Using 320-slice computed tomography to preoperatively investigate the leg perforator arterial system and design a perforator flap for patients with a soft-tissue defect in the leg

PURPOSE

To investigate the leg perforator arterial system, identify the perforator flap's pedicle artery and its projected cutaneous point using a 320-slice computed tomography (CT 320) scanner.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients with leg soft-tissue defects unilaterally underwent 320-slice CT angiography scanning (CTA 320) with 47 legs. The used method enabled investigation of the perforator arteries originating from the tibial, peroneal arteries, perforator flap's pedicle artery and its projected cutaneous point. These data were used to preoperatively design an improved flap. Then, the CT-confirmed location and length of the flap's pedicle artery were compared with intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

Findings of the CTA 320 on 47 legs showed that 217 perforator arteries with diameters of ≥0.5mm were detected; the average number of arteries per leg, their average length and diameter were 4.6±2.1, 30.7±10.4mm and 1.16±0.27mm, respectively. The perforator arteries originating from the anterior tibial artery were mainly distributed in the proximal and middle thirds of the leg. Perforators from the posterior tibial and peroneal arteries were distributed abundantly in the middle and distal thirds of the leg. As identified in the CT, the location and length of the flap's pedicle artery and its projected cutaneous point were consistent with those observed during the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTA 320 is a minimally invasive imaging method that provides high-quality images of the leg perforator arterial system and can identify the exact location and projected cutaneous point of the perforator flap's pedicle artery.

Preoperative Vascular Imaging in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction: Comparison Between Imaging Modalities

BACKGROUND

Adequate vascular anatomy and perfusion status are essential for successful lower extremity free tissue transfer. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is widely available, minimally invasive, and enables visualization of soft tissues and bones. Angiography permits temporal evaluation of flow, identifies potential needs for concurrent endovascular interventions, and enhances visibility in the setting of hardware. Despite widespread availability of these imaging modalities, no standardized algorithm for preoperative imaging prior to lower extremity free flap reconstruction exists.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes identified patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity over an 18-year period (2002-2020). Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient, treatment, and imaging characteristics, and pre- and post-imaging laboratory values. Outcomes included imaging findings and related complications and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 405 patients were identified, with 59% (n = 238) undergoing preoperative imaging with angiography, 10% (n = 42) with CTA, 7.2% (n = 29) with both imaging modalities, and 24% (n = 96) with neither performed. Forty percent (122 of 309) of patients who underwent preoperative imaging had less than 3-vessel runoff. Four patients developed contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after angiography only and one after having both CTA and angiography. Vessel runoff on CTA and angiography demonstrated moderate correlation.

CONCLUSION

Most patients undergoing lower extremity free tissue transfer underwent preoperative imaging with angiography and/or CTA, 40% of which had less than 3-vessel runoff. Both angiography and CTA had low complication rates, with no statistically significant risk factors identified. Specifically, the incidence of CIN was not found to be significant using either modality. We discuss our institutional algorithm to aid in decision-making for preoperative imaging prior to lower extremity free flap reconstruction. Specifically, we recommend angiography for patients with peripheral vascular disease, internal hardware, or distal defects secondary to trauma.

Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence

For women undergoing mastectomy, breast reconstruction can be performed by using implants or autologous tissue flaps. Mastectomy options include skin- and nipple-sparing techniques. Implant-based reconstruction can be performed with saline or silicone implants. Various autologous pedicled or free tissue flap reconstruction methods based on different tissue donor sites are available. The aesthetic outcomes of implant- and flap-based reconstructions can be improved with oncoplastic surgery, including autologous fat graft placement and nipple-areolar complex reconstruction. The authors provide an update on recent advances in implant reconstruction techniques and contemporary expanded options for autologous tissue flap reconstruction as it relates to imaging modalities. As breast cancer screening is not routinely performed in this clinical setting, tumor recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction is often detected by palpation at physical examination. Most local recurrences occur within the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Diagnostic breast imaging continues to have a critical role in confirmation of disease recurrence. Knowledge of the spectrum of benign and abnormal imaging appearances in the reconstructed breast is important for postoperative evaluation of patients, including recognition of early and late postsurgical complications and breast cancer recurrence. The authors provide an overview of multimodality imaging of the postmastectomy reconstructed breast, as well as an update on screening guidelines and recommendations for this unique patient population. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

MRA for Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Management of Perforator Flap Surgeries: A Review

Perforator flap magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has emerged as a widely accepted and preferred modality for perforator flap mapping at several institutions. Autologous perforator flaps are a type of reconstructive microsurgical technique that involves transferring skin and fat from one part of the patient's body to another to replace tissue lost due to trauma, cancer resection, or other reasons. Autologous perforator flaps are based on a specific perforating blood vessel perfusing the transferred tissue. Hence, the surgery relies on the precise identification and mapping of perforating vessels to ensure successful outcomes. With its superior soft tissue contrast and multiplanar imaging capabilities, MRA has shown great potential in providing accurate and detailed visualization of perforator anatomy, size, and course. This review article summarizes the current literature on perforator flap MRA, including its technical considerations, imaging protocols, postprocessing, and reporting, specifically for autologous breast reconstructions. The advantages and limitations of MRA in evaluating perforator flaps are discussed, including its role in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative assessment. Anatomy, brief surgical technique, specific technical modifications, and reporting of most commonly performed autologous breast flaps are described. Recent advancements in Perforator flap surgery and MRA techniques are discussed. Additionally, we examine the emerging role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in improving the accuracy and efficiency of perforator flap MRA interpretation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Operative Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction: Key Concepts and Implementation

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has become one of the most popular approaches for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy. As much of health care has moved to a value-based approach, reducing complications, operative time, and length of stay in deep inferior flap reconstruction is becoming increasingly important. In this article, we discuss important preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations to maximize efficiency when performing autologous breast reconstruction and offer tips on how to handle certain challenges.

Computed tomography angiography-aided individualized anterolateral thigh flap design in the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects

PURPOSE

To evaluate a novel method and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for locating anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) perforators to design individualized ALTFs to reconstruct maxillofacial soft tissue defects.

STUDY DESIGN

This study comprised a group of 36 patients (CTA group) with malignant oral and maxillofacial tumors who underwent CTA and who received individualized ALTFs and a group of 28 patients (control group) with the same condition but without preoperative CTA examination and with nonindividualized ALTFs. ALTFs in the CTA group were designed and harvested using the locating device and CTA, whereas ALTFs in the control group were designed and harvested according to each surgeon's experience.

RESULTS

Fifty perforators were located and 36 ALTFs harvested in the CTA group. In the control group, 34 perforators were located and 28 ALTFs harvested. Less time was required to locate the perforators in the CTA group. Moreover, the CTA group had a higher flap survival rate and better patient satisfaction regarding the postoperative aesthetics and phonetic and swallowing functions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that CTA and the locating device can be used to accurately locate ALTF perforators and that this method aids in the design and harvesting of individualized ALTFs to achieve good functional and aesthetic outcomes.

A single-center retrospective comparison of Duplex ultrasonography versus audible Doppler regarding anterolateral thigh perforator flap harvest and operative times

INTRODUCTION

We reported on the superiority of preoperative Duplex mapping ("Duplex") over audible Dopplers ("Doppler") in anterolateral thigh perforator (ALT) free flaps for upper extremity reconstruction. To corroborate our findings on a larger cohort, we conducted this present study focusing on surgical efficiency and patient safety.

METHODS

150 consecutive ALT free flaps were divided into 65 cases of preoperative Duplex versus 85 Doppler controls. We first compared patient demographics, operative details, and defect and flap characteristics. We then assessed group differences in the number and course of perforators pursued intraoperatively, flap harvest and operative times, and donor-site complications. Additionally, the impact of the training level of the primary microsurgeon was evaluated.

RESULTS

Cases and controls were comparable regarding age (p = .48), sex (p = .81), ASA class (p = .48), and BMI (p = .90). Duplex was associated with an increased likelihood of raising flaps on one single dominant perforator of purely septal course and significant reductions of flap harvest (68 ± 10 min, p < .0001) and operative times (74 ± 16 min, p < .0001), regardless of the experience of the primary microsurgeon. There were strong negative linear correlations between preoperative Duplex and both the flap harvest and operative times (p < .0001). Additionally, while there was no effect on the emergency take-back rate (OR = 1.3, p = .60), revisions were significantly less likely among duplexed patients (OR = 0.15, p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative Duplex is associated with a significant reduction in ALT free flap harvest and overall operative times, as well as donor-site revisions as opposed to Doppler planning, regardless of the training level of the primary microsurgeon.

Surgical Free Flaps and Grafts in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Principles and Postoperative Imaging

This review article discusses the basic principles behind the use of flaps and grafts for reconstructive surgery in the head and neck, with a special emphasis on the types of commonly used free flaps, their imaging appearance as well as some frequently encountered postoperative complications. Given the ubiquity and complexity of these reconstructive techniques, it is essential that head and neck radiologists be familiar in distinguishing between the expected evolving findings, complications, and tumor recurrence.

Comparison of Various Modalities Utilized for Preoperative Planning in Microsurgical Reconstructive Surgery

BACKGROUND

 The benefits of preoperative perforator imaging for microsurgical reconstruction have been well established in the literature.

METHODS

 An extensive literature review was performed to determine the most commonly used modalities, and their applicability, advantages and disadvantages.

RESULTS

 The review demonstrated varioius findings including decreases in operative time and cost with the use of CT angiography to identification of perforators for inclusion in flap design with hand-held Doppler ultrasound. Modalities like MR angiography offer alternatives for patients with contrast allergies or renal dysfunction while maintaining a high level of clarity and fidelity. Although the use of conventional angiography has decreased due to the availability of less invasive alternatives, it continues to serve a role in the preoperative evaluation of patients for lower extremity reconstruction. Duplex ultrasonography has been of great interest recently as an inexpensive, risk free, and extraordinarily accurate diagnostic tool. Emerging technologies such as indocyanine green fluorescence angiography and dynamic infrared thermography provide real-time information about tissue vascularity and perfusion without requiring radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

 This article presents an in-depth review of the various imaging modalities available to reconstructive surgeons and includes hand held Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography, MR angiography, conventional angiography, duplex ultrasonography, Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography and Dynamic Infrared Thermography.

Thermal, Hyperspectral, and Laser Doppler Imaging: Non-Invasive Tools for Detection of The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforators-A Prospective Comparison Study

Perforator flaps have become one of the leading procedures in microsurgical tissue transfer. Individual defects require a tailored approach to guarantee the most effective treatment. A thorough understanding of the individual vascular anatomy and the location of prominent perforators is of utmost importance and usually requires invasive angiography or at least acoustic Doppler exploration. In this study, we aimed at evaluating different non-invasive imaging modalities as possible alternatives for perforator location detection. After a cooling phase, we performed thermal, hyperspectral and Laser Doppler imaging and visually evaluated a possible detection of the perforator for a period of five minutes with an image taken every minute. We identified the most prominent perforator of the deep inferior epigastric artery by handheld acoustic Doppler in 18 patients. The detected perforator locations were then correlated. Eighteen participants were assessed with six images each per imaging method. We could show a positive match for 94.44%, 38.89%, and 0% of patients and 92.59%, 25.93%, and 0% of images for the methods respectively compared to the handheld acoustic Doppler. Sex, age, abdominal girth, and BMI showed no correlation with a possible visual detection of the perforator in the images. Therefore, thermal imaging can yield valuable supporting data in the individualized procedure planning. Future larger cohort studies are required to better assess the full potential of modern handheld thermal imaging devices.

DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): The role of imaging in uterus transplantation

Objective:

Uterus transplantation is rapidly becoming a viable clinical option for women with uterine-factor infertility and a desire for parenthood. Radiological imaging plays a central role in selecting the optimal living donors for uterus transplantation and serves to exclude any pathology and evaluate the uterine vasculature. The latter is the most important variable in the ultimate technical success of the uterus transplant. In this first report of imaging in the setting of uterus transplantation, we report our experience with living-donor selection, and the evolution of the imaging techniques that ultimately allowed a significant improvement in donor selection and transplant outcome. We also suggest a framework for preoperative imaging in uterus transplantation.

Methods:

Between 2016 and 2018, 27 potential living donors were evaluated by imaging prior to uterine donation for uterus transplantation. Predonation imaging included a screening chest radiograph, dual-phase computed tomography (CT) angiograms of the abdomen and pelvis in the arterial and venous phases and pelvic sonography with Doppler. Seventeen potential donors additionally underwent multiphasic pelvic MR angiograms. The imaging performed was meant to display features of the vascular anatomy relevant for uterus transplantation.

Results:

Out of the 27 potential live donors who were evaluated by imaging, 9 eventually donated their uterus for transplantation. The most frequent reason for exclusion was suboptimal quality of the vessels (33%), including small uterine arteries, the presence of atherosclerosis or small size/poor quality of the uterine or utero-ovarian veins, or both. The next most common reason was voluntary patient withdrawal or failure to complete the evaluation process (28%). Three potential donors (16.6%) were rejected for uterine factors, fibroids, and/or adenomyosis. Other reasons for donor rejection included ABO incompatibility and unfavorable psychological evaluation.

Conclusion:

Diagnostic imaging plays a crucial role in selecting appropriate potential donors, screening prospective recipients, planning the graft procedure, and following up on any graft or nongraft-related complications in both the donor and recipient after the transplantation procedure is performed. Contrast-enhanced CT and MR angiographies have complementary roles, especially when evaluating the donor for adequacy of the arterial and venous supply to the uterine graft and the experience gained from our series indicates that the inclusion of both modalities contributed directly to successful uterus transplant graft survival by selecting patients with favorable arterial and venous vasculature.

Technological Advances in Lymphatic Surgery: Bringing to Light the Invisible

Lymphatic surgery has become an integral and flourishing component of the field of plastic surgery. The diversity of ongoing technological innovations in perioperative imaging, including intraoperative dyes and cameras, allows plastic surgeons to work at the supermicrosurgical level. This study aims to highlight innovations that have shaped and will continue to revolutionize the perioperative management of the lymphatic surgery patient in the future. As additional advances emerge, we need a systematic and objective way to evaluate the efficacy and clinical integration readiness of such technologies. Undoubtedly, these technologies will help lymphatic surgery trend toward increasing objectivity, which will be critical for continued evolution and advancement.

Accurate Prediction of Submental Lymph Nodes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymphedema Surgery

Background:

Submental lymph node transfer has proved to be an effective approach for the treatment of lymphedema. This study was to investigate the anatomy and distribution of vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) flap using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their clinical outcome.

Methods:

Fifteen patients who underwent 19 VSLN flap transfers for upper or lower limb lymphedema were retrospectively analyzed. The number of submental lymph nodes was compared among preoperative MRI, preoperative sonography, intraoperative finding, postoperative sonography, and postoperative computed tomography angiography. The outcome was compared between preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results:

All 19 VSLN flaps survived. Two hundred fifteen lymph nodes were identified in 30 submandibular regions by MRI. The mean number of submental lymph nodes on preoperative MRI was 7.2 ± 2.4, on preoperative sonography was 3.2 ± 1.1, on intraoperative finding was 3.1 ± 0.6, postoperative sonography was 4.6 ± 1.8, and postoperative CTA was 5.2 ± 1.9. Sixty-one percent of the lymph nodes were located in the central two-quarters of the line drawn from the mental protuberance to the mandibular angle. The actual harvest rate of submental lymph nodes was 72.2%. At a 12-month follow-up, mean episodes of cellulitis were improved from 2.7 ± 0.6 to 0.8 ± 0.2 (P < 0.01); mean of circumferential difference was improved 3.2 ± 0.4 cm (P < 0.03). The overall lymphedema quality-of-life was improved 4.9 ± 0.3 (P < 0.04).

Conclusions:

The preoperative MRI is a useful tool for the detection of mean 7.2 submental lymph nodes. Mean 72.2% of submental lymph nodes can be successfully transferred for extremity lymphedema with optimal functional recovery.

Fibular osteofasciocutaneous flap in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects in oral malignancies

Virtual surgical planning technology in head and neck surgery is witnessing strong growth. In the literature, the validity of the method from the point of view of accuracy and clinical utility has been widely documented, especially for bone modelling. To date, however, with its increased use in head and neck oncology, and consequently the increased need for bone and soft tissue reconstruction, is important to carry out the virtual programme considering not only bone reconstruction but also all aspects related to the reconstruction of soft tissue using composite flaps. We describe our approach to virtual planning in the case of composite flaps. The study reports six consecutive patients with malignant disease requiring mandibular bone and soft tissue reconstruction using fibular osteocutaneous flaps. In all six patients, the resection and reconstruction were planned virtually focusing on the position of cutaneous perforator vessels in order to schedule fibula cutting guides. There were no complications in all six cases. The technique described allowed us to schedule composite fibula flaps in mandibular reconstruction virtually with good accuracy of the position of the bone segment in relation to the cutaneous paddle, important for soft tissue reconstruction. Despite the limited number of cases, the preliminary results of the study suggest that this protocol is useful in virtual programmes using composite flaps in mandibular reconstruction. Further investigations are needed.

Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery following surgery can be achieved through the introduction of evidence-based perioperative maneuvers. This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery and to provide evidence-based recommendations for an enhanced perioperative protocol.

METHODS

A systematic review of meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohorts was conducted for each protocol element. Smaller prospective cohorts and retrospective cohorts were considered only when higher level evidence was unavailable. The available literature was graded by an international panel of experts in breast reconstructive surgery and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. Each recommendation was graded following a consensus discussion among the expert panel. Development of these recommendations was endorsed by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society.

RESULTS

High-quality randomized controlled trial data in patients undergoing breast reconstruction informed some of the recommendations; however, for most items, data from lower level studies in the population of interest were considered along with extrapolated data from high-quality studies in non-breast reconstruction populations. Recommendations were developed for a total of 18 unique enhanced recovery after surgery items and are discussed in the article. Key recommendations support use of opioid-sparing perioperative medications, minimal preoperative fasting and early feeding, use of anesthetic techniques that decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain, use of measures to prevent intraoperative hypothermia, and support of early mobilization after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Based on the best available evidence for each topic, a consensus review of optimal perioperative care for patients undergoing breast reconstruction is presented.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.