Hemodialysis fistula: preoperative MR venography--a promising but partial view

Magnetic Resonance Techniques in Hemodialysis access Management

In this review we describe current applications and future perspectives of MR angiography, MR flow quantification, and interventional MRI in hemodialysis access management. Each section starts with a brief overview of the main techniques that are currently available or under development. This is followed by a survey of the pertinent literature. Each section concludes with a discussion of the reported findings and an indication of research opportunities.

Upper-extremity venography: CO2 versus iodinated contrast material

PURPOSE

To determine prospectively the diagnostic performance of CO(2) venography, by using conventional venography with iodinated contrast material as the reference standard, for the preoperative evaluation of upper-limb and central veins before creation of fistulas for hemodialysis access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-two patients underwent comparative CO(2) and conventional venography of upper-extremity and central veins. Two independent observers evaluated the opacification of the veins and grade of stenosis, if present. Interobserver agreements were estimated with the Cohen kappa coefficient. Calculations of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used for intertechnique observations.

RESULTS

For CO(2) venography, global interobserver agreement was good, with a kappa value of 0.90 (range, 0.71-1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.84, 0.95). A kappa value of 0.96 (range, 0.86-1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.93, 0.99) was calculated for global interobserver agreement for conventional venography. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CO(2) venography for all vein segments were 97%, 85%, and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CO(2) venography had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 85% in the assessment of upper-limb and central vein patency and stenosis, with conventional venography used as the reference standard.

Preoperative Radiological Assessment for Vascular Access

There is increasing evidence that routine preoperative duplex scanning ultrasound cannot only increase the utilisation of native AVF for dialysis access but also allow proper selection of a target vessel with adequate luminal diameter to improve outcome. A minimum arterial diameter of 2mm is associated with successful fistula formation. A threshold for minimal venous diameter is difficult to establish. Most clinical studies use a value of 2.5mm for AVF and 4mm for prosthetic grafts. Traditional contrast venography is mandatory where there is suspicion of central vein stenosis. In predialysis patients where there is a risk of contrast nephropathy MR venography is emerging as a possible alternative.

Comparison of MS-325- and gadodiamide-enhanced MR venography of iliocaval veins

PURPOSE

To compare conventional extracellular and blood-pool magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents in "indirect" contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR venography of the iliocaval veins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine gadodiamide-enhanced 3D MR (Gd-MR) angiography studies and 12 MS-325-enhanced 3D MR (MS-325-MR) angiography studies were reviewed retrospectively. Abnormalities of the inferior vena cava (IVC) or iliac veins were not suspected before MR imaging. The MR angiography studies were reviewed with and without subtraction. Diagnostic conspicuity and subjective contrast of the various iliocaval venous segments (suprarenal IVC, infrarenal IVC, and iliac veins) and the presence of artifacts were subjectively scored by two blinded observers.

RESULTS

In the Gd-MR angiography group, the infrarenal IVC and iliac veins were visualized with good conspicuity in only 55% of segments compared to 92%-100% of segments in the MS-325-MR angiography group. Although subtraction improved subjective conspicuity and contrast relative to background in the Gd-MR angiography group, it resulted in increased artifacts and luminal blurring. Subtraction offered little diagnostic advantage in the MS-325-MR angiography group.

CONCLUSION

Indirect contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography with use of MS-325 offered significantly improved diagnostic conspicuity and contrast in iliocaval venous opacification compared to gadodiamide-enhanced studies.