to passive smoking, many more innocent lives are also adversely affected for no fault. This aspect of smoking, i.e., passive or second-hand smoking, is a fearful complication of smoking which is seldom seen with other modes of addiction. Time and again, numerous researches have highlighted the adverse effects of smoking on the human body and the interference it does bring in one's life. Smoking contributes to the deterioration of many preexisting ailments and depletes many valuable aspects of the human body. Smoking thus has a devastating effect on almost all of the tissues of our body and thus exerts its effect on nearly all the major organs. This review article is made by analysing various findings from many researches conducted across the globe by having a thorough search of Pubmed database, which in turn is the main methodology of the article. This review article aims to provide a simple and subtle understanding of the ill effects of smoking on the human body by serving the readers with a readymade platter of comprehensive knowledge about smoking coupled with efforts to eliminate the associated myths.

MR imaging of the airways

The need for airway imaging is defined by the limited sensitivity of common clinical tests like spirometry, lung diffusion (DLCO) and blood gas analysis to early changes of peripheral airways and to inhomogeneous regional distribution of lung function deficits. Therefore, X-ray and computed tomography (CT) are frequently used to complement the standard tests.As an alternative, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers radiation-free lung imaging, but at lower spatial resolution. Non-contrast enhanced MRI shows healthy airways down to the first subsegmental level/4^th order (CT: eighth). Bronchiectasis can be identified by wall thickening and fluid accumulation. Smaller airways become visible, when altered by peribronchiolar inflammation or mucus retention (tree-in-bud sign).The strength of MRI is functional imaging. Dynamic, time-resolved MRI directly visualizes expiratory airway collapse down to the lobar level (CT: segmental level). Obstruction of even smaller airways becomes visible as air trapping on the expiratory scans. MRI with hyperpolarized noble gases (³He, ¹²⁹Xe) directly shows the large airways and peripheral lung ventilation. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI) indirectly shows airway dysfunction as perfusion deficits resulting from hypoxic vasoconstriction of the dependent lung volumes. Further promising scientific approaches such as non-contrast enhanced, ventilation-/perfusion-weighted MRI from periodic signal changes of respiration and blood flow are in development.In summary, MRI of the lungs and airways excels with its unique combination of morphologic and functional imaging capacities for research (e.g., in chronic obstructive lung disease or asthma) as well as for clinical imaging (e.g., in cystic fibrosis).