Esophageal malignancy: imaging results and complications of combined endoscopic-radiologic palliation

Palliative treatment of inoperable malignant esophageal strictures with metal stents: one center's experience with four different stents

PURPOSE

Our center's experience with Ultraflex, Flamingo, SR stent and Flexstent for the palliation of malignant esophageal strictures is reported, and current pertinent literature is reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Stents have been placed under fluoroscopic guidance between August 1993 and February 2002 for the palliation of malignant dysphagia in 116 patients. 59 patients received Ultraflex, 33 patients received Flamingo Wallstent, 20 patients received the SR stent and four patients received Flexstent.

RESULTS

Stent placement was successful in all the patients, with good symptomatic control in 123 out of 126 patients (98%) and no procedure-related complications. Four esophagorespiratory fistulas were successfully closed with covered Flamingo stents. Repeat intervention was necessary in 30 patients (51%) who received the Ultraflex stent, secondary to tumor ingrowth, overgrowth, ulceration, fistula and incomplete expansion. Two patients (6%) who received Flamingo Wallstent died due to gastrointestinal bleeding and one patient had proximal migration. Four patients (20%) who received the SR stent had complete migration of the stent.

CONCLUSION

Covered stents were found to provide better long-term palliation compared to uncovered stents. The covered Flamingo Wallstent seems to be the best choice of stent for lesions where crossing the esophagogastric junction is not necessary. For lesions where it is mandatory to cross the junction it may be preferable to use a stent with an antireflux mechanism.

Endoscopic ultrasound for staging esophageal cancer, with or without dilation, is clinically important and safe

BACKGROUND

To fully evaluate patients with esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), the transducer must pass through the entire tumor to the cardia to scan the celiac axis. Dilation may be necessary. Published information suggests that dilation with EUS carries a sizeable risk.

METHODS

In order to assess the complication rate associated with dilation prior to EUS in patients with esophageal cancer and the clinical significance of dilation for complete EUS staging, we reviewed the records of all patients who had undergone EUS for esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients underwent EUS staging of esophageal cancer. Thirty-nine (62%) had lesions through which the EUS scope was passable (Group I). Ten (16%) patients (Group II) had lesions through which an EUS scope (diameter 13 mm) was unable to pass even after dilation. Fourteen patients (22%) had lesions that were dilated to allow passage of the EUS scope (Group III). All patients in Groups II and III had confirmation of EUS staging by CT and/or surgery. In Group II, five patients had tumors defined as T4 (50%) and five as T3 (50%). In Group III, nine (64%) had T4 tumors, four (29%) had T3, and one (7.7%) had T2. No complications were encountered in any group.

CONCLUSION

EUS, either alone or after dilation, is a safe procedure and the complete EUS examination with celiac node visualization adds prognostically significant information.

High-grade malignant stricture is predictive of esophageal tumor stage. Risks of endosonographic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Endosonography is very accurate for the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma. Approximately 20-38% of patients with esophageal carcinoma present with high-grade malignant strictures that preclude passage of the dedicated echoendoscope. In patients with such strictures, endosonographic staging of esophageal tumors may be performed after aggressive esophageal dilatation. However, aggressive dilatation and passage of the echoendoscope in patients with high-grade malignant strictures is not without risk. A detailed assessment of the tumor stage in patients presenting with high-grade malignant stenoses has not been previously reported to the authors' knowledge.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with esophageal carcinoma were staged preoperatively using endosonography. The results of preoperative staging were compared with the pathologic stage of the esophagectomy specimen when available or the surgical stage (detection of adjacent organ involvement [Stage T4] or metastatic disease [Stage M1] at the time of surgery).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (26.6%) presented with high-grade malignant strictures precluding endosonographic examination without prior esophageal dilatation. Nineteen of the 21 patients (91%) with high-grade malignant stricture had Stage III or IV disease by histopathologic examination of the surgical specimen. Five of these 21 patients (24%) sustained an esophageal perforation as a result of either wire-guided dilatation, or as a direct consequence of the endosonographic staging procedure. The discovery of metastatic lymph nodes proximal to the stricture resulted in successful staging (assessment of depth of tumor penetration and lymph node involvement) in only 2 of these 21 patients before esophageal dilatation (incomplete staging). Staging of the proximal aspect of the tumor was obtained in the remaining 19 patients before dilatation; however, the accuracy for such incomplete staging was only 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with esophageal carcinoma presenting with high-grade malignant strictures precluding endoscope passage without prior dilatation have a relatively advanced stage of disease (Stage III or IV) compared with those patients presenting with less severe stenoses. There is a significant risk for esophageal perforation (24%) when patients with high-grade malignant esophageal strictures undergo preoperative staging using endosonography. Patients with high-grade malignant strictures, therefore, present a relative contraindication to endosonography using the dedicated echoendoscope.