Postoperative bone marrow alterations: potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis with In-111-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy

Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone. Medical imaging tests, such as radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are often used to diagnose osteomyelitis.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, inter-rater reliability and implementation of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception to July 2018.

REVIEW METHODS

Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 [quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (version 2)]. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using bivariate regression models. Imaging tests were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the location and nature of the suspected osteomyelitis. Studies of children, inter-rater reliability and implementation outcomes were synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies were included (diagnostic accuracy: 77 studies; inter-rater reliability: 11 studies; implementation: one study; some studies were included in two reviews). One-quarter of diagnostic accuracy studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias. In adults, MRI had high diagnostic accuracy [95.6% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) 92.4% to 97.5%; 80.7% specificity, 95% CI 70.8% to 87.8%]. PET also had high accuracy (85.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.5% to 92.9%; 92.8% specificity, 95% CI 83.0% to 97.1%), as did SPECT (95.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 87.8% to 98.1%; 82.0% specificity, 95% CI 61.5% to 92.8%). There was similar diagnostic performance with MRI, PET and SPECT. Scintigraphy (83.6% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.8% to 91.1%; 70.6% specificity, 57.7% to 80.8%), computed tomography (69.7% sensitivity, 95% CI 40.1% to 88.7%; 90.2% specificity, 95% CI 57.6% to 98.4%) and radiography (70.4% sensitivity, 95% CI 61.6% to 77.8%; 81.5% specificity, 95% CI 69.6% to 89.5%) all had generally inferior diagnostic accuracy. Technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime white blood cell scintigraphy (87.3% sensitivity, 95% CI 75.1% to 94.0%; 94.7% specificity, 95% CI 84.9% to 98.3%) had higher diagnostic accuracy, similar to that of PET or MRI. There was no evidence that diagnostic accuracy varied by scan location or cause of osteomyelitis, although data on many scan locations were limited. Diagnostic accuracy in diabetic foot patients was similar to the overall results. Only three studies in children were identified; results were too limited to draw any conclusions. Eleven studies evaluated inter-rater reliability. MRI had acceptable inter-rater reliability. We found only one study on test implementation and no evidence on patient preferences or cost-effectiveness of imaging tests for osteomyelitis.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies included < 50 participants and were poorly reported. There was limited evidence for children, ultrasonography and on clinical factors other than diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteomyelitis is reliably diagnosed by MRI, PET and SPECT. No clear reason to prefer one test over the other in terms of diagnostic accuracy was identified. The wider availability of MRI machines, and the fact that MRI does not expose patients to harmful ionising radiation, may mean that MRI is preferable in most cases. Diagnostic accuracy does not appear to vary with the potential cause of osteomyelitis or with the body part scanned. Considerable uncertainty remains over the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests in children. Studies of diagnostic accuracy in children, particularly using MRI and ultrasound, are needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068511.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging

Prosthetic joint replacement surgery is performed with increasing frequency. Overall the incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and subsequently prosthesis revision failure is estimated to be between 1 and 3%. Differentiating infection from aseptic mechanical loosening, which is the most common cause of prosthetic failure, is especially important because of different types of therapeutic management. Despite a thorough patient history, physical examination, multiple diagnostic tests and complex algorithms, differentiating PJI from aseptic loosening remains challenging. Among imaging modalities, radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific and cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, are limited by hardware-induced artefacts. Radionuclide imaging reflects functional rather than anatomical changes and is not hampered by the presence of a metallic joint prosthesis. As a result scintigraphy is currently the modality of choice in the investigation of suspected PJI. Unfortunately, there is no true consensus about the gold standard technique since there are several drawbacks and limitations inherent to each modality. Bone scintigraphy (BS) is sensitive for identifying the failed joint replacement, but cannot differentiate between infection and aseptic loosening. Combined bone/gallium scintigraphy (BS/GS) offers modest improvement over BS alone for diagnosing PJI. However, due to a number of drawbacks, BS/GS has generally been superseded by other techniques but it still may have a role in neutropenic patients. Radiolabelled leucocyte scintigraphy remains the gold standard technique for diagnosing neutrophil-mediated processes. It seems to be that combined in vitro labelled leucocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy (LS/BMS), with an accuracy of about 90%, is currently the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing PJI. There are, however, significant limitations using in vitro labelled leucocytes and considerable effort has been devoted to developing alternative radiotracers, such as radiolabelled HIGs, liposomes, antigranulocyte antibodies and fragments, as well as more investigational tracers such as radiolabelled antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages and thymidine kinase. On the other hand, positron emission tomography (PET) is still growing in the field of PJI imaging with radiotracers such as (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), (18)F-FDG white blood cells and (18)F-fluoride. But unfortunately this superb tomographic technique will only receive full acceptance when specific PET uptake patterns can be successfully developed. The emergence of hybrid modality imaging using integrated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and PET with computed tomography (SPECT/CT and PET/CT) may also have a contributing role for more accurate assessment of joint replacement complications, especially combined with new radiotracers such as (68)Ga and (64)Cu. Finally, in searching for infection-specific tracers, currently there is no such diagnostic agent available.

99mTc-HMPAO labelled white blood cell scintigraphy in patients with osteoarticular infection: the value of late images for diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reproducibility

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value of 99mTc-HMPAO labelled white blood cell scintigraphy (WBCS) in patients with suspected osteomyelitis using late images and to study interobserver reproducibility. This study prospectively included 120 patients, and after a follow-up of one year, only 70 patients (n = 49 with implants, n = 21 without implants) were selected. The final diagnosis of infection was based either on microbiological data (n = 54) or follow-up (n = 16). We performed WBCS with 4 h and 24 h scans. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 77%, 72%, 83%, 64%, and 75% at 4 h, and 74%, 87%, 91%, 59%, and 79% at 24 h, respectively. The interobserver reproducibility shows a 63% prevalence of agreement between results (kappa = 0.5) at 4 h and 80% (kappa = 0.74) at 24 h, respectively. WBCS with 24-h images improves specificity and interobserver reproducibility in patients with suspected osteoarticular sepsis.

Imaging of musculoskeletal infections

Imaging procedures are routinely used to evaluate patients suspected of having musculoskeletal infection. Radiographs should be performed whenever musculoskeletal infection is suspected. Even when not diagnostic, radiographs are useful. They provide an anatomic overview of the region of interest, including pre-existing conditions that could influence the selection and interpretation of subsequent procedures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive, provides superb anatomic detail, does not use ionizing radiation, and is rapidly completed. This technique is especially valuable for septic arthritis, spinal osteomyelitis, and diabetic foot infections. Among the radionuclide procedures, three-phase bone imaging is readily available, and very accurate in unviolated bone. Labeled leukocyte imaging should be used in cases of 'complicating osteomyelitis' such as prosthetic joint infections. This test is also useful in unsuspected diabetic pedal osteomyelitis and the neuropathic joint. Gallium imaging is a useful adjunct to MIR in spinal infection. 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) will likely play an important role, especially in the evaluation of spinal infection.

Combined labeled leukocyte and technetium 99m sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging for diagnosing musculoskeletal infection

The use of labeled leukocyte (white blood cell [WBC]) studies in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis can be problematic. A combined study consisting of WBC imaging and complementary bone marrow imaging performed with technetium 99m (99mTc) sulfur colloid is approximately 90% accurate and is especially useful for diagnosing osteomyelitis in situations involving altered marrow distribution. There are limitations and pitfalls associated with a combined study. If there is no labeled WBC activity in the region of interest, marrow imaging is not useful. The sulfur colloid image becomes photopenic within about 1 week after the onset of infection, so that the study should be interpreted cautiously in the acute setting. Labeled WBC accumulation in lymph nodes can also confound image interpretation, although nodal activity can usually be recognized because it is typically round, discrete, multifocal, linear in distribution, and often bilateral. Furthermore, 99mTc-sulfur colloid that is improperly prepared or is more than about 2 hours old degrades image quality, potentially causing erroneous conclusions. Nevertheless, WBC-marrow imaging is a very accurate technique for diagnosing osteomyelitis. Knowledge of the criteria for image interpretation and of the aforementioned limitations and pitfalls, combined with careful attention to imaging technique, will maximize the value of this study.

Osteomyelitis: clinical update for practical guidelines

Bone infections represent a diagnostic or therapeutic challenge for the infectivologist, orthopaedic surgeon, radiologist and nuclear medicine physician. Staphylococcus aureus is the major bacterium responsible for bone infections although Mycobacterium tuberculosis is emerging as an infectious agent in Italy because of immigration from Africa and Asia. Osteomyelitis requires long and expensive antibiotic treatment, including rifampicin administered parenterally for several weeks and the use of antimicrobial-impregnated cement in prosthesis substitution. Sometimes it is necessary to carry out surgical debridement of a necrotic bone or the consolidation of compromised bones and joint prosthesis implants. Radiographs and bone cultures are mainstays for the diagnosis of bone infections but are often useless in the lengthy management of these patients. Diagnosis of skeletal infections still includes conventional radiography but magnetic resonance imaging is essential in haematogenous and spinal infections. Bone scans are still useful in acute osteomyelitis whereas scintigraphy using labelled white blood cells is preferred in infections of peripheral bone segments or joint prosthesis. In the axial skeleton a combination of an agent for detecting inflammation ((67)Ga citrate) and a metabolic agent ((99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate) enables an infection and an area of increased metabolic activity to be distinguished. [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, where available, has a significant impact in the study of infections using radionuclides: high-resolution tomographic images represent an effective alternative to gallium in the assessment of inflammation of spine lesions but a comparison with morphological examinations (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) is essential.

Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty

Modification of MRI pulse sequence parameters has permitted imaging of arthroplasty and the surrounding soft tissue envelope, enabling detection of regional tendon attachments, including the hip abductors, the knee extensor mechanism, and the rotator cuff of the shoulder. The multiplanar capabilities and superior soft tissue contrast have established MRI as the most sensitive, noninvasive means to detect periacetabular osteolysis after hip arthroplasty. Detection of intrasynovial deposits that may precede bone loss and regions of neurovascular compression also is possible. An additional advantage is the lack of ionizing radiation, which is beneficial in serial examinations for the longitudinal assessment of particle disease.

What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty?

MRI has been shown to be an extremely effective instrument in the management of painful hip arthroplasty. Its superior soft tissue contrast and direct multiplanar acquisition compared to computerized tomography (CT) and radiographs allows for reproducible visualization of periacetabular osteolysis, demonstrating compression of neurovascular bundles by extracapsular synovial deposits. In addition, MRI can often elucidate etiology of neuropathy in the perioperative period and is further helpful in evaluating the soft tissue envelope, including the attachment of the hip abductors, short external rotators and iliopsoas tendon. A further advantage of MRI over CT is its lack of ionizing radiation. Most importantly, MRI can disclose intracapsular synovial deposits that precede osteoclastic resorption of bone.

The usefulness of 99mTc sulfur colloid bone marrow scintigraphy combined with 111In leucocyte scintigraphy in prosthetic joint infection

AIM

To assess the extent to which bone marrow scintigraphy (BMS) makes the interpretation of leucocyte scintigraphy (LS) easier and improves its diagnostic value.

METHODS

Seventy-three 111In LSs, 99mTc hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphies (BSs) and 99mTc sulfur colloid BMSs were performed in 60 patients with suspected infection related to a hip prosthesis or knee prosthesis, either in situ (+group, n = 43) or after removal for septic loosening (-group, n = 30). Bacteriological samples were obtained from all patients. LS was interpreted together with BS (LS-BS) or with BMS (LS-BMS) by three independent readers.

RESULTS

The concordance among readers, estimated by the kappa test, was average with LS-BS (kappa/kappam coefficients = 0.58, 0.58 and 0.46, respectively, for the three pairs of readers) and excellent with LS-BMS (kappa/kappam coefficients = 1.00 for the three pairs of readers). With LS-BS, 64/219 interpretations were equivocal whereas only one was equivocal with LS-BMS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of LS-BMS were, respectively, 80%, 94% and 91% in the +group, and 33%, 100% and 93% in the -group.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that (1) the interpretation of the results for LS-BMS is very easy, in contrast to LS-BS; (2) the diagnostic value of LS-BMS for detecting infected joint prostheses is good; and (3) additional data are needed to assess the accuracy of LS-BMS when the prosthesis has been removed.

What is the role of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses?

AIM

To analyse the role played by bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses.

METHODS

The study included 77 patients, aged 32-77 years, in whom infection of a joint prosthesis (48 hip, 29 knee) was suspected. In all patients the following examinations were performed consecutively: a two-phase Tc methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) bone scan, a Tc hexamethylproplyene amine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) labelled white blood cell (WBC) scan, and a Tc microcolloid bone marrow (BM) scan. The minimum interval between examinations was 48 h. The diagnoses were based on data obtained from bacteriological cultures.

RESULTS

The bone scan was positive in all patients and 28 of them had an infection (sensitivity 100%, specificity 0%). The WBC scan was positive in 61 patients but only 27 had an infection. The WBC scan was negative in 16 patients, and the possibility of infection was discarded in 15 of these cases (sensitivity 96%, specificity 30%). The results of the bone marrow scan were not compatible with those of the WBC scan (suggestive of infection) in 27 patients: 26 of them had prosthesis infection. The results of both examinations were compatible in the other 34 patients and the possibility of infection was discarded in 33 of these patients (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 98%). The addition of a BM scan to a WBC scan decreased the sensitivity from 96% to 92.8% but increased specificity from 30% to 98%. The addition of a bone scan to this dual combination did not alter the results.

CONCLUSIONS

When infection of a prosthesis is suspected the diagnostic procedure should start with a WBC scan followed, if positive, by a BM scan. This procedure reduces the cost, the time required for a diagnosis, and the dose of radiation received by the patient.

Localizing infection with a technetium-99m-labeled peptide: initial results

In vitro-labeled leukocyte imaging is useful for the detection of infection, but an in vivo labeling method is preferable. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a leukocyte-avid peptide for the detection of infection, to determine the effects of peptide dose on performance and to compare the peptide with in vitro-labeled leukocytes. A 23-amino acid peptide, P483, containing the platelet factor-4 heparin-binding sequence, was labeled with 99mTc and complexed with heparin (P483H). Thirty patients were injected with 29 microg (n = 11), 145 microg (n = 10) or 290 microg (n = 9) of labeled peptide, and imaged 15 min and 90-120 min later. Early and late images were interpreted individually and jointly. Twenty patients underwent (111)In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy. Fourteen patients had infection: osteomyelitis (n = 7), vascular graft (n = 2), abscess (n = 2), joint replacement (n = 1), surgical wound (n = 1) and pneumonia (n = 1). There were 10 adverse events in six patients; all were mild and resolved spontaneously, and without any intervention. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were the same for both early and late imaging: 0.86, 0.81 and 0.83, respectively. Interpreting early and late images together did not improve the results. No relationship between peptide dose and study accuracy was found. In patients undergoing both examinations, the accuracies of the peptide and in vitro-labeled leukocyte imaging were identical: 0.80. In summary, 99mTc-P483H safely, rapidly and accurately detected focal infection, was comparable with in vitro-labeled leukocyte imaging and therefore merits further investigation.

Imaging of osteomyelitis in the mature skeleton

Diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis is often challenging but can be made by plain radiograph, bone scan, or MR imaging. This diagnosis may be more problematic in small bones, in diabetic or immunocompromised patients, those partially treated, post-traumatic, previous surgery, or with pre-existing marrow conditions and associated soft tissue infections. CT is the modality of choice for revealing sequestra and cortical erosions in chronic osteomyelitis. Nonenhanced and enhanced STIR or fat-saturated sequences are essential to reveal the marrow abnormality and its extension for diagnosis of subtle cases with neuropathic or other associated conditions. Combined radionuclide scintigraphy becomes necessary in complicated situations.

Radionuclide imaging in orthopedic infections

In otherwise normal bone, Three Phase Bone Scintigraphy is sensitive and specific for osteomyelitis. In patients with underlying osseous abnormalities the specificity of the study is decreased. The four phase bone scan, bone/gallium scintigraphy, leukocyte imaging, leukocyte/bone and leukocyte/marrow studies have all been reported to increase specificity. The techniques, strategies, and limitations are discussed. No single study is equally useful in all situations. Labeled leukocyte imaging is of little value in vertebral osteomyelitis because this entity often presents as a nonspecific photopenic defect. The preferred technique for the spine is bone/gallium imaging. Intense uptake, on bone scintigraphy, in two adjacent vertebrae with loss of the disc space is highly suggestive of spinal osteomyelitis. Gallium not only enhances the specificity of the diagnosis but provides information about surrounding soft tissue infection. In the diabetic foot, labeled leukocyte imaging alone is sufficient to determine the presence of osteomyelitis in the fore--foot. In the midfoot and hindfoot it may be necessary to combine leukocyte scintigraphy with bone scintigraphy to precisely localize the infection. Labeled leukocytes accumulate in the uninfected neuropathic joint and preliminary data suggest that leukocyte/marrow imaging may be useful to determine the significance of such uptake. For the painful joint replacement, if infection is the primary concern, leukocyte/marrow scintigraphy should be performed initially. If any postoperative complication, regardless of type, is the concern, it is reasonable to begin with bone scintigraphy because a normal study rules strongly against any complication. An abnormal bone scan will require additional studies to more precisely determine the cause of that abnormality.

Importance of dressing removal before radiolabeled WBC imaging for musculoskeletal infection

Leukocyte imaging performed with in-111 or Tc-99m is gaining widespread acceptance as a method for detection of osteomyelitis associated with soft tissue injury or infection. The authors present three cases in which initial imaging was suggestive of a focal infectious process in bone and soft tissue. However, repeat imaging after the removal of wound dressings, which revealed sero-sanguineous discharge in all cases, resulted in a scan appearance that was much less remarkable for focal radiotracer accumulation in the bone. The authors conclude that accumulation of labeled WBCs in wound discharge can result in scans that are false-positive for osteomyelitis. Therefore, the authors recommend that wounds should be cleaned and dressings changed before imaging in order to avoid scans that are false-positive for osteomyelitis.

Multimodality imaging of osteomyelitis

Early diagnosis of osteomyelitis continues to be a clinical problem. Multiple imaging modalities are being used for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, but none of them is ideal for all cases. The choice of modality depends on several factors based on an understanding of the pathophysiologic aspects of different forms of osteomyelitis. After a brief introduction outlining some basic principles regarding the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, pathophysiologic aspects are reviewed. Advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality and their applications in different forms of osteomyelitis are discussed. The use of different imaging modalities in the diagnosis of special forms of osteomyelitis, including chronic, diabetic foot, and vertebral osteomyelitis, and osteomyelitis associated with orthopedic appliances and sickle cell disease is reviewed. Taking into account the site of suspected osteomyelitis and the presence or absence of underlying pathologic changes and their nature, an algorithm summarizing the use of various imaging modalities in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis is presented.

Technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime leucocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections: a retrospective study in 116 patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime leucocyte scintigraphy (HMPAO-LS) by means of a retrospective review of 116 patients divided into three groups of bone and joint infection. One hundred and thirty-one LS examinations were performed, and 143 sites analysed. The final diagnosis of infection was based on surgical, histological and bacteriological data and follow-up. Ninety-four suspected localizations were examined in group 1, which included 74 patients with an infection suspected to involve orthopaedic implants. In this group, there were 38 true-positives, 1 false-negative, 49 true-negatives and 6 false-positives. Surgical confirmation was obtained in 34 cases. In group 2 (24 patients with suspected osteomyelitis), there were 27 localizations of which 14 were true-positives and 13 were true-negatives (including seven surgical confirmations). In group 3 (18 patients suspected of septic arthritis) there were eight true-positives, two false-negatives, ten true-negatives and two false-positives. Overall sensitivity of 99mTc-HMPAO-LS for the detection of bone and joint infection was 95%, with a specificity of 90% (group 1: sensitivity 97%, specificity 89%; group 2: 100% and 100%; group 3: 80% and 83%). It may be concluded that HMPAO-LS is an effective tool for the diagnosis of both bone infection involving implants and chronic osteomyelitis.

Radionuclide imaging after skeletal interventional procedures

Although nuclear medicine is often used as an adjunct to planning skeletal therapeutic interventions, its role in the assessment of these various interventional procedures, after the fact, is equally important. Skeletal therapeutic interventions studied with radionuclide imaging include bone grafts, the postoperative spine, and joint replacements. Vascularized bone grafts allow the successful reconstruction of large bone gaps. Early detection of vascular compromise permits prompt reevaluation of the vascular anastomosis so that potentially reversible causes of ischemia can be corrected. Radionuclide bone scintigraphy is a simple noninvasive method to evaluate the anastomotic patency of these grafts. Scintigraphically, vascular patency is characterized by normal or diffusely increased tracer uptake throughout the graft, whereas failure of the graft presents as photopenia. Bone scintigraphy, especially single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), is of considerable value in the work-up of patients with persistent back pain after spinal surgery. Postoperatively, spinal fusion is characterized by diffusely increased uptake of radiotracer in the fused area. In contrast, focally increased uptake has been shown to be related to bony nonunion or pseudoarthroses. In patients who have undergone laminectomy, SPECT bone scintigraphy can localize the level of maximum instability and vertebral stress. The radionuclide evaluation of joint replacement complications, especially of hip and knee prostheses, has been extensively studied for nearly 2 decades. Bone scintigraphy is probably most useful when the images are normal. Although periprosthetic sites of increased uptake may be indicative of postoperative problems such as loosening or infection, they may also merely reflect postoperative changes. Dual tracer studies, focusing primarily on the diagnosis of the infected joint replacement, have consequently become the norm. Bone-gallium scintigraphy was the earliest dual tracer modality used, with an accuracy of 60% to 80%. The current radionuclide study of choice for diagnosing the infected prosthesis is labeled leukocyte-marrow imaging. Both leukocytes and colloid tracers accumulate in marrow, whereas only leukocytes accumulate in infection. This technique facilitates the discrimination of labeled leukocyte uptake in aberrant, but not abnormal, marrow from uptake in infection. The reported accuracy of this technique consistently exceeds 90%.

Diagnosis of infection in ununited fractures. Combined imaging with indium-111-labeled leukocytes and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate

The results of combined scintigraphy in which indium-111-labeled leukocytes and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate were used were compared with the results of cultures of open bone at 102 sites of delayed union or non-union, to determine the effectiveness of this combination as a preoperative indicator of osteomyelitis. There were twenty-five true-positive, fifty-nine true-negative, eleven false-positive, four false-negative, and three indeterminate interpretations, yielding, for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, a sensitivity of 86 per cent, a specificity of 84 per cent, an accuracy of 82 per cent, a positive predictive value of 69 per cent, and a negative predictive value of 94 per cent. There were few false-negative scans; false-positive results were most likely at a metaphyseal site adjacent to a joint in which there was post-traumatic arthropathy, at the site of a failed arthrodesis, and at the site of an unstable delayed union or non-union.

Photopenic defects in marrow-containing skeleton on indium-111 leucocyte scintigraphy: prevalence at sites suspected of osteomyelitis and as an incidental finding

The skeletal distribution of red marrow-containing sites with a decreased uptake of indium-111-labelled leucocytes was examined as part of a retrospective review of 128 consecutive scans in 113 patients. The prevalence of photopenic defects was determined for sites of suspected osteomyelitis and for other skeletal locations included as part of limited or total-body surveys. Of 52 sites suspected of osteomyelitis based upon radiological and clinical data, 21 (40%) demonstrated a decreased leucocyte uptake. The prevalence of photopenia ranged from 79% (11/14) in the spine and 63% (5/8) in the pelvis to 25% (4/16) in the proximal femur and 0% elsewhere in the extremities (0/9) and in the skull (0/3). Fourteen of these 21 defects (67%) were due to active (n = 9) or healed (n = 5) osteomyelitis/discitis. All sites of active osteomyelitis showed destructive changes on correlative radiographs and were associated with infectious processes of more than 1 months duration. Thirty-seven photopenic defects were observed as incidental findings. The prevalence of photopenia as an incidental finding ranged from 0% in the skull, neck and chest to 3%-4% in the thoracolumbar spine and pelvis and 14% in the femoral heads, the latter reflecting primarily bilateral loss of femoral head marrow. No incidentally found photopenic defect reflected active osteomyelitis. At sites in the spine and pelvis with radiologic evidence of bone destruction suggestive of osteomyelitis, an absence of normal red marrow uptake of labelled leucocytes often reflects a variant presentation for active chronic infection. In contrast, incidental photopenia is uncommon at all skeletal sites except the femoral heads, and should not raise concern over unsuspected active osteomyelitis.