Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of the Large Bowel Assessment Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Different Techniques for Current and Emerging Clinical Applications

Radiological assessments of the small and large bowel are essential in daily clinical practice. Over plain film X-ray and ultrasound, cross-sectional techniques are considered the most comprehensive imaging modalities. In fact, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging take great advantage of the three-dimensional appraisal and the extensive evaluation of the abdominal cavity, allowing intestinal evaluation as well as detection of extra-intestinal findings. In this context, the chief advantage of computed tomography is the fast scan time, which is crucial for emergency cases. Nonetheless, it is undeniably impaired using ionizing radiation. As the awareness of radiation exposure is a topic of increasing importance, magnetic resonance imaging is not only becoming a mere alternative but also a primary imaging technique used in assessing intestinal diseases. Specifically, the evaluation of the large bowel through MRI can be still considered relatively uncharted territory. Although it has demonstrated superior accuracy in the assessment of some clinical entities from inflammatory bowel disease to rectal carcinoma, its role needs to be consolidated in many other conditions. Moreover, different technical methods can be applied for colonic evaluation depending on the specific disease and segment involved. This article aims to provide a thorough overview of the techniques that can be utilized in the evaluation of the large bowel and a discussion on the major findings in different colonic pathologies of primary interest.

Diagnostic Performance of Simultaneous [18F]-FDG PET/MR for Assessing Endoscopically Active Inflammation in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study

Background: To investigate the diagnostic performance of simultaneous ¹⁸F-fluoro-deoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]-FDG) PET/MR enterography in assessing and grading endoscopically active inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods: 50 patients underwent PET/MR 24 h before ileocolonoscopy. Inflammatory activities of bowel segments were evaluated with both Mayo endoscopic subscore and Nancy histologic index. MR, DWI (Diffusion-weighted imaging) and PET were utilized as qualitative parameters for detecting endoscopically active inflammation. SUVmaxQuot in each segment (maximum of standard uptake value relative to liver) was calculated to quantify inflammation. Results: In the study arm without bowel purgation, combined reading of PET and MR resulted in significantly increased specificity against each submodality alone (0.944 vs. 0.82 for MR and 0.843 for PET, p < 0.05) and highest overall accuracy. In the study arm with bowel purgation, the significantly lower specificity of PET (0.595) could be markedly improved by a combined reading of PET and MR. Metabolic conditions in bowel segments with both endoscopic and histological remission were significantly lower than in segments with endoscopic remission but persistent microscopic inflammation (SUVmaxQuot 0.719 vs. 0.947, p < 0.001). SUVmaxQuot correlated highly with Mayo endoscopic subscore (ρ = 0.718 and 0.606) and enabled grading of inflammatory activity. Conclusions: Simultaneous [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MR may be considered as an alternative to endoscopy in clinical trials.

MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

To assess the usefulness of MR colonography (MRC) with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with suspected or known IBD underwent MRC with a 1.5-T MR system (Siemens Symphony) using a phased-array coil. A fecal tagging technique was performed by oral administration of dense barium sulfate (200 ml) at major meals starting 2 days before the MRI. After a water enema (2000-2500 ml), the MR protocol was carried out, starting with HASTE and true-FISP sequences. Coronal T1w 3D VIBE (2.0 mm thick) was obtained before and 60 s after intravenous administration of Gd chelate. MR images were evaluated by consensus agreement of two observers in terms of image quality and by searching for bowel abnormalities. MRC findings were correlated with our gold standard-conventional colonoscopy (incomplete in 6/22 patients) with histopathological analysis, and surgery (performed in 8/22 subjects).

RESULTS

The MR imaging protocol was completed in all of the investigated subjects. In terms of image quality, 128 out of 132 colon segments (97 %) were considered diagnostic on MR examinations by the two reviewers; signs of bowel inflammation were identified in 74 and 72 % of colon segments of patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 6) and Crohn's disease (n = 15), respectively. In 13/15 patients with Crohn's disease, involvement of both the large and small bowel was demonstrated on MR imaging; perianal abscesses and fistulas were also identified in 2 and 3 of these patients, respectively. In one patient with normal MRC, a diagnosis of IBD could not be confirmed.

CONCLUSION

MRC with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema is a promising minimally invasive technique for evaluating the bowel in patients with a suspected or established diagnosis of IBD.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging without bowel preparation for detection of ulcerative colitis

AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) without bowel preparation, the optimal b value and the changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in detecting ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS: A total of 20 patients who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without bowel preparation and colonoscopy within 24 h were recruited. Biochemical indexes, including C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hemoglobin, leucocytes, platelets, serum iron and albumin, were determined. Biochemical examinations were then performed within 24 h before or after MR colonography was conducted. DWI was performed at various b values (b = 0, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 s/mm²). Two radiologists independently and blindly reviewed conventional- and contrast-enhanced MR images, DWI and ADC maps; these radiologists also determined ADC in each intestinal segment (rectum, sigmoid, left colon, transverse colon, and right colon). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of DWI hyperintensity from various b factors, ADC values and different radiological signs to detect endoscopic inflammation in the corresponding bowel segment. Optimal ADC threshold was estimated by maximizing the combination of sensitivity and specificity. MR findings were correlated with endoscopic results and clinical markers; these findings were then estimated by ROC analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 100 segments (71 with endoscopic colonic inflammation; 29 normal) were included. The proposed total magnetic resonance score (MR-score-T) was correlated with the total modified Baron score (Baron-T; r = 0.875, P < 0.0001); the segmental MR score (MR-score-S) was correlated with the segmental modified Baron score (Baron-S; r = 0.761, P < 0.0001). MR-score-T was correlated with clinical and biological markers of disease activity (r = 0.445 to 0.831, P < 0.05). MR-score-S > 1 corresponded to endoscopic colonic inflammation with a sensitivity of 85.9%, a specificity of 82.8% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.929 (P < 0.0001). The accuracy of DWI hyperintensity was significantly greater at b = 800 than at b = 400, 600, or 1000 s/mm² (P < 0.05) when endoscopic colonic inflammation was detected. DWI hyperintensity at b = 800 s/mm² indicated endoscopic colonic inflammation with a sensitivity of 93.0%, a specificity of 79.3% and an AUC of 0.867 (P < 0.0001). Quantitative analysis results revealed that ADC values at b = 800 s/mm² differed significantly between endoscopic inflamed segment and normal intestinal segment (1.56 ± 0.58 mm²/s vs 2.63 ± 0.46 mm²/s, P < 0.001). The AUC of ADC values was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.983) when endoscopic inflammation was detected. The threshold ADC value of 2.18 × 10^-3 mm²/s indicated that endoscopic inflammation differed from normal intestinal segment with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 80.3%.

CONCLUSION: DWI combined with conventional MRI without bowel preparation provides a quantitative strategy to differentiate actively inflamed intestinal segments from the normal mucosa to detect UC.

New Imaging Techniques in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background

Cross-sectional imaging modalities are fundamental in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from the first diagnosis and throughout the entire course of the disease. Over the past few years, the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) has considerably increased, and no other imaging modality has experienced as advanced a development as MRI.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search (PubMed/Medline) using keywords such as ‘MR enterography’, ‘imaging modalities’, ‘IBD’, and ‘Crohn's disease’ was performed. 48 articles published between 1999 and 2015 were systematically reviewed. In this article, besides the current standard MRI techniques, we review novel and implementable for routine use MR techniques. The use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and hybrid imaging such as PET/MRI with enormous potential will also be briefly discussed.

Results

New imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion, and MR motility imaging yield advanced findings about changes in the microenvironment and alterations in motility of the affected bowel segment, and are proven to improve the diagnostic accuracy in assessing the scale, activity level, and severity of the IBD. Novel magnetization transfer imaging allows direct visualization of fibrosis in the bowel wall.

Conclusion

Diffusion-weighted imaging can be easily implemented in standard MRI for routine use to further enhance the diagnostic accuracy in disease assessment. For validation of magnetization transfer imaging, larger studies are warranted.

Diagnostic accuracy of three different MRI protocols in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for workup and control of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, disagreement remains as to how the MRI should be performed.

PURPOSE

To compare prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of MRI with neither oral nor intravenous contrast medium (plain MRI), magnetic resonance follow-through (MRFT) and MR enteroclysis (MRE) using MRE as the reference standard in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plain MRI and MRE were carried out in addition to MRFT. All patients underwent both plain MR and MRFT on the same day and MRE within seven days. For the evaluation, the bowel was divided into nine segments. One radiologist, blinded to clinical findings, evaluated bowel wall thickness, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), mural hyperenhancement, and other inflammatory changes in each bowel segment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (6 men, 14 women; median age, 43.5 years; age range, 26-76 years) underwent all three examinations; 10 with Crohn's disease (CD), three with ulcerative colitis (UC), and seven with IBD unclassified (IBD-U). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were in the range of 0-75%, 81-96%, and 75-95% for wall thickening, and 0-37%, 59-89%, and 50-86% for DWI in plain MRI, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were in the range of 0-50%, 96-100%, and 90-100% for wall thickening, 0-50%, 84-97%, and 82-95% for DWI, and 0-71%, 94-100%, and 85-100% for mural hyperenhancement in MRFT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of oral and intravenous contrast agent improves detection of bowel lesions resulting in MRFT remaining the superior choice over plain MRI for diagnostic workup in patients with IBD.

Plain magnetic resonance imaging as an alternative in evaluating inflammation and bowel damage in inflammatory bowel disease--a prospective comparison with conventional magnetic resonance follow-through

OBJECTIVE

To compare prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without use of contrast medium orally or intravenously (plain MRI) with magnetic resonance follow-through (MRFT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plain MRI was carried out in addition to MRFT, to which the patients were referred. All patients underwent both examinations on the same day. For the evaluation, the bowel was divided into nine segments. Two radiologists, blinded to clinical findings, evaluated bowel wall thickness, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and other inflammatory changes in each bowel segments. Further, hyperenhancement of the bowel was also evaluated in MRFT.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (40 males and 60 females; median age: 38.5; range: 19-90) were enrolled; 44 with Crohn's disease (CD), 25 with ulcerative colitis (UC), 24 with IBD unclassified (IBD-U), and 7 had other diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in CD ranged 50-86%, 93-94%, and 91-92% for wall thickening and 49-82%, 85-93%, and 84-89% for DWI, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in UC range 0-40%, 87-100%, and 80-100% for wall thickening and 0-52%, 83-94% and 76-92% for DWI, respectively. The κ values for bowel wall thickening, DWI, and mural hyperenhancement were detected with fair agreement (κ = 0.26-0.39) at both MRI examinations, whereas only bowel wall thickening in MRFT were detected with moderate agreement (κ = 0.47) Conclusion. Plain MRI cannot currently replace MRFT in the workup of patients with IBD. Further research on plain MRI is needed to improve the protocol.

Magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn's disease: optimal use in clinical practice and clinical trials

The purpose of this review is to provide a practical appraisal of the usefulness of magnetic resonance enterography in the management of Crohn's disease and the potential utilities that this imaging modality may have in clinical research. Also, we review some basic technical considerations that clinicians should know to understand the value and limitations of the technique. Lastly, we outline the future trends and potential contributions of new technological advances in the field of magnetic resonance imaging that can improve the classic magnetic resonance enterography technique.

Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital

AIM: To evaluate significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital.

METHODS: A total of 11812 consecutive Japanese people were identified who underwent a colonoscopy at an academic hospital. A multiple logistic regression model was used to evaluate retrospectively the significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy.

RESULTS: The cecal intubation rate was 95.0%. By univariate analysis, age, female sex, poor bowel cleansing, and a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery were significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy (P < 0.001). Moreover, age- and sex-adjusted analysis showed that significant risk factors for incomplete colonoscopy were female sex (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.17-1.64, P = 0.0002), age ≥ 60 years old (OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.22-1.71, P < 0.0001), a history of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery (OR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.28-1.86, P < 0.0001), poor bowel cleansing (OR = 4.64, 95%CI: 3.69-5.84, P < 0.0001), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.13-1.95, P = 0.0048). In Japanese men, by age-adjusted analysis, IBD (OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.18-2.43, P = 0.005) was an independent risk factor for incomplete colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION: Several characteristics in the Japanese population were identified that could predict technical difficulty with colonoscopy.

Radiographical evaluation of ulcerative colitis

Radiographical modalities have become important diagnostic tools in cases of ulcerative colitis (UC). Imaging can be used non-invasively to determine the extent of involvement, severity of disease and to detect disease-related complications and extra-intestinal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) manifestations. While abdominal X-rays and barium enemas still retain their relevance in specific clinical settings, the use of computed tomography enterography (CTE) or magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are now used as first-line investigations to exclude active small bowel disease in IBD patients and can be utilized to detect active colonic inflammation. Additionally, CT colonography and MR colonography are emerging techniques with potential applications in UC. Ultrasonography, leukocyte scintigraphy and positron emission tomography are novel abdominal imaging modalities currently being explored for IBD interrogations. This plethora of radiological imaging options has become a vital component of UC assessments.

Magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents with chronic inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent challenges, both from a diagnostic, and therapeutic point of view. Deep-seated anatomic structures are difficult to assess by ultrasound technique alone. As radiation-free alternative cross-sectional imaging method, magnetic resonance imaging of the intestinal structures is costly and time-consuming. Examination of pediatric patients imply additional considerations: reduction of body motions in younger children and consideration of the most appropriate preparation, and examination technique. The demanding Sellink technique is the only means for appropriately distending the lesser intestine in order to detect small bowel strictures. Oral intake of contrast medium (CM) alone shows its limitations regarding distensibility. The need for intravenous contrast media application needs to be considered, too. Active inflammation of both intestinal wall, and mesentery can be demonstrated accurately. Nevertheless, viable alternatives to CM application is desirable, considering non-negligible adverse reactions. Recent data suggest diffusion weighted imaging might fill this diagnostic gap. Irrespective of sequence technique chosen, bowel movement remains a major obstacle. Antispasmolytics in their function as smooth muscle relaxants help in improving image quality, however, their use in children might be off-label. Optimal preparation for the examination and appropriate imaging technique allow for diagnosing typical patterns of changes in IBD, such as bowel wall thickening, ulcers, mural stratification, strictures, creeping fat, and comb sign, and lymphadenopathy. The article gives a detailed overview of current significance of magnetic resonance imaging pediatric patients suffering from IBD, considering indications, limitations, and safety aspects.

Motility mapping as evaluation tool for bowel motility: initial results on the development of an automated color-coding algorithm in cine MRI

PURPOSE

To develop and implement an automated algorithm for visualizing and quantifying bowel motility using cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four healthy volunteers as well as eight patients with suspected or diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) underwent MR examinations on a 1.5T scanner. Coronal T2-weighted cine MR images were acquired in healthy volunteers without and with intravenous (i.v.) administration of butylscopolamine. In patients with IBD, cine MRI sequences were collected prior to standard bowel MRI. Bowel motility was assessed using an optical flow algorithm. The resulting motion vector magnitudes were presented as bowel motility maps. Motility changes after i.v. administration of butylscopolamine were measured in healthy volunteers. Inflamed bowel segments in patients were correlated with motility map findings.

RESULTS

The acquisition of bowel motility maps was feasible in all subjects examined. In healthy volunteers butylscopolamine led to quantitatively measurable decrease in bowel motility (mean decrease of 59%; P = 0.171). In patients with IBD, visualization of bowel movement by color-coded motility mapping allowed for the detection of segments with abnormal bowel motility. Inflamed bowel segments could be identified by exhibiting a decreased motility.

CONCLUSION

Our method is a feasible and promising approach for the assessment of bowel motility disorders.

Comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance enterography for the assessment of disease activity and complications in ileo-colonic Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assess disease activity and severity in Crohn's disease (CD). Three-Tesla magnetic resonance (3T) increases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and reduces time of image acquisition (IAT). Whether 3T increases the accuracy of MRI in CD compared to 1.5T is unknown.

AIM

We aimed to compare prospectively the accuracy of 3 and 1.5T in ileo-colonic CD patients.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with ileo-colonic CD underwent 1.5 and 3T MR enterography at the same time. Ileocolonoscopy was the reference standard for luminal disease. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in evaluating six signs of active and complicated disease (localization, thickening, enhancement, strictures, entero-enteric fistulas, and ulcers) were calculated for both techniques.

RESULTS

Three-Tesla resulted as sensitive, specific, and accurate as 1.5T in detecting disease location (accuracy 0.93 vs. 0.86), bowel wall thickening and enhancement (accuracy 0.92 vs. 0.80 for both parameters), strictures (accuracy 0.90 vs. 0.80) and entero-enteric fistulas (accuracy 0.92 vs. 0.92). 3T was superior to 1.5T in detecting ulcers (0.76 vs. 0.42, P < 0.05). SNR resulted higher in 3T, and IAT resulted shorter than 1.5.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that 3T is equally accurate as 1.5T in evaluating ileo-colonic CD. Because of superiority in detecting mucosal ulcers, 3T should be preferred in patients with ileo-colonic CD.

Magnetic resonance colonography in rats with TNBS-induced colitis: a feasibility and validation study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) has been recently developed to assess bowel inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Evaluating animal models of inflammation with MRC may be important in new drug-screening processes. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of MRC in colitic rats and confront it with model characteristics.

METHODS

Colitis was induced by rectal injection of trinitrobenzene-sulfonic acid (TNBS) in 13 rats while six rats received the vehicle. MRC was performed at day 2. Colon inflammation and production of inflammatory mediators were evaluated. Image quality was assessed by wall and motion artifacts. MRC criteria were bowel wall thickness, wall signal intensity on T2-weighted (T2w) and T1w images, the appearance of a target sign pattern, and irregular patterns of mucosal surface.

RESULTS

MRC quality was good or excellent in 16/21 examinations with no difference between groups. Colitis rats were significantly different from controls in terms of wall thickness (P = 0.004), the appearance of a target sign pattern (P = 0.02), irregular patterns of mucosal surface (P = 0.01), and hyperintensity on T1w images (P = 0.03). All MRC criteria except maximal bowel wall thickness were associated with colon weight:length ratio and inflammatory biomarkers (all P < 0.05). Minimal bowel wall thickness and wall signal intensity on T2w images were associated with histological score (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MRC is feasible and reliable in rats with TNBS-induced colitis. MRC criteria including colon wall thickness, wall signal intensity on T2w images, hyperintensity in T1w sequence, and the appearance of a target sign pattern may be potential targets for new IBD drugs.

Magnetic resonance enterography with and without biphasic contrast agent enema compared to conventional ileocolonoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bowel is a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We compared magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) with and without water enema to conventional ileocolonoscopy to evaluate the advantage of a water enema for MRI diagnostics of Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 50 patients with known CD. MRE with enema was performed in 23 cases, whereas 27 patients received an MRE without enema. All patients underwent conventional ileocolonoscopy. We assessed the degree of inflammation in both modalities, evaluating up to seven bowel segments in each patient. We compared MRE with and without rectal enema to each other and to conventional ileocolonoscopy.

RESULTS

MRE achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 74%, respectively, for detection of inflammation in the terminal ileum with enema and a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 87%, respectively, without enema. Considering the colon, MRE with enema had a sensitivity of 79% (specificity 96%), while the examination without enema showed a sensitivity of 38% (specificity 99%). MRE with enema proved statistically superior to MRE without enema in detecting inflammation in the terminal ileum, ascending colon, and rectum (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MRE with enema is a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing inflammation in CD patients. Water enema is well tolerated and significantly improves detection of inflammation in the terminal ileum. Water enema should therefore be included in MRE protocols for CD patients.

The future developments in gastrointestinal radiology

The last decade has witnessed great advances in abdominal imaging with technological developments and diagnostic improvements in CT, MRI and positron emission tomography-CT. Over the next decade, gastrointestinal imaging is set to rapidly evolve. Fluoroscopic techniques will be left behind and we will develop beyond simply anatomical imaging, embracing increasingly functional and quantitative techniques. Dose reduction and radiation-free modalities will take centre stage as imaging goes mobile, allowing clinicians at the bedside and remote subspecialty radiologists to review radiology from electronic devices. The authors discuss some of the key trends set to define the next decade in gastrointestinal radiology.

MDCT assessment of ulcerative colitis: radiologic analysis with clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic correlation

PURPOSE

Evaluate the utility of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in assessing the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) in comparison with clinical assessment, colonoscopy, and histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with UC evaluated with at least one abdominal contrast-enhanced CT study (CECT) within 7 days of colonoscopy with biopsy were included. CECT of 23 patients (12 male; mean age 40 years; age range, 20-72 years) were retrospectively evaluated in consensus by two radiologists. A total of 138 lower GI tract segments were evaluated by CECT and graded for the presence of bowel wall thickening, mucosal hyperenhancement, mural stratification, mesenteric hyperemia, pericolonic stranding, and lymph nodes. A cumulative CT severity score was calculated and correlated with clinical, colonoscopic, and histopathologic severity grades.

RESULTS

The cumulative CT score and individual CECT scores for bowel wall thickening, mucosal hyperenhancement, and mural stratification showed positive correlation with clinical severity (P < 0.05). All individual CECT features as well as the cumulative CT score demonstrated statistically significant correlation with colonoscopic severity (P < 0.0001). Only wall thickening on CECT demonstrated significant correlation with histopathologic severity (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Disease severity assessment by MDCT demonstrates positive correlation with severity established by clinical assessment and colonoscopy. Only increasing wall thickness, as graded on MDCT, correlates with histopathologic disease severity.

MRI in Crohn's disease--current and future clinical applications

Crohn's disease is a chronic, disabling disease that, over time, can lead to irreversible bowel damage. MRI can be used to diagnose and assess the activity, severity and complications of Crohn's disease; however, the role of MRI in therapeutic monitoring of changes in disease-related intestinal damage is still to be defined. Objective, validated MRI-based scores have been developed to assess the activity of Crohn's disease; these indices are based on the extent and severity of intestinal inflammation, postoperative recurrence and perianal disease. MRI is accurate, safe, reproducible and can allow repeated evaluations of patients without radiation exposure. Evidence that MRI might be valuable in the therapeutic monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease is increasing and, in combination with endoscopy and surgical history, this imaging technique could enable clinicians to assess Crohn's-disease-related intestinal damage. MRI could, therefore, have a crucial role in a future 'damage-driven' treatment paradigm--in which imaging is used to monitor intestinal damage and medication use is targeted to prevent the accumulation of further damage. This damage-driven therapeutic approach could potentially change the course of Crohn's disease.

MRI in Crohn's disease--current and future clinical applications

Crohn's disease is a chronic, disabling disease that, over time, can lead to irreversible bowel damage. MRI can be used to diagnose and assess the activity, severity and complications of Crohn's disease; however, the role of MRI in therapeutic monitoring of changes in disease-related intestinal damage is still to be defined. Objective, validated MRI-based scores have been developed to assess the activity of Crohn's disease; these indices are based on the extent and severity of intestinal inflammation, postoperative recurrence and perianal disease. MRI is accurate, safe, reproducible and can allow repeated evaluations of patients without radiation exposure. Evidence that MRI might be valuable in the therapeutic monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease is increasing and, in combination with endoscopy and surgical history, this imaging technique could enable clinicians to assess Crohn's-disease-related intestinal damage. MRI could, therefore, have a crucial role in a future 'damage-driven' treatment paradigm--in which imaging is used to monitor intestinal damage and medication use is targeted to prevent the accumulation of further damage. This damage-driven therapeutic approach could potentially change the course of Crohn's disease.

Radiological imaging of the small bowel

Recently introduced endoscopy-based imaging methods such as double-balloon endoscopy or wireless capsule endoscopy can visualize the complete small bowel. These approaches are quite invasive diagnostic methods. Therefore, radiological small bowel imaging is also still considered as the primary imaging approach to diagnose pathological changes of the small bowel. In this review article the most important small bowel imaging modalities such as conventional fluoroscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound are discussed. Additionally the most important diseases, which can affect the small bowel, are evaluated and the optimal imaging modalities are pointed out, respectively.

MRI in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects ≈1.4 million people in North America and, because of its typical early age of onset and episodic disease course, IBD patients often undergo numerous imaging studies over the course of their lifetimes. Computed tomography (CT) has become the standard imaging modality for assessment of IBD patients because of its widespread availability, rapid image acquisition, and ability to evaluate intraluminal and extraluminal disease. However, repetitive CT imaging has been associated with a significant ionizing radiation risk to patients, making MRI an appealing alternative IBD imaging modality. Pelvic MRI is currently the imaging gold standard for detecting perianal disease, while recent studies indicate that MRI bowel-directed techniques (enteroclysis, enterography, colonography) can accurately evaluate bowel inflammation in IBD. With recent technical innovations leading to faster and higher resolution body MRI, the role of MRI in IBD evaluation is likely to continue to expand. Future applications include surveillance imaging, detection of mural fibrosis, and early assessment of therapy response.

Feasibility of 3-T MRI for the evaluation of Crohn disease in children

BACKGROUND

Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract from the oral cavity to the anal canal. It occurs in all ages and is a significant cause for morbidity in children. Interest in MRI evaluation of CD has increased because of the concern regarding cumulative radiation dose from contrast fluoroscopic studies and CT. Several reports have demonstrated MRI to be a useful technique for CD. Most of these studies were performed at 1.5-T field strength. Imaging at a higher field strength, with a greater signal-to-noise ratio, has the potential of reducing scan times and increasing the resolution. However, there is a concurrent increase in artefacts, and these can be pronounced with abdominal imaging at 3 T.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of 3-T MRI for CD in children and to assess the value of different sequences and the effect of artefacts that could potentially limit the role of bowel MR imaging at higher field strengths.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 46 children with biopsy-proven CD (ages 8-19 years, 53% boys) was performed. Sixty-eight consecutive MRI studies were performed on a 3-T scanner between 2005 and 2007; 42 of the abdomen (62%) and 26 of the pelvis/perineum (38%). Sorbitol was administered for the abdominal studies; orally for 36/42 (86%) studies and via a naso-jejunal (NJ) tube for 6/42 (14%) studies. For the abdomen, T2-W half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (T2-W HASTE), true steady-state free precession (true FISP), pre-contrast and contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-volume interpolated gradient-echo (T1-W VIBE) and CE T1-W fast low-angle shot (T1-W FLASH) sequences were performed. For the perianal and pelvic assessment, fat-saturated T2-W turbo spin-echo (TSE), pre-contrast and CE T1-W FLASH or VIBE sequences were performed. The sequences were scored for diagnostic quality by two paediatric radiologists for visualisation of the bowel wall, whether normal or pathological and the visualization of extra intestinal manifestations. The effects of distension, susceptibility artefact and motion were assessed.

RESULTS

Six (14%) abdominal MRI studies were normal. Thirty-six (86%) were abnormal with good correlation with endoscopic findings. The pelvic and perianal MRI studies were all abnormal (26/26, 100%) with good correlation with proctoscopy and examination under anaesthesia. All the sequences had high average scores (greater than or close to 3), except true FISP with a score of 2.4. The score was greatest in those who had NJ administration of sorbitol; however, satisfactory distension was also possible with oral administration of contrast. True FISP was the sequence most affected by a combination of suboptimal distension and artefact from colonic contents. With adequate distension, true FISP image quality improved remarkably. The overall score of this sequence was satisfactory in the absence of susceptibility and movement artefact.

CONCLUSION

With appropriate attention to technique, with optimal distension and control of movement, high-quality, 3-T assessment of the abdomen, pelvis and perineum is possible. All sequences used at 1.5 T can be used at 3 T, however true FISP was the most prone to artefact.

MR colonography and MR enterography

The bowel is a common site for pathologic processes, including malignancies and inflammatory disease. Colorectal cancer accounts for 10% of all new cancers and 9% of cancer deaths. A significant decrease in the incidence of colorectal cancer and cancer death rates has been attributed to screening measures, earlier detection, and improved therapies. Virtual colonoscopy (VC), also known as computed tomography colonography, is an effective method for detecting polyps. However, in light of increasing concerns about ionizing radiation exposure from medical imaging and potential increased risk of future radiation-induced malignancies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is seen as an increasingly attractive alternative. Improvements in MRI technology now permit three-dimensional volumetric imaging of the entire colon in a single breath hold at high spatial resolution, making VC with MRI possible.

[Markers of the course of inflammatory bowel disease treated with immunomodulators or biological agents]

Immunosuppressive or biological treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can modify the natural history of their disease, although these treatments are not universally effective and can have severe adverse effects. Attempts have been made to identify predictive factors of response to the various therapeutic options in order to aid the choice of the most appropriate therapeutic alternative in each patient. The possibility of modifying any one of these predictive factors would be of great interest since it would provide the opportunity to alter the course of the disease. Epidemiological, biological, clinical, endoscopic, radiological, genetic and even proteomic markers have been studied, in addition to others related to the disease itself or to specific treatments. The present article briefly discusses the real use of each of these markers and the evidence supporting their utility.

Colonic Crohn's disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity

Conventional colonoscopy combined by histological examination, represents the standard for the evaluation of colorectal pathologies and usually is the first examination for the evaluation of patients with suspected or established diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD). However, information provided by colonoscopy is limited to mucosal alterations since the technique is unable to evaluate transmural changes or presence of extraluminal complications such as abscesses or fistula. Technological advances in magnetic resonance (MR) raised expectations on the potential role of this imaging modality for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract based on the high spatial and tissue resolution as well as lack of ionizing radiation. Available evidence indicates that MR colonography (MRC) can be a useful tool as an alternative or complementary to endoscopy for the detection of activity and assessment of severity in colonic CD. In this article, we review the technical aspects of MRC and the spectrum of findings that provide valuable information for the evaluation of colonic CD. Potential applications and limitations of MRC are also discussed.